BharatTax.net
SearchITATHigh CourtsSupreme CourtPhrasesAI ResearchHistory

Filters

BharatTax.net

Free search engine for ITAT (Income Tax Appellate Tribunal) judgments across all 28 benches in India.

Quick Links

  • Search Judgments
  • Browse by Bench
  • Recent Judgments

About

BharatTax provides free access to Income Tax Appellate Tribunal orders for legal research and reference.

© 2026 BharatTax.net. All rights reserved.

15 results for “charitable trust”+ Section 196clear

Sorted by relevance

Karnataka428Delhi141Mumbai70Bangalore30Jaipur23Cuttack19Lucknow18Chandigarh16Calcutta16Chennai15Ahmedabad12Pune6Hyderabad6Surat5Visakhapatnam5Kolkata5Agra4Telangana4Amritsar3Jodhpur3Rajasthan2Indore2Rajkot2SC2Andhra Pradesh2Patna1Punjab & Haryana1Jabalpur1Nagpur1

Key Topics

Section 2(15)26Section 1119Section 143(3)11Addition to Income11Exemption10Charitable Trust9Section 153C6Section 250(6)5Section 12A5

ITO, CHENNAI vs. UNITED EDUCATIONAL FOUNDATION, CHENNAI

In the result appeals of the Revenue are dismissed

ITA 2890/CHNY/2014[2011-12]Status: DisposedITAT Chennai12 Apr 2017AY 2011-12

Bench: Shri A.Mohan Alankamony & Shri G. Pavan Kumarआयकर अपील सं./Ita No.2890/Mds/2014 िनधा"रण वष" / Assessment Year : 2011-12 The Income Tax Officer, V. M/S. United Educational (Exemptions)-Iv Foundation, Chennai Mac/Ich Building, Vhs Campus, Chennai – 600 113. Pan: Aaatu3411D (अपीलाथ"/Appellant) (""यथ"/Respondent) & आयकर अपील सं./Ita No.2885/Mds/2014 िनधा"रण वष" / Assessment Year : 2011-12 The Income Tax Officer, V. M/S. Mac Public Charitable Trust, (Exemptions)-Iv Mac/Ich Block 2, Chennai Vhs Campus, Adyar, Ttti Post, Taramani, Chennai – 600 113. Pan: Aaatm0484C (अपीलाथ"/Appellant) (""यथ"/Respondent) & आयकर अपील सं./Ita No.2887/Mds/2014 िनधा"रण वष" / Assessment Year : 2011-12 The Income Tax Officer, V. M/S. Mac Charities, (Exemptions)-Iv Mac/Ich Block 2, Chennai Vhs Campus, Adyar, Ttti Post, Taramani, Chennai – 600 113. Pan: Aaatm0483F (अपीलाथ"/Appellant) (""यथ"/Respondent)

For Appellant: Shri M.N. Maurya, CIT
Section 11Section 250(6)

Trust reported in 196 ITR 31 wherein it was held as follows: “A charitable purpose may be served in more than one way. One is to directly contribute money to another charitable organization, which advances that cause. In the absence of allegations of device and/or malafides, the amount contributed to other charitable 22 I.T.A. Nos.2885 – 2887,2889 & 2890/Mds/2014 institutions

