BharatTax.net
SearchITATHigh CourtsSupreme CourtPhrasesAI ResearchHistory

Filters

BharatTax.net

Free search engine for ITAT (Income Tax Appellate Tribunal) judgments across all 28 benches in India.

Quick Links

  • Search Judgments
  • Browse by Bench
  • Recent Judgments

About

BharatTax provides free access to Income Tax Appellate Tribunal orders for legal research and reference.

© 2026 BharatTax.net. All rights reserved.

8 results for “charitable trust”+ Section 260Aclear

Sorted by relevance

Delhi88Karnataka37Mumbai30Bangalore22Calcutta21Indore11Amritsar11Telangana11Chennai8Jaipur6Hyderabad6SC4Punjab & Haryana4Agra3Kolkata3Allahabad3Cochin3Orissa3Himachal Pradesh2Lucknow2Pune2Rajasthan2Ahmedabad1Rajkot1J&K1T.S. THAKUR ROHINTON FALI NARIMAN1Nagpur1

Key Topics

Section 2(15)13Section 153C8Section 143(3)7Section 116Exemption5Section 12A4Section 13(1)(c)4Section 260A4Addition to Income4Section 2

DEPUTY COMMISSIONER OF INCOME TAX, EXEMPTIONS CIRCLE, CHENNAI, INCOME TAX DEPARTMENT vs. THE INDIAN INSTITUTE OF ENGINEERING TECHNOLOGY, CHENNAI

In the result the appeal of the Revenue dismissed

ITA 679/CHNY/2024[2012-13]Status: DisposedITAT Chennai30 Aug 2024AY 2012-13

Bench: Shri Mahavir Singh & Shri S.R. Raghunathaआयकर अपील सं./Ita No.679/Chny/2024 िनधा;रण वष; /Assessment Year: 2012-13 The Dy. Commissioner Of The Indian Institute Of Engineering Income Tax, Vs. Technology, Exemptions Circle, 363, Arcot Road, Kodambakkam, Chennai. Chennai – 600 024. [Pan: Aaatt 2768C] (अपीलाथ"/Appellant) (""यथ"/Respondent) अपीलाथH की ओर से/ Assessee By : Shri R. Vijayaraghavan, Advocate JkथH की ओर से /Revenue By : Shri N. Sanjay Gandhi, Jcit सुनवाई की तारीख/Date Of Hearing : 11.06.2024 घोषणा की तारीख /Date Of Pronouncement : 30.08.2024 आदेश / O R D E R Per S.R. Raghunatha, A.M : This Appeal By The Revenue Is Arising Out Of The Order Of The Commissioner Of Income Tax (Appeals), (Nfac), Delhi [Hereinafter “Cit(A)] In Din & Order No.Itba/Nfac/S/250/2023- 24/1059500064(1), Dated 09.01.2024. The Assessment Was Framed By The Assessing Officer For The Assessment Year 2012-13 U/S.143(3) Of The Income Tax Act, 1961 (Hereinafter The ‘Act’), Vide Order Dated 20.03.2015. :- 2 -: 2. There Is A Delay Of 06 Days In Filing The Appeal By The Revenue.

For Appellant: Shri R. Vijayaraghavan, AdvocateFor Respondent: Shri N. Sanjay Gandhi, JCIT
Section 10Section 11Section 12ASection 13(1)
3
Charitable Trust3
Depreciation2
Section 13(1)(c)
Section 13(1)(d)
Section 143(3)

260A of the Act is completed as under: As the registration u/s 12AA of the Act continued to exist in the case of assessee, the benefits of the sec 11 are extended to the assessee trust. 5.1 Depreciation: The issue of depreciation was decided in favour of the assessee trust relying on the decision

