BharatTax.net
SearchITATHigh CourtsSupreme CourtPhrasesAI ResearchHistory

Filters

BharatTax.net

Free search engine for ITAT (Income Tax Appellate Tribunal) judgments across all 28 benches in India.

Quick Links

  • Search Judgments
  • Browse by Bench
  • Recent Judgments

About

BharatTax provides free access to Income Tax Appellate Tribunal orders for legal research and reference.

© 2026 BharatTax.net. All rights reserved.

1 result for “capital gains”+ Section 801Bclear

Sorted by relevance

Mumbai97Delhi29Guwahati15Ahmedabad13Kolkata11Chandigarh10Bangalore7Indore5Jaipur4Hyderabad4Pune4Jodhpur3Lucknow1Chennai1

ITO, CHENNAI vs. PRAVIN KUMAR JAIN, CHENNAI

In the result, the appeal filed by the Revenue is allowed for statistical purposes

ITA 764/CHNY/2016[2008-09]Status: DisposedITAT Chennai23 Jun 2017AY 2008-09

Bench: Shri A. Mohan Alankamony & Shri Duvvuru Rl Reddyआयकर अपील सं./I T.A. No. 764/Mds/2016 "नधा"रण वष"/Assessment Year:2008-09 The Income Tax Officer, Shri Pravin Kumar Jain, Company Ward 5(1), Vs. No. 123, Mint Street, Sowcarpet, 121, Uthamar Gandhi Salai, Chennai 600 079. Chennai 600 034. [Pan:Aahpp9122B] (अपीलाथ" /Appellant) (""यथ"/Respondent) अपीलाथ" क" ओर से / Appellant By : Shri A.V. Sreekanth, Jcit ""यथ" क" ओर से/Respondent By : Shri A.S. Sriraman, Advocate सुनवाई क" तार"ख/ Date Of Hearing : 06.04.2017 घोषणा क" तार"ख /Date Of Pronouncement : 23.06.2017 आदेश /O R D E R Per Duvvuru Rl Reddy: This Appeal Filed By The Revenue Is Directed Against The Order Of The Commissioner Of Income Tax (Appeals) 3, Chennai Dated 18.01.2016 Relevant To The Assessment Year 2008-09. The Only Effective Ground Raised In The Appeal Of The Revenue Is That The Ld. Cit(A) Has Erred In Deleting The Long Term Capital Gain By Holding That The Joint Venture Agreement Did Not Result In Transfer Of Capital Asset In The Year Under Consideration.

For Appellant: Shri A.V. Sreekanth, JCITFor Respondent: Shri A.S. Sriraman, Advocate
Section 143(1)Section 143(3)Section 148Section 2(47)(v)

capital gain and to claim deduction under section 801B of the Act, the owners and the developers would have carried