BharatTax.net
SearchITATHigh CourtsSupreme CourtPhrasesAI ResearchHistory

Filters

BharatTax.net

Free search engine for ITAT (Income Tax Appellate Tribunal) judgments across all 28 benches in India.

Quick Links

  • Search Judgments
  • Browse by Bench
  • Recent Judgments

About

BharatTax provides free access to Income Tax Appellate Tribunal orders for legal research and reference.

© 2026 BharatTax.net. All rights reserved.

30 results for “bogus purchases”+ Revision u/s 263clear

Sorted by relevance

Mumbai255Delhi179Jaipur135Kolkata123Karnataka104Chandigarh50Bangalore48Ahmedabad40Indore31Chennai30Rajkot30Pune28Surat22Hyderabad19Lucknow16Agra16Nagpur11Raipur9Amritsar6Patna4Ranchi3Cuttack3Guwahati3Jodhpur2Dehradun2Jabalpur2Panaji1Visakhapatnam1

Key Topics

Section 26347Section 143(3)28Addition to Income22Section 13114Section 271(1)(c)12Section 153A11Section 13211Section 153C10Section 14810

TARUN KUMAR KUNDANMALJI JAIN,CHENNAI vs. PCIT-8, CHENNAI

In the result, the appeals of the Assessees in I

ITA 307/CHNY/2021[213-14]Status: DisposedITAT Chennai15 Jun 2022

Bench: Shri G. Manjunatha & Shri Anikesh Banerjeeआयकर अपील सं./I.T.A No.:307/Chny/2021 िनधा"रण वष"/Assessment Year: 2013 - 2014

For Appellant: Shri. M. Abhishek, C.AFor Respondent: Dr. S. Palani Kumar, CIT
Section 143(1)Section 143(3)Section 148Section 263

Revision proceedings u/s 263 of the Income tax Act 1961 in A.Y.2013-14 dated 11.03.2021 was issued and the assessee was given an opportunity of being heard on 19.03.2021 at 12.10 PM. The assessee submitted his response electronically, stating as under: a) Off Market purchase of shares is not illegal. The said proposition is affirmed by the Hon ‘ble Mumbai High

Showing 1–20 of 30 · Page 1 of 2

Disallowance7
Revision u/s 2636
Penalty6

VINOD KUMAR KUNDANMAL ,CHENNAI vs. PCIT-8, CHENNAI

ITA 309/CHNY/2021[2012-13]Status: DisposedITAT Chennai15 Jun 2022AY 2012-13

Bench: Shri G. Manjunatha & Shri Anikesh Banerjeeआयकर अपील सं./I.T.A No.:307/Chny/2021 िनधा"रण वष"/Assessment Year: 2013 - 2014

For Appellant: Shri. M. Abhishek, C.AFor Respondent: Dr. S. Palani Kumar, CIT
Section 143(1)Section 143(3)Section 148Section 263

Revision proceedings u/s 263 of the Income tax Act 1961 in A.Y.2013-14 dated 11.03.2021 was issued and the assessee was given an opportunity of being heard on 19.03.2021 at 12.10 PM. The assessee submitted his response electronically, stating as under: a) Off Market purchase of shares is not illegal. The said proposition is affirmed by the Hon ‘ble Mumbai High

VINOD KUMAR KUNDANMALJI JAIN,CHENNAI vs. PCIT-8, CHENNAI

In the result, the appeals of the Assessees in I

ITA 310/CHNY/2021[2013-14]Status: DisposedITAT Chennai15 Jun 2022AY 2013-14

Bench: Shri G. Manjunatha & Shri Anikesh Banerjeeआयकर अपील सं./I.T.A No.:307/Chny/2021 िनधा"रण वष"/Assessment Year: 2013 - 2014

For Appellant: Shri. M. Abhishek, C.AFor Respondent: Dr. S. Palani Kumar, CIT
Section 143(1)Section 143(3)Section 148Section 263

Revision proceedings u/s 263 of the Income tax Act 1961 in A.Y.2013-14 dated 11.03.2021 was issued and the assessee was given an opportunity of being heard on 19.03.2021 at 12.10 PM. The assessee submitted his response electronically, stating as under: a) Off Market purchase of shares is not illegal. The said proposition is affirmed by the Hon ‘ble Mumbai High

