DCIT CC 2 2 , CHENNAI, CHENNAI vs. SOUTHERN AGRIFURANE INDUSTRIES PVT LTD, CHENNAI

In the result, both the both the appeals filed by the Revenue and the Revenue and the

Bench: Shri Aby T. Varkey & Shri Amitabh Shukla

iii)an entry or entries in the books of account, which has escaped assessment amounts to or is likely to amount which has escaped assessment amounts to or is likely to amount which has escaped assessment amounts to or is likely to amount to fifty lakh rupees or more: lakh rupees or more: Provided that no notice under section

DCIT CC 2 2 , CHENNAI, CHENNAI vs. SOUTHERN AGRIFURANE INDUSTRIES PVT LTD, CHENNAI

In the result, both the appeals filed by the Revenue and the\nassessee are dismissed

bogus purchases from\nvendors of old liquor bottles and transportation & logistics services.\nConsequently, the case of the assessee was reopened and notice(s) u/s\n148 of the Act dated 30-03-2023 was issued to the assessee for the\nrelevant AYs 2013-14 to 2016-17. The details of the return(s) of income\nfiled in response to notice

DCIT CC 2 2 , CHENNAI, CHENNAI vs. SOUTHERN AGRIFURANE INDUSTRIES PVT LTD, CHENNAI

In the result, both the appeals filed by the Revenue and the\nassessee are dismissed

bogus purchases from\nvendors of old liquor bottles and transportation & logistics services.\nConsequently, the case of the assessee was reopened and notice(s) u/s\n148 of the Act dated 30-03-2023 was issued to the assessee for the\nrelevant AYs 2013-14 to 2016-17. The details of the return(s) of income\nfiled in response to notice

SOUTHERN AGRIFURANE INDUSTRIES PVT. LTD.,CHENNAI vs. ACIT, CENTRAL CIRCLE-2(2),, CHENNAI

In the result, both the appeals filed by the Revenue and the\nassessee are dismissed

bogus purchases from\nvendors of old liquor bottles and transportation & logistics services.\nConsequently, the case of the assessee was reopened and notice(s) u/s\n148 of the Act dated 30-03-2023 was issued to the assessee for the\nrelevant AYs 2013-14 to 2016-17. The details of the return(s) of income\nfiled in response to notice

SOUTHERN AGRIFURANE INDUSTRIES PVT.. LTD.,CHENNAI vs. ACIT, CENTRAL CIRCLE-2(2), CHENNAI

In the result, both the appeals filed by the Revenue and the\nassessee are dismissed

bogus purchases from\nvendors of old liquor bottles and transportation & logistics services.\nConsequently, the case of the assessee was reopened and notice(s) u/s\n148 of the Act dated 30-03-2023 was issued to the assessee for the\nrelevant AYs 2013-14 to 2016-17. The details of the return(s) of income\nfiled in response to notice

DEPUTY COMMISSIONER OF INCOME TAX, CENTRAL CIRCLE 2 (2), CHENNAI, CHENNAI vs. SOUTHERN AGRIFURANE INDUSTRIES PVT LTD, CHENNAI

bogus purchases from\nvendors of old liquor bottles and transportation & logistics services.\nConsequently, the case of the assessee was reopened and notice(s) u/s\n148 of the Act dated 30-03-2023 was issued to the assessee for the\nrelevant AYs 2013-14 to 2016-17. The details of the return(s) of income\nfiled in response to notice

SOUTHERN AGRIFURANE INDUSTRIES PVT. LTD.,CHENNAI vs. ACIT, CENTRAL CIRCLE-2(2),, CHENNAI

bogus purchases from\nvendors of old liquor bottles and transportation & logistics services.\nConsequently, the case of the assessee was reopened and notice(s) u/s\n148 of the Act dated 30-03-2023 was issued to the assessee for the\nrelevant AYs 2013-14 to 2016-17. The details of the return(s) of income\nfiled in response to notice

DCIT CC 2 2 , CHENNAI, CHENNAI vs. SOUTHERN AGRIFURANE INDUSTRIES PVT LTD, CHENNAI

In the result, both the both the appeals filed by the Revenue and the Revenue and the

Bench: Shri Aby T. Varkey & Shri Amitabh Shukla

Section 153C of the Act fro analyzed the entire statutory framework of Section 153C of the Act fro analyzed the entire statutory framework of Section 153C of the Act from its introduction to the amendment by Finance Act, 2017 and its its introduction to the amendment by Finance Act, 2017 and its its introduction to the amendment by Finance

