BharatTax.net
SearchITATHigh CourtsSupreme CourtPhrasesAI ResearchHistory

Filters

BharatTax.net

Free search engine for ITAT (Income Tax Appellate Tribunal) judgments across all 28 benches in India.

Quick Links

  • Search Judgments
  • Browse by Bench
  • Recent Judgments

About

BharatTax provides free access to Income Tax Appellate Tribunal orders for legal research and reference.

© 2026 BharatTax.net. All rights reserved.

65 results for “charitable trust”+ Section 272A(1)(d)clear

Sorted by relevance

Chennai65Karnataka22Allahabad12Mumbai11Kolkata9Cochin7Pune7Bangalore6Delhi5Chandigarh4Jaipur2Ahmedabad2Rajkot1Hyderabad1Jodhpur1Lucknow1Nagpur1Raipur1

Key Topics

Section 234E262Section 200A101TDS56Section 200(3)46Section 272A(2)(e)41Section 206C(3)32Charitable Trust30Section 13922Penalty15

M/S SOUTH EAST CONSTRUCTUIONS COMPANY P LTD,CHENNAI vs. DCIT,CPC, GAZIABAD

In the result, the fees levied by TDS officer u/s 234E for Financial

ITA 245/CHNY/2022[2014-15(24Q-Q1)]Status: DisposedITAT Chennai26 May 2022

Bench: Hon’Ble Shri V. Durga Rao & Hon’Ble Shri Manoj Kumar Aggarwal, Am

For Appellant: Shri N. Arjun Raj (C.A)-Ld. ARFor Respondent: Shri P. Sajit Kumar (JCIT) – Ld. DR
Section 200(3)Section 200ASection 206C(3)Section 234E

D E R Per Bench: 1. Aggrieved by confirmation of levy of fees u/s 234E, the assessee is in further appeal before us for various quarters of Assessment Years (AY) 2014-15 & 2015-16. The impugned orders, though separate orders, ITA Nos.245 to 258/Chny/2022 are substantially the same and has confirmed the levy of fees primarily by relying upon

Showing 1–20 of 65 · Page 1 of 4

Condonation of Delay11
Section 109
Section 272A(2)(k)7

M/S SOUTH EAST CONSTRUCTIONS CO.P LTD1,CHENNAI vs. DCIT,CPC, GHAZIABAD

In the result, the fees levied by TDS officer u/s 234E for Financial

ITA 253/CHNY/2022[2015-16 (24Q-Q2)]Status: DisposedITAT Chennai26 May 2022

Bench: Hon’Ble Shri V. Durga Rao & Hon’Ble Shri Manoj Kumar Aggarwal, Am

For Appellant: Shri N. Arjun Raj (C.A)-Ld. ARFor Respondent: Shri P. Sajit Kumar (JCIT) – Ld. DR
Section 200(3)Section 200ASection 206C(3)Section 234E

D E R Per Bench: 1. Aggrieved by confirmation of levy of fees u/s 234E, the assessee is in further appeal before us for various quarters of Assessment Years (AY) 2014-15 & 2015-16. The impugned orders, though separate orders, ITA Nos.245 to 258/Chny/2022 are substantially the same and has confirmed the levy of fees primarily by relying upon

M/S SOUTH EAST CONSTRUCTIONS CO.P LTD,CHENNAI vs. DCIT,CPC, GHAZIABAD

In the result, the fees levied by TDS officer u/s 234E for Financial

ITA 249/CHNY/2022[2014-15(24Q-Q2)]Status: DisposedITAT Chennai26 May 2022

Bench: Hon’Ble Shri V. Durga Rao & Hon’Ble Shri Manoj Kumar Aggarwal, Am

For Appellant: Shri N. Arjun Raj (C.A)-Ld. ARFor Respondent: Shri P. Sajit Kumar (JCIT) – Ld. DR
Section 200(3)Section 200ASection 206C(3)Section 234E

D E R Per Bench: 1. Aggrieved by confirmation of levy of fees u/s 234E, the assessee is in further appeal before us for various quarters of Assessment Years (AY) 2014-15 & 2015-16. The impugned orders, though separate orders, ITA Nos.245 to 258/Chny/2022 are substantially the same and has confirmed the levy of fees primarily by relying upon

