BharatTax.net
SearchITATHigh CourtsSupreme CourtPhrasesAI ResearchHistory

Filters

BharatTax.net

Free search engine for ITAT (Income Tax Appellate Tribunal) judgments across all 28 benches in India.

Quick Links

  • Search Judgments
  • Browse by Bench
  • Recent Judgments

About

BharatTax provides free access to Income Tax Appellate Tribunal orders for legal research and reference.

© 2026 BharatTax.net. All rights reserved.

24 results for “TDS”+ Section 80P(2)(d)clear

Sorted by relevance

Mumbai139Bangalore56Chennai24Pune22Ahmedabad21Delhi19Visakhapatnam18Kolkata13Jaipur12Raipur11Nagpur9Lucknow9Cochin8Surat7Jabalpur4Chandigarh3Indore2Amritsar1Karnataka1Kerala1Panaji1Rajkot1Hyderabad1

Key Topics

Section 80P(2)(a)25Section 80P24Deduction19Section 244A14Section 15414Section 246A14Disallowance13Section 14A12Section 36(1)12TDS

THE THANJAVUR DISTRICT CO OP MILK PRODUCERS UNION LIMITED,THANJAVUR vs. ACIT, CIRCLE2(1), TRICHY

In the result, appeal of the Assessee is Allowed

ITA 404/CHNY/2022[2017-18]Status: DisposedITAT Chennai21 Nov 2022AY 2017-18

Bench: Shri Mahavir Singh, Vice- & Dr. Dipak P. Ripoteआयकरअपीलसं. / Ita No.404/Chny/2022 िनधा"रणवष" / Assessment Year : 2017-18 The Thanjavur District Co Op The Principal Milk Producers Union Limited, Vs Commissioner Of Income No.1, Nanjikottai Road, Tax-1, Madurai. Thanjavur – 613006. Pan: Aaaat 0224 E Appellant/ Assessee Respondent /Revenue Assessee By K.Meenakshisundaram - Itp Revenue By Shri M.Rajan – Cit(Dr) Date Of Hearing 23/08/2022 Date Of Pronouncement 21/11/2022 आदेश/ Order Per Dr. Dipak P. Ripote, Am: This Is An Appeal Filed By The Appellant Assessee Against The Order U/S 263 Of The Income Tax Act (Act) Of The Principal Commissioner Of Income Tax Madurai-1, Dated 26/03/2022 For A.Y. 2017-18. The Assessee Has Raised Following Grounds Of Appeal: “The Order Under Section 263 Of The Income Tax Act Dated 26/3/2022 Received By The Appellant On 1/4/2022 Is Objected To On The Following Grounds Of Appeal. 1. The Learned Principal Commissioner Madurai Erred In Setting Aside The Valid Order Passed By The Assisstant Commissioner Of Income Tax Circle-2(1) Trichy Dated 5/11/2019 For The Assessment Year 2017- 2018 Under Section 263 On Mere Assumptions & Presumptions That The Order Had Been Erroneous & Prejudicial To The Interest Of Revenue. 2. The Learned Principal Commissioner Misdirected Himself That The Valid Order Passed By The Assisstant Commissioner Was Erroneous & Prejudicial To The Interest Of Revenue Simply For The Reason That The

Section 263Section 80Section 80PSection 80P(2)

Showing 1–20 of 24 · Page 1 of 2

11
Section 26310
Rectification u/s 1547
Section 80P(2)(d)
Section 80P(2)(e)

section 80(P)(2)(d). 3. The learned Principal Commissioner is believed to have set aside the valid order mainly on account of the objections raised by Revenue Audit party or the Internal Audit party and such action on the part of the Principal Commissioner is erroneous as the Audit parties are not the persons vested with powers to express

ASSISTANT COMMISSIONER OF INCOME TAX, SALEM vs. PANDYAN GRAMA BANK, SALEM

In the result, the appeal of the revenue is dismissed and the CO of the assessee is partly allowed

