DEPUTY COMMISSIONER OF INCOME TAX, CENTRAL CIRCLE 2(2), CHENNAI, CHENNAI vs. SOUTHERN AGRIFURANE INDUSTRIES PVT LTD, CHENNAI

Bench: Shri Aby T. Varkey & Shri Amitabh Shuklaआयकरअपीलसं./Ita Nos. 1613 To 1615/Chny/2025 िनधा"रणवष"/Assessment Years: 2018-19 & 2019-20

bogus purchases. Consequent to the rejection of books of accounts and estimation of Consequent to the rejection of books of accounts and estimation of Consequent to the rejection of books of accounts and estimation of profits, the Ld. CIT(A) deleted all other separate disallowance(s)/ profits, the Ld. CIT(A) deleted all other separate disallowance(s)/ profits

DEPUTY COMMISSIONER OF INCOME TAX, CENTRAL CIRCLE 2(2), CHENNAI, CHENNAI vs. SOUTHERN AGRIFURANE INDUSTRIES PVT LTD, CHENNAI

Bench: Shri Aby T. Varkey & Shri Amitabh Shuklaआयकरअपीलसं./Ita Nos. 1613 To 1615/Chny/2025 िनधा"रणवष"/Assessment Years: 2018-19 & 2019-20

bogus purchases. Consequent to the rejection of books of accounts and estimation of Consequent to the rejection of books of accounts and estimation of Consequent to the rejection of books of accounts and estimation of profits, the Ld. CIT(A) deleted all other separate disallowance(s)/ profits, the Ld. CIT(A) deleted all other separate disallowance(s)/ profits

SOUTHERN AGRIFURANE INDUSTRIES PVT. LTD.,CHENNAI vs. ACIT, CENTRAL CIRCLE-2(2),, CHENNAI

In the result, both the appeals filed by the Revenue and the\nassessee are dismissed

Section 153C.\nThe power to undertake such an assessment would stand confined to\nthose years to which the material may relate or is likely to influence.\nAbsent any material that may either cast a doubt on the estimation of\ntotal income for a particular year or years, the AO would not be justified\n:: 41 ::\nITA Nos.1254, 1255, 1258, 1260/Chny/2025

DCIT CC 2 2 , CHENNAI, CHENNAI vs. SOUTHERN AGRIFURANE INDUSTRIES PVT LTD, CHENNAI

In the result, both the both the appeals filed by the Revenue and the Revenue and the

Bench: Shri Aby T. Varkey & Shri Amitabh Shukla

bogus purchases. Apart from the gus purchases. Apart from the ITA Nos.1254, 1255, 1258, 1260 1254, 1255, 1258, 1260/Chny/2025 & ITA Nos.1233, 1235, 1237, 1238 1233, 1235, 1237, 1238/Chny/2025 (AYs 2014 s 2014-15 to 2017-18) Southern Agrifurane Industries Pvt. Ltd. M/s. Southern Agrifurane Industries Pvt :: 4 :: foregoing, the AO is also noted to have made addition(s)/disallowance

SOUTHERN AGRIFURANE INDUSTRIES PVT. LTD.,CHENNAI vs. ACIT, CENTRAL CIRCLE-2(2),, CHENNAI

In the result, both the both the appeals filed by the Revenue and the Revenue and the

Bench: Shri Aby T. Varkey & Shri Amitabh Shukla

bogus purchases. Apart from the gus purchases. Apart from the ITA Nos.1254, 1255, 1258, 1260 1254, 1255, 1258, 1260/Chny/2025 & ITA Nos.1233, 1235, 1237, 1238 1233, 1235, 1237, 1238/Chny/2025 (AYs 2014 s 2014-15 to 2017-18) Southern Agrifurane Industries Pvt. Ltd. M/s. Southern Agrifurane Industries Pvt :: 4 :: foregoing, the AO is also noted to have made addition(s)/disallowance

DCIT CC 2 2 , CHENNAI, CHENNAI vs. SOUTHERN AGRIFURANE INDUSTRIES PVT LTD, CHENNAI

In the result, both the appeals filed by the Revenue and the\nassessee are dismissed

Section 153C.\nThe power to undertake such an assessment would stand confined to\nthose years to which the material may relate or is likely to influence.\nAbsent any material that may either cast a doubt on the estimation of\ntotal income for a particular year or years, the AO would not be justified\n:: 41 ::\nITA Nos.1254, 1255, 1258, 1260/Chny/2025

ASSISTANT COMMISSIONER OF INCOME TAX LTU CIRCLE 1 CHENNAI, CHENNAI vs. E I D PARRY INDIA LIMITED, CHENNAI

In the result, all the appeals filed by the assessee are partly allowed for statistical purposes and the appeal filed by the Revenue is dismissed

Bench: Shri George George Kand Shri S.R. Raghunathait(Tp)A. Nos.:105, 106, 107/Chny/2024 & Ita No.3113/Chny/2024 िनधा"रण वष"/Assessment Years: 2011-12, 2012-13, 2013-14 & 2014-15 M/S. E.I.D. Parry India Ltd., The Deputy Commissioner Of No. 234, Dare House, Nsc Vs. Income Tax, Bose Road, Parrys Corner, Large Taxpayer Unit -1, Chennai 600 001. Chennai. [Pan: Aaace-0702-C] (अपीलाथ"/Appellant) (""यथ"/Respondent)

section 14A(2) of the Act. We find force in the arguments of the ld. Counsel for the assessee that the disallowance under Rule 8D(2)(iii) has to be restricted at 0.5% of investments, which has actually yielded exempt income during the year after reducing suo motu disallowance made by the assessee and not the average of investments

