BharatTax.net
SearchITATHigh CourtsSupreme CourtPhrasesAI ResearchHistory

Filters

BharatTax.net

Free search engine for ITAT (Income Tax Appellate Tribunal) judgments across all 28 benches in India.

Quick Links

  • Search Judgments
  • Browse by Bench
  • Recent Judgments

About

BharatTax provides free access to Income Tax Appellate Tribunal orders for legal research and reference.

© 2026 BharatTax.net. All rights reserved.

10 results for “charitable trust”+ Section 273Bclear

Sorted by relevance

Karnataka21Bangalore15Chennai10Mumbai4Hyderabad4Jodhpur3Kolkata3Jaipur2Raipur1Cuttack1Kerala1Nagpur1Ahmedabad1

Key Topics

Section 272A(2)(e)41Section 14823Section 13920Penalty10Section 109Section 1477Charitable Trust7Addition to Income7Section 12A5

THIRUVARUR LIONS EYE HOSPITAL TRUST,THIRUVARUR vs. INCOME TAX OFFICER, THIRUVARUR

In the result, both the appeals filed by the assessee are allowed

ITA 2531/CHNY/2025[2016-17]Status: DisposedITAT Chennai11 Nov 2025AY 2016-17

Bench: Shri George George K & Shri Jagadishआयकर अपील सं./Ita Nos.: 2531 & 2535/Chny/2025 िनधा"रण वष"/Assessment Years: 2016-17 & 2018-19 M/S. Thiruvarur Lions Eye The Income Tax Officer, Hospital Trust, Vs. Thiruvarur 157, Vandampalai, Kangalanchery Post, Thiruvarur – 610 101. Pan: Aaatt 0632P (अपीलाथ"/Appellant) (""यथ"/Respondent) अपीलाथ" क" ओर से/Appellant By : Shri D. Ambarish, Advocate ""यथ" क" ओर से/Respondent By : Ms. Gouthami Manivasagam, Jcit सुनवाई क" तारीख/Date Of Hearing : 11.11.2025 घोषणा क" तारीख/Date Of Pronouncement : 11.11.2025

For Appellant: Shri D. Ambarish, AdvocateFor Respondent: Ms. Gouthami Manivasagam, JCIT
Section 10Section 139Section 143(3)Section 147Section 148Section 250Section 272A(2)(e)
Section 273B5
Natural Justice5
Section 1514

charitable institutions claiming exemption under section 10(22) are obliged to file a return under section 139(4A) to enable verification of their exemption claim. iii) Himalayan Educational Trust v. CIT ([2018] 101 taxmann.com 113) (Chennai Trib.): The Hon’ble Tribunal held that penalty under section 272A(2)(e) operates independently of the assessment outcome. Once the total income before

THIRUVARUR LIONS EYE HOSPITAL TRUST,THIRUVARUR vs. INCOME TAX OFFICER, THIRUVARUR

In the result, both the appeals filed by the assessee are allowed

ITA 2535/CHNY/2025[2018-19]Status: DisposedITAT Chennai11 Nov 2025AY 2018-19

Bench: Shri George George K & Shri Jagadishआयकर अपील सं./Ita Nos.: 2531 & 2535/Chny/2025 िनधा"रण वष"/Assessment Years: 2016-17 & 2018-19 M/S. Thiruvarur Lions Eye The Income Tax Officer, Hospital Trust, Vs. Thiruvarur 157, Vandampalai, Kangalanchery Post, Thiruvarur – 610 101. Pan: Aaatt 0632P (अपीलाथ"/Appellant) (""यथ"/Respondent) अपीलाथ" क" ओर से/Appellant By : Shri D. Ambarish, Advocate ""यथ" क" ओर से/Respondent By : Ms. Gouthami Manivasagam, Jcit सुनवाई क" तारीख/Date Of Hearing : 11.11.2025 घोषणा क" तारीख/Date Of Pronouncement : 11.11.2025