Section 11A4
Deduction4
Section 40A(2)(a)3

ITO, CHENNAI vs. MAC CHARITIES, CHENNAI

In the result appeals of the Revenue are dismissed

ITA 2887/CHNY/2014[2011-12]Status: DisposedITAT Chennai12 Apr 2017AY 2011-12

Bench: Shri A.Mohan Alankamony & Shri G. Pavan Kumarआयकर अपील सं./Ita No.2890/Mds/2014 िनधा"रण वष" / Assessment Year : 2011-12 The Income Tax Officer, V. M/S. United Educational (Exemptions)-Iv Foundation, Chennai Mac/Ich Building, Vhs Campus, Chennai – 600 113. Pan: Aaatu3411D (अपीलाथ"/Appellant) (""यथ"/Respondent) & आयकर अपील सं./Ita No.2885/Mds/2014 िनधा"रण वष" / Assessment Year : 2011-12 The Income Tax Officer, V. M/S. Mac Public Charitable Trust, (Exemptions)-Iv Mac/Ich Block 2, Chennai Vhs Campus, Adyar, Ttti Post, Taramani, Chennai – 600 113. Pan: Aaatm0484C (अपीलाथ"/Appellant) (""यथ"/Respondent) & आयकर अपील सं./Ita No.2887/Mds/2014 िनधा"रण वष" / Assessment Year : 2011-12 The Income Tax Officer, V. M/S. Mac Charities, (Exemptions)-Iv Mac/Ich Block 2, Chennai Vhs Campus, Adyar, Ttti Post, Taramani, Chennai – 600 113. Pan: Aaatm0483F (अपीलाथ"/Appellant) (""यथ"/Respondent)

For Appellant: Shri M.N. Maurya, CIT
Section 11Section 250(6)

Trust reported in 196 ITR 31 wherein it was held as follows: “A charitable purpose may be served in more than one way. One is to directly contribute money to another charitable organization, which advances that cause. In the absence of allegations of device and/or malafides, the amount contributed to other charitable 22 I.T.A. Nos.2885 – 2887,2889 & 2890/Mds/2014 institutions

ITO, CHENNAI vs. MAC (EDUCATIONAL) FOUNDATION, CHENNAI

In the result appeals of the Revenue are dismissed

ITA 2886/CHNY/2014[2011-12]Status: DisposedITAT Chennai12 Apr 2017AY 2011-12

Bench: Shri A.Mohan Alankamony & Shri G. Pavan Kumarआयकर अपील सं./Ita No.2890/Mds/2014 िनधा"रण वष" / Assessment Year : 2011-12 The Income Tax Officer, V. M/S. United Educational (Exemptions)-Iv Foundation, Chennai Mac/Ich Building, Vhs Campus, Chennai – 600 113. Pan: Aaatu3411D (अपीलाथ"/Appellant) (""यथ"/Respondent) & आयकर अपील सं./Ita No.2885/Mds/2014 िनधा"रण वष" / Assessment Year : 2011-12 The Income Tax Officer, V. M/S. Mac Public Charitable Trust, (Exemptions)-Iv Mac/Ich Block 2, Chennai Vhs Campus, Adyar, Ttti Post, Taramani, Chennai – 600 113. Pan: Aaatm0484C (अपीलाथ"/Appellant) (""यथ"/Respondent) & आयकर अपील सं./Ita No.2887/Mds/2014 िनधा"रण वष" / Assessment Year : 2011-12 The Income Tax Officer, V. M/S. Mac Charities, (Exemptions)-Iv Mac/Ich Block 2, Chennai Vhs Campus, Adyar, Ttti Post, Taramani, Chennai – 600 113. Pan: Aaatm0483F (अपीलाथ"/Appellant) (""यथ"/Respondent)

For Appellant: Shri M.N. Maurya, CIT
Section 11Section 250(6)

Trust reported in 196 ITR 31 wherein it was held as follows: “A charitable purpose may be served in more than one way. One is to directly contribute money to another charitable organization, which advances that cause. In the absence of allegations of device and/or malafides, the amount contributed to other charitable 22 I.T.A. Nos.2885 – 2887,2889 & 2890/Mds/2014 institutions

ITO, CHENNAI vs. MAC PUBLIC CHARITABLE TRUST, CHENNAI

In the result appeals of the Revenue are dismissed

ITA 2885/CHNY/2014[2011-12]Status: DisposedITAT Chennai12 Apr 2017AY 2011-12

Bench: Shri A.Mohan Alankamony & Shri G. Pavan Kumarआयकर अपील सं./Ita No.2890/Mds/2014 िनधा"रण वष" / Assessment Year : 2011-12 The Income Tax Officer, V. M/S. United Educational (Exemptions)-Iv Foundation, Chennai Mac/Ich Building, Vhs Campus, Chennai – 600 113. Pan: Aaatu3411D (अपीलाथ"/Appellant) (""यथ"/Respondent) & आयकर अपील सं./Ita No.2885/Mds/2014 िनधा"रण वष" / Assessment Year : 2011-12 The Income Tax Officer, V. M/S. Mac Public Charitable Trust, (Exemptions)-Iv Mac/Ich Block 2, Chennai Vhs Campus, Adyar, Ttti Post, Taramani, Chennai – 600 113. Pan: Aaatm0484C (अपीलाथ"/Appellant) (""यथ"/Respondent) & आयकर अपील सं./Ita No.2887/Mds/2014 िनधा"रण वष" / Assessment Year : 2011-12 The Income Tax Officer, V. M/S. Mac Charities, (Exemptions)-Iv Mac/Ich Block 2, Chennai Vhs Campus, Adyar, Ttti Post, Taramani, Chennai – 600 113. Pan: Aaatm0483F (अपीलाथ"/Appellant) (""यथ"/Respondent)

