BharatTax.net
SearchITATHigh CourtsSupreme CourtPhrasesAI ResearchHistory

Filters

BharatTax.net

Free search engine for ITAT (Income Tax Appellate Tribunal) judgments across all 28 benches in India.

Quick Links

  • Search Judgments
  • Browse by Bench
  • Recent Judgments

About

BharatTax provides free access to Income Tax Appellate Tribunal orders for legal research and reference.

© 2026 BharatTax.net. All rights reserved.

18 results for “charitable trust”+ Section 197(1)clear

Sorted by relevance

Karnataka448Delhi159Mumbai46Hyderabad46Bangalore33Jaipur28Cochin27Chandigarh19Chennai18Lucknow18Calcutta17Pune11Ahmedabad11Kolkata10Varanasi4Cuttack4Jodhpur3Allahabad3Telangana3Orissa2Rajasthan2Indore2Amritsar1Rajkot1SC1Surat1Visakhapatnam1Andhra Pradesh1Punjab & Haryana1

Key Topics

Section 1138Section 2(15)16Section 143(3)12Addition to Income12Section 12A11Exemption11Section 1486Section 148A6Section 153C6

TAMIL NADU CRICKET ASSOCIATION,CHENNAI vs. DDIT, CHENNAI

In the result, the assessee’s appeal for assessment year

ITA 1537/CHNY/2014[2010-2011]Status: DisposedITAT Chennai14 Aug 2015AY 2010-2011

Bench: Shri N.R.S. Ganesan & Shri A. Mohan Alankamonyआयकर अपील सं./Ita Nos.1535, 1536 & 1537/Mds/2014 "नधा"रण वष" / Assessment Years : 2008-09 To 2010-11 M/S Tamil Nadu Cricket Association, The Deputy Director Of No.5, M.A.Chidambaram Stadium, V. Income Tax (Exemptions), Victoria Hostel Road, Chennai - 600 034. Chepauk, Chennai - 600 005. Pan : Aaaat 0398 M (अपीलाथ"/Appellant) (""यथ"/Respondent)

For Appellant: Shri V. Ravichandran, CAFor Respondent: Shri N. Rengaraj, CIT
Section 12A

197 of the paper-book. The assessee challenged the correctness of the order of the Director of Income Tax (Exemptions) cancelling the registration granted under Section 12AA of the Act, in I.T.A. No.396/Mds/2012. This Tribunal by an order dated 22.02.2013, confirmed the order of the Director of Income Tax (Exemptions). The assessee carried the matter before the High Court

TAMIL NADU CRICKET ASSOCIATION,CHENNAI vs. DDIT, CHENNAI

Section 1474
Condonation of Delay3
Charitable Trust3

In the result, the assessee’s appeal for assessment year

ITA 1535/CHNY/2014[2008-2009]Status: DisposedITAT Chennai14 Aug 2015AY 2008-2009

Bench: Shri N.R.S. Ganesan & Shri A. Mohan Alankamonyआयकर अपील सं./Ita Nos.1535, 1536 & 1537/Mds/2014 "नधा"रण वष" / Assessment Years : 2008-09 To 2010-11 M/S Tamil Nadu Cricket Association, The Deputy Director Of No.5, M.A.Chidambaram Stadium, V. Income Tax (Exemptions), Victoria Hostel Road, Chennai - 600 034. Chepauk, Chennai - 600 005. Pan : Aaaat 0398 M (अपीलाथ"/Appellant) (""यथ"/Respondent)

For Appellant: Shri V. Ravichandran, CAFor Respondent: Shri N. Rengaraj, CIT
Section 12A

197 of the paper-book. The assessee challenged the correctness of the order of the Director of Income Tax (Exemptions) cancelling the registration granted under Section 12AA of the Act, in I.T.A. No.396/Mds/2012. This Tribunal by an order dated 22.02.2013, confirmed the order of the Director of Income Tax (Exemptions). The assessee carried the matter before the High Court