For Appellant: Shri D. Ambarish, AdvocateFor Respondent: Ms. Gouthami Manivasagam, JCIT
Section 10Section 139Section 143(3)Section 147Section 148Section 250Section 272A(2)(e)

charitable institutions claiming exemption under section 10(22) are obliged to file a return under section 139(4A) to enable verification of their exemption claim. iii) Himalayan Educational Trust v. CIT ([2018] 101 taxmann.com 113) (Chennai Trib.): The Hon’ble Tribunal held that penalty under section 272A(2)(e) operates independently of the assessment outcome. Once the total income before

SRI JSSDJ EDUCATIONAL HEALTH AND CHARITABLE TRUST,VILLUPURAM vs. ITO, EXEMPTIONS WARD-1,, CHENNAI

In the result, appeal filed by the assessee is allowed

ITA 2918/CHNY/2025[2015-16]Status: DisposedITAT Chennai04 Feb 2026AY 2015-16

Bench: Shri Aby T. Varkey & Shri S.R.Raghunatha

For Appellant: Ms.Nidhi Jain, CAFor Respondent: Mr.K. Ilaiyaraja, Addl.CIT
Section 12ASection 139Section 139(1)Section 148Section 271FSection 272A(2)(e)Section 274

Section Date granted date or ITR Filing ITR due to the belated COVID return 2025-26 Original ITR-7 139(4A) 04-11-2025 31-10-2025 10-12-2025 Yes 2024-25 Original ITR-7 139(4A) 23-10-2024 31-10-2024 15-11-2024 Yes 2023-24 Original

MERCY EDUCATION TRUST,CHENNAI vs. ITO, NCW-19(6), CHENNAI

In the result, the appeal filed by the assessee is partly-allowed

ITA 2231/CHNY/2025[2018-19]Status: DisposedITAT Chennai29 Jan 2026AY 2018-19

Bench: Shri George George K & Shri S.R. Raghunathaआयकर अपील सं./Ita No.: 2231/Chny/2025 िनधा"रण वष"/Assessment Year: 2018-19 M/S. Mercy Education Trust, The Income Tax Officer, No.66, Sree Gokulam Towers, Vs. Non-Corporate Ward 19(6), Arcot Road, Chennai. Kodambakkam, Chennai – 600 024. Pan: Aactm 6190M (अपीलाथ"/Appellant) (""यथ"/Respondent) अपीलाथ" क" ओर से/Appellant By : Shri N. Arjun Raj, Advocate ""यथ" क" ओर से/Respondent By : Shri N. Rajakumar, Addl.Cit सुनवाई क" तारीख/Date Of Hearing : 27.01.2026 घोषणा क" तारीख/Date Of Pronouncement : 29.01.2026

For Appellant: Shri N. Arjun Raj, AdvocateFor Respondent: Shri N. Rajakumar, Addl.CIT
Section 10Section 139Section 147Section 148Section 250Section 272A(2)(e)Section 273B

273B of the Act and further ought to have appreciated that the discretion vested with the Assessing Officer for passing/not passing the penalty order was not exercised properly/ independently, thereby vitiating the impugned order in its entirety. 10. The NFAC, Delhi failed to appreciate that there was no proper opportunity given before passing of the impugned order and any order

AMMAPALAYAM BASUVAPTTI PRIMARY AGRICULTURAL CO OP CREDIT SOCIETY LIMITED,ERODE vs. THE INCOME TAX OFFICER, WARD 2(1) ERODE, ERODE

ITA 2704/CHNY/2025[2018-19]Status: DisposedITAT Chennai04 Dec 2025AY 2018-19

Bench: Shri Aby T. Varkey & Shri Jagadish

For Appellant: Ms.A. Vijayalakshmi, CAFor Respondent: Mr.R. Raghupathy, Addl.CIT
Section 144BSection 147Section 148Section 148ASection 151Section 151ASection 271B

Charitable Trust v. The ITO, Exemptions Ward, Trichy. - Income Tax Appellate Tribunal, Chennai - ITA Nos.2416 & 2417/CHNY/2024 13 24.04.2025 Tecumseh Products India (P.) Ltd. v. Deputy Commissioner of Income-tax High Court of Telangana - 174 taxmann.com 1203 4. Per contra, the Ld.DR supported the action of the JAO issuing notice u/s.148 of the Act and submitted that both the NFAC