For Appellant: Shri M.N. Maurya, CIT
Section 11Section 250(6)

Trust reported in 196 ITR 31 wherein it was held as follows: “A charitable purpose may be served in more than one way. One is to directly contribute money to another charitable organization, which advances that cause. In the absence of allegations of device and/or malafides, the amount contributed to other charitable 22 I.T.A. Nos.2885 – 2887,2889 & 2890/Mds/2014 institutions

ITO, CHENNAI vs. SRI VENKATESWARA EDUCATIONAL & HEALTH TRUST, CHENNAI

In the result appeals of the Revenue are dismissed

ITA 2889/CHNY/2014[2011-12]Status: DisposedITAT Chennai12 Apr 2017AY 2011-12

Bench: Shri A.Mohan Alankamony & Shri G. Pavan Kumarआयकर अपील सं./Ita No.2890/Mds/2014 िनधा"रण वष" / Assessment Year : 2011-12 The Income Tax Officer, V. M/S. United Educational (Exemptions)-Iv Foundation, Chennai Mac/Ich Building, Vhs Campus, Chennai – 600 113. Pan: Aaatu3411D (अपीलाथ"/Appellant) (""यथ"/Respondent) & आयकर अपील सं./Ita No.2885/Mds/2014 िनधा"रण वष" / Assessment Year : 2011-12 The Income Tax Officer, V. M/S. Mac Public Charitable Trust, (Exemptions)-Iv Mac/Ich Block 2, Chennai Vhs Campus, Adyar, Ttti Post, Taramani, Chennai – 600 113. Pan: Aaatm0484C (अपीलाथ"/Appellant) (""यथ"/Respondent) & आयकर अपील सं./Ita No.2887/Mds/2014 िनधा"रण वष" / Assessment Year : 2011-12 The Income Tax Officer, V. M/S. Mac Charities, (Exemptions)-Iv Mac/Ich Block 2, Chennai Vhs Campus, Adyar, Ttti Post, Taramani, Chennai – 600 113. Pan: Aaatm0483F (अपीलाथ"/Appellant) (""यथ"/Respondent)

For Appellant: Shri M.N. Maurya, CIT
Section 11Section 250(6)

Trust reported in 196 ITR 31 wherein it was held as follows: “A charitable purpose may be served in more than one way. One is to directly contribute money to another charitable organization, which advances that cause. In the absence of allegations of device and/or malafides, the amount contributed to other charitable 22 I.T.A. Nos.2885 – 2887,2889 & 2890/Mds/2014 institutions

ACIT NON CORP CIRCLE 2 , COIMBATORE vs. M.PALANISAMY, COIMBATORE

In the result, appeal filed by the assessee is allowed for statistical purposes

ITA 1514/CHNY/2017[2011-12]Status: DisposedITAT Chennai28 Feb 2022AY 2011-12

Bench: Shri V. Durga Rao & Shri G. Manjunatha

For Appellant: 04.01.2022For Respondent: Mr. S.Sridhar, Advocate
Section 40A(2)(a)

196/- from mining in leasehold lands. The assessee has worked out 75% of gross sales of revenue which works out to Rs.1,23,02,45,578/- and claimed as lease rent paid to the lessee Sree Vijayalakshmi Charitable Trust. During the course of assessment proceedings, the Assessing Officer noticed that the assessee has not considered various other expenses incurred

