BharatTax.net
SearchITATHigh CourtsSupreme CourtPhrasesAI ResearchHistory

Filters

BharatTax.net

Free search engine for ITAT (Income Tax Appellate Tribunal) judgments across all 28 benches in India.

Quick Links

  • Search Judgments
  • Browse by Bench
  • Recent Judgments

About

BharatTax provides free access to Income Tax Appellate Tribunal orders for legal research and reference.

© 2026 BharatTax.net. All rights reserved.

5 results for “capital gains”+ Section 80Mclear

Sorted by relevance

Mumbai66Delhi37Bangalore12Chandigarh8Kolkata5Chennai5Ahmedabad3Karnataka2Hyderabad2Pune2Raipur2SC2Jaipur1Surat1Orissa1Telangana1

Key Topics

Section 115J5Section 2634Disallowance4Addition to Income4Condonation of Delay4

M/S. TAMIL NADU INDUSTRIAL DEVELOPMENT CORPOR,CHENNAI vs. ACIT,, CHENNAI

In the result, the appeal of the assessee is partly allowed

ITA 1181/CHNY/2008[2003-04]Status: DisposedITAT Chennai28 Feb 2020AY 2003-04

Bench: Mahavir Singh & Shri M. Balaganeshआयकर अपील सं./I.T.A.No.1181/Chny/2008 ("नधा"रण वष" / Assessment Year: 2003-04) M/S. Tamilnadu Industrial Vs The Acit, Development Corporation Limited, Company Circle – Iii(1), 19-A, Rukmini Lakshmipathy Salai, Chennai – 34. Egmore, Chennai – 600 008. Pan: Aaact3409P (अपीलाथ"/Appellant) (""यथ"/Respondent) अपीलाथ" क" ओर से/ Appellant By : Shri R. Vijayaraghavan, Advocate ""यथ" क" ओर से/Respondent By : Shri Abani Kanta Nayak, Cit

For Appellant: Shri R. Vijayaraghavan, AdvocateFor Respondent: Shri Abani Kanta Nayak, CIT
Section 11Section 115JSection 263

Capital Gain - (-) Rs.1,73,74,551/- iv) Income from other sources - Rs.6,13,81,287/- Gross Total Income before set off Rs.1,46,76,023/- of Brought Forward loss The Ld.AO had adjusted the brought forward business loss of assessment year 1998-99 amounting to Rs.1,46,76,023/- against the aforesaid income. The Ld.CIT observed that brought forward business

ACIT, TRICHY vs. THE KARUR VYSYA BANK LTD., KARUR

In the result, I.T.A. Nos

ITA 1496/CHNY/2013[2003-04]Status: DisposedITAT Chennai27 Apr 2017AY 2003-04

Bench: Shri N.R.S. Ganesan & Shri Abraham P. Georgeआयकर अपील सं./Ita Nos.1340 & 1341/Mds/2013 "नधा"रण वष" / Assessment Years : 2003-04 & 2005-06

For Appellant: Shri N. Quadir Hoseyn, AdvocateFor Respondent: Shri S. Sankaralingam, CIT

capital expenditure, therefore, the Assessing Officer has rightly disallowed the claim of the assessee. 18. We have considered the rival submissions on either side and perused the relevant material available on record. The loss occurred due to non delivery of UTI Master gain 92 bond. The loss of sale of securities was allowed as business loss in the assessee

THE KARUR VYSYA BANK LTD.,KARUR vs. ADDL. CIT, TRICHY

In the result, I.T.A. Nos

ITA 1341/CHNY/2013[2005-06]Status: DisposedITAT Chennai27 Apr 2017AY 2005-06

Bench: Shri N.R.S. Ganesan & Shri Abraham P. Georgeआयकर अपील सं./Ita Nos.1340 & 1341/Mds/2013 "नधा"रण वष" / Assessment Years : 2003-04 & 2005-06

For Appellant: Shri N. Quadir Hoseyn, AdvocateFor Respondent: Shri S. Sankaralingam, CIT

capital expenditure, therefore, the Assessing Officer has rightly disallowed the claim of the assessee. 18. We have considered the rival submissions on either side and perused the relevant material available on record. The loss occurred due to non delivery of UTI Master gain 92 bond. The loss of sale of securities was allowed as business loss in the assessee

ACIT, TRICHY vs. THE KARUR VYSYA BANK LTD., KARUR

In the result, I.T.A. Nos

ITA 1527/CHNY/2013[2005-06]Status: DisposedITAT Chennai27 Apr 2017AY 2005-06

Bench: Shri N.R.S. Ganesan & Shri Abraham P. Georgeआयकर अपील सं./Ita Nos.1340 & 1341/Mds/2013 "नधा"रण वष" / Assessment Years : 2003-04 & 2005-06

For Appellant: Shri N. Quadir Hoseyn, AdvocateFor Respondent: Shri S. Sankaralingam, CIT

capital expenditure, therefore, the Assessing Officer has rightly disallowed the claim of the assessee. 18. We have considered the rival submissions on either side and perused the relevant material available on record. The loss occurred due to non delivery of UTI Master gain 92 bond. The loss of sale of securities was allowed as business loss in the assessee

THE KARUR VYSYA BANK LTD.,KARUR vs. ADDL. CIT, TRICHY

In the result, I.T.A. Nos

ITA 1340/CHNY/2013[2003-04]Status: DisposedITAT Chennai27 Apr 2017AY 2003-04

Bench: Shri N.R.S. Ganesan & Shri Abraham P. Georgeआयकर अपील सं./Ita Nos.1340 & 1341/Mds/2013 "नधा"रण वष" / Assessment Years : 2003-04 & 2005-06

For Appellant: Shri N. Quadir Hoseyn, AdvocateFor Respondent: Shri S. Sankaralingam, CIT

capital expenditure, therefore, the Assessing Officer has rightly disallowed the claim of the assessee. 18. We have considered the rival submissions on either side and perused the relevant material available on record. The loss occurred due to non delivery of UTI Master gain 92 bond. The loss of sale of securities was allowed as business loss in the assessee