Search: bogus purchases

5 results for “bogus purchases”+ Section 546clear

Sorted by relevance

Mumbai107 Karnataka99 Delhi80 Jaipur27 Kolkata27 Chandigarh20 Bangalore17 Visakhapatnam15 Surat10 Pune9 Indore7 Chennai5 Amritsar5 Hyderabad4 Ahmedabad3 Lucknow3 Rajkot2 Patna2 Raipur1 Varanasi1 Guwahati1

Key Topics

Section 153A6 Section 143(3)4 Section 684 Section 143(1)4 Section 1484 Section 1323 Section 1473 Addition to Income3 Disallowance2

SHEETAL V. BHAT,CHENNAI vs. ACIT, CHENNAI

In the result, the appeal filed by the assessee is allowed

ITA 272/CHNY/2017[2007-08]Status: DisposedITAT Chennai28 Jun 2017AY 2007-08

Bench: Shri N.R.S. Ganesan & Shri S. Jayaraman

For Appellant: Shri D. Anand, AdvocateFor Respondent: Shri AR.V. Sreenivasan, JCIT

Section 143(1)Section 147Section 148

546). Therefore, according to the Ld. counsel, the reopening of assessment is not justified. 3 I.T.A. No.272/Mds/17 3. On the contrary, Shri AR.V. Sreenivasan, the Ld. Departmental Representative, submitted that the return of income was admittedly processed under Section 143(1) of the Act. It is not a case that there was no material for opening assessment. According

SHEETAL V. BHAT,CHENNAI vs. ACIT, CHENNAI

DEPUTY COMMISSIONER OF INCOME TAX, CHENNAI vs. MOHANLAL JEWELLERS PRIVATE LIMITED, CHENNAI

SHEETAL V. BHAT,CHENNAI vs. ACIT, CHENNAI

DEPUTY COMMISSIONER OF INCOME TAX, CHENNAI vs. MOHANLAL JEWELLERS PRIVATE LIMITED, CHENNAI

AADARSH SURANA, CHENNAI,CHENNAI vs. DEPUTY COMMISSIONER OF INCOME TAX, CORPORATE CIRCLE 1(1), CHENNAI, CHENNAI

MOHANLAL JEWELLERS PVT. LTD.,CHENNAI vs. DCIT, CENTRAL CIRCLE-3(3), CHENNAI

DEPUTY COMMISSIONER OF INCOME TAX, CHENNAI vs. MOHANLAL JEWELLERS PRIVATE LIMITED, CHENNAI