ITA 2870/CHNY/2024[2016]Status: DisposedITAT Chennai27 Jun 2025

Bench: Shri S.S. Viswanethra Ravi & Shri S. R. Raghunathaआयकर अपील सं./Ita No.: 2870/Chny/2024 & Co No.06/Chny/2025 (In Ita No.: 2870/Chny/2024) िनधा"रण वष" / Assessment Year: 2016-17 The Assistant Commissioner Of Pandyan Grama Bank, Income Tax, Vs. Now Known As Tamil Nadu Grama Circle 1, Bank, Salem. No.6, Yercaud Road, Hasthampatty, Salem – 636 007. [Pan: Aahat-7854-K] (अपीलाथ"/Appellant) (""थ"/Respondent) Assessee By : Shri. N. Arjun Raj, Advocate & Shri. P. Gurusamy, I.T.P. Department By : Shri. Shivanand K Kalakeri, C.I.T. सुनवाई की तारीख/Date Of Hearing : 15.04.2025 घोषणा की तारीख/Date Of Pronouncement : 27.06.2025

For Appellant: Shri. N. Arjun Raj, Advocate &For Respondent: Shri. Shivanand K Kalakeri, C.I.T
Section 143(2)Section 147Section 80P

D E R PER S. R. RAGHUNATHA, AM: This appeal filed by the Revenue and cross objection filed by the assessee are directed against the order of the Commissioner of Income Tax (Appeals), National Faceless Appeal Centre (NFAC), Delhi, for the assessment year 2016-17, vide order dated 18.07.2024. Since facts are identical and issues are common, appeal filed

ITO WARD 5, PONDICHERRY vs. MS/ CENTRAL CO OP PROCESSING SUPPLY AND MARKETING SOCIETY LTD, PONDICHERY

In the result, the appeal filed by the Revenue is dismissed

ITA 418/CHNY/2018[2012-13]Status: DisposedITAT Chennai12 Sept 2018AY 2012-13

Bench: Shri N.R.S. Ganesan & Shri A. Mohan Alankamony

For Appellant: Ms. S. Vijayaprabha, JCITFor Respondent: None
Section 80P(2)(iii)

D E R PER N.R.S. GANESAN, JUDICIAL MEMBER: This appeal of the Revenue is directed against the order of the Commissioner of Income Tax (Appeals), Puducherry, dated 02.11.2017 and pertains to assessment year 2012-13. 2 I.T.A. No.418/Chny/18 2. No one appeared for the assessee inspite of service of notice by RPAD. Therefore, we heard the Ld. Departmental Representative

M/S MADRAS RACE CLUB,CHENNAI vs. DCIT CORPO CIRCLE 4 (1), CHENNAI

In the result, the appeals filed by the assessee in ITA Nos

ITA 501/CHNY/2018[2012-13]Status: DisposedITAT Chennai13 Jul 2022AY 2012-13

Bench: Shri Mahavir Singhand Shri Manoj Kumar Aggarwal

For Appellant: Shri G. Baskar & Shri I. DineshFor Respondent: Shri AR.V. Sreenivasan, Addl.CIT
Section 143(3)Section 194C

d) payment to jockeys and trainers fund and employees welfare society is a kind of contribution connected with the business activities of the assessee and the said payments are also not covered by any of the TDS provisions. (e) the last item “Syces subsidy” is the money paid to the owners of horses from out of stake money

M/S MADRAS RACE CLUB,CHENNAI vs. DCIT CORPO CIRCLE 4 (1), CHENNAI

In the result, the appeals filed by the assessee in ITA Nos

ITA 502/CHNY/2018[2013-14]Status: DisposedITAT Chennai13 Jul 2022AY 2013-14

Bench: Shri Mahavir Singhand Shri Manoj Kumar Aggarwal

For Appellant: Shri G. Baskar & Shri I. DineshFor Respondent: Shri AR.V. Sreenivasan, Addl.CIT
Section 143(3)Section 194C

d) payment to jockeys and trainers fund and employees welfare society is a kind of contribution connected with the business activities of the assessee and the said payments are also not covered by any of the TDS provisions. (e) the last item “Syces subsidy” is the money paid to the owners of horses from out of stake money