TAMIL NADU CRICKET ASSOCIATION,CHENNAI vs. DDIT, CHENNAI

In the result, the assessee’s appeal for assessment year

ITA 1536/CHNY/2014[2009-2010]Status: DisposedITAT Chennai14 Aug 2015AY 2009-2010

Bench: Shri N.R.S. Ganesan & Shri A. Mohan Alankamonyआयकर अपील सं./Ita Nos.1535, 1536 & 1537/Mds/2014 "नधा"रण वष" / Assessment Years : 2008-09 To 2010-11 M/S Tamil Nadu Cricket Association, The Deputy Director Of No.5, M.A.Chidambaram Stadium, V. Income Tax (Exemptions), Victoria Hostel Road, Chennai - 600 034. Chepauk, Chennai - 600 005. Pan : Aaaat 0398 M (अपीलाथ"/Appellant) (""यथ"/Respondent)

For Appellant: Shri V. Ravichandran, CAFor Respondent: Shri N. Rengaraj, CIT
Section 12A

197 of the paper-book. The assessee challenged the correctness of the order of the Director of Income Tax (Exemptions) cancelling the registration granted under Section 12AA of the Act, in I.T.A. No.396/Mds/2012. This Tribunal by an order dated 22.02.2013, confirmed the order of the Director of Income Tax (Exemptions). The assessee carried the matter before the High Court

ITO(EXCEMPTION) TRICHY, TRICHY vs. GRAMA VIDIYAL TRUST, TRICHY

In the result, both ITA No

ITA 1534/CHNY/2019[2009-10]Status: DisposedITAT Chennai24 Aug 2022AY 2009-10

Bench: Shri Veeravalli Durga Rao, Jm & Shri Girish Agrawalita Nos.1534 & 1535/Chny/2019 Assessment Years: 2009-10 & 2011-12 Income-Tax Officer, Grama Vidiyal Trust, (Exemptions), Trichy Vs. No. 44, Williams Road, Cantonment, Trichy-620001 (Pan: Aaatg2928F) (Appellant) (Respondent) Present For: Appellant By : Shri N. V. Balaji, Advocate Respondent By : Shri Arv. Sreenivasan, Addl. Cit Date Of Hearing : 31.05.2022 Date Of Pronouncement : 24.08.2022 O R D E R Per Girish Agrawal: Both These Appeals By Revenue Are Directed Against The Separate Orders Of Ld. Cit(A)-1, Trichy Vide Ita No. 156/2017-18/Cit(A)-1/Try Dated 04.03.2019 & 163/2017-18/Cit(A)-1/Try Dated 22.02.2019 Against The Separate Orders Of Ld. Ito, Exemptions Ward, Trichy, Passed U/S 143(3) R.W.S. 254 Of The Income-Tax Act,1961 (Hereinafter Referred To As The Act), Both Dated 30.12.2017 For Ays 2009-10 & 2011-12. 2. First We Take Up Ita No. 1534/Chny/2019 For Ay 2009-10 For Which The Revised Ground Taken By The Revenue Is As Under:

For Appellant: Shri N. V. Balaji, AdvocateFor Respondent: Shri ARV. Sreenivasan, Addl. CIT
Section 11Section 143(3)Section 2(15)

charitable activity. Therefore, looking into the activities carried on by the assessee, we fully agree with the findings of the AO and this view of ours is squarely covered by the decision of the Tribunal in the case of Janalakshmi Social Services (33 SOT 197) (Bang.). The assessee relied on various judgments, which cannot be applied to the facts

ITO(EXCEMPTION) TRICHY, TRICHY vs. GRAMA VIDIYAL TRUST, TRICHY

In the result, both ITA No

ITA 1535/CHNY/2019[2011-12]Status: DisposedITAT Chennai24 Aug 2022AY 2011-12

Bench: Shri Veeravalli Durga Rao, Jm & Shri Girish Agrawalita Nos.1534 & 1535/Chny/2019 Assessment Years: 2009-10 & 2011-12 Income-Tax Officer, Grama Vidiyal Trust, (Exemptions), Trichy Vs. No. 44, Williams Road, Cantonment, Trichy-620001 (Pan: Aaatg2928F) (Appellant) (Respondent) Present For: Appellant By : Shri N. V. Balaji, Advocate Respondent By : Shri Arv. Sreenivasan, Addl. Cit Date Of Hearing : 31.05.2022 Date Of Pronouncement : 24.08.2022 O R D E R Per Girish Agrawal: Both These Appeals By Revenue Are Directed Against The Separate Orders Of Ld. Cit(A)-1, Trichy Vide Ita No. 156/2017-18/Cit(A)-1/Try Dated 04.03.2019 & 163/2017-18/Cit(A)-1/Try Dated 22.02.2019 Against The Separate Orders Of Ld. Ito, Exemptions Ward, Trichy, Passed U/S 143(3) R.W.S. 254 Of The Income-Tax Act,1961 (Hereinafter Referred To As The Act), Both Dated 30.12.2017 For Ays 2009-10 & 2011-12. 2. First We Take Up Ita No. 1534/Chny/2019 For Ay 2009-10 For Which The Revised Ground Taken By The Revenue Is As Under:

For Appellant: Shri N. V. Balaji, AdvocateFor Respondent: Shri ARV. Sreenivasan, Addl. CIT
Section 11Section 143(3)Section 2(15)

charitable activity. Therefore, looking into the activities carried on by the assessee, we fully agree with the findings of the AO and this view of ours is squarely covered by the decision of the Tribunal in the case of Janalakshmi Social Services (33 SOT 197) (Bang.). The assessee relied on various judgments, which cannot be applied to the facts

JAGATHESH,CHENNAI vs. AACIT, NCC-11(1), CHENNAI

In the result the appeal of the assessee in ITA No

ITA 1565/CHNY/2025[2017-18]Status: DisposedITAT Chennai30 Dec 2025AY 2017-18

Bench: Shri George George K & Shri S.R. Raghunathaआयकर अपील सं./Ita No.:1565/Chny/2025 ननिाजरण वर्ज / Assessment Year: 2017-18 Jagathesh, Acit, Flat 2A, Block V, Vs. Non- Corporate Circle - 11(1), Rani Meyammai Towers, Chennai. Mrc Nagar, Raja Annamalai Puram, Chennai – 600 028. [Pan:Aclpj-4702-H] (अपीलाथी/Appellant) (प्रत्यथी/Respondent) आयकर अपील सं./Ita No.:1566/Chny/2025 ननिाजरण वर्ज / Assessment Year: 2017-18 Jagathesh, Acit, Flat 2A, Block V, Vs. Non- Corporate Circle - 11(1), Rani Meyammai Towers, Chennai. Mrc Nagar, Raja Annamalai Puram, Chennai – 600 028. [Pan:Aclpj-4702-H] (अपीलाथी/Appellant) (प्रत्यथी/Respondent)

For Appellant: Shri. D. Anand, Advocate &For Respondent: Shri. ARV Sreenivasan, CIT
Section 115BSection 133ASection 147Section 148Section 148ASection 183Section 197Section 271ASection 69A

197(b) of the Finance Act, 2016 was of the view that income so reflected in the Form 1 was assessable in the assessment year (A.Y.) 2017-18. 5. Consequent to the same, the AO issued a notice u/s.148 of the Income Tax Act, 1961 (in short “the Act”). The said notice came to be issued on 23.04.2021. Pursuant

JAGATHESH,CHENNAI vs. ACIT, NCC-1(1), CHENNAI

In the result the appeal of the assessee in ITA No

ITA 1566/CHNY/2025[2017-18]Status: DisposedITAT Chennai30 Dec 2025AY 2017-18

Bench: Shri George George K & Shri S.R. Raghunathaआयकर अपील सं./Ita No.:1565/Chny/2025 ननिाजरण वर्ज / Assessment Year: 2017-18 Jagathesh, Acit, Flat 2A, Block V, Vs. Non- Corporate Circle - 11(1), Rani Meyammai Towers, Chennai. Mrc Nagar, Raja Annamalai Puram, Chennai – 600 028. [Pan:Aclpj-4702-H] (अपीलाथी/Appellant) (प्रत्यथी/Respondent) आयकर अपील सं./Ita No.:1566/Chny/2025 ननिाजरण वर्ज / Assessment Year: 2017-18 Jagathesh, Acit, Flat 2A, Block V, Vs. Non- Corporate Circle - 11(1), Rani Meyammai Towers, Chennai. Mrc Nagar, Raja Annamalai Puram, Chennai – 600 028. [Pan:Aclpj-4702-H] (अपीलाथी/Appellant) (प्रत्यथी/Respondent)

For Appellant: Shri. D. Anand, Advocate &For Respondent: Shri. ARV Sreenivasan, CIT
Section 115BSection 133ASection 147Section 148Section 148ASection 183Section 197Section 271ASection 69A

