DEPUTY COMMISSIONER OF INCOME TAX, CENTRAL CIRCLE 2(2), CHENNAI, CHENNAI vs. SOUTHERN AGRIFURANE INDUSTRIES PRIVATE LIMITED, CHENNAI

Bench: Shri Aby T. Varkey & Shri Amitabh Shukla

1 to 66. It is noted that, this excel file comprised of five( comprised of five(5)sheets which comprised of data relating to which comprised of data relating to purchase of old bottles for ttles for three-month period in the year 2020 month period in the year 2020. The AO is noted to have tabulated sample data from

DCIT CC 2 2 , CHENNAI, CHENNAI vs. SOUTHERN AGRIFURANE INDUSTRIES PVT LTD, CHENNAI

In the result, both the appeals filed by the Revenue and the\nassessee are dismissed

13. Thus, the information in the seized materials and other\nevidences available with the undersigned, unambiguously evidenced that\nthe assessee had booked bogus old bottle purchase expenses with the\nconnivance of the five old bottle vendors thereby generating\nunaccounted cash which clearly suggests that income represented in the\nform of asset has escaped assessment, and exceeds more than

DCIT CC 2 2 , CHENNAI, CHENNAI vs. SOUTHERN AGRIFURANE INDUSTRIES PVT LTD, CHENNAI

In the result, both the appeals filed by the Revenue and the\nassessee are dismissed

13.\nThus, the information in the seized materials and other\nevidences available with the undersigned, unambiguously evidenced that\nthe assessee had booked bogus old bottle purchase expenses with the\nconnivance of the five old bottle vendors thereby generating\nunaccounted cash which clearly suggests that income represented in the\nform of asset has escaped assessment, and exceeds more than

SOUTHERN AGRIFURANE INDUSTRIES PVT.. LTD.,CHENNAI vs. ACIT, CENTRAL CIRCLE-2(2), CHENNAI

In the result, both the appeals filed by the Revenue and the\nassessee are dismissed

13.\nThus, the information in the seized materials and other\nevidences available with the undersigned, unambiguously evidenced that\nthe assessee had booked bogus old bottle purchase expenses with the\nconnivance of the five old bottle vendors thereby generating\nunaccounted cash which clearly suggests that income represented in the\nform of asset has escaped assessment, and exceeds more than

SOUTHERN AGRIFURANE INDUSTRIES PVT. LTD.,CHENNAI vs. ACIT, CENTRAL CIRCLE-2(2),, CHENNAI

In the result, both the appeals filed by the Revenue and the\nassessee are dismissed

13.\nThus, the information in the seized materials and other\nevidences available with the undersigned, unambiguously evidenced that\nthe assessee had booked bogus old bottle purchase expenses with the\nconnivance of the five old bottle vendors thereby generating\nunaccounted cash which clearly suggests that income represented in the\nform of asset has escaped assessment, and exceeds more than

DEPUTY COMMISSIONER OF INCOME TAX, CENTRAL CIRCLE 2 (2), CHENNAI, CHENNAI vs. SOUTHERN AGRIFURANE INDUSTRIES PVT LTD, CHENNAI

13. Thus, the information in the seized materials and other\nevidences available with the undersigned, unambiguously evidenced that\nthe assessee had booked bogus old bottle purchase expenses with the\nconnivance of the five old bottle vendors thereby generating\nunaccounted cash which clearly suggests that income represented in the\nform of asset has escaped assessment, and exceeds more than

SOUTHERN AGRIFURANE INDUSTRIES PVT. LTD.,CHENNAI vs. ACIT, CENTRAL CIRCLE-2(2),, CHENNAI

13. Thus, the information in the seized materials and other\nevidences available with the undersigned, unambiguously evidenced that\nthe assessee had booked bogus old bottle purchase expenses with the\nconnivance of the five old bottle vendors thereby generating\nunaccounted cash which clearly suggests that income represented in the\nform of asset has escaped assessment, and exceeds more than

VELLORE INSTITUTE OF TECHNOLOGY,VELLORE vs. DCIT, CC IV(1), CHENNAI

Appeals of the Revenue are dismissed whereas that of assessee are partly allowed

Bench: Shri Abraham P. George & Shri Duvvuru Rl Reddy]

bogus claim of refund of fees, all clearly proved diversion of funds to specified persons and Section 13(1) (c) of the Act stood attracted. Viz-a-viz, alleged specific instances falling within Section 22. 13(1) (c) of the Act, arguments taken by the ld. Departmental Representative are summarized here under:- (i) As for the payment of advance

VELLORE INSTITUTE OF TECHNOLOGY,VELLORE vs. DCIT, CC IV(1), CHENNAI

Appeals of the Revenue are dismissed whereas that of assessee are partly allowed

Bench: Shri Abraham P. George & Shri Duvvuru Rl Reddy]

bogus claim of refund of fees, all clearly proved diversion of funds to specified persons and Section 13(1) (c) of the Act stood attracted. Viz-a-viz, alleged specific instances falling within Section 22. 13(1) (c) of the Act, arguments taken by the ld. Departmental Representative are summarized here under:- (i) As for the payment of advance

DCIT, CENTRAL CIRCLE 1(1), CHENNAI vs. VELLORE INSTITUTE OF TECHNOLOGY, VELLORE

Appeals of the Revenue are dismissed whereas that of assessee are partly allowed

Bench: Shri Abraham P. George & Shri Duvvuru Rl Reddy]

bogus claim of refund of fees, all clearly proved diversion of funds to specified persons and Section 13(1) (c) of the Act stood attracted. Viz-a-viz, alleged specific instances falling within Section 22. 13(1) (c) of the Act, arguments taken by the ld. Departmental Representative are summarized here under:- (i) As for the payment of advance