M/S MADRAS RACE CLUB,CHENNAI vs. DCIT CORPO CIRCLE 4 (1), CHENNAI

In the result, the appeals filed by the assessee in ITA Nos

ITA 503/CHNY/2018[2014-15]Status: DisposedITAT Chennai13 Jul 2022AY 2014-15

Bench: Shri Mahavir Singhand Shri Manoj Kumar Aggarwal

For Appellant: Shri G. Baskar & Shri I. DineshFor Respondent: Shri AR.V. Sreenivasan, Addl.CIT
Section 143(3)Section 194C

d) payment to jockeys and trainers fund and employees welfare society is a kind of contribution connected with the business activities of the assessee and the said payments are also not covered by any of the TDS provisions. (e) the last item “Syces subsidy” is the money paid to the owners of horses from out of stake money

THE INCOME TAX OFFICER, WARD -4, PUDUCHERRY vs. KALAPET PRIMARY AGRICULTURAL CO-OPERATIVE BANK LTD. , PONDICHERRY

In the result, the Revenue’s appeals are allowed for statistical purposes’’

ITA 2190/CHNY/2017[2008-09]Status: DisposedITAT Chennai06 Feb 2018AY 2008-09

Bench: Shri Abraham P. George & Shri Duvvuru Rl Reddy]

For Appellant: Mrs. S. Vijayaprabha, IRS, JCITFor Respondent: Shri. T. Vasudevan, Advocate
Section 5Section 56Section 80Section 80P(2)(a)Section 80P(4)

D E R PER ABRAHAM P. GEORGE, ACCOUNTANT MEMBER These are appeals filed by the Revenue directed against an order dated 28.06.2017 of ld. Commissioner of Income Tax (Appeals)- Puducherry. 2. Grounds taken by the Revenue are reproduced hereunder:- 1.‘’It was seen from the assessment order dt. 31.03.2016 that assessing officer treated the assessee as co-operative bank

ACIT CIRCLE 1, KUMBAKONAM vs. CITY UNION BANK LIMITED, KUMBAKONAM

In the result, appeal of the Revenue in ITA 1316/CHNY/2018

ITA 1315/CHNY/2018[2012-13]Status: DisposedITAT Chennai09 Jul 2019AY 2012-13

Bench: Shri George Mathan & Shri Inturi Rama Rao

For Appellant: Shri. S. Ananthan,C.AFor Respondent: Shri. Sailendra Mamidi, IRS
Section 143(3)Section 14ASection 36(1)Section 36(1)(vii)Section 40Section 41(1)

D. S. Chaudhry IT (A&J), CBDT, New Delhi.' ITA Nos.1129-30/-1315-16/18 :- 14 -: From the reading of the above circular, it is clear that investments held by the banking concern are treated as a part of business of the banking company and therefore, the income arising from such investments is treated as part of business income falling under

ACIT CIRCLE 1, KUMBAKONAM vs. CITY UNION BANK LIMITED, KUMBAKONAM

In the result, appeal of the Revenue in ITA 1316/CHNY/2018

ITA 1316/CHNY/2018[2014-15]Status: DisposedITAT Chennai09 Jul 2019AY 2014-15

Bench: Shri George Mathan & Shri Inturi Rama Rao

For Appellant: Shri. S. Ananthan,C.AFor Respondent: Shri. Sailendra Mamidi, IRS
Section 143(3)Section 14ASection 36(1)Section 36(1)(vii)Section 40Section 41(1)

D. S. Chaudhry IT (A&J), CBDT, New Delhi.' ITA Nos.1129-30/-1315-16/18 :- 14 -: From the reading of the above circular, it is clear that investments held by the banking concern are treated as a part of business of the banking company and therefore, the income arising from such investments is treated as part of business income falling under

