BharatTax.net
SearchITATHigh CourtsSupreme CourtPhrasesAI ResearchHistory

Filters

BharatTax.net

Free search engine for ITAT (Income Tax Appellate Tribunal) judgments across all 28 benches in India.

Quick Links

  • Search Judgments
  • Browse by Bench
  • Recent Judgments

About

BharatTax provides free access to Income Tax Appellate Tribunal orders for legal research and reference.

© 2026 BharatTax.net. All rights reserved.

4 results for “TDS”+ Section 80G(5)(ix)clear

Sorted by relevance

Delhi30Bangalore16Mumbai16Ahmedabad13Chandigarh8Indore6Chennai4Lucknow3Pune3Jaipur2SC2Surat2Hyderabad1

Key Topics

Section 1324Section 153A4

SAHAI & SONS (I) LTD.,CHENNAI vs. DCIT, CHENNAI

ITA 1447/CHNY/2017[2011-12]Status: DisposedITAT Chennai27 Jun 2018AY 2011-12

Bench: Shri N.R.S. Ganesan & Shri Abraham P. George]

For Appellant: Shri. N. Muralikumaran, AdvocateFor Respondent: Shri. D. Prabhu Mukunth Arun
Section 132Section 153A

ix) Sales Tax authorities have found that his method of raising the tax invoice is defeating the object and reasons of introduction of Tamil Nadu Value Added Tax Act ITA Nos. 1447, 1448, 1988, :- 12 -: 1989, 1449 to 1455, 1485 to 1491/17. (x) Sales Thx authorities have found that his GP is less than normal GP in bullion trade

NARESH PRASAD AGARWAL,CHENNAI vs. DCIT, CHENNAI

ITA 1449/CHNY/2017[2006-07]Status: DisposedITAT Chennai27 Jun 2018AY 2006-07

Shri N.R.S. Ganesan & Shri Abraham P. George]

Bench:
For Appellant: Shri. N. Muralikumaran, AdvocateFor Respondent: Shri. D. Prabhu Mukunth Arun
Section 132Section 153A

ix) Sales Tax authorities have found that his method of raising the tax invoice is defeating the object and reasons of introduction of Tamil Nadu Value Added Tax Act ITA Nos. 1447, 1448, 1988, :- 12 -: 1989, 1449 to 1455, 1485 to 1491/17. (x) Sales Thx authorities have found that his GP is less than normal GP in bullion trade

ACIT, CHENNAI vs. NARESH PRASAD AGARWAL, CHENNAI

ITA 1485/CHNY/2017[2006-07]Status: DisposedITAT Chennai27 Jun 2018AY 2006-07

Bench: Shri N.R.S. Ganesan & Shri Abraham P. George]

For Appellant: Shri. N. Muralikumaran, AdvocateFor Respondent: Shri. D. Prabhu Mukunth Arun
Section 132Section 153A

ix) Sales Tax authorities have found that his method of raising the tax invoice is defeating the object and reasons of introduction of Tamil Nadu Value Added Tax Act ITA Nos. 1447, 1448, 1988, :- 12 -: 1989, 1449 to 1455, 1485 to 1491/17. (x) Sales Thx authorities have found that his GP is less than normal GP in bullion trade

ACIT CENTRAL CIRCLE 3(1), CHENNAI vs. SHIV SAHAI & SONS (INDIA) LTD., CHENNAI

ITA 1988/CHNY/2017[2011-12]Status: DisposedITAT Chennai27 Jun 2018AY 2011-12

Bench: Shri N.R.S. Ganesan & Shri Abraham P. George]

For Appellant: Shri. N. Muralikumaran, AdvocateFor Respondent: Shri. D. Prabhu Mukunth Arun
Section 132Section 153A

ix) Sales Tax authorities have found that his method of raising the tax invoice is defeating the object and reasons of introduction of Tamil Nadu Value Added Tax Act ITA Nos. 1447, 1448, 1988, :- 12 -: 1989, 1449 to 1455, 1485 to 1491/17. (x) Sales Thx authorities have found that his GP is less than normal GP in bullion trade