BharatTax.net
SearchITATHigh CourtsSupreme CourtPhrasesAI ResearchHistory

Filters

BharatTax.net

Free search engine for ITAT (Income Tax Appellate Tribunal) judgments across all 28 benches in India.

Quick Links

  • Search Judgments
  • Browse by Bench
  • Recent Judgments

About

BharatTax provides free access to Income Tax Appellate Tribunal orders for legal research and reference.

© 2026 BharatTax.net. All rights reserved.

6 results for “bogus purchases”+ Section 80Cclear

Sorted by relevance

Mumbai19Delhi14Jaipur9Varanasi6Chennai6Lucknow6Ahmedabad4Kolkata4Chandigarh2Bangalore1Cuttack1Hyderabad1

Key Topics

Section 14815Cash Deposit5Reopening of Assessment5Section 143(3)3

MITHU KUMARI RANKA,CHENNAI vs. ITO NON CORPORATE WARD 5(30, CHENNAI

In the result, five appeals vide ITA Nos

ITA 1970/CHNY/2018[2014-15]Status: DisposedITAT Chennai31 Mar 2022AY 2014-15

Bench: Shri Mahavir Singh, Hon’Ble & Shri Girish Agrawal, Hon’Ble“C” Bench

Section 10(38)Section 112Section 143(3)Section 234Section 68

Purchase contract through recognized stock exchange 5 ITA 1903-1904/CHNY/2019 A.Ys 2011-12 & 2013-14 Smt. Vandana Jain ITA 1905-1906/Chny/2019 A.Ys 2011-12 & 2013-14 Raj Kumar Jain ITA 1907/Chny/2019 A.Y. 2013-14 Raj Kumar Jain HUF & ITA 1970/Chny/2018 A.Y. 2014-15 Smt. Mithu Kumari Ranka vide contract note. The said uncontroverted evidences are overlooked

K.SURESH,CHENNAI vs. DCIT, CHENNAI

In the result, all the appeals of the assessee are dismissed

ITA 570/CHNY/2017[2010-11]Status: DisposedITAT Chennai19 Jun 2017AY 2010-11

Bench: Shri Chandra Poojari & Shri G. Pavan Kumar

For Appellant: Shri K. Ravi, AdvocateFor Respondent: Shri Supriyo Pal, JCIT
Section 148

bogus. Hence, proper investigation regarding these loans is necessary.” He submitted that Supreme Court did not find that these were sufficient reasons for reopening the assessment. With regard to the sentence ‘hence, proper investigation regarding these loans is necessary’, the Supreme Court observed that this - - 5 ITA 568 to 572/M/17 conclusion that there is a case for investigation

K.SURESH,CHENNAI vs. DCIT, CHENNAI

In the result, all the appeals of the assessee are dismissed

ITA 572/CHNY/2017[2012-13]Status: DisposedITAT Chennai19 Jun 2017AY 2012-13

Bench: Shri Chandra Poojari & Shri G. Pavan Kumar

For Appellant: Shri K. Ravi, AdvocateFor Respondent: Shri Supriyo Pal, JCIT
Section 148

bogus. Hence, proper investigation regarding these loans is necessary.” He submitted that Supreme Court did not find that these were sufficient reasons for reopening the assessment. With regard to the sentence ‘hence, proper investigation regarding these loans is necessary’, the Supreme Court observed that this - - 5 ITA 568 to 572/M/17 conclusion that there is a case for investigation

K.SURESH,CHENNAI vs. DCIT, CHENNAI

In the result, all the appeals of the assessee are dismissed

ITA 569/CHNY/2017[2009-10]Status: DisposedITAT Chennai19 Jun 2017AY 2009-10

Bench: Shri Chandra Poojari & Shri G. Pavan Kumar

For Appellant: Shri K. Ravi, AdvocateFor Respondent: Shri Supriyo Pal, JCIT
Section 148

bogus. Hence, proper investigation regarding these loans is necessary.” He submitted that Supreme Court did not find that these were sufficient reasons for reopening the assessment. With regard to the sentence ‘hence, proper investigation regarding these loans is necessary’, the Supreme Court observed that this - - 5 ITA 568 to 572/M/17 conclusion that there is a case for investigation

K.SURESH,CHENNAI vs. DCIT, CHENNAI

In the result, all the appeals of the assessee are dismissed

ITA 571/CHNY/2017[2011-12]Status: DisposedITAT Chennai19 Jun 2017AY 2011-12

Bench: Shri Chandra Poojari & Shri G. Pavan Kumar

For Appellant: Shri K. Ravi, AdvocateFor Respondent: Shri Supriyo Pal, JCIT
Section 148

bogus. Hence, proper investigation regarding these loans is necessary.” He submitted that Supreme Court did not find that these were sufficient reasons for reopening the assessment. With regard to the sentence ‘hence, proper investigation regarding these loans is necessary’, the Supreme Court observed that this - - 5 ITA 568 to 572/M/17 conclusion that there is a case for investigation

K.SURESH,CHENNAI vs. DCIT, CHENNAI

In the result, all the appeals of the assessee are dismissed

ITA 568/CHNY/2017[2008-09]Status: DisposedITAT Chennai19 Jun 2017AY 2008-09

Bench: Shri Chandra Poojari & Shri G. Pavan Kumar

For Appellant: Shri K. Ravi, AdvocateFor Respondent: Shri Supriyo Pal, JCIT
Section 148

bogus. Hence, proper investigation regarding these loans is necessary.” He submitted that Supreme Court did not find that these were sufficient reasons for reopening the assessment. With regard to the sentence ‘hence, proper investigation regarding these loans is necessary’, the Supreme Court observed that this - - 5 ITA 568 to 572/M/17 conclusion that there is a case for investigation