ARVIND NANDAGOPAL,CHENNAI vs. ACIT, CC-3(1),, CHENNAI

In the result, all appeals filed by the assessee are allowed

Bench: Shri Aby T. Varkey & Shri S.R.Raghunatha

56(2)(vii) alleging receipt of cash without consideration. He thus urged us that such whimsical action taken by the AO u/s 153C of the Act ought to be struck down. 22. We have heard both the parties and perused the relevant provisions of the Act. Before we advert to the legal issue raised by the assessee, it would first

ARVIND NANDAGOPAL,CHENNAI vs. ACIT, CC-3(1), CHENNAI

In the result, all appeals filed by the assessee are allowed

Bench: Shri Aby T. Varkey & Shri S.R.Raghunatha

56(2)(vii) alleging receipt of cash without consideration. He thus urged us that such whimsical action taken by the AO u/s 153C of the Act ought to be struck down. 22. We have heard both the parties and perused the relevant provisions of the Act. Before we advert to the legal issue raised by the assessee, it would first

ARVIND NANDAGOPAL,CHENNAI vs. ACIT, CC-3(1),, CHENNAI

In the result, all appeals filed by the assessee are allowed

56(2)(vii) alleging receipt of cash without consideration. He\nthus urged us that such whimsical action taken by the AO u/s 153C of the\nAct ought to be struck down.\n22. We have heard both the parties and perused the relevant provisions\nof the Act. Before we advert to the legal issue raised by the assessee, it\nwould first

DEPUTY COMMISSIONER OF INCOME TAX, CENTRAL CIRCLE - 1(3), CHENNAI vs. M. MAHADEVAN, CHENNAI

In the result, the appeals of the Revenue are decided as under:-\nITA Nos\nAssessment\nResult\nYear\nPartly allowed

bogus and fictitious\ntrail. The Ld AO also observed that the sale of fine dining division of\nOCPL to CCMPL included a significantly valued property at 71 cathedral\nroad in Chennai, which was again sold by OCPL to assessee's wife\nMs.Badrunissa at a much lower value. The Ld.AO concluded that the\nentire share transfer transaction was built to avoid

AADARSH SURANA, CHENNAI,CHENNAI vs. DEPUTY COMMISSIONER OF INCOME TAX, CORPORATE CIRCLE 1(1), CHENNAI, CHENNAI

vii) Kunrathur Project Site\n14,87,97,000\n(714 pt)\n(viii) Kunrathur Project Site\n11,00,39,000\n(713 pt)\n(C) Other Advances\n1091,000\n(i) Land Advance Nemeli\n91,000\nVillage\n(ii) Land Pazhanthandalam\n10,00,000\nAdv to Mohan.K\nCash and Cash Equivalents\n10,602\nCash in hand\n10,602\nTotal\n134

ACIT, NON-CORPORATE CIRCLE 7(1), CHENNAI, CHENNAI vs. LATE SHRI MAHAVEER BHANDARI, LEGAL HEIR- SMT. LALITHA BHANDARI, CHENNAI

Bench: Shri Manu Kumar Giri & Shri S.R. Raghunathaआयकर अपील सं./Ita No.: 2785/Chny/2024 िनधा"रण वष"/Assessment Year : 2016-17 The Asst. Commissioner Of Late Shri Mahaveer Bhandari, Income Tax, Rep. By Legal Heir Smt. Lalitha Non-Corporate Circle 7(1), Vs. Bhandari, Chennai. 9, Athipattan Street, Mount Road, Chennai – 600 002. Pan: Aadpb 877A (अपीलाथ"/Appellant) (""यथ"/Respondent) अपीलाथ" क" ओर से/Appellant By : Ms. Anitha, Addl.Cit ""यथ" क" ओर से/Respondent By : Shri Ajith Kumar Chordia, Ca (Through Virtual Mode) सुनवाई क" तारीख/Date Of Hearing : 18.07.2025 घोषणा क" तारीख/Date Of Pronouncement : 15.10.2025

section 56(vii) of the Income Tax Act under the head income from other sources. ITA. No:2785/Chny/2024 The appellant in his submissions stated that in exchange of transfer by way of sale of UPSPL shares to EMIL and pursuant to the share purchase agreement dated 24.02.2015, EMIL had approached their Board of Directors, shareholders, stock exchanges

ACIT NON CORP CIRCLE 1 (1) FORMERLY KNOWN AS BUSINESS CIRCLE 1, CHENNAI vs. M/S DEOLITE HASKINS & SELLS, CHENNAI

Bench: Shri Joginder Singh & Shri A.Mohan Alankamony

purchase basis' as well as on 'lease/rent basis', a reassessment notice issued after four years has been held not to suffer from any illegality as the same was based on the bona fide action of the competent authority to determine whether or not the vehicles in respect of which the petitioner had been claiming depreciation, were actually owned