AMMAPALAYAM BASUVAPTTI PRIMARY AGRICULTURAL CO OP CREDIT SOCIETY LIMITED,ERODE vs. THE INCOME TAX OFFICER, WARD 2(1) ERODE, ERODE

ITA 2703/CHNY/2025[2018-19]Status: DisposedITAT Chennai04 Dec 2025AY 2018-19

Bench: Shri Aby T. Varkey & Shri Jagadish

For Appellant: Ms.A. Vijayalakshmi, CAFor Respondent: Mr.R. Raghupathy, Addl.CIT
Section 144BSection 147Section 148Section 148ASection 151Section 151ASection 271B

Charitable Trust v. The ITO, Exemptions Ward, Trichy. - Income Tax Appellate Tribunal, Chennai - ITA Nos.2416 & 2417/CHNY/2024 13 24.04.2025 Tecumseh Products India (P.) Ltd. v. Deputy Commissioner of Income-tax High Court of Telangana - 174 taxmann.com 1203 4. Per contra, the Ld.DR supported the action of the JAO issuing notice u/s.148 of the Act and submitted that both the NFAC

NATIONAL INSTITUTE OF WOMEN CHILD AND RURAL HEALTH TRUST,MELUR vs. JCIT, RANGE-II, MADURAI

In the result, all the appeals filed by the assessee for assessment years 2007-08 to 2010-11 are allowed

ITA 104/CHNY/2019[2010-11]Status: DisposedITAT Chennai08 Dec 2021AY 2010-11

Bench: Shri Mahavir Singh & Shri G. Manjunathaआयकर अपील सं./Ita Nos.: 101, 102, 103 & 104/Chny/2019 िनधा"रण वष" / Assessment Years: 2007-08, 2008-09, 2009-10 & 2010-11 M/S. National Institute Of Women The Joint Commissioner Of Child & Rural Health Trust V. Income Tax, (Niwcrht), Range –Ii, 4/1, Raja Veethi, Keelavalavu Post, Madurai. Melur – 626 106. [Pan: Aaatn 3813C] (अपीलाथ"/Appellant) (""यथ"/Respondent) : Shri. S. Sridhar, Advocate अपीलाथ" क" ओर से/Appellant By ""यथ" क" ओर से/Respondent By : Shri. G. Johnson, Addl. Cit सुनवाई क" तार"ख/Date Of Hearing : 30.11.2021 घोषणा क" तार"ख/Date Of Pronouncement : 08.12.2021

For Respondent: Shri. G. Johnson, Addl. CIT
Section 12ASection 139Section 272A(2)(e)Section 273Section 273BSection 4ASection 4C

charitable trust registered u/s. 12AA of the Income Tax Act, 1961 (herein after ‘the Act’). The assessee has filed its return of income up to assessment year 2006-07, but for the assessment year 2007-08 to 2009-10, it has filed return of income beyond the due date specified u/s. 139 of the Act, and for assessment year

NATIONAL INSTITUTE OF WOMEN CHILD AND RURAL HEALTH TRUST,MELUR vs. JCIT, RANGE-II, MADURAI

In the result, all the appeals filed by the assessee for assessment years 2007-08 to 2010-11 are allowed

ITA 101/CHNY/2019[2007-08]Status: DisposedITAT Chennai08 Dec 2021AY 2007-08

Bench: Shri Mahavir Singh & Shri G. Manjunathaआयकर अपील सं./Ita Nos.: 101, 102, 103 & 104/Chny/2019 िनधा"रण वष" / Assessment Years: 2007-08, 2008-09, 2009-10 & 2010-11 M/S. National Institute Of Women The Joint Commissioner Of Child & Rural Health Trust V. Income Tax, (Niwcrht), Range –Ii, 4/1, Raja Veethi, Keelavalavu Post, Madurai. Melur – 626 106. [Pan: Aaatn 3813C] (अपीलाथ"/Appellant) (""यथ"/Respondent) : Shri. S. Sridhar, Advocate अपीलाथ" क" ओर से/Appellant By ""यथ" क" ओर से/Respondent By : Shri. G. Johnson, Addl. Cit सुनवाई क" तार"ख/Date Of Hearing : 30.11.2021 घोषणा क" तार"ख/Date Of Pronouncement : 08.12.2021