197(b) of the Finance Act, 2016 was of the view that income so reflected in the Form 1 was assessable in the assessment year (A.Y.) 2017-18. 5. Consequent to the same, the AO issued a notice u/s.148 of the Income Tax Act, 1961 (in short “the Act”). The said notice came to be issued on 23.04.2021. Pursuant

ITO, TRICHY vs. GRAMA VIDIYAL TRUST, TRICHY

In the result, appeal of Revenue in 345/2013 is partly allowed for

ITA 392/CHNY/2015[2011-12]Status: DisposedITAT Chennai30 Jun 2016AY 2011-12

Bench: Shri Chandra Poojari & Shri G.Pavan Kumar

For Respondent: 23-06-2016
Section 11Section 12ASection 2(15)Section 80G

section 11 of the Income tax Act. 5.1 Regarding the payment of `22,44,016 paid to the activists for social alternatives (ASA), the CIT(A) observed that the assessee Trust has donated this amount for doing charitable activities of the ASA Trust, which is having similar objectives such as lending microfinance self help groups / NGOs /Trusts I Societies

ACIT, TRICHY vs. GRAMA VIDIYAL TRUST, TRICHY

In the result, appeal of Revenue in 345/2013 is partly allowed for

ITA 345/CHNY/2013[2009-10]Status: DisposedITAT Chennai30 Jun 2016AY 2009-10

Bench: Shri Chandra Poojari & Shri G.Pavan Kumar

For Respondent: 23-06-2016
Section 11Section 12ASection 2(15)Section 80G

section 11 of the Income tax Act. 5.1 Regarding the payment of `22,44,016 paid to the activists for social alternatives (ASA), the CIT(A) observed that the assessee Trust has donated this amount for doing charitable activities of the ASA Trust, which is having similar objectives such as lending microfinance self help groups / NGOs /Trusts I Societies

ACIT, TRICHY vs. GRAMA VIDIYAL TRUST, TRICHY

In the result, appeal of Revenue in 345/2013 is partly allowed for

ITA 1437/CHNY/2014[2010-11]Status: DisposedITAT Chennai30 Jun 2016AY 2010-11

Bench: Shri Chandra Poojari & Shri G.Pavan Kumar

For Respondent: 23-06-2016
Section 11Section 12ASection 2(15)Section 80G

section 11 of the Income tax Act. 5.1 Regarding the payment of `22,44,016 paid to the activists for social alternatives (ASA), the CIT(A) observed that the assessee Trust has donated this amount for doing charitable activities of the ASA Trust, which is having similar objectives such as lending microfinance self help groups / NGOs /Trusts I Societies

DCIT (EXEMPTIONS), CHENNAI vs. GREAT LAKES INSTITUTE OF MANAGEMENT, CHENNAI

In the result, the appeal filed by the Revenue is dismissed

ITA 2879/CHNY/2017[2011-12]Status: DisposedITAT Chennai29 Oct 2018AY 2011-12

Bench: Shri Abraham P. George & Shri Duvvuru Rl Reddyआयकर अपील सं./I T.A. No. 2879/Chny/2017 िनधा"रण वष"/Assessment Year:2011-12 The Deputy Commissioner Of M/S. Great Lakes Institute Of Income Tax (Exemption), Chennai Vs. Management, No. 24, South Mada Circle, Aayakar Bhavan, Annexe Street, Srinagar Colony, Saidapet, Building, Iii Floor, 121, M.G. Road, Chennai 600 015. Nungambakkam, Chennai – 600 034. [Pan:Aaccg2885L] (अपीलाथ" /Appellant) (""थ"/Respondent) अपीलाथ" की ओर से / Appellant By : Shri Maruda Pandian, Addl. Cit ""थ" की ओर से/Respondent By : None सुनवाई की तारीख/ Date Of Hearing : 11.09.2018 घोषणा की तारीख /Date Of Pronouncement : 29.10.2018 आदेश /O R D E R Per Duvvuru Rl Reddy: This Appeal Filed By The Revenue Is Directed Against The Order Of The Commissioner Of Income Tax (Appeals) 17, Chennai Dated 14.09.2017 Relevant To The Assessment Year 2011-12. The Only Effective Ground Raised In The Appeal Of The Revenue Is That The Ld. Cit(A) Has Erred In Holding That The Assessee Is Eligible To Set Off Of Brought Forward Excess Application Of Funds To Subsequent Years.