M/S. EID PARRY INDIA LTD.,CHENNAI vs. DCIT, LTU-1,, CHENNAI

In the result, all the appeals filed by the assessee are partly allowed for statistical purposes and the appeal filed by the Revenue is dismissed

Bench: Shri George George Kand Shri S.R. Raghunathait(Tp)A. Nos.:105, 106, 107/Chny/2024 & Ita No.3113/Chny/2024 िनधा"रण वष"/Assessment Years: 2011-12, 2012-13, 2013-14 & 2014-15 M/S. E.I.D. Parry India Ltd., The Deputy Commissioner Of No. 234, Dare House, Nsc Vs. Income Tax, Bose Road, Parrys Corner, Large Taxpayer Unit -1, Chennai 600 001. Chennai. [Pan: Aaace-0702-C] (अपीलाथ"/Appellant) (""यथ"/Respondent)

section 14A(2) of the Act. We find force in the arguments of the ld. Counsel for the assessee that the disallowance under Rule 8D(2)(iii) has to be restricted at 0.5% of investments, which has actually yielded exempt income during the year after reducing suo motu disallowance made by the assessee and not the average of investments

SOUTHERN AGRIFURANE INDUSTRIES PVT. LTD.,CHENNAI vs. ACIT, CENTRAL CIRCLE-2(2),, CHENNAI

In the result, both the appeals filed by the Revenue and the\nassessee are dismissed

bogus purchases. Notices under Section 153C were issued to the assessee for Assessment Years 2014-15 to 2017-18.", "held": "The Tribunal held that the notices issued under Section 153C were invalid because the satisfaction note recorded by the Assessing Officer did not establish a nexus between the seized material and the relevant Assessment Years. The Tribunal found a complete

SOUTHERN AGRIFURANE INDUSTRIES PVT. LTD.,CHENNAI vs. ACIT, CENTRAL CIRCLE-2(2),, CHENNAI

In the result, both the appeals filed by the Revenue and the\nassessee are dismissed

purchases in FYs 2017-18 to 2019-20. The recording made\nby the AO is categorical to the extent that the seized material received by\nhim contained information only for FYs 2017-18 to 2019-20. The AO has\nnowhere referred to existence of any seized material relating or pertaining\nto AYs 2014-15 to 2017-18 which would have

M/S ENRIA ENTERPRISES PVT. LTD,CHENNAI vs. DCIT. CENTRAL CIRCLE - 3(4), CHENNAI

In the result, appeal filed by the assessee in ITA

Bench: Shri Manjunatha. G & Shri Manomohan Das

purchase invoices available with department prove genuineness of expenditure is incorrect. 7.3.5 Similarly appellant mentioned that there is no finding in the assessment order that there have, been false entries in the books of account, hence 270A (9) (d) is not attracted as has been mentioned by AO, Examination of assessment order shows that vide para 3 of assessment order

M/S ENRICE ENTERPRISES PVT. LTD,CHENNAI vs. DCIT,CENTRAL CIRCLE-3(4), CHENNAI

In the result, appeal filed by the assessee in ITA

Bench: Shri Manjunatha. G & Shri Manomohan Das

purchase invoices available with department prove genuineness of expenditure is incorrect. 7.3.5 Similarly appellant mentioned that there is no finding in the assessment order that there have, been false entries in the books of account, hence 270A (9) (d) is not attracted as has been mentioned by AO, Examination of assessment order shows that vide para 3 of assessment order

M/S.ENRICA ENTERPRISES PVT LTD,CHENNAI vs. DCIT,CENTRAL CIRCLE-3(4), CHENNAI

In the result, appeal filed by the assessee in ITA

Bench: Shri Manjunatha. G & Shri Manomohan Das

bogus bills from our suppliers of gift articles to generate unaccounted cash. However, we received back one third of the invoice value on an average in the form of cash from our gift article suppliers. Since this amounts to inflation of the expenditure in our books of account, we undertake to withdraw of claim towards expenditure in the respective years

M/S ENRICA ENTERPRISES PVT LTD,CHENNAI vs. DCIT,CENTRAL CIRCLE-3(4), CHENNAI

In the result, appeal filed by the assessee in ITA

Bench: Shri Manjunatha. G & Shri Manomohan Das

bogus bills from our suppliers of gift articles to generate unaccounted cash. However, we received back one third of the invoice value on an average in the form of cash from our gift article suppliers. Since this amounts to inflation of the expenditure in our books of account, we undertake to withdraw of claim towards expenditure in the respective years

AADARSH SURANA, CHENNAI,CHENNAI vs. DEPUTY COMMISSIONER OF INCOME TAX, CORPORATE CIRCLE 1(1), CHENNAI, CHENNAI

Section 47(xiv) it is apparent that where the sole proprietorship\nconcern is succeeded by a company in the business carried on by it, as a\nresult of which some proprietary concern seeks or otherwise transfers any\ncapital asset or intangible asset to the company, the transactions are not\ntreated as transfer subject to the three conditions laid down therein