CITY UNION BANK LIMITED,KUMBAKONAM vs. ACIT CIRCLE 1, KUMBAKONAM

In the result, appeal of the Revenue in ITA 1316/CHNY/2018

ITA 1129/CHNY/2018[2012-13]Status: DisposedITAT Chennai09 Jul 2019AY 2012-13

Bench: Shri George Mathan & Shri Inturi Rama Rao

For Appellant: Shri. S. Ananthan,C.AFor Respondent: Shri. Sailendra Mamidi, IRS
Section 143(3)Section 14ASection 36(1)Section 36(1)(vii)Section 40Section 41(1)

D. S. Chaudhry IT (A&J), CBDT, New Delhi.' ITA Nos.1129-30/-1315-16/18 :- 14 -: From the reading of the above circular, it is clear that investments held by the banking concern are treated as a part of business of the banking company and therefore, the income arising from such investments is treated as part of business income falling under

CITY UNION BANK LIMITED,KUMBAKONAM vs. ACIT CIRCLE 1, KUMBAKONAM

In the result, appeal of the Revenue in ITA 1316/CHNY/2018

ITA 1130/CHNY/2018[2014-15]Status: DisposedITAT Chennai09 Jul 2019AY 2014-15

Bench: Shri George Mathan & Shri Inturi Rama Rao

For Appellant: Shri. S. Ananthan,C.AFor Respondent: Shri. Sailendra Mamidi, IRS
Section 143(3)Section 14ASection 36(1)Section 36(1)(vii)Section 40Section 41(1)

D. S. Chaudhry IT (A&J), CBDT, New Delhi.' ITA Nos.1129-30/-1315-16/18 :- 14 -: From the reading of the above circular, it is clear that investments held by the banking concern are treated as a part of business of the banking company and therefore, the income arising from such investments is treated as part of business income falling under

PANDYAN GRAMA BANK,VIRUDHUNAGAR vs. ACIT, VIRUDHUNAGAR

In the result, the assessee’s appeal in ITA Nos

ITA 2445/CHNY/2016[2009-10]Status: DisposedITAT Chennai25 Oct 2018AY 2009-10

Bench: Shri George Mathan & Shri S. Jayaramanआयकर अपील सं/.I.T.A. Nos. 685, 684, 687 & 688/Chny/2018 & 2443, 2444 & 2445/Chny/2016 "नधा"रण वष"/Assessment Years : 2007-08, 2008-09, 2009-10 & 2010-11 Pandyan Grama Bank, The Assistant Commissioner Of Admn. Office, Vs. Income Tax, No. 2-70-1, Collectroate Complex, Katcheri Road, Virudhunagar, 626 002. Virundhunagar, 626 001. [Pan: Aaaaap 0895P] (%&यथ'/Respondent) (अपीलाथ"/Appellant)

For Appellant: Shri P. Gurusamy, ITPFor Respondent: Shri Clement Ramesh Kumar, Addl. CIT
Section 154Section 244ASection 246ASection 80P(2)(a)

D E R PER BENCH : The assessee filed these appeals against the orders of the Commissioner of Income Tax (Appeals)-1, Madurai in ITA Nos. 154, 155, 156 & 153/16-17 dated 23.01.2018 for assessment years 2007-08, 2008-09, 2009-10 & 2010-11, respectively and the consolidated orders of the Commissioner of Income Tax (Appeals)-3, Madurai

PANDYAN GRAMA BANK,VIRUDHUNAGAR vs. ACIT CIRCLE 1, VIRUDHUNAGAR

In the result, the assessee’s appeal in ITA Nos

ITA 685/CHNY/2018[2007-08]Status: DisposedITAT Chennai25 Oct 2018AY 2007-08

Bench: Shri George Mathan & Shri S. Jayaramanआयकर अपील सं/.I.T.A. Nos. 685, 684, 687 & 688/Chny/2018 & 2443, 2444 & 2445/Chny/2016 "नधा"रण वष"/Assessment Years : 2007-08, 2008-09, 2009-10 & 2010-11 Pandyan Grama Bank, The Assistant Commissioner Of Admn. Office, Vs. Income Tax, No. 2-70-1, Collectroate Complex, Katcheri Road, Virudhunagar, 626 002. Virundhunagar, 626 001. [Pan: Aaaaap 0895P] (%&यथ'/Respondent) (अपीलाथ"/Appellant)

