DCIT, CEN CIR 2(2), CHENNAI, CHENNAI vs. JAYAPRIYA COMPANY, CHENNAI

In the result, both the appeals of the Revenue are dismissed and

Bench: Shri Aby T. Varkey & Shri Amitabh Shukla

127 taxmann.com 813 (Gujarat), the Hon'ble Gujarat High Court held that once debts were written off in books, it was to be allowed without expecting the assessee to prove that debts had actually become bad or they were recoverable or recovered in subsequent years. Head note of the decision is reproduced below: “Section 36(1)(vii) of the Income

VYASA VIDYA MANDIRAM,COIMBATORE vs. CIT, EXEMPTIIONS,, CHENNAI

In the result, both the appeals of the assessee are allowed

2(c), (d), (f ), (i), (j) and (k) of its Trust Deed, as well as the\nactivities undertaken in pursuance of the same, as listed in the 'Note on\nits activities' (refer PB pgs. 8,9 and 10). In our considered view,\ntherefore, the appellant-trust qualifies to be a charitable trust as well.\nAccordingly, it is to be allowed

VYASA VIDYA MANDIRAM,COIMBATORE vs. CIT, EXEMPTIONS,, CHENNAI

In the result, both the appeals of the assessee are allowed

2(c), (d), (f ), (i), (j) and (k) of its Trust Deed, as well as the\nactivities undertaken in pursuance of the same, as listed in the 'Note on\nits activities' (refer PB pgs. 8,9 and 10). In our considered view,\ntherefore, the appellant-trust qualifies to be a charitable trust as well.\nAccordingly, it is to be allowed

AVM CHARITIES,CHENNAI vs. ITO, EXEMPTIONS WARD, CHENNAI

In the result, appeals filed by the assessee for AYs 2012-13 to 2014-15 are allowed and appeals filed by the assessee for AYs 2015-16 to 2018-19 are partly allowed

Bench: Shri V. Durga Rao, Hon’Ble & Shri Manjunatha. G, Hon’Ble

127 (SC) up to AY 2014-15, and thus, even if cost of ITA Nos.1632 to 1638/Chny/2023 :: 8 :: asset has been claimed as application of income, depreciation should be allowed for computing income from property held under Trust. 7. The Assessing Officer, after considering relevant submissions of the assessee and also taken note of factual findings noticed during the course

M/S. A V M CHARITIES,CHENNAI vs. ITO, EXEMPTIONS WARD-1, CHENNAI, CHENNAI

In the result, appeals filed by the assessee for AYs 2012-13 to 2014-15 are allowed and appeals filed by the assessee for AYs 2015-16 to 2018-19 are partly allowed

Bench: Shri V. Durga Rao, Hon’Ble & Shri Manjunatha. G, Hon’Ble

127 (SC) up to AY 2014-15, and thus, even if cost of ITA Nos.1632 to 1638/Chny/2023 :: 8 :: asset has been claimed as application of income, depreciation should be allowed for computing income from property held under Trust. 7. The Assessing Officer, after considering relevant submissions of the assessee and also taken note of factual findings noticed during the course

M/S AVM CHARITIES,CHENNAI vs. ITO, EXEMPTION WARD, CHENNAI

In the result, appeals filed by the assessee for AYs 2012-13 to 2014-15 are allowed and appeals filed by the assessee for AYs 2015-16 to 2018-19 are partly allowed

Bench: Shri V. Durga Rao, Hon’Ble & Shri Manjunatha. G, Hon’Ble

127 (SC) up to AY 2014-15, and thus, even if cost of ITA Nos.1632 to 1638/Chny/2023 :: 8 :: asset has been claimed as application of income, depreciation should be allowed for computing income from property held under Trust. 7. The Assessing Officer, after considering relevant submissions of the assessee and also taken note of factual findings noticed during the course

M/S AVM CHARITIES,CHENNAI vs. ITO, EXEMPTIONS WARD-1, CHENNAI

In the result, appeals filed by the assessee for AYs 2012-13 to 2014-15 are allowed and appeals filed by the assessee for AYs 2015-16 to 2018-19 are partly allowed

Bench: Shri V. Durga Rao, Hon’Ble & Shri Manjunatha. G, Hon’Ble

127 (SC) up to AY 2014-15, and thus, even if cost of ITA Nos.1632 to 1638/Chny/2023 :: 8 :: asset has been claimed as application of income, depreciation should be allowed for computing income from property held under Trust. 7. The Assessing Officer, after considering relevant submissions of the assessee and also taken note of factual findings noticed during the course

M/S AVM CHARITIES,CHENNAI vs. ITO,EXEMPTION WARD, CHENNAI

In the result, appeals filed by the assessee for AYs 2012-13 to 2014-15 are allowed and appeals filed by the assessee for AYs 2015-16 to 2018-19 are partly allowed

Bench: Shri V. Durga Rao, Hon’Ble & Shri Manjunatha. G, Hon’Ble

127 (SC) up to AY 2014-15, and thus, even if cost of ITA Nos.1632 to 1638/Chny/2023 :: 8 :: asset has been claimed as application of income, depreciation should be allowed for computing income from property held under Trust. 7. The Assessing Officer, after considering relevant submissions of the assessee and also taken note of factual findings noticed during the course