M/S SOUTH EAST CONSTRUCTIONS CO. LTD.1,CHENNAI vs. DCIT, CPC, GHAZIABAD

In the result, the fees levied by TDS officer u/s 234E for Financial

ITA 257/CHNY/2022[2015-16(26Q-Q3)]Status: DisposedITAT Chennai26 May 2022

Bench: Hon’Ble Shri V. Durga Rao & Hon’Ble Shri Manoj Kumar Aggarwal, Am

For Appellant: Shri N. Arjun Raj (C.A)-Ld. ARFor Respondent: Shri P. Sajit Kumar (JCIT) – Ld. DR
Section 200(3)Section 200ASection 206C(3)Section 234E

D E R Per Bench: 1. Aggrieved by confirmation of levy of fees u/s 234E, the assessee is in further appeal before us for various quarters of Assessment Years (AY) 2014-15 & 2015-16. The impugned orders, though separate orders, ITA Nos.245 to 258/Chny/2022 are substantially the same and has confirmed the levy of fees primarily by relying upon

M/S SOUTH EAST CONSTRUCTIONS CO. LTD.,CHENNAI vs. DCIT,CPC, GHAZIABAD

In the result, the fees levied by TDS officer u/s 234E for Financial

ITA 256/CHNY/2022[2015-16(26Q-Q2)]Status: DisposedITAT Chennai26 May 2022

Bench: Hon’Ble Shri V. Durga Rao & Hon’Ble Shri Manoj Kumar Aggarwal, Am

For Appellant: Shri N. Arjun Raj (C.A)-Ld. ARFor Respondent: Shri P. Sajit Kumar (JCIT) – Ld. DR
Section 200(3)Section 200ASection 206C(3)Section 234E

D E R Per Bench: 1. Aggrieved by confirmation of levy of fees u/s 234E, the assessee is in further appeal before us for various quarters of Assessment Years (AY) 2014-15 & 2015-16. The impugned orders, though separate orders, ITA Nos.245 to 258/Chny/2022 are substantially the same and has confirmed the levy of fees primarily by relying upon

M/S SOUTH EAST CONSTRUCTIONS CO.P LTD,CHENNAI vs. DCIT,CPS, GHAZIABAD

In the result, the fees levied by TDS officer u/s 234E for Financial

ITA 252/CHNY/2022[2015-16(24Q-Q1)]Status: DisposedITAT Chennai26 May 2022

Bench: Hon’Ble Shri V. Durga Rao & Hon’Ble Shri Manoj Kumar Aggarwal, Am

For Appellant: Shri N. Arjun Raj (C.A)-Ld. ARFor Respondent: Shri P. Sajit Kumar (JCIT) – Ld. DR
Section 200(3)Section 200ASection 206C(3)Section 234E

D E R Per Bench: 1. Aggrieved by confirmation of levy of fees u/s 234E, the assessee is in further appeal before us for various quarters of Assessment Years (AY) 2014-15 & 2015-16. The impugned orders, though separate orders, ITA Nos.245 to 258/Chny/2022 are substantially the same and has confirmed the levy of fees primarily by relying upon

M/S SOUTH EAST CONSTRUCTIONS CO.P LTD,CHENNAI vs. DCIT,CPC, GHAZIABAD

In the result, the fees levied by TDS officer u/s 234E for Financial

ITA 255/CHNY/2022[2015-16(26Q-Q1)]Status: DisposedITAT Chennai26 May 2022

Bench: Hon’Ble Shri V. Durga Rao & Hon’Ble Shri Manoj Kumar Aggarwal, Am

For Appellant: Shri N. Arjun Raj (C.A)-Ld. ARFor Respondent: Shri P. Sajit Kumar (JCIT) – Ld. DR
Section 200(3)Section 200ASection 206C(3)Section 234E

D E R Per Bench: 1. Aggrieved by confirmation of levy of fees u/s 234E, the assessee is in further appeal before us for various quarters of Assessment Years (AY) 2014-15 & 2015-16. The impugned orders, though separate orders, ITA Nos.245 to 258/Chny/2022 are substantially the same and has confirmed the levy of fees primarily by relying upon

M/S SOUTH EAST CONSTRUCTIONS CO.P LTD,CHENNAI vs. DCIT,CPC, GHAZIABAD

In the result, the fees levied by TDS officer u/s 234E for Financial

ITA 248/CHNY/2022[214-15(244Q-Q4)]Status: DisposedITAT Chennai26 May 2022

Bench: Hon’Ble Shri V. Durga Rao & Hon’Ble Shri Manoj Kumar Aggarwal, Am

For Appellant: Shri N. Arjun Raj (C.A)-Ld. ARFor Respondent: Shri P. Sajit Kumar (JCIT) – Ld. DR
Section 200(3)Section 200ASection 206C(3)Section 234E