For Respondent: Shri. G. Johnson, Addl. CIT
Section 12ASection 139Section 272A(2)(e)Section 273Section 273BSection 4ASection 4C

charitable trust registered u/s. 12AA of the Income Tax Act, 1961 (herein after ‘the Act’). The assessee has filed its return of income up to assessment year 2006-07, but for the assessment year 2007-08 to 2009-10, it has filed return of income beyond the due date specified u/s. 139 of the Act, and for assessment year

NATIONAL INSTITUTE OF WOMEN CHILD AND RURAL HEALTH TRUST,MELUR vs. JCIT, RANGE-II, MADURAI

In the result, all the appeals filed by the assessee for assessment years 2007-08 to 2010-11 are allowed

ITA 102/CHNY/2019[2008-09]Status: DisposedITAT Chennai08 Dec 2021AY 2008-09

Bench: Shri Mahavir Singh & Shri G. Manjunathaआयकर अपील सं./Ita Nos.: 101, 102, 103 & 104/Chny/2019 िनधा"रण वष" / Assessment Years: 2007-08, 2008-09, 2009-10 & 2010-11 M/S. National Institute Of Women The Joint Commissioner Of Child & Rural Health Trust V. Income Tax, (Niwcrht), Range –Ii, 4/1, Raja Veethi, Keelavalavu Post, Madurai. Melur – 626 106. [Pan: Aaatn 3813C] (अपीलाथ"/Appellant) (""यथ"/Respondent) : Shri. S. Sridhar, Advocate अपीलाथ" क" ओर से/Appellant By ""यथ" क" ओर से/Respondent By : Shri. G. Johnson, Addl. Cit सुनवाई क" तार"ख/Date Of Hearing : 30.11.2021 घोषणा क" तार"ख/Date Of Pronouncement : 08.12.2021

For Respondent: Shri. G. Johnson, Addl. CIT
Section 12ASection 139Section 272A(2)(e)Section 273Section 273BSection 4ASection 4C

charitable trust registered u/s. 12AA of the Income Tax Act, 1961 (herein after ‘the Act’). The assessee has filed its return of income up to assessment year 2006-07, but for the assessment year 2007-08 to 2009-10, it has filed return of income beyond the due date specified u/s. 139 of the Act, and for assessment year

NATIONAL INSTITUTE OF WOMEN CHILD AND RURAL HEALTH TRUST,MELUR vs. JCIT, RANGE-II, MADURAI

In the result, all the appeals filed by the assessee for assessment years 2007-08 to 2010-11 are allowed

ITA 103/CHNY/2019[2009-10]Status: DisposedITAT Chennai08 Dec 2021AY 2009-10

Bench: Shri Mahavir Singh & Shri G. Manjunathaआयकर अपील सं./Ita Nos.: 101, 102, 103 & 104/Chny/2019 िनधा"रण वष" / Assessment Years: 2007-08, 2008-09, 2009-10 & 2010-11 M/S. National Institute Of Women The Joint Commissioner Of Child & Rural Health Trust V. Income Tax, (Niwcrht), Range –Ii, 4/1, Raja Veethi, Keelavalavu Post, Madurai. Melur – 626 106. [Pan: Aaatn 3813C] (अपीलाथ"/Appellant) (""यथ"/Respondent) : Shri. S. Sridhar, Advocate अपीलाथ" क" ओर से/Appellant By ""यथ" क" ओर से/Respondent By : Shri. G. Johnson, Addl. Cit सुनवाई क" तार"ख/Date Of Hearing : 30.11.2021 घोषणा क" तार"ख/Date Of Pronouncement : 08.12.2021

For Respondent: Shri. G. Johnson, Addl. CIT
Section 12ASection 139Section 272A(2)(e)Section 273Section 273BSection 4ASection 4C

charitable trust registered u/s. 12AA of the Income Tax Act, 1961 (herein after ‘the Act’). The assessee has filed its return of income up to assessment year 2006-07, but for the assessment year 2007-08 to 2009-10, it has filed return of income beyond the due date specified u/s. 139 of the Act, and for assessment year