AVM CHARITIES,CHENNAI vs. ITO, EXEMPTION WARD, CHENNAI

In the result, appeals filed by the assessee for AYs 2012-13 to 2014-15 are allowed and appeals filed by the assessee for AYs 2015-16 to 2018-19 are partly allowed

Bench: Shri V. Durga Rao, Hon’Ble & Shri Manjunatha. G, Hon’Ble

127 (SC) up to AY 2014-15, and thus, even if cost of ITA Nos.1632 to 1638/Chny/2023 :: 8 :: asset has been claimed as application of income, depreciation should be allowed for computing income from property held under Trust. 7. The Assessing Officer, after considering relevant submissions of the assessee and also taken note of factual findings noticed during the course

M/S AVM CHARITIES ,CHENNAI vs. ITO,EXEMPTIONS WARD-1, CHENNAI

In the result, appeals filed by the assessee for AYs 2012-13 to 2014-15 are allowed and appeals filed by the assessee for AYs 2015-16 to 2018-19 are partly allowed

Bench: Shri V. Durga Rao, Hon’Ble & Shri Manjunatha. G, Hon’Ble

127 (SC) up to AY 2014-15, and thus, even if cost of ITA Nos.1632 to 1638/Chny/2023 :: 8 :: asset has been claimed as application of income, depreciation should be allowed for computing income from property held under Trust. 7. The Assessing Officer, after considering relevant submissions of the assessee and also taken note of factual findings noticed during the course

MEDICOS WELFARE TRUST,MADURAI vs. CIT, EXEMPTIONS,, CHENNAI

In the result, the appeal of the assessee is allowed

Bench: Shri Manu Kumar Giri & Shri S. S. R. Raghunathaआयकर अपील सं./Ita No.: 1068/Chny/2025 धनिाारण वर्ा / Assessment Year: - Medicos Welfare Trust, The Commissioner Of Income Plot No. 127, E B Colony Vs. Tax (Exemption), Iyer Bunglow, Chennai. Ma Reserve Lines S.O, Alathur, Madurai – 625 014. [Pan: Aahtm-1007-C] (अपीलाथी/Appellant) (प्रत्यथी/Respondent) अपीलाथी की ओर से/Appellant By : Shri. P.M. Kathir, Advocate & Shri. G. Akash, Advocate प्रत्यथी की ओर से/Respondent By : Shri. Bipin C.N, Cit.

127, E B Colony vs. Tax (Exemption), Iyer Bunglow, Chennai. Ma Reserve Lines S.O, Alathur, Madurai – 625 014. [PAN: AAHTM-1007-C] (अपीलाथी/Appellant) (प्रत्यथी/Respondent) अपीलाथी की ओर से/Appellant by : Shri. P.M. Kathir, Advocate & Shri. G. Akash, Advocate प्रत्यथी की ओर से/Respondent by : Shri. Bipin C.N, CIT. सुनवाई की तारीख/Date of Hearing : 24.07.2025 घोर्णा की तारीख

RURAL EDUCATION AND ACTION FOR LIBERATION,VILLUPURAM vs. ITO WARD 1, VILLUPURAM

In the result, the appeal filed by the assessee in ITA

Bench: Shri Inturi Rama Rao & Shri Duvvuru Rl Reddy] आयकर अपील सं./I.T.A. No.1246/Chny/2019. "नधा$रण वष$ /Assessment Year : 2010-11

2. Since, the identical facts and issues are involved in these appeals, we proceed to dispose the same vide this common order. 3. All the three appeals filed by the above assessees in the title have been filed with a delay of 1009 days. The two Assessees filed petitions for each appeal requesting for condoning the delay by stating that

ESSK EDUCATIONAL CHARITIES,VILLUPURAM vs. ITO WARD 1, VILLUPURAM

In the result, the appeal filed by the assessee in ITA

Bench: Shri Inturi Rama Rao & Shri Duvvuru Rl Reddy] आयकर अपील सं./I.T.A. No.1246/Chny/2019. "नधा$रण वष$ /Assessment Year : 2010-11

2. Since, the identical facts and issues are involved in these appeals, we proceed to dispose the same vide this common order. 3. All the three appeals filed by the above assessees in the title have been filed with a delay of 1009 days. The two Assessees filed petitions for each appeal requesting for condoning the delay by stating that

RURAL EDUCATION AND ACTION FOR LIBERATION,VILLUPURAM vs. ITO WARD 1, VILLUPURAM

In the result, the appeal filed by the assessee in ITA

Bench: Shri Inturi Rama Rao & Shri Duvvuru Rl Reddy] आयकर अपील सं./I.T.A. No.1246/Chny/2019. "नधा$रण वष$ /Assessment Year : 2010-11

2. Since, the identical facts and issues are involved in these appeals, we proceed to dispose the same vide this common order. 3. All the three appeals filed by the above assessees in the title have been filed with a delay of 1009 days. The two Assessees filed petitions for each appeal requesting for condoning the delay by stating that

