BharatTax.net
SearchITATHigh CourtsSupreme CourtAI ResearchHistory

Filters

BharatTax.net

Free search engine for ITAT (Income Tax Appellate Tribunal) judgments across all 28 benches in India.

Quick Links

  • Search Judgments
  • Browse by Bench
  • Recent Judgments

About

BharatTax provides free access to Income Tax Appellate Tribunal orders for legal research and reference.

© 2026 BharatTax.net. All rights reserved.

4 results for “bogus purchases”+ Section 144Bclear

Sorted by relevance

Mumbai155Delhi102Ahmedabad64Jaipur41Rajkot40Kolkata36Chandigarh28Raipur19Indore19Surat18Pune17Hyderabad15Bangalore10Guwahati5Amritsar5Agra5Chennai4Lucknow4Visakhapatnam3Dehradun3Jodhpur2Ranchi2Cochin2Nagpur1Jabalpur1

Key Topics

Section 2636Section 1326Section 143(3)3Section 1433Section 1473Section 139(1)3Section 44A3Reassessment3Addition to Income3

K V TEX FIRM,CHENNAI vs. ASST. COMMISSIONER OF INCOME TAX,, CHENNAI

In the result, all the three appeals of the assessee stand allowed

ITA 1860/CHNY/2025[2020-21]Status: DisposedITAT Chennai04 Feb 2026AY 2020-21

Bench: Shri George George K & Shri S.R. Raghunatha

For Appellant: Shri. D. Anand, AdvocateFor Respondent: Shri. Shiva Srinivas, CIT
Section 132Section 139(1)Section 143Section 147Section 44A

144B of the Act would also be applicable to the Scheme.” 21.2 Further it is submitted that the Hon’ble Telangana High Court in the case of Sri Venkataramana Reddy Patloola Vs. Deputy Commissioner of Income Tax, Circle 1(1) in WP Nos. 13353, 16141 & 16877 of 2024, has adopted the view of the Bombay High Court in the case

Search & Seizure3

K V TEX FIRM,CHENNAI vs. ASST. COMMISSIONER OF INCOME TAX , CHENNAI

In the result, all the three appeals of the assessee stand allowed

ITA 1859/CHNY/2025[2021-22]Status: DisposedITAT Chennai04 Feb 2026AY 2021-22
Section 132Section 139(1)Section 143Section 147Section 44A

144B of the Act would also be applicable\nto the Scheme.”\n21.2 Further it is submitted that the Hon'ble Telangana High Court in the case\nof Sri Venkataramana Reddy Patloola Vs. Deputy Commissioner of Income Tax,\nCircle 1(1) in WP Nos. 13353, 16141 & 16877 of 2024, has adopted the view of\nthe Bombay High Court in the case

K V TEX FIRM,CHENNAI vs. ASST. COMMISSIONER OF INCOME TAX , CHENNAI

In the result, all the three appeals of the assessee stand allowed

ITA 1865/CHNY/2025[2022-23]Status: DisposedITAT Chennai04 Feb 2026AY 2022-23
Section 132Section 139(1)Section 143Section 147Section 44A

144B of the Act would also be applicable\nto the Scheme.\"\n21.2 Further it is submitted that the Hon'ble Telangana High Court in the case\nof Sri Venkataramana Reddy Patloola Vs. Deputy Commissioner of Income Tax,\nCircle 1(1) in WP Nos. 13353, 16141 & 16877 of 2024, has adopted the view of\nthe Bombay High Court in the case

ARIHANT RETAIL PVT. LTD.,,CHENNAI vs. PCIT-1,, CHENNAI

In the result the appeal of the assessee is allowed

ITA 1308/CHNY/2024[2018-19]Status: DisposedITAT Chennai09 Oct 2024AY 2018-19

Bench: Shri Mahavir Singh, Hon’Ble & Shri S. R. Raghunatha, Hon’Bleआयकर अपील सं./Ita No.: 1308/Chny/2024 िनधा"रण वष" / Assessment Year: 2018-19 Arihant Retail Private Limited, Principal Commissioner Of 29, Namachivaya Chetty Street, V. Income Tax -1, Old Washermanpet, Chennai – 600 034. Chennai – 600 021. [Pan: Aaics-3648-F] (अपीलाथ"/Appellant) (""यथ"/Respondent) : Shri. T. Banusekar, Advocate अपीलाथ" क" ओर से/Appellant By ""यथ" क" ओर से/Respondent By : Shri. Nilay Baran Som, Cit सुनवाई क" तारीख/Date Of Hearing : 07.08.2024 घोषणा क" तारीख/Date Of Pronouncement : 09.10.2024

For Respondent: Shri. Nilay Baran Som, CIT
Section 142(1)Section 143(3)Section 2(24)(x)Section 263Section 69C

144B of the Act vide order dated 13.09.2021 by disallowing 10% of purchases Rs.10,24,37,338/- u/s.69C of the Act and Rs.8,70,890/- u/s.2(24)(x) of the Act by holding as under: “5. On perusal of trading and P & L account as on 31.03.2018, it is found that assessee has shown purchases of Rs.1