ACIT NON CORP CIRCLE 2 , COIMBATORE vs. M.PALANISAMY, COIMBATORE

In the result, appeal filed by the assessee is allowed for statistical purposes

ITA 1515/CHNY/2017[2012-13]Status: DisposedITAT Chennai28 Feb 2022AY 2012-13

Bench: Shri V. Durga Rao & Shri G. Manjunatha

For Appellant: 04.01.2022For Respondent: Mr. S.Sridhar, Advocate
Section 40A(2)(a)

196/- from mining in leasehold lands. The assessee has worked out 75% of gross sales of revenue which works out to Rs.1,23,02,45,578/- and claimed as lease rent paid to the lessee Sree Vijayalakshmi Charitable Trust. During the course of assessment proceedings, the Assessing Officer noticed that the assessee has not considered various other expenses incurred

M.PALANISAMY ,COIMBATORE vs. ACIT NON CORPORATE CIRCLE 2 , COIMBATORE

In the result, appeal filed by the assessee is allowed for statistical purposes

ITA 1642/CHNY/2017[2011-12]Status: DisposedITAT Chennai28 Feb 2022AY 2011-12

Bench: Shri V. Durga Rao & Shri G. Manjunatha

For Appellant: 04.01.2022For Respondent: Mr. S.Sridhar, Advocate
Section 40A(2)(a)

196/- from mining in leasehold lands. The assessee has worked out 75% of gross sales of revenue which works out to Rs.1,23,02,45,578/- and claimed as lease rent paid to the lessee Sree Vijayalakshmi Charitable Trust. During the course of assessment proceedings, the Assessing Officer noticed that the assessee has not considered various other expenses incurred

SAMYUKTA GOWDA SARASWATHA SABHA,CHENNAI vs. ITO WARD 4, CHENNAI

In the result, the appeals of the Assessee in ITA

ITA 2837/CHNY/2018[2014-15]Status: DisposedITAT Chennai09 Mar 2022AY 2014-15

Bench: Shri Mahavir Singh & Dr. M.L. Meenaआयकर अपील सं./Ita Nos.:2834, 2835, 2836 & 2837/Chny/2018 Assessment Years: 2010-11, 2012-13, 2013-14 & 2014-15

For Appellant: Mr. S. Sridhar, AdvocateFor Respondent: Mr. AR.V. Sreenivasan, Addl. CIT
Section 11Section 11ASection 12ASection 143(3)Section 2(15)

Section 2(15) of the Act and also the decision of the Co-ordinate Bench of the Tribunal in the case of DCIT (Exemptions) Vs. Chennai Kammavar Trust reported in 166 ITD 196 confirmed the action of the Assessing Officer for denying the claim of exemption u/s.11 of the Act. The CIT(A) also denied the claim of exemption

SAMYUKTA GOWDA SARASWATHA SABHA,CHENNAI vs. ITO WARD 4, CHENNAI

In the result, the appeals of the Assessee in ITA

ITA 2835/CHNY/2018[2012-13]Status: DisposedITAT Chennai09 Mar 2022AY 2012-13

Bench: Shri Mahavir Singh & Dr. M.L. Meenaआयकर अपील सं./Ita Nos.:2834, 2835, 2836 & 2837/Chny/2018 Assessment Years: 2010-11, 2012-13, 2013-14 & 2014-15

For Appellant: Mr. S. Sridhar, AdvocateFor Respondent: Mr. AR.V. Sreenivasan, Addl. CIT
Section 11Section 11ASection 12ASection 143(3)Section 2(15)

Section 2(15) of the Act and also the decision of the Co-ordinate Bench of the Tribunal in the case of DCIT (Exemptions) Vs. Chennai Kammavar Trust reported in 166 ITD 196 confirmed the action of the Assessing Officer for denying the claim of exemption u/s.11 of the Act. The CIT(A) also denied the claim of exemption

SAMYUKTA GOWDA SARASWATHA SABHA,CHENNAI vs. ITO WARD 4, CHENNAI

In the result, the appeals of the Assessee in ITA

ITA 2836/CHNY/2018[2013-14]Status: DisposedITAT Chennai09 Mar 2022AY 2013-14

Bench: Shri Mahavir Singh & Dr. M.L. Meenaआयकर अपील सं./Ita Nos.:2834, 2835, 2836 & 2837/Chny/2018 Assessment Years: 2010-11, 2012-13, 2013-14 & 2014-15