SOUTHERN AGRIFURANE INDUSTRIES PVT. LTD.,CHENNAI vs. ACIT, CENTRAL CIRCLE-2(2),, CHENNAI

In the result, both the both the appeals filed by the Revenue and the Revenue and the

Bench: Shri Aby T. Varkey & Shri Amitabh Shukla

Section 153C of the Act fro analyzed the entire statutory framework of Section 153C of the Act fro analyzed the entire statutory framework of Section 153C of the Act from its introduction to the amendment by Finance Act, 2017 and its its introduction to the amendment by Finance Act, 2017 and its its introduction to the amendment by Finance

SOUTHERN AGRIFURANE INDUSTRIES PVT. LTD.,CHENNAI vs. ACIT, CENTRAL CIRCLE-2(2), CHENNAI

In the result, both the appeals filed by the Revenue and the\nassessee are dismissed

36,677 1,29,61,697\n3\nAddition on a/c of unaccounted sale of\nscrap\nNA\n42,94,341 42,94,341\n4\nAddition on a/c of bogus CSR contribution\nΝΑ\n4,00,00,000\nNA\n3.\nIt is noted that the reasoning given by the AO for making the\naboveadditions/disallowances were verbatim same across all AYs. Hence,\nforthe sake

SOUTHERN AGRIFURANE INDUSTRIES PVT. LTD.,CHENNAI vs. ACIT, CENTRAL CIRCLE-2(2), CHENNAI

In the result, both the appeals filed by the Revenue and the\nassessee are dismissed

36,677 1,29,61,697\n3\nAddition on a/c of unaccounted sale of\nscrap\nNA\n42,94,341 42,94,341\n4\nAddition on a/c of bogus CSR contribution\nΝΑ\n4,00,00,000\nNA\n3.\nIt is noted that the reasoning given by the AO for making the\naboveadditions/disallowances were verbatim same across all AYs. Hence,\nforthe sake

DEPUTY COMMISSIONER OF INCOME TAX, CENTRAL CIRCLE 2(2), CHENNAI, CHENNAI vs. SOUTHERN AGRIFURANE INDUSTRIES PRIVATE LIMITED, CHENNAI

In the result, both the appeals filed by the Revenue and the\nassessee are dismissed

36,677\n1,29,61,697\n3\nAddition on a/c of unaccounted sale of\nscrap\nNA\n42,94,341\n42,94,341\n4\nAddition on a/c of bogus CSR contribution\nΝΑ\n4,00,00,000\nNA\n3.\nIt is noted that the reasoning given by the AO for making the\naboveadditions/disallowances were verbatim same across all AYs. Hence,\nforthe sake

SOUTHERN AGRIFURANE INDUSTRIES PVT. LTD.,CHENNAI vs. ACIT, CENTRAL CIRCLE-2(2), CHENNAI

In the result, both the appeals filed by the Revenue and the\nassessee are dismissed

36,677\n1,29,61,697\n3\nAddition on a/c of unaccounted sale of\nscrap\nNA\n42,94,341\n42,94,341\n4\nAddition on a/c of bogus CSR contribution\nNA\n4,00,00,000\nNA\n3. It is noted that the reasoning given by the AO for making the\naboveadditions/disallowances were verbatim same across all AYs. Hence,\nforthe sake

DEPUTY COMMISSIONER OF INCOME TAX, CENTRAL CIRCLE 2(2), CHENNAI, CHENNAI vs. SOUTHERN AGRIFURANE INDUSTRIES PRIVATE LIMITED, CHENNAI

In the result, both the appeals filed by the Revenue and the\nassessee are dismissed

36,677\n1,29,61,697\n3\nAddition on a/c of unaccounted sale of\nscrap\nNA\n42,94,341\n42,94,341\n4\nAddition on a/c of bogus CSR contribution\nΝΑ\n4,00,00,000\nNA\n\n3. It is noted that the reasoning given by the AO for making the\naboveadditions/disallowances were verbatim same across all AYs. Hence,\nforthe

SOUTHERN AGRIFURANE INDUSTRIES PVT. LTD.,CHENNAI vs. ACIT, CENTRAL CIRCLE-2(2),, CHENNAI

In the result, both the appeals filed by the Revenue and the\nassessee are dismissed