TARUN KUNDANMAL HUF,CHENNAI vs. PCIT-8, CHENNAI

In the result, the appeals of the Assessees in I

ITA 308/CHNY/2021[2013-15]Status: DisposedITAT Chennai15 Jun 2022AY 2013-15

Bench: Shri G. Manjunatha & Shri Anikesh Banerjeeआयकर अपील सं./I.T.A No.:307/Chny/2021 िनधा"रण वष"/Assessment Year: 2013 - 2014

For Appellant: Shri. M. Abhishek, C.AFor Respondent: Dr. S. Palani Kumar, CIT
Section 143(1)Section 143(3)Section 148Section 263

Revision proceedings u/s 263 of the Income tax Act 1961 in A.Y.2013-14 dated 11.03.2021 was issued and the assessee was given an opportunity of being heard on 19.03.2021 at 12.10 PM. The assessee submitted his response electronically, stating as under: a) Off Market purchase of shares is not illegal. The said proposition is affirmed by the Hon ‘ble Mumbai High

V.S. NATARAJAN,THANJAVUR vs. ACIT, CC-3(2), CHENNAI

In the result both the appeals filed by the assessee are allowed

ITA 1604/CHNY/2024[2020-21]Status: DisposedITAT Chennai18 Oct 2024AY 2020-21

Bench: Shri Manu Kumar Giri, Hon’Ble & Shri S. R. Raghunatha, Hon’Bleआयकर अपील सं./Ita Nos.: 1603 & 1604/Chny/2024 िनधा"रण वष" / Assessment Years: 2019-20 & 2020-21 Valikaramuthu Subramanian Assistant Commissioner Of Natarajan, V. Income-Tax, No. 104-B, 3Rd Street, Central Circle -3(2), Mangalapuram, Medical College Chennai. Road, Voc Nagar, Thanjavur – 613 007. [Pan: Acypn-0616-R] (अपीलाथ"/Appellant) (""यथ"/Respondent) अपीलाथ" क" ओर से/Appellant By : Shri. Y. Sridhar, Fca ""यथ" क" ओर से/Respondent By : Shri. Nilay Baran Som, Cit सुनवाई की तारीख/Date Of Hearing : 26.09.2024 घोषणा की तारीख/Date Of Pronouncement : 18.10.2024 आदेश /O R D E R Per S. R. Raghunatha:

For Appellant: Shri. Y. Sridhar, FCAFor Respondent: Shri. Nilay Baran Som, CIT
Section 142(1)Section 153CSection 263

bogus purchases proposed to be added Rs.30,33,48,099 You are requested to show cause why the addition should not be made in your hands considering Kals Group of concerns is denying having resorted to any inflation of purchases from Devi Bottles group of concerns. 8. Unaccounted commission income earned from over invoicing of sale of empty

V.S. NATARAJAN,THANJAVUR vs. ACIT, CC-3(2), , CHENNAI

In the result both the appeals filed by the assessee are allowed

ITA 1603/CHNY/2024[2019-20]Status: DisposedITAT Chennai18 Oct 2024AY 2019-20

Bench: Shri Manu Kumar Giri, Hon’Ble & Shri S. R. Raghunatha, Hon’Bleआयकर अपील सं./Ita Nos.: 1603 & 1604/Chny/2024 िनधा"रण वष" / Assessment Years: 2019-20 & 2020-21 Valikaramuthu Subramanian Assistant Commissioner Of Natarajan, V. Income-Tax, No. 104-B, 3Rd Street, Central Circle -3(2), Mangalapuram, Medical College Chennai. Road, Voc Nagar, Thanjavur – 613 007. [Pan: Acypn-0616-R] (अपीलाथ"/Appellant) (""यथ"/Respondent) अपीलाथ" क" ओर से/Appellant By : Shri. Y. Sridhar, Fca ""यथ" क" ओर से/Respondent By : Shri. Nilay Baran Som, Cit सुनवाई की तारीख/Date Of Hearing : 26.09.2024 घोषणा की तारीख/Date Of Pronouncement : 18.10.2024 आदेश /O R D E R Per S. R. Raghunatha:

For Appellant: Shri. Y. Sridhar, FCAFor Respondent: Shri. Nilay Baran Som, CIT
Section 142(1)Section 153CSection 263

bogus purchases proposed to be added Rs.30,33,48,099 You are requested to show cause why the addition should not be made in your hands considering Kals Group of concerns is denying having resorted to any inflation of purchases from Devi Bottles group of concerns. 8. Unaccounted commission income earned from over invoicing of sale of empty

