DEPUTY COMMISSIONER OF INCOME TAX, CENTRALCIRCLE-2, MADURAI vs. IRULANDI THEVAR VETRIVEL, PALAMEDU MAIN ROAD, MADURAI

In the result, all the appeals of the Revenue are dismissed and the\nappeals of the assessee are partly allowed

65B of the Indian\nEvidence Act, 1872. The relevant scanned images of the Profit & Loss\nAccount extracted from the seized tally software was reproduced by the\nAO in the impugned assessment orders.\n4.\nUpon analysis of the above seized material i.e. the tally software,\nthe AO was of the view that, the tally data revealed that, the assessee\nhad understated

SHRI. IRULANDI THEVAR VETRIVEL,MADURAI vs. ACIT, CENTRAL CIRCLE 2, MADURAI, MADURAI

65B of the Indian\nEvidence Act, 1872. The relevant scanned images of the Profit & Loss\nAccount extracted from the seized tally software was reproduced by the\nAO in the impugned assessment orders.\n4.\nUpon analysis of the above seized material i.e. the tally software,\nthe AO was of the view that, the tally data revealed that, the assessee\nhad understated

A.GOVINDARAJ, DEPUTY COMMISSIONER OF INCOME TAX, CENTRAL CIRCLE-2, MADURAI, CENTRAL RANGE, MADURAI vs. IRULANDI THEVAR VETRIVEL, PALAMEDU MAIN ROAD MADURAI

In the result, all the appeals of the Revenue are dismissed and the\nappeals of the assessee are partly allowed

65B of the Indian\nEvidence Act, 1872. The relevant scanned images of the Profit & Loss\nAccount extracted from the seized tally software was reproduced by the\nAO in the impugned assessment orders.\n4.\nUpon analysis of the above seized material i.e. the tally software,\nthe AO was of the view that, the tally data revealed that, the assessee\nhad understated

SHRI. IRULANDI THEVAR VETRIVEL ,MADURAI vs. ACIT, CENTRAL CIRCLE 2, MADURAI, MADURAI

In the result, all the appeals of the Revenue are dismissed and the appeals of the assessee are partly allowed

Bench: Shri Aby T. Varkey & Shri Amitabh Shukla

65B of the Indian Evidence Act, 1872. The relevant scanned images of the Profit & Loss Account extracted from the seized tally software was reproduced by the AO in the impugned assessment orders. 4. Upon analysis of the above seized material i.e. the tally software, the AO was of the view that, the tally data revealed that, the assessee had understated

SHRI. IRULANDI THEVAR VETRIVEL,MADURAI vs. ACIT, CENTRAL CRICLE 2, MADURAI, MADURAI

In the result, all the appeals of the Revenue are dismissed and the appeals of the assessee are partly allowed

Bench: Shri Aby T. Varkey & Shri Amitabh Shukla

65B of the Indian Evidence Act, 1872. The relevant scanned images of the Profit & Loss Account extracted from the seized tally software was reproduced by the AO in the impugned assessment orders. 4. Upon analysis of the above seized material i.e. the tally software, the AO was of the view that, the tally data revealed that, the assessee had understated

SHRI. IRULANDI THEVAR VETRIVEL,MADURAI vs. ACIT, CENTRAL CIRCLE 2, MADURAI, MADURAI

In the result, all the appeals of the Revenue are dismissed and the appeals of the assessee are partly allowed

Bench: Shri Aby T. Varkey & Shri Amitabh Shukla

65B of the Indian Evidence Act, 1872. The relevant scanned images of the Profit & Loss Account extracted from the seized tally software was reproduced by the AO in the impugned assessment orders. 4. Upon analysis of the above seized material i.e. the tally software, the AO was of the view that, the tally data revealed that, the assessee had understated

SHRI. IRULANDI THEVAR VETRIVEL,MADURAI vs. ACIT, CENTRAL, CIRCLE 2, MADURAI, MADURAI

65B of the Indian\nEvidence Act, 1872. The relevant scanned images of the Profit & Loss\nAccount extracted from the seized tally software was reproduced by the\nAO in the impugned assessment orders.\n4.\nUpon analysis of the above seized material i.e. the tally software,\nthe AO was of the view that, the tally data revealed that, the assessee\nhad understated

SHIR. IRULANDI THEVAR VETRIVEL,MADURAI vs. ACIT, CENTRAL CIRCLE 2, MADURAI, MADURAI

In the result, all the appeals of the Revenue are dismissed and the appeals of the assessee are partly allowed

Bench: Shri Aby T. Varkey & Shri Amitabh Shukla

65B of the Indian Evidence Act, 1872. The relevant scanned images of the Profit & Loss Account extracted from the seized tally software was reproduced by the AO in the impugned assessment orders. 4. Upon analysis of the above seized material i.e. the tally software, the AO was of the view that, the tally data revealed that, the assessee had understated