For Appellant: Mr. S. Sridhar, AdvocateFor Respondent: Mr. AR.V. Sreenivasan, Addl. CIT
Section 11Section 11ASection 12ASection 143(3)Section 2(15)

Section 2(15) of the Act and also the decision of the Co-ordinate Bench of the Tribunal in the case of DCIT (Exemptions) Vs. Chennai Kammavar Trust reported in 166 ITD 196 confirmed the action of the Assessing Officer for denying the claim of exemption u/s.11 of the Act. The CIT(A) also denied the claim of exemption

SAMYUKTA GOWDA SARASWATHA SABHA,CHENNAI vs. ITO WARD 4, CHENNAI

In the result, the appeals of the Assessee in ITA

ITA 2834/CHNY/2018[2010-11]Status: DisposedITAT Chennai09 Mar 2022AY 2010-11

Bench: Shri Mahavir Singh & Dr. M.L. Meenaआयकर अपील सं./Ita Nos.:2834, 2835, 2836 & 2837/Chny/2018 Assessment Years: 2010-11, 2012-13, 2013-14 & 2014-15

For Appellant: Mr. S. Sridhar, AdvocateFor Respondent: Mr. AR.V. Sreenivasan, Addl. CIT
Section 11Section 11ASection 12ASection 143(3)Section 2(15)

Section 2(15) of the Act and also the decision of the Co-ordinate Bench of the Tribunal in the case of DCIT (Exemptions) Vs. Chennai Kammavar Trust reported in 166 ITD 196 confirmed the action of the Assessing Officer for denying the claim of exemption u/s.11 of the Act. The CIT(A) also denied the claim of exemption

ASSISTANT COMMISSIONER OF INCOME TAX, CENTRAL CIRCLE-2, TRICHY vs. JAYARAMAN MUTHUREDDIAR, TRICHY

In the result, both the appeals stand dismissed

ITA 2640/CHNY/2024[2016-17]Status: DisposedITAT Chennai22 Jan 2025AY 2016-17

Bench: Hon’Ble Shri Manoj Kumar Aggarwal, Am & Hon’Ble Shri Manu Kumar Giri, Jm 1. आयकरअपील सं./ Ita No.2641/Chny/2024 (िनधा9रणवष9 / Assessment Year: 2015-16) Acit Shri Ramasamy Natarajan बनाम Central Circle-2 # 255, Ganapathy Nagar South, / Vs. Trichy. T.V. Kovil Trichy-620005. "थायीलेखासं./ जीआइआरसं./Pan/Gir No. Aabpn-8486-E (अपीलाथ"/Appellant) : (" थ" / Respondent) & 2. आयकरअपील सं./ Ita No.2640/Chny/2024 (िनधा9रणवष9 / Assessment Year: 2016-17) Acit Shri Jayaraman Muthureddiar बनाम #14, Akila Gardens, 1St Street, Central Circle-2 Trichy. Ganapathy Nagar, T.V.Kovil / Vs. Trichy-620005. "थायीलेखासं./ जीआइआरसं./Pan/Gir No. Aadhj-0819-D (अपीलाथ"/Appellant) : (" थ" / Respondent) अपीलाथ" कीओर से/ Revenue By : Shri R. Clement Ramesh Kumar (Cit)-Ld. Dr " थ" की ओर से/ Assessee By : Shri Y. Sridhar (Fca) & Ms. Varshha Sridhar (Ca)-Ld. Ars सुनवाई की तारीख/Date Of Hearing : 02-01-2025 घोषणा की तारीख /Date Of Pronouncement : 22-01-2025 आदेश / O R D E R

For Appellant: Shri Y. Sridhar (FCA) & Ms. VarshhaFor Respondent: Shri R. Clement Ramesh Kumar (CIT)-Ld. DR
Section 131Section 132Section 143(3)Section 153CSection 69

section 153C without considering the fact that the AO has properly recorded satisfaction basing on the documents viz., loose sheets containing financial transactions in the form of loan advanced by the assessee and interest received by him, was seized from the residence of Smt. R. Ezhilarasi in connection with the search in M/s. Dhanalakshmi Srinivasan Group

