SOUTHERN AGRIFURANE INDUSTRIES PVT. LTD.,CHENNAI vs. ACIT, CENTRAL CIRCLE-2(2),, CHENNAI

In the result, both the both the appeals filed by the Revenue and the Revenue and the

Bench: Shri Aby T. Varkey & Shri Amitabh Shukla

Section 153C of the Act fro analyzed the entire statutory framework of Section 153C of the Act fro analyzed the entire statutory framework of Section 153C of the Act from its introduction to the amendment by Finance Act, 2017 and its its introduction to the amendment by Finance Act, 2017 and its its introduction to the amendment by Finance

DCIT CC 2 2 , CHENNAI, CHENNAI vs. SOUTHERN AGRIFURANE INDUSTRIES PVT LTD, CHENNAI

In the result, both the both the appeals filed by the Revenue and the Revenue and the

Bench: Shri Aby T. Varkey & Shri Amitabh Shukla

Section 153C of the Act fro analyzed the entire statutory framework of Section 153C of the Act fro analyzed the entire statutory framework of Section 153C of the Act from its introduction to the amendment by Finance Act, 2017 and its its introduction to the amendment by Finance Act, 2017 and its its introduction to the amendment by Finance

SOUTHERN AGRIFURANE INDUSTRIES PVT. LTD.,CHENNAI vs. ACIT, CENTRAL CIRCLE-2(2),, CHENNAI

In the result, both the appeals filed by the Revenue and the\nassessee are dismissed

154 taxmann.com 144 (Bombay) wherein\nthe Hon'ble high Court held that “A plain reading of section 153A(1)(b)\nshows that Commissioner having jurisdiction under the said section is\nempowered to assess or reassess the total income of six years\nimmediately preceding the assessment year relevant to the previous\nyear in which the search was conducted

DCIT CC 2 2 , CHENNAI, CHENNAI vs. SOUTHERN AGRIFURANE INDUSTRIES PVT LTD, CHENNAI

In the result, both the appeals filed by the Revenue and the\nassessee are dismissed

154 taxmann.com 144 (Bombay) wherein\nthe Hon'ble high Court held that “A plain reading of section 153A(1)(b)\nshows that Commissioner having jurisdiction under the said section is\nempowered to assess or reassess the total income of six years\nimmediately preceding the assessment year relevant to the previous\nyear in which the search was conducted

SOUTHERN AGRIFURANE INDUSTRIES PVT. LTD.,CHENNAI vs. ACIT, CENTRAL CIRCLE-2(2),, CHENNAI

In the result, both the appeals filed by the Revenue and the\nassessee are dismissed

154 taxmann.com 144 (Bombay) wherein\nthe Hon'ble high Court held that “A plain reading of section 153A(1)(b)\nshows that Commissioner having jurisdiction under the said section is\nempowered to assess or reassess the total income of six years\nimmediately preceding the assessment year relevant to the previous\nyear in which the search was conducted

SOUTHERN AGRIFURANE INDUSTRIES PVT. LTD.,CHENNAI vs. ACIT, CENTRAL CIRCLE-2(2),, CHENNAI

In the result, both the appeals filed by the Revenue and the\nassessee are dismissed

154 taxmann.com 144 (Bombay) wherein\nthe Hon'ble high Court held that “A plain reading of section 153A(1)(b)\nshows that Commissioner having jurisdiction under the said section is\nempowered to assess or reassess the total income of six years\nimmediately preceding the assessment year relevant to the previous\nyear in which the search was conducted

RESPLENDA EXPRESSIONS PVT. LTD.,CHENNAI vs. ITO CORPORATE WARD 5(4), CHENNAI

In the result, all the appeals filed by the assessee are allowed for statistical purposes

Bench: Shri N.R.S. Ganesan & Shri S. Jayaramanआयकर अपील सं./Ita Nos.2935, 2936 & 2937/Chny/2017 "नधा"रण वष" /Assessment Years : 2008-09, 2008-09 & 2009-10

Section 154 of the Act. 3. Sh. T. Banusekar, the Ld. representative for the assessee, submitted that on the issues arise for consideration in I.T.A. No.2935/Chny/2017, the first issue is regarding reopening of assessment and the second issue is with regard to addition of ₹40,66,090/- as bogus purchases

RESPLENDA EXPRESSIONS PVT. LTD.,CHENNAI vs. ITO CORPORATE WARD 5(4), CHENNAI

In the result, all the appeals filed by the assessee are allowed for statistical purposes

Bench: Shri N.R.S. Ganesan & Shri S. Jayaramanआयकर अपील सं./Ita Nos.2935, 2936 & 2937/Chny/2017 "नधा"रण वष" /Assessment Years : 2008-09, 2008-09 & 2009-10

Section 154 of the Act. 3. Sh. T. Banusekar, the Ld. representative for the assessee, submitted that on the issues arise for consideration in I.T.A. No.2935/Chny/2017, the first issue is regarding reopening of assessment and the second issue is with regard to addition of ₹40,66,090/- as bogus purchases