ACIT NON CORP CIRCLE 1 (1) FORMERLY KNOWN AS BUSINESS CIRCLE 1, CHENNAI vs. M/S DEOLITE HASKINS & SELLS, CHENNAI

Bench: Shri Joginder Singh & Shri A.Mohan Alankamony

purchase basis' as well as on 'lease/rent basis', a reassessment notice issued after four years has been held not to suffer from any illegality as the same was based on the bona fide action of the competent authority to determine whether or not the vehicles in respect of which the petitioner had been claiming depreciation, were actually owned

ACIT NON CORP CIRCLE 1 (1) FORMERLY KNOWN AS BUSINESS CIRCLE 1, CHENNAI vs. M/S DEOLITE HASKINS & SELLS, CHENNAI

Bench: Shri Joginder Singh & Shri A.Mohan Alankamony

purchase basis' as well as on 'lease/rent basis', a reassessment notice issued after four years has been held not to suffer from any illegality as the same was based on the bona fide action of the competent authority to determine whether or not the vehicles in respect of which the petitioner had been claiming depreciation, were actually owned

M/S. STERLITE INDUSTRIES (INDIA) LTD.,MADURAI vs. ADDITIONAL CIT, CHENNAI

Bench: Shri N.R.S. Ganesan & Shri Abraham P. Georgeआयकर अपील सं./Ita Nos.318 & 319/Mds/2008 "नधा"रण वष" / Assessment Year : 2004-05 आयकर अपील सं./Ita No. 1020/Mds/2010 "नधा"रण वष" / Assessment Year : 2005-06 आयकर अपील सं./Ita No. 1665/Mds/2010 "नधा"रण वष" / Assessment Year : 2006-07

56. Now coming to disallowance of `1 Crore donated to Tsunami Relief Fund of Rajiv Gandhi Relief and National Welfare Trust. ITA No.1020,1665 & 1386/Mds/10 57. Shri M. Swaminathan, Ld. Sr. Standing Counsel for the Revenue, submitted that the payment made by the assessee to Tsunami Relief Fund is not for business purpose. Under Section

ACIT, CHENNAI vs. M/S. STERLITE INDUSTRIES (INDIA) LTD., TUTICORIN

Bench: Shri N.R.S. Ganesan & Shri Abraham P. Georgeआयकर अपील सं./Ita Nos.318 & 319/Mds/2008 "नधा"रण वष" / Assessment Year : 2004-05 आयकर अपील सं./Ita No. 1020/Mds/2010 "नधा"रण वष" / Assessment Year : 2005-06 आयकर अपील सं./Ita No. 1665/Mds/2010 "नधा"रण वष" / Assessment Year : 2006-07

56. Now coming to disallowance of `1 Crore donated to Tsunami Relief Fund of Rajiv Gandhi Relief and National Welfare Trust. ITA No.1020,1665 & 1386/Mds/10 57. Shri M. Swaminathan, Ld. Sr. Standing Counsel for the Revenue, submitted that the payment made by the assessee to Tsunami Relief Fund is not for business purpose. Under Section

ACIT, CHENNAI vs. M/S STERLITE INDUSTRIES (INDIA) LTD., CHENNAI

Bench: Shri N.R.S. Ganesan & Shri Abraham P. Georgeआयकर अपील सं./Ita Nos.318 & 319/Mds/2008 "नधा"रण वष" / Assessment Year : 2004-05 आयकर अपील सं./Ita No. 1020/Mds/2010 "नधा"रण वष" / Assessment Year : 2005-06 आयकर अपील सं./Ita No. 1665/Mds/2010 "नधा"रण वष" / Assessment Year : 2006-07

56. Now coming to disallowance of `1 Crore donated to Tsunami Relief Fund of Rajiv Gandhi Relief and National Welfare Trust. ITA No.1020,1665 & 1386/Mds/10 57. Shri M. Swaminathan, Ld. Sr. Standing Counsel for the Revenue, submitted that the payment made by the assessee to Tsunami Relief Fund is not for business purpose. Under Section

M/S STERLITE INDUSTRIES (INDIA) LTD.,TUTICORIN vs. DCIT, CHENNAI

Bench: Shri N.R.S. Ganesan & Shri Abraham P. Georgeआयकर अपील सं./Ita Nos.318 & 319/Mds/2008 "नधा"रण वष" / Assessment Year : 2004-05 आयकर अपील सं./Ita No. 1020/Mds/2010 "नधा"रण वष" / Assessment Year : 2005-06 आयकर अपील सं./Ita No. 1665/Mds/2010 "नधा"रण वष" / Assessment Year : 2006-07

56. Now coming to disallowance of `1 Crore donated to Tsunami Relief Fund of Rajiv Gandhi Relief and National Welfare Trust. ITA No.1020,1665 & 1386/Mds/10 57. Shri M. Swaminathan, Ld. Sr. Standing Counsel for the Revenue, submitted that the payment made by the assessee to Tsunami Relief Fund is not for business purpose. Under Section