D E R Per Bench: 1. Aggrieved by confirmation of levy of fees u/s 234E, the assessee is in further appeal before us for various quarters of Assessment Years (AY) 2014-15 & 2015-16. The impugned orders, though separate orders, ITA Nos.245 to 258/Chny/2022 are substantially the same and has confirmed the levy of fees primarily by relying upon

M/S SOUTH EAST CONSTRUCTIONS CO.P LTD112, KALIAMMAN KOIL STREET, NATESA NAGAR, VIRUGAMBAKKAM,CHENNAI vs. DCIT,CPC, GHAZIABAD

In the result, the fees levied by TDS officer u/s 234E for Financial

ITA 247/CHNY/2022[2014-15(24Q-Q3)]Status: DisposedITAT Chennai26 May 2022

Bench: Hon’Ble Shri V. Durga Rao & Hon’Ble Shri Manoj Kumar Aggarwal, Am

For Appellant: Shri N. Arjun Raj (C.A)-Ld. ARFor Respondent: Shri P. Sajit Kumar (JCIT) – Ld. DR
Section 200(3)Section 200ASection 206C(3)Section 234E

D E R Per Bench: 1. Aggrieved by confirmation of levy of fees u/s 234E, the assessee is in further appeal before us for various quarters of Assessment Years (AY) 2014-15 & 2015-16. The impugned orders, though separate orders, ITA Nos.245 to 258/Chny/2022 are substantially the same and has confirmed the levy of fees primarily by relying upon

M/S. SOUTH EAST CONSTRUCTIONS COMPANY P LTD.,CHENNAI vs. DCIT , CPC, GHAZIABAD

In the result, the fees levied by TDS officer u/s 234E for Financial

ITA 246/CHNY/2022[2014-15(24Q-Q2)]Status: DisposedITAT Chennai26 May 2022

Bench: Hon’Ble Shri V. Durga Rao & Hon’Ble Shri Manoj Kumar Aggarwal, Am

For Appellant: Shri N. Arjun Raj (C.A)-Ld. ARFor Respondent: Shri P. Sajit Kumar (JCIT) – Ld. DR
Section 200(3)Section 200ASection 206C(3)Section 234E

D E R Per Bench: 1. Aggrieved by confirmation of levy of fees u/s 234E, the assessee is in further appeal before us for various quarters of Assessment Years (AY) 2014-15 & 2015-16. The impugned orders, though separate orders, ITA Nos.245 to 258/Chny/2022 are substantially the same and has confirmed the levy of fees primarily by relying upon

M/S SOUTH EAST CONSTRUCTIONS CO.P LTD,CHENNAI vs. DCIT,CPC, GHAZIABAD

In the result, the fees levied by TDS officer u/s 234E for Financial

ITA 250/CHNY/2022[2014-15 (26Q-Q3)]Status: DisposedITAT Chennai26 May 2022

Bench: Hon’Ble Shri V. Durga Rao & Hon’Ble Shri Manoj Kumar Aggarwal, Am

For Appellant: Shri N. Arjun Raj (C.A)-Ld. ARFor Respondent: Shri P. Sajit Kumar (JCIT) – Ld. DR
Section 200(3)Section 200ASection 206C(3)Section 234E

D E R Per Bench: 1. Aggrieved by confirmation of levy of fees u/s 234E, the assessee is in further appeal before us for various quarters of Assessment Years (AY) 2014-15 & 2015-16. The impugned orders, though separate orders, ITA Nos.245 to 258/Chny/2022 are substantially the same and has confirmed the levy of fees primarily by relying upon

M/S SOUTH EAST CONSTRUCTIONS CO. LTD.,CHENNAI vs. DCIT,CPC, GHAZIABAD

In the result, the fees levied by TDS officer u/s 234E for Financial

ITA 258/CHNY/2022[2015-16(24Q-Q4)]Status: DisposedITAT Chennai26 May 2022

Bench: Hon’Ble Shri V. Durga Rao & Hon’Ble Shri Manoj Kumar Aggarwal, Am

For Appellant: Shri N. Arjun Raj (C.A)-Ld. ARFor Respondent: Shri P. Sajit Kumar (JCIT) – Ld. DR
Section 200(3)Section 200ASection 206C(3)Section 234E

D E R Per Bench: 1. Aggrieved by confirmation of levy of fees u/s 234E, the assessee is in further appeal before us for various quarters of Assessment Years (AY) 2014-15 & 2015-16. The impugned orders, though separate orders, ITA Nos.245 to 258/Chny/2022 are substantially the same and has confirmed the levy of fees primarily by relying upon

