ABHISHEK MEHTA,CHENNAI vs. ITO, CORPORATE CIRCLE-2(1), CHENNAI
In the result, the appeal filed by the assessee is allowed
ITA 1509/CHNY/2025[2018-19]Status: DisposedITAT Chennai31 Oct 2025AY 2018-19
Bench: Shri Aby T. Varkey & Shri Jagadishआयकर अपील सं./Ita No.1509/Chny/2025 िनधा9रण वष9 /Assessment Year: 2018-19 Abhishek Mehta, The Income Tax Officer, No.8, Suraj Kunj, Rutland Gate, Vs. Corporate Circle-3(1), 5Th Street, Nungambakkam, Chennai. Chennai – 600 006. [Pan: Adxpa 8566D]
For Appellant: Shri Hitesh, AdvocateFor Respondent: Shri Nishanth Rao, JCIT
Section 271BSection 44ASection 57
271B of the Act for failure to get the accounts audited as
required u/s. 44AB of the Act.
4. The assessee is an individual and filed his return of income
declaring income from salary, house property, share of profit/loss from
partnership firms, capital gains, and income from other sources
(interest income). The assessee has shown interest income of
Rs.1