ACIT, CHENNAI vs. M/S. STERLITE INDUSTRIES (INDIA) LTD., TUTICORIN

Bench: Shri N.R.S. Ganesan & Shri Abraham P. Georgeआयकर अपील सं./Ita Nos.318 & 319/Mds/2008 "नधा"रण वष" / Assessment Year : 2004-05 आयकर अपील सं./Ita No. 1020/Mds/2010 "नधा"रण वष" / Assessment Year : 2005-06 आयकर अपील सं./Ita No. 1665/Mds/2010 "नधा"रण वष" / Assessment Year : 2006-07

56. Now coming to disallowance of `1 Crore donated to Tsunami Relief Fund of Rajiv Gandhi Relief and National Welfare Trust. ITA No.1020,1665 & 1386/Mds/10 57. Shri M. Swaminathan, Ld. Sr. Standing Counsel for the Revenue, submitted that the payment made by the assessee to Tsunami Relief Fund is not for business purpose. Under Section

ACIT, CHENNAI vs. M/S STERLITE INDUSTRIES (INDIA) LTD., TUTICORIN

Bench: Shri N.R.S. Ganesan & Shri Abraham P. Georgeआयकर अपील सं./Ita Nos.318 & 319/Mds/2008 "नधा"रण वष" / Assessment Year : 2004-05 आयकर अपील सं./Ita No. 1020/Mds/2010 "नधा"रण वष" / Assessment Year : 2005-06 आयकर अपील सं./Ita No. 1665/Mds/2010 "नधा"रण वष" / Assessment Year : 2006-07

56. Now coming to disallowance of `1 Crore donated to Tsunami Relief Fund of Rajiv Gandhi Relief and National Welfare Trust. ITA No.1020,1665 & 1386/Mds/10 57. Shri M. Swaminathan, Ld. Sr. Standing Counsel for the Revenue, submitted that the payment made by the assessee to Tsunami Relief Fund is not for business purpose. Under Section

MASILAMANI NANDAGOPAL,CHENNAI vs. ACIT, CC-3(1), CHENNAI

In the result, appeals filed by the assessee(s) are allowed

purchases, is non-existent in the present case. In\nthe said case, there was a factual finding to the effect that the Assessees\nwere habitual offenders, indulging in clandestine operations whereas there\nis nothing in the present case, whatsoever, to suggest that any statement\nmade by Mr. Anu Aggarwal or Mr. Harjeet Singh contained any such\nadmission.\"\n(c) PCIT

ACIT CENTRAL CIRCLE, SALEM vs. THRIVENI EARTHMOVERS PVT. LTD., SALEM

In the result, the appeal filed by the Revenue in ITA

Bench: Shri Inturi Rama Rao & Shri Duvvuru Rl Reddy] आयकर अपील सं./I.T.A. Nos. 2280, 2281, 2282 & 2283/Chny/2018 "नधा"रण वष" /Assessment Years :2011-12, 2012-13, 2013-14 & 2014-15 The Assistant Commissioner Vs. M/S. Thriveni Earthmovers Pvt Ltd, Of Income Tax, 22/110, Greenways Road, Central Circle, Fairlands, Salem Salem 636 016. [Pan Aabct 6759R] (अपीलाथ"/Appellant) (""यथ"/Respondent)

vii) Community assisted programmes and events, sports activities (viii) Community welfare expenses and running old aged homes (ix) Providing plantation jobs for the tribal and unskilled people living in the vicinity of the mines area’’. It is submitted that assessee company is engaged in mining services at various mines located in Keonjihar Dist. Odisha State. The mines ITA Nos.2280-83 /2018

ACIT CENTRAL CIRCLE, SALEM vs. THRIVENI EARTHMOVERS PVT. LTD., SALEM

In the result, the appeal filed by the Revenue in ITA

Bench: Shri Inturi Rama Rao & Shri Duvvuru Rl Reddy] आयकर अपील सं./I.T.A. Nos. 2280, 2281, 2282 & 2283/Chny/2018 "नधा"रण वष" /Assessment Years :2011-12, 2012-13, 2013-14 & 2014-15 The Assistant Commissioner Vs. M/S. Thriveni Earthmovers Pvt Ltd, Of Income Tax, 22/110, Greenways Road, Central Circle, Fairlands, Salem Salem 636 016. [Pan Aabct 6759R] (अपीलाथ"/Appellant) (""यथ"/Respondent)

vii) Community assisted programmes and events, sports activities (viii) Community welfare expenses and running old aged homes (ix) Providing plantation jobs for the tribal and unskilled people living in the vicinity of the mines area’’. It is submitted that assessee company is engaged in mining services at various mines located in Keonjihar Dist. Odisha State. The mines ITA Nos.2280-83 /2018