M/S SOUTH EAST CONSTRUCTIONS CO.P LTD,CHENNAI vs. DCIT,CPC, GHAZIABAD

In the result, the fees levied by TDS officer u/s 234E for Financial

ITA 254/CHNY/2022[2015-16(24Q-Q3)]Status: DisposedITAT Chennai26 May 2022

Bench: Hon’Ble Shri V. Durga Rao & Hon’Ble Shri Manoj Kumar Aggarwal, Am

For Appellant: Shri N. Arjun Raj (C.A)-Ld. ARFor Respondent: Shri P. Sajit Kumar (JCIT) – Ld. DR
Section 200(3)Section 200ASection 206C(3)Section 234E

D E R Per Bench: 1. Aggrieved by confirmation of levy of fees u/s 234E, the assessee is in further appeal before us for various quarters of Assessment Years (AY) 2014-15 & 2015-16. The impugned orders, though separate orders, ITA Nos.245 to 258/Chny/2022 are substantially the same and has confirmed the levy of fees primarily by relying upon

M/S SOUTH EAST CONSTRUCTIONS CO.P LTD,CHENNAI vs. DCIT,CPC, GHAZIABAD

In the result, the fees levied by TDS officer u/s 234E for Financial

ITA 251/CHNY/2022[2014-15 (26Q-Q4)]Status: DisposedITAT Chennai26 May 2022

Bench: Hon’Ble Shri V. Durga Rao & Hon’Ble Shri Manoj Kumar Aggarwal, Am

For Appellant: Shri N. Arjun Raj (C.A)-Ld. ARFor Respondent: Shri P. Sajit Kumar (JCIT) – Ld. DR
Section 200(3)Section 200ASection 206C(3)Section 234E

D E R Per Bench: 1. Aggrieved by confirmation of levy of fees u/s 234E, the assessee is in further appeal before us for various quarters of Assessment Years (AY) 2014-15 & 2015-16. The impugned orders, though separate orders, ITA Nos.245 to 258/Chny/2022 are substantially the same and has confirmed the levy of fees primarily by relying upon

THE CONGREGATION OF THE SISTERS OF THE CROSS OF CHAVANOD ,TRICHY vs. CIT , CPC , TDS , GHAZIABAD

In the result, the fees levied by TDS officer u/s 234E for Financial

ITA 807/CHNY/2022[2015-2016]Status: DisposedITAT Chennai26 Oct 2022AY 2015-2016

Bench: Hon’Ble Shri V. Durga Rao & Hon’Ble Shri Manoj Kumar Aggarwal, Am आयकरअपील सं./ Ita No.807/Chny/2022 (िनधा1रण वष1 / Assessment Year: 2015-16) The Congregation Of The Sisters Of The The Acit, Cpc बनाम/ Cross Of Chavanod, Tds, Ghaziabad Holy Cross Provincilate, Puthur, Vs. Tiruchirappalli-620 017. थायीलेखासं./जीआइआरसं./Pan: Aaatt-4867-G / (अपीलाथ)/Appellant) : (*+थ) / Respondent) अपीलाथ)कीओरसे/ Appellant By : None *+थ)कीओरसे/Respondent By : Shri Ar.V Sreenivasan (Addl. Cit)-Ld. Sr. Dr

For Appellant: NoneFor Respondent: Shri AR.V Sreenivasan (Addl. CIT)-Ld. Sr. DR
Section 200(3)Section 200ASection 206C(3)Section 234ESection 272A(2)(k)

D E R Manoj Kumar Aggarwal (Accountant Member): 1. Aforesaid appeal by assessee for Assessment Year (AY) 2015-16 arises out of the order of learned Commissioner of Income Tax, National Faceless Appeal Centre (NFAC), Delhi [CIT(A)] dated 05-08-2022 in the matter of intimation issued by Centralized Processing Center, TDS, Ghaziabad (CPC) u/s. 200A

VEERA CREATIONS,TIRUPUR vs. THE INCOME TAX OFFICER,TDS WARD, TIRUPUR

In the result, the fees levied by TDS officer u/s 234E for Financial

ITA 559/CHNY/2021[2014-2015]Status: DisposedITAT Chennai12 May 2022AY 2014-2015

Bench: Hon’Ble Shri Mahavir Singh & Hon’Ble Shri Manoj Kumar Aggarwal, Am

For Appellant: Shri R. Kumar (Advocate) – Ld. ARFor Respondent: Shri ARV Sreenivasan (Addl. CIT) –Ld. DR
Section 200(3)Section 200ASection 206C(3)Section 234E