For Appellant: Shri Maruda Pandian, Addl. CITFor Respondent: None
Section 11Section 12ASection 142(1)Section 143(2)Section 143(3)

1) of the Act was issued on 12.09.2013 calling for specific details. In response to the above notices, the assessee filed the details as called for. The Assessing Officer completed the assessment under section 143(3) of the Act determining the taxable income at NIL. The Assessing Officer further held that the assessee would not be eligible to carry forward

ASSISTANT COMMISSIONER OF INCOME TAX, CENTRAL CIRCLE-2, TRICHY, TRICHY vs. RAMASAMY NATARAJAN, TRICHY

In the result, both the appeals stand dismissed

ITA 2641/CHNY/2024[2015-16]Status: DisposedITAT Chennai22 Jan 2025AY 2015-16

Bench: Hon’Ble Shri Manoj Kumar Aggarwal, Am & Hon’Ble Shri Manu Kumar Giri, Jm 1. आयकरअपील सं./ Ita No.2641/Chny/2024 (िनधा9रणवष9 / Assessment Year: 2015-16) Acit Shri Ramasamy Natarajan बनाम Central Circle-2 # 255, Ganapathy Nagar South, / Vs. Trichy. T.V. Kovil Trichy-620005. "थायीलेखासं./ जीआइआरसं./Pan/Gir No. Aabpn-8486-E (अपीलाथ"/Appellant) : (" थ" / Respondent) & 2. आयकरअपील सं./ Ita No.2640/Chny/2024 (िनधा9रणवष9 / Assessment Year: 2016-17) Acit Shri Jayaraman Muthureddiar बनाम #14, Akila Gardens, 1St Street, Central Circle-2 Trichy. Ganapathy Nagar, T.V.Kovil / Vs. Trichy-620005. "थायीलेखासं./ जीआइआरसं./Pan/Gir No. Aadhj-0819-D (अपीलाथ"/Appellant) : (" थ" / Respondent) अपीलाथ" कीओर से/ Revenue By : Shri R. Clement Ramesh Kumar (Cit)-Ld. Dr " थ" की ओर से/ Assessee By : Shri Y. Sridhar (Fca) & Ms. Varshha Sridhar (Ca)-Ld. Ars सुनवाई की तारीख/Date Of Hearing : 02-01-2025 घोषणा की तारीख /Date Of Pronouncement : 22-01-2025 आदेश / O R D E R

For Appellant: Shri Y. Sridhar (FCA) & Ms. VarshhaFor Respondent: Shri R. Clement Ramesh Kumar (CIT)-Ld. DR
Section 131Section 132Section 143(3)Section 153CSection 69

1. The order of the learned Commissioner of Income Tax (Appeals) is erroneous on facts of the case and in law. 2. The Ld. CIT (A) erred in deleting the addition of Rs.5,17,84,840/- made towards undisclosed investment u/s.69 and Rs.1,08,00,000/- towards income from other sources, on the ground that the Assessing Officer (AO) lacked

ASSISTANT COMMISSIONER OF INCOME TAX, CENTRAL CIRCLE-2, TRICHY vs. JAYARAMAN MUTHUREDDIAR, TRICHY

In the result, both the appeals stand dismissed

ITA 2640/CHNY/2024[2016-17]Status: DisposedITAT Chennai22 Jan 2025AY 2016-17

Bench: Hon’Ble Shri Manoj Kumar Aggarwal, Am & Hon’Ble Shri Manu Kumar Giri, Jm 1. आयकरअपील सं./ Ita No.2641/Chny/2024 (िनधा9रणवष9 / Assessment Year: 2015-16) Acit Shri Ramasamy Natarajan बनाम Central Circle-2 # 255, Ganapathy Nagar South, / Vs. Trichy. T.V. Kovil Trichy-620005. "थायीलेखासं./ जीआइआरसं./Pan/Gir No. Aabpn-8486-E (अपीलाथ"/Appellant) : (" थ" / Respondent) & 2. आयकरअपील सं./ Ita No.2640/Chny/2024 (िनधा9रणवष9 / Assessment Year: 2016-17) Acit Shri Jayaraman Muthureddiar बनाम #14, Akila Gardens, 1St Street, Central Circle-2 Trichy. Ganapathy Nagar, T.V.Kovil / Vs. Trichy-620005. "थायीलेखासं./ जीआइआरसं./Pan/Gir No. Aadhj-0819-D (अपीलाथ"/Appellant) : (" थ" / Respondent) अपीलाथ" कीओर से/ Revenue By : Shri R. Clement Ramesh Kumar (Cit)-Ld. Dr " थ" की ओर से/ Assessee By : Shri Y. Sridhar (Fca) & Ms. Varshha Sridhar (Ca)-Ld. Ars सुनवाई की तारीख/Date Of Hearing : 02-01-2025 घोषणा की तारीख /Date Of Pronouncement : 22-01-2025 आदेश / O R D E R

