BharatTax.net
SearchITATHigh CourtsSupreme CourtPhrasesAI ResearchHistory

Filters

BharatTax.net

Free search engine for ITAT (Income Tax Appellate Tribunal) judgments across all 28 benches in India.

Quick Links

  • Search Judgments
  • Browse by Bench
  • Recent Judgments

About

BharatTax provides free access to Income Tax Appellate Tribunal orders for legal research and reference.

© 2026 BharatTax.net. All rights reserved.

2,349 results for “TDS”+ Section 5clear

Sorted by relevance

Delhi5,637Mumbai5,428Bangalore2,718Chennai2,349Kolkata1,448Pune1,153Ahmedabad751Hyderabad688Patna555Jaipur474Raipur385Indore382Karnataka375Chandigarh326Cochin302Nagpur282Visakhapatnam195Lucknow175Surat163Rajkot158Jodhpur109Cuttack98Dehradun83Amritsar71Telangana70Ranchi68Agra59Panaji58Guwahati53Jabalpur42SC26Calcutta21Allahabad18Kerala17Rajasthan9Varanasi9Himachal Pradesh8Punjab & Haryana7J&K5Orissa4Uttarakhand3Gauhati1A.K. SIKRI ROHINTON FALI NARIMAN1Bombay1

Key Topics

Section 143(3)88Section 234E79Disallowance58Addition to Income51Section 4047Section 200A46Section 14A40TDS39Deduction34Section 153C

PRAKASHCHAND,CHENNAI vs. ITO, TDS WARD-1,, CHENNAI

In the result, all the appeals filed by the assessee are allowed

ITA 3063/CHNY/2025[2013-14]Status: DisposedITAT Chennai18 Dec 2025AY 2013-14

Bench: Shri Manu Kumar Giri & Shri S.R.Raghunatha

For Appellant: Mr. Hitesh, AdvocateFor Respondent: 17.12.2025
Section 154Section 200A(1)(c)Section 234ESection 3

section 200A(1)(c) to compute or levy such fee while processing TDS statements. compute or levy such fee while processing TDS statements. compute or levy such fee while processing TDS statements. 5

PRAKASHCHAND,CHENNAI vs. ITO, TDS WARD-1,, CHENNAI

Showing 1–20 of 2,349 · Page 1 of 118

...
27
Depreciation24
Section 14721

In the result, all the appeals filed by the assessee are allowed

ITA 3061/CHNY/2025[2014-15]Status: DisposedITAT Chennai18 Dec 2025AY 2014-15

Bench: Shri Manu Kumar Giri & Shri S.R.Raghunatha

For Appellant: Mr. Hitesh, AdvocateFor Respondent: 17.12.2025
Section 154Section 200A(1)(c)Section 234ESection 3

section 200A(1)(c) to compute or levy such fee while processing TDS statements. compute or levy such fee while processing TDS statements. compute or levy such fee while processing TDS statements. 5

PRAKASHCHAND,CHENNAI vs. ITO, TDS WARD-1, CHENNAI

In the result, all the appeals filed by the assessee are allowed

ITA 3065/CHNY/2025[2014-15]Status: DisposedITAT Chennai18 Dec 2025AY 2014-15

Bench: Shri Manu Kumar Giri & Shri S.R.Raghunatha

For Appellant: Mr. Hitesh, AdvocateFor Respondent: 17.12.2025
Section 154Section 200A(1)(c)Section 234ESection 3

section 200A(1)(c) to compute or levy such fee while processing TDS statements. compute or levy such fee while processing TDS statements. compute or levy such fee while processing TDS statements. 5

PRAKASHCHAND,CHENNAI vs. ITO, TDS WARD 1,, CHENNAI

In the result, all the appeals filed by the assessee are allowed

ITA 3064/CHNY/2025[2013-14]Status: DisposedITAT Chennai18 Dec 2025AY 2013-14

Bench: Shri Manu Kumar Giri & Shri S.R.Raghunatha

For Appellant: Mr. Hitesh, AdvocateFor Respondent: 17.12.2025
Section 154Section 200A(1)(c)Section 234ESection 3

section 200A(1)(c) to compute or levy such fee while processing TDS statements. compute or levy such fee while processing TDS statements. compute or levy such fee while processing TDS statements. 5