SULEKHA.COM NEW MEDIA P. LTD.,CHENNAI vs. DCIT, CHENNAI

In the result, the assessee’s appeal is dismissed

ITA 1418/CHNY/2017[2012-13]Status: DisposedITAT Chennai09 Nov 2017AY 2012-13

Bench: Shri N.R.S. Ganesan & Shri S. Jayaraman

For Appellant: Shri. SailendraMamidi, PCIT
Section 133ASection 143(2)Section 143(3)Section 263

revision orders, after giving opportunity to the assessee.” 4.1 Thereafter, the DR submitted that it is clear from the order u/s. 263 that the assessee has not laid any material to say that the payment of Rs. 11.81 crores made to M/s. Mercado Online P. Ltd., a non-traceable company, was ever examined by the A O and the assessee

ARIHANT RETAIL PVT. LTD.,,CHENNAI vs. PCIT-1,, CHENNAI

In the result the appeal of the assessee is allowed

ITA 1308/CHNY/2024[2018-19]Status: DisposedITAT Chennai09 Oct 2024AY 2018-19

Bench: Shri Mahavir Singh, Hon’Ble & Shri S. R. Raghunatha, Hon’Bleआयकर अपील सं./Ita No.: 1308/Chny/2024 िनधा"रण वष" / Assessment Year: 2018-19 Arihant Retail Private Limited, Principal Commissioner Of 29, Namachivaya Chetty Street, V. Income Tax -1, Old Washermanpet, Chennai – 600 034. Chennai – 600 021. [Pan: Aaics-3648-F] (अपीलाथ"/Appellant) (""यथ"/Respondent) : Shri. T. Banusekar, Advocate अपीलाथ" क" ओर से/Appellant By ""यथ" क" ओर से/Respondent By : Shri. Nilay Baran Som, Cit सुनवाई क" तारीख/Date Of Hearing : 07.08.2024 घोषणा क" तारीख/Date Of Pronouncement : 09.10.2024

For Respondent: Shri. Nilay Baran Som, CIT
Section 142(1)Section 143(3)Section 2(24)(x)Section 263Section 69C

bogus, and it had been stated that the entire amount of Rs.102,43,73,377/- could not be disallowed, hence to protect the interest of revenue, a moderate disallowance of business purchases the extent of 10% i.e., Rs.10,24,37,338/- was treated as unexplained expenditure u/s 69C of the I.T. Act. 3.2 As per Section

R.SRINIVASAN,CHENNAI vs. DCIT CENTRAL CIRCLE 1, COIMBATORE

In the result, appeal filed by assessee is partly allowed

ITA 1466/CHNY/2018[1996-97]Status: DisposedITAT Chennai25 Feb 2021AY 1996-97

Bench: Shri V.Durga Rao & Shri G. Manjunathaआयकर अपीलसं./I.T.A.No.1466/Chny/2018 ("नधा"रणवष" / Assessment Year: 1996-97) Mr.R.Srinivasan Vs The Deputy Commissioner Of 103, Ashok Nagar Main Road Income Tax, Kodambakkam, Corporate Circle-I(2) Chennai-600 024. Chennai. Pan : Aaips 8386H (अपीलाथ"/Appellant) (""यथ"/Respondent)

Section 132

u/s. 143(3) of the Act on 30.03.1999 and additions were made towards unexplained investments in bank deposits amounting to `13,25,642/- , estimated interest income on said unexplained deposit of ` 10,00,000/- and salary income not disclosed in the return of 6 income amounting to `1,00,000/-. Besides the above

SHEIKH KUTBUDDIN HABIB,COIMBATORE vs. ACIT, COIMBATORE

In the result, the appeal filed by the assessee is dismissed

ITA 264/CHNY/2017[2011-12]Status: DisposedITAT Chennai18 Aug 2021AY 2011-12

Bench: Shri V. Durga Rao & Shri G. Manjunathaआयकर अपील सं./Ita Nos.: 263 & 264/Chny/2017 िनधा"रण वष" / Assessment Years: 2010-11 & 2011-12