DCIT, CHENNAI vs. THE WILLINGDON CHARITABLE TRUST, CHENNAI

In the result, the appeal filed by the Revenue is allowed

ITA 587/CHNY/2015[2011-12]Status: DisposedITAT Chennai14 Oct 2022AY 2011-12

Bench: Shri V. Durga Rao & Shri G. Manjunathaआयकर अपील सं./I.T.A. No.587/Chny/2015 िनधा"रण वष"/Assessment Year: 2011-12 The Deputy Commissioner Of Vs. M/S. The Willingdon Charitable Trust, Income Tax (Exemptions), Chennai Rani Seethai Hall, No. 603, Anna Salai, Circle, Aayakar Bhavan, Annexe Chennai 600 006. Building, Iii Floor, 121, M.G. Road, Nungambakkam, Chennai 600 034. [Pan:Aaatt0683N] (अपीलाथ"/Appellant) (""थ"/Respondent) अपीलाथ" की ओर से / Appellant By : Shri D. Hema Bhupal, Jcit ""थ" की ओर से/Respondent By : Shri S. Sridhar, Advocate सुनवाई की तारीख/ Date Of Hearing : 03.08.2022 घोषणा की तारीख /Date Of Pronouncement : 14.10.2022 आदेश /O R D E R Per V. Durga Rao: This Appeal Filed By The Revenue Is Directed Against The Order Of The Ld. Commissioner Of Income Tax (Appeals) 17, Chennai, Dated 12.12.2014 Relevant To The Assessment Year 2011-12. The Revenue Has Raised The Following Grounds: Ground No.1 1. The Order Of The Learned Cit (A) Is Contrary To The Law & Facts Of The Case. Ground No:2: 2.1 The Id Cit(A) Erred In Holding That The Assessee Is Eligible For Exemption U/S 11 Of The Act & Not Hit By The Amended Provisions Of Sec.2(15) Of The Act, Under The Object Of "General Public Utility".

For Appellant: Shri D. Hema Bhupal, JCITFor Respondent: Shri S. Sridhar, Advocate
Section 11Section 2(15)

Charitable Trust (supra) is concerned, the Hon’ble High Court has remitted the matter back to the file of the Assessing Officer and the findings of the Hon’ble High Court are reproduced as under: “13.8. We are also of the opinion that even though the assessee has produced the relevant records before us, we cannot embark upon the jurisdiction

ACIT CENTRAL CIRCLE 1(3), CHENNAI vs. SHRI RAMACHANDRA EDUCATIONAL AND HEALTH TRUST, CHENNAI

In the result, the appeal of the Revenue is dismissed

ITA 1061/CHNY/2018[2009-10]Status: DisposedITAT Chennai03 Sept 2019AY 2009-10

Bench: Shri George Mathan & Shri S.Jayaraman

For Appellant: Mr.AR.V.Sreenivasan,JCIT,D.RFor Respondent: Ms.S.Vidya,C.A
Section 143(3)Section 195Section 260ASection 40

charitable trust, the Id.CIT(A) ought to have appreciated that the AO has not disallowed the payment of Rs.93,55,477/- made to M/s Harward Medical International Inc., U/s.40(a)(ia) of the IT Act but has only held that the said payment cannot be treated as application of income for the AY 2009-10 as the assessee

ASHA NIVAS SOCIAL WELFARE SOCIETY,CHENNAI vs. DDIT EXEMPTIONS I, CHENNAI

In the result, the appeals filed by the assessee are dismissed

ITA 931/CHNY/2018[2011-12]Status: DisposedITAT Chennai25 Feb 2022AY 2011-12

Bench: Shri Mahavir Singhand Shri Manoj Kumar Aggarwal

For Appellant: Shri N.V. Balaji, AdvocateFor Respondent: Shri P. Sajit Kumar, JCIT
Section 12ASection 143(3)Section 2Section 2(15)Section 260A

section 260A before the Hon’ble High Court of Madras. The said appeal TCA no.867/2015 for AY 2006-07 and TCA No.868/2015 for AY 2009-10 has been admitted by the Hon’ble High Court and stay has been granted vide order dated 08.09.2015 in M.P. 1of 2015 in TCA No.867/2015. I.T.A. Nos.930 to 932/Chny/2018 4 3. Briefly stated facts