RESPLENDA EXPRESSIONS PVT. LTD.,CHENNAI vs. ITO CORPORATE WARD 5(4), CHENNAI

In the result, all the appeals filed by the assessee are allowed for statistical purposes

Bench: Shri N.R.S. Ganesan & Shri S. Jayaramanआयकर अपील सं./Ita Nos.2935, 2936 & 2937/Chny/2017 "नधा"रण वष" /Assessment Years : 2008-09, 2008-09 & 2009-10

Section 154 of the Act. 3. Sh. T. Banusekar, the Ld. representative for the assessee, submitted that on the issues arise for consideration in I.T.A. No.2935/Chny/2017, the first issue is regarding reopening of assessment and the second issue is with regard to addition of ₹40,66,090/- as bogus purchases

SOUTHERN AGRIFURANE INDUSTRIES PVT. LTD.,CHENNAI vs. ACIT, CENTRAL CIRCLE-2(2),, CHENNAI

In the result, both the both the appeals filed by the Revenue and the Revenue and the

Bench: Shri Aby T. Varkey & Shri Amitabh Shukla

Section 153A(1)(b) states that the assessing officer shall assess or Section 153A(1)(b) states that the assessing officer shall assess or Section 153A(1)(b) states that the assessing officer shall assess or reassess the total income of six years immediately preceding the reassess the total income of six years immediately preceding the reassess the total income

DCIT CC 2 2 , CHENNAI, CHENNAI vs. SOUTHERN AGRIFURANE INDUSTRIES PVT LTD, CHENNAI

In the result, both the both the appeals filed by the Revenue and the Revenue and the

Bench: Shri Aby T. Varkey & Shri Amitabh Shukla

Section 153A(1)(b) states that the assessing officer shall assess or Section 153A(1)(b) states that the assessing officer shall assess or Section 153A(1)(b) states that the assessing officer shall assess or reassess the total income of six years immediately preceding the reassess the total income of six years immediately preceding the reassess the total income

DCIT, CENTRAL CIRCLE-2.4, CHENNAI vs. SHRI P. RAMA MOHAN RAO, CHENNAI

Accordingly, cross- objections for AYs 2015-16 and 2016-17 stands dismissed

Bench: Hon’Ble Shri V. Durga Rao, Jmand Hon’Ble Shri Manoj Kumar Aggarwal, Am 1. आयकरअपीलसं./ Ita No.223/Chny/2023 (िनधा"रणवष" / Assessment Year: 2015-16) & 2. आयकरअपीलसं./ Ita No.224/Chny/2023 (िनधा"रणवष" / Assessment Year: 2016-17) & 3. आयकरअपीलसं./ Ita No.225/Chny/2023 (िनधा"रणवष" / Assessment Year: 2017-18) Dcit Shri P. Rama Mohan Rao बनाम Central Circle-2(4) No.17/184, Y Block, First Street, 6Th Main Road, Anna Nagar, Chennai. / Vs. Chennai-600 040. "थायीलेखासं./जीआइआरसं./Pan/Gir No. Aafpr-2074-N (अपीलाथ"/Appellant) : (!"थ" / Respondent) & 4. Cross Objection No.10/Chny/2023 (In Ita No.223/Chny/2023) (िनधा"रण वष" / Assessment Year: 2015-16) & 5. Cross Objection No.11/Chny/2023 (In Ita No.224/Chny/2023) (िनधा"रण वष" / Assessment Year: 2016-17) & 6. Cross Objection No.12/Chny/2023 (In Ita No.225/Chny/2023) (िनधा"रण वष" / Assessment Year: 2017-18 बनाम/ Dcit Shri P. Rama Mohan Rao No.17/184, Y Block, First Street, Central Circle-1(4)

154 by insertion of Sub Section (2) by the Act 2 of 2006 w.e.f. 16.04.2006, it is well open to the petitioner to work out his right in accordance with law on receipt of the evidence directed to be given. 6. In the result, this writ petition shall stand dismissed. No costs. Consequently, connected Miscellaneous Petition is closed

DCIT, CENTRAL CIRCLE-2.4, CHENNAI vs. SHRI P. RAMA MOHAN RAO, CHENNAI

Accordingly, cross- objections for AYs 2015-16 and 2016-17 stands dismissed

Bench: Hon’Ble Shri V. Durga Rao, Jmand Hon’Ble Shri Manoj Kumar Aggarwal, Am 1. आयकरअपीलसं./ Ita No.223/Chny/2023 (िनधा"रणवष" / Assessment Year: 2015-16) & 2. आयकरअपीलसं./ Ita No.224/Chny/2023 (िनधा"रणवष" / Assessment Year: 2016-17) & 3. आयकरअपीलसं./ Ita No.225/Chny/2023 (िनधा"रणवष" / Assessment Year: 2017-18) Dcit Shri P. Rama Mohan Rao बनाम Central Circle-2(4) No.17/184, Y Block, First Street, 6Th Main Road, Anna Nagar, Chennai. / Vs. Chennai-600 040. "थायीलेखासं./जीआइआरसं./Pan/Gir No. Aafpr-2074-N (अपीलाथ"/Appellant) : (!"थ" / Respondent) & 4. Cross Objection No.10/Chny/2023 (In Ita No.223/Chny/2023) (िनधा"रण वष" / Assessment Year: 2015-16) & 5. Cross Objection No.11/Chny/2023 (In Ita No.224/Chny/2023) (िनधा"रण वष" / Assessment Year: 2016-17) & 6. Cross Objection No.12/Chny/2023 (In Ita No.225/Chny/2023) (िनधा"रण वष" / Assessment Year: 2017-18 बनाम/ Dcit Shri P. Rama Mohan Rao No.17/184, Y Block, First Street, Central Circle-1(4)