For Appellant: Shri K. Raghu, CAFor Respondent: Shri G. Suresh Periasamy, JCIT
Section 131Section 139(1)Section 143(3)Section 147Section 148Section 271(1)(c)Section 274

u/s 271(1)(c) has been held as justified by a number of Courts. 4.1 In the case of DCIT vs. R.Padmanabhan [2015] 371 ITR 211, High Court of Madras held as below after considering the facts and circumstances of that case: "It is seen from the order of the assessing officer that after the survey being conducted

SHEIKH KUTBUDDIN HABIB,COIMBATORE vs. ACIT, COIMBATORE

In the result, the appeal filed by the assessee is dismissed

ITA 263/CHNY/2017[2010-11]Status: DisposedITAT Chennai18 Aug 2021AY 2010-11

Bench: Shri V. Durga Rao & Shri G. Manjunathaआयकर अपील सं./Ita Nos.: 263 & 264/Chny/2017 िनधा"रण वष" / Assessment Years: 2010-11 & 2011-12

For Appellant: Shri K. Raghu, CAFor Respondent: Shri G. Suresh Periasamy, JCIT
Section 131Section 139(1)Section 143(3)Section 147Section 148Section 271(1)(c)Section 274

u/s 271(1)(c) has been held as justified by a number of Courts. 4.1 In the case of DCIT vs. R.Padmanabhan [2015] 371 ITR 211, High Court of Madras held as below after considering the facts and circumstances of that case: "It is seen from the order of the assessing officer that after the survey being conducted

D.SHANTHA,VILLUPURAM vs. ITO, VILLUPURAM

In the result, the assessee’s appeal in ITA No

ITA 1593/CHNY/2016[2008-09]Status: DisposedITAT Chennai27 Sept 2017AY 2008-09

Bench: Shri N.R.S. Ganesan & Shri S. Jayaraman

For Appellant: Shri. T. Vasudevan, AdvocateFor Respondent: Shri. Nataraja, JCIT
Section 143(3)Section 263Section 271(1)(c)

revised return on 05.03.2010 admitting a total income of Rs. 7,25,460/- and an agricultural income of Rs. 1,24,000/-. The AO completed the assessment u/s. 143(3) on 13.12.2010 determining the :-3-: ITA Nos. 1593, 1828 & 1829& 1803/Mds/2016 total income at Rs. 19,52,590/-. The assessee did not file any appeal against this assessment order

D.SHANTHA,VILLUPURAM vs. ITO, VILLUPURAM

In the result, the assessee’s appeal in ITA No

ITA 1829/CHNY/2016[2009-10]Status: DisposedITAT Chennai27 Sept 2017AY 2009-10

Bench: Shri N.R.S. Ganesan & Shri S. Jayaraman

For Appellant: Shri. T. Vasudevan, AdvocateFor Respondent: Shri. Nataraja, JCIT
Section 143(3)Section 263Section 271(1)(c)

revised return on 05.03.2010 admitting a total income of Rs. 7,25,460/- and an agricultural income of Rs. 1,24,000/-. The AO completed the assessment u/s. 143(3) on 13.12.2010 determining the :-3-: ITA Nos. 1593, 1828 & 1829& 1803/Mds/2016 total income at Rs. 19,52,590/-. The assessee did not file any appeal against this assessment order

D.SHANTHA,VILLUPURAM vs. ITO, VILLUPURAM

In the result, the assessee’s appeal in ITA No

ITA 1828/CHNY/2016[2008-09]Status: DisposedITAT Chennai27 Sept 2017AY 2008-09

Bench: Shri N.R.S. Ganesan & Shri S. Jayaraman

For Appellant: Shri. T. Vasudevan, AdvocateFor Respondent: Shri. Nataraja, JCIT
Section 143(3)Section 263Section 271(1)(c)

revised return on 05.03.2010 admitting a total income of Rs. 7,25,460/- and an agricultural income of Rs. 1,24,000/-. The AO completed the assessment u/s. 143(3) on 13.12.2010 determining the :-3-: ITA Nos. 1593, 1828 & 1829& 1803/Mds/2016 total income at Rs. 19,52,590/-. The assessee did not file any appeal against this assessment order

