BharatTax.net
SearchITATHigh CourtsSupreme CourtPhrasesAI ResearchHistory

Filters

BharatTax.net

Free search engine for ITAT (Income Tax Appellate Tribunal) judgments across all 28 benches in India.

Quick Links

  • Search Judgments
  • Browse by Bench
  • Recent Judgments

About

BharatTax provides free access to Income Tax Appellate Tribunal orders for legal research and reference.

© 2026 BharatTax.net. All rights reserved.

3 results for “TDS”+ Section 80Lclear

Sorted by relevance

Chennai3Delhi2Mumbai2

Key Topics

Section 56(2)(vii)4Disallowance3Addition to Income3Section 56(2)2Section 14A2Section 144A2Section 160(1)2Section 161(1)2Section 56(1)2Section 562

SHRIRAM OWNERSHIP TRUST,CHENNAI vs. DCIT, CHENNAI

In the result, the appeals of the assessee for both

ITA 406/CHNY/2017[2013-14]Status: DisposedITAT Chennai05 May 2017AY 2013-14

Bench: Shri N.R.S. Ganesan & Shri Abraham P. George] आयकर अपील सं./I.T.A. Nos. 406 & 407/Mds/2017 "नधा"रण वष" /Assessment Years : 2013-2014 & 2014-2015. Shriram Ownership Trust, Vs. The Deputy Commissioner Of No.4, Shriram House, I Floor, Income Tax, Burkit Road, T. Nagar, Non Corporate Circle 2, Chennai 600 017. Chennai 600 034. [Pan Aagts 2243H] (अपीलाथ"/Appellant) (""यथ"/Respondent)

For Appellant: Shri. R. Sivaraman, AdvocateFor Respondent: Shri. Shaji P. Jacob, IRS, Addl. CIT
Section 144ASection 14ASection 160(1)Section 161(1)Section 2(31)Section 56Section 56(1)Section 56(2)
Section 56(2)(vii)

80L, 54F and 194A of the Act, it should be so considered for application of Sec. 56(2)(vii) as well. As held by Apex Court in the case of CIT vs. Sun Engineering Works P. Ltd 198 ITR 297, it is neither desirable nor permissible to pick out a word or sentence divorced from the context of a question

SHRIRAM OWNERSHIP TRUST,CHENNAI vs. DCIT, CHENNAI

In the result, the appeals of the assessee for both

ITA 407/CHNY/2017[2014-15]Status: DisposedITAT Chennai05 May 2017AY 2014-15

Bench: Shri N.R.S. Ganesan & Shri Abraham P. George] आयकर अपील सं./I.T.A. Nos. 406 & 407/Mds/2017 "नधा"रण वष" /Assessment Years : 2013-2014 & 2014-2015. Shriram Ownership Trust, Vs. The Deputy Commissioner Of No.4, Shriram House, I Floor, Income Tax, Burkit Road, T. Nagar, Non Corporate Circle 2, Chennai 600 017. Chennai 600 034. [Pan Aagts 2243H] (अपीलाथ"/Appellant) (""यथ"/Respondent)

For Appellant: Shri. R. Sivaraman, AdvocateFor Respondent: Shri. Shaji P. Jacob, IRS, Addl. CIT
Section 144ASection 14ASection 160(1)Section 161(1)Section 2(31)Section 56Section 56(1)Section 56(2)Section 56(2)(vii)

80L, 54F and 194A of the Act, it should be so considered for application of Sec. 56(2)(vii) as well. As held by Apex Court in the case of CIT vs. Sun Engineering Works P. Ltd 198 ITR 297, it is neither desirable nor permissible to pick out a word or sentence divorced from the context of a question

SIRISH KUMAR BAFNA,CHENNAI vs. ACIT, CHENNAI

In the result, the appeal filed by the assessee is dismissed

ITA 1034/CHNY/2016[2010-11]Status: DisposedITAT Chennai28 Jul 2017AY 2010-11

Bench: Shri Chandra Poojari & Shri Duvvuru Rl Reddyआयकर अपील सं./I.T.A.No.1034/Mds/2016 "नधा"रण वष"/Assessment Year:2010-11 Shri Sirish Kumar Bafna, The Assistant Commissioner Of No. 6, Mulla Lane, Sowcarpet, Vs. Income Tax, Chennai 600 079. Business Circle Xii, [Pan: Aaepb1644B] Chennai 600 006. (अपीलाथ" /Appellant) (""यथ"/Respondent) अपीलाथ" क" ओर से / Appellant By : Shri S. Sridhar, Advocate ""यथ" क" ओर से/Respondent By : Shri Murali Mohan, Addl. Cit सुनवाई क" तार"ख/ Date Of Hearing : 29.05.2017 घोषणा क" तार"ख /Date Of Pronouncement : 28.07.2017 आदेश /O R D E R Per Duvvuru Rl Reddy: This Appeal Filed By The Assessee Is Directed Against The Order Of The Ld. Commissioner Of Income Tax (Appeals) 5, Chennai Dated 22.02.2016 Relevant To The Assessment Year 2010-11. The Only Effective Ground Raised In The Appeal Of The Assessee Is That The Ld. Cit(A) Has Erred In Confirming The Addition Being The Difference Arrived At In Interest Received As Per Form No. 26As & Interest Disclosed In The Return In The Computation Of Taxable Total Income.

For Appellant: Shri S. Sridhar, AdvocateFor Respondent: Shri Murali Mohan, Addl. CIT
Section 142(1)Section 143(1)Section 143(2)

section 142(1) of the Act were issued and served on the assessee. In response thereto, the AR of the assessee filed books of account and furnished all details. 2.1 The assessee has been deriving income from salary, house property, share of profit from other firm in the capacity as partner and income from other sources. As per AIR information