BharatTax.net
SearchITATHigh CourtsSupreme CourtPhrasesAI ResearchHistory

Filters

BharatTax.net

Free search engine for ITAT (Income Tax Appellate Tribunal) judgments across all 28 benches in India.

Quick Links

  • Search Judgments
  • Browse by Bench
  • Recent Judgments

About

BharatTax provides free access to Income Tax Appellate Tribunal orders for legal research and reference.

© 2026 BharatTax.net. All rights reserved.

2 results for “charitable trust”+ Section 124(1)(ac)clear

Sorted by relevance

Karnataka362Hyderabad39Mumbai34Delhi33Calcutta16Pune13Bangalore10Chandigarh7Rajkot5Surat4Varanasi4Jaipur2Ahmedabad2Chennai2Raipur2Rajasthan2SC2Telangana2Indore1Kolkata1Agra1Andhra Pradesh1Dehradun1

Key Topics

Section 805Section 2(15)5Section 112

NEURO UPDATE CHENNAI,CHENNAI vs. ITO, EXEMPTION WARD-1, CHENNAI

In the result, the appeal of the assessee is allowed

ITA 1480/CHNY/2025[2016-17]Status: DisposedITAT Chennai30 Oct 2025AY 2016-17

Bench: Shri Aby T Varkey & Shri S.R.Raghunatha

For Appellant: Shri. G. Sitharaman, CA &For Respondent: Shri. R. Raghupathy, Addl. C.I.T
Section 11Section 12ASection 2(15)Section 250

124(1)(ac)(i) of the Act on the ground that our trust satisfies the condition stipulated in this section. 2. During the Assessment Year 2016-17, the Appellant conducted three major conferences in furtherance of its charitable

M/S. MAHINDRA RESIDENTIAL DEVELOPERS LTD.,,KANCHIPURAM vs. ITO, CORPORATE WARD - 4 (1),, CHENNAI

In the result, the appeals of the assessee for AYs 2012-13, 2013-14

ITA 338/CHNY/2020[2013-14]Status: DisposedITAT Chennai06 Sept 2024AY 2013-14

Bench: Shri Aby T. Varkey & Shri Jagadishआयकर अपील सं./Ita No.870/Chny/2017 िनधा"रणवष"/Assessment Year: 2012-13 & आयकर अपील सं./Ita Nos.338 & 339/Chny/2020 िनधा"रणवष"/Assessment Years: 2013-14 & 2014-15

For Appellant: Mr.Raghavan-For Respondent: Shri A. Sasikumar, CIT
Section 10ASection 143(2)Section 143(3)Section 80

124- 200 of the paper-book. The assessee thus urged that the deduction claimed u/s 80-IAB ought to be allowed. 9. Per contra, the Ld. CIT, DR appearing for the Revenue, has filed written submissions setting out extensive reasons as to why the orders of the lower authorities ought to be upheld. At the onset