D E R Manoj Kumar Aggarwal (Accountant Member) 1. Aggrieved by confirmation of levy of fees u/s 234E for late filing of TDS returns, the assessee is in further appeal before us for various quarters of Assessment Year (AY) 2014-15. The impugned order has been passed by Ld. Commissioner of Income Tax (Appeals), National Faceless Appeal Centre (NFAC), Delhi

D. SENTHAMARAISELVI,DINDIGUL vs. DCIT,CPC, GAZIABAD

In the result, the fees levied by TDS officer u/s 234E for Financial

ITA 406/CHNY/2022[2014-15]Status: DisposedITAT Chennai22 Jun 2022AY 2014-15

Bench: Hon’Ble Shri V. Durga Rao & Hon’Ble Shri Manoj Kumar Aggarwal, Am

For Appellant: NoneFor Respondent: Shri P. Sajit Kumar (JCIT) –Ld. DR
Section 200(3)Section 200ASection 206C(3)Section 234ESection 272A(2)(k)

D E R Manoj Kumar Aggarwal (Accountant Member) 1. Aggrieved by confirmation of levy of fees u/s 234E for late filing of quarterly TDS returns, the assessee is in further appeal before us for various quarters of Assessment Year (AY) 2014-15. The quantum of fees for Q-1, 2 & 3 is Rs.80,200/-, Rs.63,000/- & Rs.44,600/- respectively

D. SENTHAMARAISELVI,DINDIGUL vs. DCIT,CPC, GAZIABAD

In the result, the fees levied by TDS officer u/s 234E for Financial

ITA 405/CHNY/2022[2014-15]Status: DisposedITAT Chennai22 Jun 2022AY 2014-15

Bench: Hon’Ble Shri V. Durga Rao & Hon’Ble Shri Manoj Kumar Aggarwal, Am

For Appellant: NoneFor Respondent: Shri P. Sajit Kumar (JCIT) –Ld. DR
Section 200(3)Section 200ASection 206C(3)Section 234ESection 272A(2)(k)

D E R Manoj Kumar Aggarwal (Accountant Member) 1. Aggrieved by confirmation of levy of fees u/s 234E for late filing of quarterly TDS returns, the assessee is in further appeal before us for various quarters of Assessment Year (AY) 2014-15. The quantum of fees for Q-1, 2 & 3 is Rs.80,200/-, Rs.63,000/- & Rs.44,600/- respectively

D. SENTHAMARAISELVI,DINDIGUL vs. DCIT,CPC, GHAZIABAD

In the result, the fees levied by TDS officer u/s 234E for Financial

ITA 407/CHNY/2022[2014-15]Status: DisposedITAT Chennai22 Jun 2022AY 2014-15

Bench: Hon’Ble Shri V. Durga Rao & Hon’Ble Shri Manoj Kumar Aggarwal, Am

For Appellant: NoneFor Respondent: Shri P. Sajit Kumar (JCIT) –Ld. DR
Section 200(3)Section 200ASection 206C(3)Section 234ESection 272A(2)(k)

D E R Manoj Kumar Aggarwal (Accountant Member) 1. Aggrieved by confirmation of levy of fees u/s 234E for late filing of quarterly TDS returns, the assessee is in further appeal before us for various quarters of Assessment Year (AY) 2014-15. The quantum of fees for Q-1, 2 & 3 is Rs.80,200/-, Rs.63,000/- & Rs.44,600/- respectively

EVERGREEN HARVEST AGRO PRODUCTS PVT LTD ,CHENNAI vs. ITO,TDS WARD -1(2), CHENNAI

In the result, petition fails and is dismissed

ITA 188/CHNY/2022[2015-16]Status: DisposedITAT Chennai12 May 2022AY 2015-16

Bench: Hon’Ble Shri Mahavir Singh & Hon’Ble Shri Manoj Kumar Aggarwal, Am

For Appellant: Shri. Sriraj Gokavarapur (ACA) – Ld. ARFor Respondent: Shri ARV Sreenivasan (Addl. CIT) –Ld. DR
Section 200(3)Section 200ASection 206C(3)Section 234E

D E R Manoj Kumar Aggarwal (Accountant Member) 1. Aggrieved by confirmation of levy of fees u/s 234E, the assessee is in further appeal before us for various quarters of Assessment Years (AY) 2014-15 & 2015-16. The impugned orders, though separate orders, are substantially the same and has confirmed the levy of fees primarily ITA Nos.185 to194/Chny/2022 by relying