M/S. SRI BALAJI EDUCATIONAL AND CHARITABLE PUBLIC TRUST,CHENNAI vs. ACIT, CENTRAL CIRCLE-3(4), CHENNAI

In the result, the appeal of the Assessee and that of the Department are dismissed

Bench: Shri Aby T Varkey & Shri S. R. Raghunathaआयकर अपील सं./Ita No.: 1249/Chny/2025 िनधा$रण वष$ / Assessment Year: 2017-18 M/S. Sri Balaji Educational & Acit, Charitable Public Trust, Vs. Central Circle 3(4), No. 60, First Avenue, Chennai. Jai Durga Complex, Ashok Nagar, Chennai – 600 083. Tamil Nadu. (&'थ"/Respondent) [Pan: Aacts-1386-D] (अपीलाथ"/Appellant) आयकर अपील सं./Ita Nos.:1471/Chny/2025 िनधा$रण वष$ / Assessment Year: 2017-18 Acit, M/S. Sri Balaji Educational & Central Circle 3(4), Vs. Charitable Public Trust, Chennai. No. 60, First Avenue, Jai Durga Complex, Ashok Nagar, Chennai – 600 083. Tamil Nadu. (अपीलाथ"/Appellant) [Pan: Aacts-1386-D] (&'थ"/Respondent) िनधा$)रती की ओर से/Assessee By : Shri. Y.Sridhar, Fca राज4 की ओर से /Revenue By : Ms. E. Pavuna Sundari, Cit सुनवाई की तारीख/Date Of Hearing : 08.09.2025 घोषणा की तारीख/Date Of Pronouncement : 01.12.2025

Charitable Trust engaged in providing education through the educational institutions run under its aegis in the streams of Medicine, Engineering, Arts, Science and Allied Disciplines. :-3-: ITA. No.:1249 &1471/Chny/2025 3. An action u/s.132 of the Act was undertaken in the case of an assessee on 24.06.2016 and the residential and office premises of the Chairman and Managing Trustee M.K.Rajagopalan

ACIT, CHENNAI vs. SRI BALAJI EDUCATIONAL AMD TRUST CHARITABLE PUBLIC TRUST , CHENNA

In the result, the appeal of the Assessee and that of the Department are dismissed

Bench: Shri Aby T Varkey & Shri S. R. Raghunathaआयकर अपील सं./Ita No.: 1249/Chny/2025 िनधा$रण वष$ / Assessment Year: 2017-18 M/S. Sri Balaji Educational & Acit, Charitable Public Trust, Vs. Central Circle 3(4), No. 60, First Avenue, Chennai. Jai Durga Complex, Ashok Nagar, Chennai – 600 083. Tamil Nadu. (&'थ"/Respondent) [Pan: Aacts-1386-D] (अपीलाथ"/Appellant) आयकर अपील सं./Ita Nos.:1471/Chny/2025 िनधा$रण वष$ / Assessment Year: 2017-18 Acit, M/S. Sri Balaji Educational & Central Circle 3(4), Vs. Charitable Public Trust, Chennai. No. 60, First Avenue, Jai Durga Complex, Ashok Nagar, Chennai – 600 083. Tamil Nadu. (अपीलाथ"/Appellant) [Pan: Aacts-1386-D] (&'थ"/Respondent) िनधा$)रती की ओर से/Assessee By : Shri. Y.Sridhar, Fca राज4 की ओर से /Revenue By : Ms. E. Pavuna Sundari, Cit सुनवाई की तारीख/Date Of Hearing : 08.09.2025 घोषणा की तारीख/Date Of Pronouncement : 01.12.2025

Charitable Trust engaged in providing education through the educational institutions run under its aegis in the streams of Medicine, Engineering, Arts, Science and Allied Disciplines. :-3-: ITA. No.:1249 &1471/Chny/2025 3. An action u/s.132 of the Act was undertaken in the case of an assessee on 24.06.2016 and the residential and office premises of the Chairman and Managing Trustee M.K.Rajagopalan

ASSISTANT COMMISSIONER OF INCOME TAX, CENTRAL CIRCLE-2, TRICHY, TRICHY vs. NEELARAJ VINOTH, PERAMBALUR

In the result, the appeal of the assessee is dismissed

Charitable and Educational Trust (where the\nassessee's father Shri Neelraj is the Chairman) and M/s DS group\nRs.35,00,000 and Rs.30,00,000 respectively, adding up to\nRs.65,00,000, which was amount transferred to Vinoth. Few more such\ninstances are given below:\nSI Who transferred Amount\nNo funds to vinoth transferred\n1 K MURALIDHARAN 6000000\nSource\nRECEIVED

HYUNDAI MOTOR INDIA LIMITED,KANCHEEPURAM vs. DCIT, CHENNAI

In the result, while CO of the assessee is dismissed, all the three appeals filed by the assessee are partly allowed in the terms indicated above, all the three appeals filed by the revenue are dis...

charitable purpose of the holding company in allowing the assessee company to use the existing popular brand? No business entity will enter into an agreement for charity with another entity. It is for certain hidden benefits, the holding company has made the assessee company use the brand name and logo in all the vehicles manufactured. Had it been for charity