For Appellant: Shri Y. Sridhar (FCA) & Ms. VarshhaFor Respondent: Shri R. Clement Ramesh Kumar (CIT)-Ld. DR
Section 131Section 132Section 143(3)Section 153CSection 69

1. The order of the learned Commissioner of Income Tax (Appeals) is erroneous on facts of the case and in law. 2. The Ld. CIT (A) erred in deleting the addition of Rs.5,17,84,840/- made towards undisclosed investment u/s.69 and Rs.1,08,00,000/- towards income from other sources, on the ground that the Assessing Officer (AO) lacked

AVVAI VILLAGE WELFARE SOCIETY,NAGAPATTINAM vs. ITO, TRICHY

In the result, the appeal filed by the Revenue is partly allowed for statistical purposes and the appeal filed by the assessee is partly allowed

ITA 9/CHNY/2017[2012-13]Status: DisposedITAT Chennai08 Oct 2018AY 2012-13

Bench: Shri Abraham P. George & Shri Duvvuru Rl Reddyआयकर अपील सं./I T.A. No. 09/Chny/2017 िनधा"रण वष"/Assessment Year:2012-13 M/S. Avvai Village Welfare Society, Vs. The Income Tax Officer, 260, Public Office Road, Velipalayam, Exemptions Ward, Nagapattinam – 611 001. Thiruchirapalli. [Pan: Aaata3067H] (अपीलाथ" /Appellant) (""थ"/Respondent) आयकर अपील सं./I T.A. No. 36/Chny/2017 िनधा"रण वष"/Assessment Year:2012-13 The Income Tax Officer, M/S. Avvai Village Welfare Society, Vs. Exemptions Ward, 260, Public Office Road, Velipalayam, Thiruchirapalli. Nagapattinam – 611 001. (अपीलाथ" /Appellant) (""थ"/Respondent) Shri S. Senthamarai Kannan, Advocate अपीलाथ" की ओर से / Assessee By : ""थ" की ओर से/ Department By : Mrs. Ruby George, Cit सुनवाई की तारीख/ Date Of Hearing : 16.08.2018 घोषणा की तारीख /Date Of Pronouncement : 08.10.2018 आदेश /O R D E R Per Duvvuru Rl Reddy: Both The Cross Appeals Filed By The Assessee As Well As Revenue Are Directed Against The Order Of The Ld. Commissioner Of Income Tax (Appeals) 2, Tiruchirappalli Dated 04.11.2016 Relevant To The Assessment Year 2012-13. The Assessee Has Raised Two Effective Grounds Viz., (I) The 2

For Respondent: Mrs. Ruby George, CIT
Section 11Section 12ASection 143(3)Section 2(15)

197 (Bang), the 3 I.T.A. No. 36/Chny/17 & I.T.A. No. 06/Chny/17 Assessing Officer denied exemption under section 11 of the Act and assessed the total income of the assessee at ₹.4,54,54,087/- after making various disallowances. 3. The assessee carried the matter in appeal before the ld. CIT(A). After considering the submissions of the assessee on various issues

ITO, TRICHY vs. AVVAI VILLAGE WELFARE SOCIETY, NAGAPATTINAM

In the result, the appeal filed by the Revenue is partly allowed for statistical purposes and the appeal filed by the assessee is partly allowed