DOLLARS & POUNDS,CHENNAI vs. ACIT CPC TDS, GHAZIABAD

In the result, all the appeals filed by the assessee are allowed

ITA 2015/CHNY/2018[2013-14(Q2)-24Q]Status: DisposedITAT Chennai30 Nov 2018

Bench: Shri A. Mohan Alankamony & Shri Duvvuru Rl Reddy

For Respondent: Ms. G.D. Jayanthi Angayarkanni, JCIT
Section 200ASection 200A(1)Section 234E

TDS)] & Others 5. On the other hand, the ld. DR supported the orders of the authorities below. 6. We have heard both the sides, perused the materials available on record and gone through the orders of authorities below. The issue arising in this bunch of appeals is against levy of fees under section

DOLLARS & POUNDS,CHENNAI vs. ACIT CPC TDS, GHAZIABAD

In the result, all the appeals filed by the assessee are allowed

ITA 2017/CHNY/2018[2013-14(Q4)-24Q]Status: DisposedITAT Chennai30 Nov 2018

Bench: Shri A. Mohan Alankamony & Shri Duvvuru Rl Reddy

For Respondent: Ms. G.D. Jayanthi Angayarkanni, JCIT
Section 200ASection 200A(1)Section 234E

TDS)] & Others 5. On the other hand, the ld. DR supported the orders of the authorities below. 6. We have heard both the sides, perused the materials available on record and gone through the orders of authorities below. The issue arising in this bunch of appeals is against levy of fees under section

DOLLARS & POUNDS,CHENNAI vs. ACIT CPC TDS, GHAZIABAD

In the result, all the appeals filed by the assessee are allowed

ITA 2018/CHNY/2018[2013-14(Q2)-26Q]Status: DisposedITAT Chennai30 Nov 2018

Bench: Shri A. Mohan Alankamony & Shri Duvvuru Rl Reddy

For Respondent: Ms. G.D. Jayanthi Angayarkanni, JCIT
Section 200ASection 200A(1)Section 234E

TDS)] & Others 5. On the other hand, the ld. DR supported the orders of the authorities below. 6. We have heard both the sides, perused the materials available on record and gone through the orders of authorities below. The issue arising in this bunch of appeals is against levy of fees under section

DOLLARS & POUNDS,CHENNAI vs. ACIT CPC TDS, GHAZIABAD

In the result, all the appeals filed by the assessee are allowed

ITA 2019/CHNY/2018[2013-14(Q3)-26Q]Status: DisposedITAT Chennai30 Nov 2018

Bench: Shri A. Mohan Alankamony & Shri Duvvuru Rl Reddy

For Respondent: Ms. G.D. Jayanthi Angayarkanni, JCIT
Section 200ASection 200A(1)Section 234E

TDS)] & Others 5. On the other hand, the ld. DR supported the orders of the authorities below. 6. We have heard both the sides, perused the materials available on record and gone through the orders of authorities below. The issue arising in this bunch of appeals is against levy of fees under section

DOLLARS & POUNDS,CHENNAI vs. ACIT CPC TDS, GHAZIABAD

In the result, all the appeals filed by the assessee are allowed

ITA 2020/CHNY/2018[2013-14(Q3)-26Q]Status: DisposedITAT Chennai30 Nov 2018

Bench: Shri A. Mohan Alankamony & Shri Duvvuru Rl Reddy

For Respondent: Ms. G.D. Jayanthi Angayarkanni, JCIT
Section 200ASection 200A(1)Section 234E

TDS)] & Others 5. On the other hand, the ld. DR supported the orders of the authorities below. 6. We have heard both the sides, perused the materials available on record and gone through the orders of authorities below. The issue arising in this bunch of appeals is against levy of fees under section

DOLLARS & POUNDS,CHENNAI vs. ACIT CPC TDS, GHAZIABAD

In the result, all the appeals filed by the assessee are allowed

ITA 2016/CHNY/2018[2013-14(Q3)-24Q]Status: DisposedITAT Chennai30 Nov 2018

Bench: Shri A. Mohan Alankamony & Shri Duvvuru Rl Reddy

For Respondent: Ms. G.D. Jayanthi Angayarkanni, JCIT
Section 200ASection 200A(1)Section 234E

TDS)] & Others 5. On the other hand, the ld. DR supported the orders of the authorities below. 6. We have heard both the sides, perused the materials available on record and gone through the orders of authorities below. The issue arising in this bunch of appeals is against levy of fees under section

