D.RAMGOPAL,COIMBATORE vs. DCIT, CENTRAL CIRCLE-1(1), COIMBATORE
In the result the appeal of the assessee is allowed
ITA 583/CHNY/2022[2013-14]Status: DisposedITAT Chennai23 Oct 2024AY 2013-14
Bench: Shri Aby T Varkey, Hon’Ble & Shri S. R. Raghunatha, Hon’Bleआयकरअपीलसं./Ita No.: 583 /Chny/2022 िनधा"रणवष" / Assessment Year: 2013-14 Deputy Commissioner Of Income Shri. D. Ramagopal, V. Tax, 14-A, 10Th Street, Central Circle -1, Ganapathypudur, Coimbatore. Ganapathy, Coimbatore – 641 006. [Pan: Akgpr-3621-L] (अपीलाथ"/Appellant) (""यथ"/Respondent) आयकरअपीलसं./Ita No.: 584/Chny/2022 िनधा"रणवष" / Assessment Year: 2014-15 Principal Commissioner Of Shri. D. Ramagopal, V. Income Tax, 14-A, 10Th Street, Central Circle -2, Ganapathypudur, Chennai. Ganapathy, Coimbatore – 641 006. [Pan: Akgpr-3621-L] (अपीलाथ"/Appellant) (""यथ"/Respondent) अपीलाथ"क"ओरसे/Appellant By : Shri. G.V. Jhabakh, Advocate ""यथ"क"ओरसे/Respondent By : Shri. Nilay Baran Som, Cit सुनवाई क" तारीख/Date Of Hearing : 06.08.2024 घोषणा क" तारीख/Date Of Pronouncement : 23.10.2024 आदेश /O R D E R
For Appellant: Shri. G.V. Jhabakh, AdvocateFor Respondent: Shri. Nilay Baran Som, CIT
Section 132Section 153ASection 50C
bogus.
4. The assessee had sold the property at Coonoor and offered Capital Gain at Rs.85,069/- and later claiming a loss at Rs.6,644/- by filing a revised computation of capital gain. The expenses claimed for building renovation, cleaning was not allowed by the assessing officer. The written submissions along with documentary evidence in the paper book filed before