ITA 36/CHNY/2017[2012-2013]Status: DisposedITAT Chennai08 Oct 2018AY 2012-2013

Bench: Shri Abraham P. George & Shri Duvvuru Rl Reddyआयकर अपील सं./I T.A. No. 09/Chny/2017 िनधा"रण वष"/Assessment Year:2012-13 M/S. Avvai Village Welfare Society, Vs. The Income Tax Officer, 260, Public Office Road, Velipalayam, Exemptions Ward, Nagapattinam – 611 001. Thiruchirapalli. [Pan: Aaata3067H] (अपीलाथ" /Appellant) (""थ"/Respondent) आयकर अपील सं./I T.A. No. 36/Chny/2017 िनधा"रण वष"/Assessment Year:2012-13 The Income Tax Officer, M/S. Avvai Village Welfare Society, Vs. Exemptions Ward, 260, Public Office Road, Velipalayam, Thiruchirapalli. Nagapattinam – 611 001. (अपीलाथ" /Appellant) (""थ"/Respondent) Shri S. Senthamarai Kannan, Advocate अपीलाथ" की ओर से / Assessee By : ""थ" की ओर से/ Department By : Mrs. Ruby George, Cit सुनवाई की तारीख/ Date Of Hearing : 16.08.2018 घोषणा की तारीख /Date Of Pronouncement : 08.10.2018 आदेश /O R D E R Per Duvvuru Rl Reddy: Both The Cross Appeals Filed By The Assessee As Well As Revenue Are Directed Against The Order Of The Ld. Commissioner Of Income Tax (Appeals) 2, Tiruchirappalli Dated 04.11.2016 Relevant To The Assessment Year 2012-13. The Assessee Has Raised Two Effective Grounds Viz., (I) The 2

For Respondent: Mrs. Ruby George, CIT
Section 11Section 12ASection 143(3)Section 2(15)

197 (Bang), the 3 I.T.A. No. 36/Chny/17 & I.T.A. No. 06/Chny/17 Assessing Officer denied exemption under section 11 of the Act and assessed the total income of the assessee at ₹.4,54,54,087/- after making various disallowances. 3. The assessee carried the matter in appeal before the ld. CIT(A). After considering the submissions of the assessee on various issues

ASSISTANT COMMISSIONER OF INCOME TAX, CENTRAL CIRCLE-2, TRICHY, TRICHY vs. RAMASAMY RAJASEHAR, PERAMBALUR

In the result, appeal filed by the Revenue is dismissed and the Cross-Objection filed by the assessee is partly allowed

ITA 3336/CHNY/2024[2014-15]Status: DisposedITAT Chennai20 Nov 2025AY 2014-15

Bench: Shri S.S. Viswanethra Ravi & Shri S. R. Raghunatha

For Appellant: Shri. D. Anand, AdvocateFor Respondent: Mr. Shiva Srinivas, C.I.T
Section 143(3)Section 69

Charitable and Educational Trust (DS Trust). A search and seizure operation u/s.132 of the Act was conducted in the case of the said trust on 15.02.2018. Consequent thereto, various related entities and key individuals, including the residential premises of the assessee, were also covered under the said search action. During the course of the search, certain documents and loose sheets

M/S. MAHASEMAM TRUST,MADURAI vs. ITO, MADURAI

In the result, the appeals filed by the assessee for both the assessment years are allowed

ITA 2920/CHNY/2016[2012-13]Status: DisposedITAT Chennai09 Aug 2017AY 2012-13

Bench: Shri N.R.S. Ganesan & Shri A. Mohan Alankamony

For Appellant: Shri A.V. Sreekanth, JCIT
Section 11Section 12ASection 13(2)(c)Section 13(8)Section 143(3)Section 250(6)

charitable activity. (vii) Though the assessee had made claim to have conducted medical camps, it is evident that such camps were conducted only by other trusts and the assessee has only acted as a facilitator. (viii) The classification of credits by the RBI as “priority sector advances” cannot be construed as “relief of the poor” as envisaged in the Income

M/S. MAHASEMAM TRUST,MADURAI vs. ITO, MADURAI

In the result, the appeals filed by the assessee for both the assessment years are allowed

ITA 2919/CHNY/2016[2011-12]Status: DisposedITAT Chennai09 Aug 2017AY 2011-12

Bench: Shri N.R.S. Ganesan & Shri A. Mohan Alankamony

For Appellant: Shri A.V. Sreekanth, JCIT
Section 11Section 12ASection 13(2)(c)Section 13(8)Section 143(3)Section 250(6)

charitable activity. (vii) Though the assessee had made claim to have conducted medical camps, it is evident that such camps were conducted only by other trusts and the assessee has only acted as a facilitator. (viii) The classification of credits by the RBI as “priority sector advances” cannot be construed as “relief of the poor” as envisaged in the Income