For Appellant: Shri P. Gurusamy, ITPFor Respondent: Shri Clement Ramesh Kumar, Addl. CIT
Section 154Section 244ASection 246ASection 80P(2)(a)

D E R PER BENCH : The assessee filed these appeals against the orders of the Commissioner of Income Tax (Appeals)-1, Madurai in ITA Nos. 154, 155, 156 & 153/16-17 dated 23.01.2018 for assessment years 2007-08, 2008-09, 2009-10 & 2010-11, respectively and the consolidated orders of the Commissioner of Income Tax (Appeals)-3, Madurai

PANDYAN GRAMA BANK,VIRUDHUNAGAR vs. ACIT CIRCLE 1, VIRUDHUNAGAR

In the result, the assessee’s appeal in ITA Nos

ITA 687/CHNY/2018[2009-10]Status: DisposedITAT Chennai25 Oct 2018AY 2009-10

Bench: Shri George Mathan & Shri S. Jayaramanआयकर अपील सं/.I.T.A. Nos. 685, 684, 687 & 688/Chny/2018 & 2443, 2444 & 2445/Chny/2016 "नधा"रण वष"/Assessment Years : 2007-08, 2008-09, 2009-10 & 2010-11 Pandyan Grama Bank, The Assistant Commissioner Of Admn. Office, Vs. Income Tax, No. 2-70-1, Collectroate Complex, Katcheri Road, Virudhunagar, 626 002. Virundhunagar, 626 001. [Pan: Aaaaap 0895P] (%&यथ'/Respondent) (अपीलाथ"/Appellant)

For Appellant: Shri P. Gurusamy, ITPFor Respondent: Shri Clement Ramesh Kumar, Addl. CIT
Section 154Section 244ASection 246ASection 80P(2)(a)

D E R PER BENCH : The assessee filed these appeals against the orders of the Commissioner of Income Tax (Appeals)-1, Madurai in ITA Nos. 154, 155, 156 & 153/16-17 dated 23.01.2018 for assessment years 2007-08, 2008-09, 2009-10 & 2010-11, respectively and the consolidated orders of the Commissioner of Income Tax (Appeals)-3, Madurai

PANDYAN GRAMA BANK,VIRUDHUNAGAR vs. ACIT CIRCLE 1, VIRUDHUNAGAR

In the result, the assessee’s appeal in ITA Nos

ITA 686/CHNY/2018[2008-09]Status: DisposedITAT Chennai25 Oct 2018AY 2008-09

Bench: Shri George Mathan & Shri S. Jayaramanआयकर अपील सं/.I.T.A. Nos. 685, 684, 687 & 688/Chny/2018 & 2443, 2444 & 2445/Chny/2016 "नधा"रण वष"/Assessment Years : 2007-08, 2008-09, 2009-10 & 2010-11 Pandyan Grama Bank, The Assistant Commissioner Of Admn. Office, Vs. Income Tax, No. 2-70-1, Collectroate Complex, Katcheri Road, Virudhunagar, 626 002. Virundhunagar, 626 001. [Pan: Aaaaap 0895P] (%&यथ'/Respondent) (अपीलाथ"/Appellant)

For Appellant: Shri P. Gurusamy, ITPFor Respondent: Shri Clement Ramesh Kumar, Addl. CIT
Section 154Section 244ASection 246ASection 80P(2)(a)

D E R PER BENCH : The assessee filed these appeals against the orders of the Commissioner of Income Tax (Appeals)-1, Madurai in ITA Nos. 154, 155, 156 & 153/16-17 dated 23.01.2018 for assessment years 2007-08, 2008-09, 2009-10 & 2010-11, respectively and the consolidated orders of the Commissioner of Income Tax (Appeals)-3, Madurai