ALFHA COACH BUILDERS,KARUR vs. ITO, WARD-1,, KARUR

In the result, all six these appeals filed by the assessee are allowed

ITA 33/CHNY/2025[2015-16]Status: DisposedITAT Chennai15 Jul 2025AY 2015-16

Bench: Shri S.S. Viswanethra Ravi & Shri S. R. Raghunathaआयकर अपील सं./Ita Nos.: 32 & 33/Chny/2025 िनधा"रण वष" / Assessment Years: 2014-15 & 2015-16 Alfha Coach Builders, The Income Tax Officer, Sf No.596’3, Andan Kovil East, Vs. Ward -1, Pudhur, Covai Road, Karur. Karur – 639 002. [Pan: Aaofa-8970-D] (अपीलाथ"/Appellant) (""थ"/Respondent)

For Appellant: Shri J. Saravanan, AdvocateFor Respondent: Shri P. Krishna Kumar, JCIT
Section 154Section 200ASection 234ESection 250

TDS under Section 200A. Hence, in such view of the matter, this Court is of the opinion that the impugned Demand Intimation Letters are liable to be set aside. 5

ALFHA COACH BUILDERS,KARUR vs. ITO, WARD-1,, KARUR

In the result, all six these appeals filed by the assessee are allowed

ITA 32/CHNY/2025[2014-15]Status: DisposedITAT Chennai15 Jul 2025AY 2014-15

Bench: Shri S.S. Viswanethra Ravi & Shri S. R. Raghunathaआयकर अपील सं./Ita Nos.: 32 & 33/Chny/2025 िनधा"रण वष" / Assessment Years: 2014-15 & 2015-16 Alfha Coach Builders, The Income Tax Officer, Sf No.596’3, Andan Kovil East, Vs. Ward -1, Pudhur, Covai Road, Karur. Karur – 639 002. [Pan: Aaofa-8970-D] (अपीलाथ"/Appellant) (""थ"/Respondent)

For Appellant: Shri J. Saravanan, AdvocateFor Respondent: Shri P. Krishna Kumar, JCIT
Section 154Section 200ASection 234ESection 250

TDS under Section 200A. Hence, in such view of the matter, this Court is of the opinion that the impugned Demand Intimation Letters are liable to be set aside. 5

M/S GOPURAM ENTERPRISES PVT LTD ,CHENNAI vs. ITO , TDS CPC , GHAZIABAD

In the result, all the appeals filed by the assessee are allowed for

ITA 1050/CHNY/2022[2015-2016]Status: DisposedITAT Chennai11 Jun 2025AY 2015-2016

Bench: Shri Aby T. Varkey & Shri Jagadish

For Appellant: Shri R. Devaraj, AdvocateFor Respondent: Ms. Gouthami Manivasagam, JCIT
Section 200ASection 200A(1)(c)Section 234E

5 -: “17. In view of the above, it is made clear that the respondent had had imposed the late fee only under Section 234E of the Act for the assessment years 2012-2013, 2013-2014, 2014-2015. However, Section 200A(1)(c) of the Act was not introduced during the said assessment years. In the absence of any provisions under

M/S GOPURAM ENTERPRISES PVT LTD ,CHENNAI vs. ITO , TDS CPC , GHAZIABAD

In the result, all the appeals filed by the assessee are allowed for

ITA 1053/CHNY/2022[2015-2016]Status: DisposedITAT Chennai11 Jun 2025AY 2015-2016

Bench: Shri Aby T. Varkey & Shri Jagadish

For Appellant: Shri R. Devaraj, AdvocateFor Respondent: Ms. Gouthami Manivasagam, JCIT
Section 200ASection 200A(1)(c)Section 234E

5 -: “17. In view of the above, it is made clear that the respondent had had imposed the late fee only under Section 234E of the Act for the assessment years 2012-2013, 2013-2014, 2014-2015. However, Section 200A(1)(c) of the Act was not introduced during the said assessment years. In the absence of any provisions under

M/S GOPURAM ENTERPRISES PVT LTD ,CHENNAI vs. ITO , TDS CPC , GHAZIABAD

In the result, all the appeals filed by the assessee are allowed for

ITA 1051/CHNY/2022[2015-2016]Status: DisposedITAT Chennai11 Jun 2025AY 2015-2016

Bench: Shri Aby T. Varkey & Shri Jagadish

For Appellant: Shri R. Devaraj, AdvocateFor Respondent: Ms. Gouthami Manivasagam, JCIT
Section 200ASection 200A(1)(c)Section 234E