ASSISTANT COMMISSIONER OF INCOME TAX, CENTRAL CIRCLE-2, TRICHY, TRICHY vs. RAMASAMY NATARAJAN, TRICHY

In the result, both the appeals stand dismissed

ITA 2641/CHNY/2024[2015-16]Status: DisposedITAT Chennai22 Jan 2025AY 2015-16

Bench: Hon’Ble Shri Manoj Kumar Aggarwal, Am & Hon’Ble Shri Manu Kumar Giri, Jm 1. आयकरअपील सं./ Ita No.2641/Chny/2024 (िनधा9रणवष9 / Assessment Year: 2015-16) Acit Shri Ramasamy Natarajan बनाम Central Circle-2 # 255, Ganapathy Nagar South, / Vs. Trichy. T.V. Kovil Trichy-620005. "थायीलेखासं./ जीआइआरसं./Pan/Gir No. Aabpn-8486-E (अपीलाथ"/Appellant) : (" थ" / Respondent) & 2. आयकरअपील सं./ Ita No.2640/Chny/2024 (िनधा9रणवष9 / Assessment Year: 2016-17) Acit Shri Jayaraman Muthureddiar बनाम #14, Akila Gardens, 1St Street, Central Circle-2 Trichy. Ganapathy Nagar, T.V.Kovil / Vs. Trichy-620005. "थायीलेखासं./ जीआइआरसं./Pan/Gir No. Aadhj-0819-D (अपीलाथ"/Appellant) : (" थ" / Respondent) अपीलाथ" कीओर से/ Revenue By : Shri R. Clement Ramesh Kumar (Cit)-Ld. Dr " थ" की ओर से/ Assessee By : Shri Y. Sridhar (Fca) & Ms. Varshha Sridhar (Ca)-Ld. Ars सुनवाई की तारीख/Date Of Hearing : 02-01-2025 घोषणा की तारीख /Date Of Pronouncement : 22-01-2025 आदेश / O R D E R

For Appellant: Shri Y. Sridhar (FCA) & Ms. VarshhaFor Respondent: Shri R. Clement Ramesh Kumar (CIT)-Ld. DR
Section 131Section 132Section 143(3)Section 153CSection 69

section 153C without considering the fact that the AO has properly recorded satisfaction basing on the documents viz., loose sheets containing financial transactions in the form of loan advanced by the assessee and interest received by him, was seized from the residence of Smt. R. Ezhilarasi in connection with the search in M/s. Dhanalakshmi Srinivasan Group

INDIAN CONCRETE INSTITUTE,CHENNAI vs. ITO EXEMPTIONS WARD 4, CHENNAI

In the result, the appeal of the assessee is allowed for statistical

ITA 912/CHNY/2019[2016-17]Status: DisposedITAT Chennai10 Jan 2024AY 2016-17

Bench: Shri Manjunatha. G & Shri Manomohan Dasआयकर अपील सं./Ita No.912/Chny/2019 िनधा(रण वष( /Assessment Year: 2016-17 M/S. Indian Concrete Institute, The Income Tax Officer No.79/35, Ocean Crest, Vs. (Exemptions), 3Rd Main Road, Gandhi Nagar, Ward-4, Chennai. Adyar, Chennai – 600 020. [Pan: Aaati-0256-J] (अपीलाथ"/Appellant) (""यथ"/Respondent) अपीलाथ* की ओर से/ Appellant By : Shri K. Ravi, Advocate ,-थ* की ओर से /Respondent By : Shri P. Sajit Kumar, Jcit सुनवाई क" तारीख/Date Of Hearing : 10.01.2024 घोषणा क" तारीख /Date Of Pronouncement : 10.01.2024 आदेश / O R D E R

For Appellant: Shri K. Ravi, AdvocateFor Respondent: Shri P. Sajit Kumar, JCIT
Section 11Section 12ASection 13Section 142(1)Section 143(2)Section 143(3)Section 2(15)

196/- and tax payable at Rs. 85,68,306/-. 4. Being aggrieved, the assessee filed appeal before the ld. CIT(A). The ld. CIT(A) vide order dated 21-03-2019 dismissed the appeal of the assessee and confirmed the addition made by the ld. AO. 5. Being aggrieved, the assessee filed the present appeal before the Tribunal. 6. Heard