PANDYAN GRAMA BANK,VIRUDHUNAGAR vs. ACIT CIRCLE 1, VIRUDHUNAGAR

In the result, the assessee’s appeal in ITA Nos

ITA 688/CHNY/2018[2010-11]Status: DisposedITAT Chennai25 Oct 2018AY 2010-11

Bench: Shri George Mathan & Shri S. Jayaramanआयकर अपील सं/.I.T.A. Nos. 685, 684, 687 & 688/Chny/2018 & 2443, 2444 & 2445/Chny/2016 "नधा"रण वष"/Assessment Years : 2007-08, 2008-09, 2009-10 & 2010-11 Pandyan Grama Bank, The Assistant Commissioner Of Admn. Office, Vs. Income Tax, No. 2-70-1, Collectroate Complex, Katcheri Road, Virudhunagar, 626 002. Virundhunagar, 626 001. [Pan: Aaaaap 0895P] (%&यथ'/Respondent) (अपीलाथ"/Appellant)

For Appellant: Shri P. Gurusamy, ITPFor Respondent: Shri Clement Ramesh Kumar, Addl. CIT
Section 154Section 244ASection 246ASection 80P(2)(a)

D E R PER BENCH : The assessee filed these appeals against the orders of the Commissioner of Income Tax (Appeals)-1, Madurai in ITA Nos. 154, 155, 156 & 153/16-17 dated 23.01.2018 for assessment years 2007-08, 2008-09, 2009-10 & 2010-11, respectively and the consolidated orders of the Commissioner of Income Tax (Appeals)-3, Madurai

PANDYAN GRAMA BANK,VIRUDHUNAGAR vs. ACIT, VIRUDHUNAGAR

In the result, the assessee’s appeal in ITA Nos

ITA 2444/CHNY/2016[2008-09]Status: DisposedITAT Chennai25 Oct 2018AY 2008-09

Bench: Shri George Mathan & Shri S. Jayaramanआयकर अपील सं/.I.T.A. Nos. 685, 684, 687 & 688/Chny/2018 & 2443, 2444 & 2445/Chny/2016 "नधा"रण वष"/Assessment Years : 2007-08, 2008-09, 2009-10 & 2010-11 Pandyan Grama Bank, The Assistant Commissioner Of Admn. Office, Vs. Income Tax, No. 2-70-1, Collectroate Complex, Katcheri Road, Virudhunagar, 626 002. Virundhunagar, 626 001. [Pan: Aaaaap 0895P] (%&यथ'/Respondent) (अपीलाथ"/Appellant)

For Appellant: Shri P. Gurusamy, ITPFor Respondent: Shri Clement Ramesh Kumar, Addl. CIT
Section 154Section 244ASection 246ASection 80P(2)(a)

D E R PER BENCH : The assessee filed these appeals against the orders of the Commissioner of Income Tax (Appeals)-1, Madurai in ITA Nos. 154, 155, 156 & 153/16-17 dated 23.01.2018 for assessment years 2007-08, 2008-09, 2009-10 & 2010-11, respectively and the consolidated orders of the Commissioner of Income Tax (Appeals)-3, Madurai

PANDYAN GRAMA BANK,VIRUDHUNAGAR vs. ACIT, VIRUDHUNAGAR

In the result, the assessee’s appeal in ITA Nos

ITA 2443/CHNY/2016[2007-08]Status: DisposedITAT Chennai25 Oct 2018AY 2007-08

Bench: Shri George Mathan & Shri S. Jayaramanआयकर अपील सं/.I.T.A. Nos. 685, 684, 687 & 688/Chny/2018 & 2443, 2444 & 2445/Chny/2016 "नधा"रण वष"/Assessment Years : 2007-08, 2008-09, 2009-10 & 2010-11 Pandyan Grama Bank, The Assistant Commissioner Of Admn. Office, Vs. Income Tax, No. 2-70-1, Collectroate Complex, Katcheri Road, Virudhunagar, 626 002. Virundhunagar, 626 001. [Pan: Aaaaap 0895P] (%&यथ'/Respondent) (अपीलाथ"/Appellant)

For Appellant: Shri P. Gurusamy, ITPFor Respondent: Shri Clement Ramesh Kumar, Addl. CIT
Section 154Section 244ASection 246ASection 80P(2)(a)