DCIT, VILLUPURAM vs. D.SANTHA, KALLAKURICHI

In the result, the assessee’s appeal in ITA No

ITA 1803/CHNY/2016[2008-09]Status: DisposedITAT Chennai27 Sept 2017AY 2008-09

Bench: Shri N.R.S. Ganesan & Shri S. Jayaraman

For Appellant: Shri. T. Vasudevan, AdvocateFor Respondent: Shri. Nataraja, JCIT
Section 143(3)Section 263Section 271(1)(c)

revised return on 05.03.2010 admitting a total income of Rs. 7,25,460/- and an agricultural income of Rs. 1,24,000/-. The AO completed the assessment u/s. 143(3) on 13.12.2010 determining the :-3-: ITA Nos. 1593, 1828 & 1829& 1803/Mds/2016 total income at Rs. 19,52,590/-. The assessee did not file any appeal against this assessment order

MIDAS GOLDEN DISTILLERIES P. LTD ,SRIPERUMBUDUR vs. OFFICE OF THE DEPUTY COMMISSIONER OF INCOME TAX, NUNGAMBAKKAM

In the result, the appeal of the assessee is dismissed

ITA 2955/CHNY/2024[2014-15]Status: DisposedITAT Chennai07 May 2025AY 2014-15

Bench: Hon’Ble Shri Manu Kumar Giri & Hon’Ble Shri Amitabh Shuklaआयकर अपील सं./Ita No.2955/Chny/2024, Assessment Years: 2014-15

For Appellant: Shri Sanjay, CAFor Respondent: Shri Shivanand K Kalakeri, CIT
Section 132Section 132(4)

bogus purchases were siphoned off from the system and in turn handed over to the assessee Company in lieu of over invoicing of sales done to the assessee apparently collected by him / his employees/ business concerns so as to meet certain incidental expenses which are peculiar to this line of business. Shri K.Karthikeyan also furnished the quantitative details of bottles

ARVIND NANDAGOPAL,CHENNAI vs. ACIT, CC-3(1), CHENNAI

In the result, all appeals filed by the assessee are allowed

ITA 2271/CHNY/2024[2015-16]Status: DisposedITAT Chennai07 Nov 2025AY 2015-16

Bench: Shri Aby T. Varkey & Shri S.R.Raghunatha

For Respondent: Mr.M. Murali, CIT
Section 131Section 132

revisions and reassessments and each scheme has its distinct set of conditions and stipulations that must be strictly adhered to. The sub-heading of Section 153A of the Act is "Assessment in case of Search or requisition" which is a special provision for assessment in case of an assessee against whom search u/s. 132 or requisition under section 132A

ARVIND NANDAGOPAL,CHENNAI vs. ACIT, CC-3(1),, CHENNAI

In the result, all appeals filed by the assessee are allowed

ITA 2273/CHNY/2024[2017-18]Status: DisposedITAT Chennai07 Nov 2025AY 2017-18

Bench: Shri Aby T. Varkey & Shri S.R.Raghunatha

For Respondent: Mr.M. Murali, CIT
Section 131Section 132

revisions and reassessments and each scheme has its distinct set of conditions and stipulations that must be strictly adhered to. The sub-heading of Section 153A of the Act is "Assessment in case of Search or requisition" which is a special provision for assessment in case of an assessee against whom search u/s. 132 or requisition under section 132A

ARVIND NANDAGOPAL,CHENNAI vs. ACIT, CC-3(1),, CHENNAI

In the result, all appeals filed by the assessee are allowed

ITA 2272/CHNY/2024[2016-17]Status: DisposedITAT Chennai07 Nov 2025AY 2016-17

Bench: Shri Aby T. Varkey & Shri S.R.Raghunatha

For Respondent: Mr.M. Murali, CIT
Section 131Section 132

revisions and reassessments and each scheme has its distinct set of conditions and stipulations that must be strictly adhered to. The sub-heading of Section 153A of the Act is "Assessment in case of Search or requisition" which is a special provision for assessment in case of an assessee against whom search u/s. 132 or requisition under section 132A

ARVIND NANDAGOPAL,CHENNAI vs. ACIT, CC-3(1), CHENNAI

In the result, all appeals filed by the assessee are allowed

ITA 2270/CHNY/2024[2014-15]Status: DisposedITAT Chennai07 Nov 2025AY 2014-15

Bench: Shri Aby T. Varkey & Shri S.R.Raghunatha

For Respondent: Mr.M. Murali, CIT
Section 131Section 132

revisions and reassessments and each scheme has its distinct set of conditions and stipulations that must be strictly adhered to. The sub-heading of Section 153A of the Act is "Assessment in case of Search or requisition" which is a special provision for assessment in case of an assessee against whom search u/s. 132 or requisition under section 132A