154 by insertion of Sub Section (2) by the Act 2 of 2006 w.e.f. 16.04.2006, it is well open to the petitioner to work out his right in accordance with law on receipt of the evidence directed to be given. 6. In the result, this writ petition shall stand dismissed. No costs. Consequently, connected Miscellaneous Petition is closed

DCIT, CENTRAL CIRCLE-2.4, CHENNAI vs. SHRI P. RAMA MOHAN RAO, CHENNAI

Accordingly, cross- objections for AYs 2015-16 and 2016-17 stands dismissed

Bench: Hon’Ble Shri V. Durga Rao, Jmand Hon’Ble Shri Manoj Kumar Aggarwal, Am 1. आयकरअपीलसं./ Ita No.223/Chny/2023 (िनधा"रणवष" / Assessment Year: 2015-16) & 2. आयकरअपीलसं./ Ita No.224/Chny/2023 (िनधा"रणवष" / Assessment Year: 2016-17) & 3. आयकरअपीलसं./ Ita No.225/Chny/2023 (िनधा"रणवष" / Assessment Year: 2017-18) Dcit Shri P. Rama Mohan Rao बनाम Central Circle-2(4) No.17/184, Y Block, First Street, 6Th Main Road, Anna Nagar, Chennai. / Vs. Chennai-600 040. "थायीलेखासं./जीआइआरसं./Pan/Gir No. Aafpr-2074-N (अपीलाथ"/Appellant) : (!"थ" / Respondent) & 4. Cross Objection No.10/Chny/2023 (In Ita No.223/Chny/2023) (िनधा"रण वष" / Assessment Year: 2015-16) & 5. Cross Objection No.11/Chny/2023 (In Ita No.224/Chny/2023) (िनधा"रण वष" / Assessment Year: 2016-17) & 6. Cross Objection No.12/Chny/2023 (In Ita No.225/Chny/2023) (िनधा"रण वष" / Assessment Year: 2017-18 बनाम/ Dcit Shri P. Rama Mohan Rao No.17/184, Y Block, First Street, Central Circle-1(4)

154 by insertion of Sub Section (2) by the Act 2 of 2006 w.e.f. 16.04.2006, it is well open to the petitioner to work out his right in accordance with law on receipt of the evidence directed to be given. 6. In the result, this writ petition shall stand dismissed. No costs. Consequently, connected Miscellaneous Petition is closed

DCIT CC 2 2 , CHENNAI, CHENNAI vs. SOUTHERN AGRIFURANE INDUSTRIES PVT LTD, CHENNAI

In the result, both the appeals filed by the Revenue and the\nassessee are dismissed

154 taxmann.com 144 (Bombay) wherein\nthe Hon'ble high Court held that \"A plain reading of section 153A(1)(b)\nshows that Commissioner having jurisdiction under the said section is\nempowered to assess or reassess the total income of six years\nimmediately preceding the assessment year relevant to the previous\nyear in which the search was conducted

SOUTHERN AGRIFURANE INDUSTRIES PVT.. LTD.,CHENNAI vs. ACIT, CENTRAL CIRCLE-2(2), CHENNAI

In the result, both the appeals filed by the Revenue and the\nassessee are dismissed

154 taxmann.com 144 (Bombay) wherein\nthe Hon'ble high Court held that \"A plain reading of section 153A(1)(b)\nshows that Commissioner having jurisdiction under the said section is\nempowered to assess or reassess the total income of six years\nimmediately preceding the assessment year relevant to the previous\nyear in which the search was conducted

DEPUTY COMMISSIONER OF INCOME TAX, CENTRAL CIRCLE 2 (2), CHENNAI, CHENNAI vs. SOUTHERN AGRIFURANE INDUSTRIES PVT LTD, CHENNAI

bogus expenses booked by the\nassessee and has added the same to the returned income in the\nrespective assessment years rather than making addition on the basis of\nany un disclosed asset found during the course of search\n6.3.26 In addition, the AO in the assessment order(s) has not\ncategorically made any addition(s) / disallowance(s) while computing\nthe

DCIT CC 2 2 , CHENNAI, CHENNAI vs. SOUTHERN AGRIFURANE INDUSTRIES PVT LTD, CHENNAI

In the result, both the appeals filed by the Revenue and the\nassessee are dismissed

154 taxmann.com 144 (Bombay) wherein\nthe Hon'ble high Court held that \"A plain reading of section 153A(1)(b)\nshows that Commissioner having jurisdiction under the said section is\nempowered to assess or reassess the total income of six years\nimmediately preceding the assessment year relevant to the previous\nyear in which the search was conducted