D E R PER BENCH : The assessee filed these appeals against the orders of the Commissioner of Income Tax (Appeals)-1, Madurai in ITA Nos. 154, 155, 156 & 153/16-17 dated 23.01.2018 for assessment years 2007-08, 2008-09, 2009-10 & 2010-11, respectively and the consolidated orders of the Commissioner of Income Tax (Appeals)-3, Madurai

RAJTELEVISION NETWORK LIMITED,CHNNAI vs. ACIT, NON CORPORAE CIRCLE-20, CHENNAI

In the result both appeals of the assessee are allowed

ITA 531/CHNY/2024[2018-19]Status: DisposedITAT Chennai09 Aug 2024AY 2018-19

Bench: Shri Aby T Varkey, Hon’Ble & Shri S.R.Raghunatha, Hon’Bleआयकरअपीलसं./Ita Nos.: 530 & 531/Chny/2024 िनधा"रणवष" / Assessment Years: 2014-15 & 2018-19 Acit, Raj Television Network V. Non Corporate Circle 20, Limited, Chennai – 34. No. 32, Poes Road 2Nd Street, Teynampet, Chennai – 600 018. [Pan: Aaacr-3580-P] (अपीलाथ"/Appellant) (""यथ"/Respondent) अपीलाथ"क"ओरसे/Appellant By : Shri.K. Balasubramanian, Advocate ""यथ"क"ओरसे/Respondent By : Shri.T.M. Suganthamala, Addl. Cit सुनवाई क" तारीख/Date Of Hearing : 31.07.2024 घोषणा क" तारीख/Date Of Pronouncement : 09.08.2024 आदेश /O R D E R

For Appellant: Shri.K. Balasubramanian, AdvocateFor Respondent: Shri.T.M. Suganthamala, Addl. CIT
Section 263

D E R PER S. R. RAGHUNATHA, ACCOUNTANT MEMBER: These appeals instituted by the assessee are against the common order of the Commissioner of Income Tax (Appeals), National Faceless Appeal Centre (NFAC), Delhi, for the assessment years 2014-15 & 2018-19, vide order dated 02.01.2024.For the sake of convenience, the appeals filed by the assessee are being heard together

RAJ TELEISION NETWORK LIMITED,CHENNAI vs. ACIT, NON CORPORAE CIRCLE-20, CHENNAI

In the result both appeals of the assessee are allowed

ITA 530/CHNY/2024[2014-15]Status: DisposedITAT Chennai09 Aug 2024AY 2014-15

Bench: Shri Aby T Varkey, Hon’Ble & Shri S.R.Raghunatha, Hon’Bleआयकरअपीलसं./Ita Nos.: 530 & 531/Chny/2024 िनधा"रणवष" / Assessment Years: 2014-15 & 2018-19 Acit, Raj Television Network V. Non Corporate Circle 20, Limited, Chennai – 34. No. 32, Poes Road 2Nd Street, Teynampet, Chennai – 600 018. [Pan: Aaacr-3580-P] (अपीलाथ"/Appellant) (""यथ"/Respondent) अपीलाथ"क"ओरसे/Appellant By : Shri.K. Balasubramanian, Advocate ""यथ"क"ओरसे/Respondent By : Shri.T.M. Suganthamala, Addl. Cit सुनवाई क" तारीख/Date Of Hearing : 31.07.2024 घोषणा क" तारीख/Date Of Pronouncement : 09.08.2024 आदेश /O R D E R

For Appellant: Shri.K. Balasubramanian, AdvocateFor Respondent: Shri.T.M. Suganthamala, Addl. CIT
Section 263

D E R PER S. R. RAGHUNATHA, ACCOUNTANT MEMBER: These appeals instituted by the assessee are against the common order of the Commissioner of Income Tax (Appeals), National Faceless Appeal Centre (NFAC), Delhi, for the assessment years 2014-15 & 2018-19, vide order dated 02.01.2024.For the sake of convenience, the appeals filed by the assessee are being heard together