DCIT, CENTRAL CIRCLE 1(1), CHENNAI vs. VELLORE INSTITUTE OF TECHNOLOGY, VELLORE

Appeals of the Revenue are dismissed whereas that of assessee are partly allowed

Bench: Shri Abraham P. George & Shri Duvvuru Rl Reddy]

bogus claim of refund of fees, all clearly proved diversion of funds to specified persons and Section 13(1) (c) of the Act stood attracted. Viz-a-viz, alleged specific instances falling within Section 22. 13(1) (c) of the Act, arguments taken by the ld. Departmental Representative are summarized here under:- (i) As for the payment of advance

DEPUTY COMMISSIONER OF INCOME TAX, CENTRAL CIRCLE 2(2), CHENNAI, CHENNAI vs. SOUTHERN AGRIFURANE INDUSTRIES PVT LTD, CHENNAI

Bench: Shri Aby T. Varkey & Shri Amitabh Shuklaआयकरअपीलसं./Ita Nos. 1613 To 1615/Chny/2025 िनधा"रणवष"/Assessment Years: 2018-19 & 2019-20

1 to 66. It is noted that, this excel file excel file comprised of five(5) Sheets which comprised of data relating to purchase which comprised of data relating to purchase which comprised of data relating to purchase of old bottles for three-month period in the year 2020 month period in the year 2020. The AO is noted

SOUTHERN AGRIFURANE INDUSTRIES PVT. LTD.,CHENNAI vs. ACIT, CENTRAL CIRCLE-2(2), CHENNAI

Bench: Shri Aby T. Varkey & Shri Amitabh Shuklaआयकरअपीलसं./Ita Nos. 1613 To 1615/Chny/2025 िनधा"रणवष"/Assessment Years: 2018-19 & 2019-20

1 to 66. It is noted that, this excel file excel file comprised of five(5) Sheets which comprised of data relating to purchase which comprised of data relating to purchase which comprised of data relating to purchase of old bottles for three-month period in the year 2020 month period in the year 2020. The AO is noted

DEPUTY COMMISSIONER OF INCOME TAX, CENTRAL CIRCLE 2(2), CHENNAI, CHENNAI vs. SOUTHERN AGRIFURANE INDUSTRIES PVT LTD, CHENNAI

Bench: Shri Aby T. Varkey & Shri Amitabh Shuklaआयकरअपीलसं./Ita Nos. 1613 To 1615/Chny/2025 िनधा"रणवष"/Assessment Years: 2018-19 & 2019-20

1 to 66. It is noted that, this excel file excel file comprised of five(5) Sheets which comprised of data relating to purchase which comprised of data relating to purchase which comprised of data relating to purchase of old bottles for three-month period in the year 2020 month period in the year 2020. The AO is noted

DEPUTY COMMISSIONER OF INCOME TAX, CENTRAL CIRCLE 2(2), CHENNAI, CHENNAI vs. SOUTHERN AGRIFURANE INDUSTRIES PVT LTD, CHENNAI

Bench: Shri Aby T. Varkey & Shri Amitabh Shuklaआयकरअपीलसं./Ita Nos. 1613 To 1615/Chny/2025 िनधा"रणवष"/Assessment Years: 2018-19 & 2019-20

1 to 66. It is noted that, this excel file excel file comprised of five(5) Sheets which comprised of data relating to purchase which comprised of data relating to purchase which comprised of data relating to purchase of old bottles for three-month period in the year 2020 month period in the year 2020. The AO is noted

SOUTHERN AGRIFURANE INDUSTRIES PVT. LTD.,CHENNAI vs. ACIT, CENTRAL CIRCLE-2(2),, CHENNAI

In the result, both the both the appeals filed by the Revenue and the Revenue and the

Bench: Shri Aby T. Varkey & Shri Amitabh Shukla

Section 153C of the Act fro analyzed the entire statutory framework of Section 153C of the Act fro analyzed the entire statutory framework of Section 153C of the Act from its introduction to the amendment by Finance Act, 2017 and its its introduction to the amendment by Finance Act, 2017 and its its introduction to the amendment by Finance

DCIT CC 2 2 , CHENNAI, CHENNAI vs. SOUTHERN AGRIFURANE INDUSTRIES PVT LTD, CHENNAI

In the result, both the both the appeals filed by the Revenue and the Revenue and the

Bench: Shri Aby T. Varkey & Shri Amitabh Shukla

Section 153C of the Act fro analyzed the entire statutory framework of Section 153C of the Act fro analyzed the entire statutory framework of Section 153C of the Act from its introduction to the amendment by Finance Act, 2017 and its its introduction to the amendment by Finance Act, 2017 and its its introduction to the amendment by Finance

DCIT CC 2 2 , CHENNAI, CHENNAI vs. SOUTHERN AGRIFURANE INDUSTRIES PVT LTD, CHENNAI

bogus purchases is Rs.4,41,70,464/- for the F.Y 2017-18 (From July\n2017), Rs.5,69,70,130/- for the F.Y 2018-19 and Rs.2,95,16,955/- for\nthe F.Y. 2019-20 (up to 4.8.2019).\nThe above seized materials were handed over to the undersigned on\n18.06.2021. On perusal of the seized material I am satisfied that