36 ::\nITA Nos.1254, 1255, 1258, 1260/Chny/2025 &\nITA Nos.1233, 1235, 1237, 1238/Chny/2025\n(AYs 2014-15 to 2017-18)\nM/s. Southern Agrifurane Industries Pvt. Ltd.\n'asset' had escaped assessment qua AYs 2014-15 & 2015-16 and\ntherefore we are in agreement with the Ld. CIT(A) that, the 'jurisdictional\nfact' as prescribed under the fourth proviso to Section 153A

DCIT CC 2 2 , CHENNAI, CHENNAI vs. SOUTHERN AGRIFURANE INDUSTRIES PVT LTD, CHENNAI

In the result, both the appeals filed by the Revenue and the\nassessee are dismissed

36 ::\nITA Nos.1254, 1255, 1258, 1260/Chny/2025 &\nITA Nos.1233, 1235, 1237, 1238/Chny/2025\n(AYs 2014-15 to 2017-18)\nM/s. Southern Agrifurane Industries Pvt. Ltd.\n'asset' had escaped assessment qua AYs 2014-15 & 2015-16 and\ntherefore we are in agreement with the Ld. CIT(A) that, the 'jurisdictional\nfact' as prescribed under the fourth proviso to Section 153A

DCIT, CENTRAL CIRCLE 2(2), CHENNAI vs. N RAMASAMY, CHENNAI

In the result, the appeal filed by the Revenue in ITA No

Bench: Shri Mahavir Singh & Shri Manjunatha.Gआयकर अपील सं./I.T.A Nos.127 & 128/Chny/2019 िनधा"रण वष" /Assessment Years : 2015-2016 & 2016-2017 The Deputy Commissioner Of Vs. Shri. N. Ramasamy, Income Tax, No.14/19, Saraswathi Street, Central Circle 2(2), Mahaingapuram, Nungambakkam High Road, Chennai 600 034. Chennai 600 034. [Pan Adupr 8003P] (अपीलाथ"/Appellant) (""यथ"/Respondent) अपीलाथ" क" ओर से/ Appellant By : Shri. Nilay Baran Som, Irs, Cit. ""यथ" क" ओर से /Respondent By : Shri. S. Sridhar, Advocate सुनवाई क" तारीख/Date Of Hearing : 18.12.2023. घोषणा क" तारीख /Date Of Pronouncement : 29.12.2023 आदेश / O R D E R Per Mahavir Singh:

bogus. Under such circumstances, when the search proceedings have not revealed anything contrary or adverse with regard to the genuineness of the expenses, the addition made of Rs.3.36 Crores and 1.07 Crores are incorrect and therefore directed to be deleted. Accordingly, the corresponding Grounds of appeal are allowed’’. Aggrieved, now the Revenue is in appeal before us. We have heard

DCIT, CENTRAL CIRCLE 2(2), CHENNAI vs. N RAMASAMY, CHENNAI

In the result, the appeal filed by the Revenue in ITA No

Bench: Shri Mahavir Singh & Shri Manjunatha.Gआयकर अपील सं./I.T.A Nos.127 & 128/Chny/2019 िनधा"रण वष" /Assessment Years : 2015-2016 & 2016-2017 The Deputy Commissioner Of Vs. Shri. N. Ramasamy, Income Tax, No.14/19, Saraswathi Street, Central Circle 2(2), Mahaingapuram, Nungambakkam High Road, Chennai 600 034. Chennai 600 034. [Pan Adupr 8003P] (अपीलाथ"/Appellant) (""यथ"/Respondent) अपीलाथ" क" ओर से/ Appellant By : Shri. Nilay Baran Som, Irs, Cit. ""यथ" क" ओर से /Respondent By : Shri. S. Sridhar, Advocate सुनवाई क" तारीख/Date Of Hearing : 18.12.2023. घोषणा क" तारीख /Date Of Pronouncement : 29.12.2023 आदेश / O R D E R Per Mahavir Singh:

bogus. Under such circumstances, when the search proceedings have not revealed anything contrary or adverse with regard to the genuineness of the expenses, the addition made of Rs.3.36 Crores and 1.07 Crores are incorrect and therefore directed to be deleted. Accordingly, the corresponding Grounds of appeal are allowed’’. Aggrieved, now the Revenue is in appeal before us. We have heard