ASHA NIVAS SOCIAL WELFARE SOCIETY,CHENNAI vs. DDIT EXEMPTIONS I, CHENNAI

In the result, the appeals filed by the assessee are dismissed

ITA 932/CHNY/2018[2012-13]Status: DisposedITAT Chennai25 Feb 2022AY 2012-13

Bench: Shri Mahavir Singhand Shri Manoj Kumar Aggarwal

For Appellant: Shri N.V. Balaji, AdvocateFor Respondent: Shri P. Sajit Kumar, JCIT
Section 12ASection 143(3)Section 2Section 2(15)Section 260A

section 260A before the Hon’ble High Court of Madras. The said appeal TCA no.867/2015 for AY 2006-07 and TCA No.868/2015 for AY 2009-10 has been admitted by the Hon’ble High Court and stay has been granted vide order dated 08.09.2015 in M.P. 1of 2015 in TCA No.867/2015. I.T.A. Nos.930 to 932/Chny/2018 4 3. Briefly stated facts

ASHA NIVAS SOCIAL WELFARE SOCIETY,CHENNAI vs. DDIT EXEMPTIONS I, CHENNAI

In the result, the appeals filed by the assessee are dismissed

ITA 930/CHNY/2018[2010-11]Status: DisposedITAT Chennai25 Feb 2022AY 2010-11

Bench: Shri Mahavir Singhand Shri Manoj Kumar Aggarwal

For Appellant: Shri N.V. Balaji, AdvocateFor Respondent: Shri P. Sajit Kumar, JCIT
Section 12ASection 143(3)Section 2Section 2(15)Section 260A

section 260A before the Hon’ble High Court of Madras. The said appeal TCA no.867/2015 for AY 2006-07 and TCA No.868/2015 for AY 2009-10 has been admitted by the Hon’ble High Court and stay has been granted vide order dated 08.09.2015 in M.P. 1of 2015 in TCA No.867/2015. I.T.A. Nos.930 to 932/Chny/2018 4 3. Briefly stated facts

DEPUTY COMMISSIONER OF INCOME TAX, CENTRAL CIRCLE 2(2), CHENNAI, CHENNAI vs. SUBRAMANIAM KATHIRESAN, CHENNAI

In the result, appeal filed by the Revenue for AY 2014-15 is dismissed

ITA 899/CHNY/2025[2014-15]Status: DisposedITAT Chennai18 Dec 2025AY 2014-15

Bench: Shri Aby T. Varkey & Shri Jagadish

For Appellant: Mr. N. Arjun Raj, Advocate &For Respondent: Ms. Gauthami Manivasagam
Section 132Section 153Section 153ASection 153A(1)Section 153C

260A on the ground that the Hon'ble ITAT failed to consider that the "satisfaction note" prepared to derive satisfaction is only a prima facie evidence for Initiating proceedings Us 153C and that further, in the instant case, the assessment order us 143(3) r.w.s 153C for the AY 2014-15 dated 14.03.2023 was passed on the basis of incriminating

LATE S. YOGARATHINAM, REP. BY L/H Y. SHANMUGA DURAI,CHENNAI vs. ACIT, CIRCLE-1(2), CHENNAI

In the result the appeal of the assessee is allowed

ITA 626/CHNY/2024[2010-11]Status: DisposedITAT Chennai17 Mar 2025AY 2010-11

Bench: Shri George George Kand Shri S.R. Raghunathaआयकर अपील सं./Ita No.:626/Chny/2024 िनधा"रण वष"/Assessment Year:2010-11 Shri Y. Shanmuga Durai, L/H Of Acit Late S.Yogarathinam Vs. Circle -1(2) Old No.24, No.14, Chennai. 17/24, Ramanathan Street, T.Nagar, Chennai-600 017. Pan: Aakpy-9845-P (अपीलाथ"/Appellant) (""यथ"/Respondent) अपीलाथ"क"ओरसे/Appellant By : Mr. N. Arjun Raj, Advocate ""यथ"क"ओरसे/Respondent By : Mr. Ar.V. Sreenivasan, Cit सुनवाई क" तारीख/Date Of Hearing : 06.03.2025 घोषणा क" तारीख/Date Of Pronouncement : 17.03.2025

For Appellant: Mr. N. Arjun Raj, AdvocateFor Respondent: Mr. AR.V. Sreenivasan, CIT
Section 122Section 2(47)Section 250Section 45Section 47

charitable purpose. v) Transactions not regarded as transfer as per section 45 of the Act “Nothing contained in section 47 shall apply to the following transfers:- (i) Any distribution capital assets on the total or partial partition of HUF; (ii) ….. (iii) any transfer of the capital asset under a gift or Will or irrevocable trust (iv) …..” vi) There were