5 -: “17. In view of the above, it is made clear that the respondent had had imposed the late fee only under Section 234E of the Act for the assessment years 2012-2013, 2013-2014, 2014-2015. However, Section 200A(1)(c) of the Act was not introduced during the said assessment years. In the absence of any provisions under

M/S GOPURAM ENTERPRISES PVT LTD ,CHENNAI vs. ITO , TDS CPC , GHAZIABAD

In the result, all the appeals filed by the assessee are allowed for

ITA 1052/CHNY/2022[2015-2016]Status: DisposedITAT Chennai11 Jun 2025AY 2015-2016

Bench: Shri Aby T. Varkey & Shri Jagadish

For Appellant: Shri R. Devaraj, AdvocateFor Respondent: Ms. Gouthami Manivasagam, JCIT
Section 200ASection 200A(1)(c)Section 234E

5 -: “17. In view of the above, it is made clear that the respondent had had imposed the late fee only under Section 234E of the Act for the assessment years 2012-2013, 2013-2014, 2014-2015. However, Section 200A(1)(c) of the Act was not introduced during the said assessment years. In the absence of any provisions under

RAMAMURTHY D.P.,PUDUCHERRY vs. ITO, TDS WARD,, PUDUCHERRY

In the result, both the appeals filed by the assessee are allowed for statistical purposes

ITA 1742/CHNY/2025[2014-15]Status: DisposedITAT Chennai28 Aug 2025AY 2014-15

Bench: Shri George George K & Shri Jagadishआयकर अपील सं./Ita Nos.1741 & 1742/Chny/2025 िनधा"रण वष" /Assessment Years: 2013-14 & 2014-15

For Appellant: Shri N. Arjun Raj, AdvocateFor Respondent: Mrs. R. Anitha, Addl. CIT
Section 154Section 200ASection 200A(1)(c)Section 234E

section 200A of the Act for the processing of quarterly TDS return filed by the assessee.” 8. Respectfully following the above decisions, we direct the A.O to delete the late fee charged u/s. 234E of the Act in the intimation issued u/s. 200A of the Act in processing of quarterly TDS statements filed by the assessee for the relevant Financial

RAMAMURTHY D.P.,PUDUCHERRY vs. ITO, TDS WARD,, PUDUCHERRY

In the result, both the appeals filed by the assessee are allowed for statistical purposes

ITA 1741/CHNY/2025[2013-14]Status: DisposedITAT Chennai28 Aug 2025AY 2013-14

Bench: Shri George George K & Shri Jagadishआयकर अपील सं./Ita Nos.1741 & 1742/Chny/2025 िनधा"रण वष" /Assessment Years: 2013-14 & 2014-15

For Appellant: Shri N. Arjun Raj, AdvocateFor Respondent: Mrs. R. Anitha, Addl. CIT
Section 154Section 200ASection 200A(1)(c)Section 234E

section 200A of the Act for the processing of quarterly TDS return filed by the assessee.” 8. Respectfully following the above decisions, we direct the A.O to delete the late fee charged u/s. 234E of the Act in the intimation issued u/s. 200A of the Act in processing of quarterly TDS statements filed by the assessee for the relevant Financial

GOPURAM ENTERPRISES PRIVATE LIMITED,CHENNAI vs. ITO, CHENNAI

In the result, all six these appeals filed by the assessee are allowed

ITA 1007/CHNY/2024[2014-15]Status: DisposedITAT Chennai26 Jun 2024AY 2014-15

Bench: Hon’Ble Shri Manu Kumar Giri, Jm & Shri S.R. Raghunathaआयकर अपील सं./Ita Nos.: 1002, 1003, 1004, 1005, 1006 & 1007/Chny/2024 िनधा"रण वष"/Assessment Years: 2013-14 (Q2), 2013-2014 (Q3). 2013-14 (Q4), 2014-2015 (Q1), 2014-2015 (Q2) & 2014-2015 (Q3) M/S. Gopuram Enterprises Private Limited, The Assistant Commissioner Of New No.8-A, Madha Church Road, Vs. Income Tax, R.A. Puram, Cc 1(1) Chennai 600 028. Chennai Pan: Aaacs 9903R (अपीलाथ"/Appellant) (""यथ"/Respondent) अपीलाथ" क" ओर से/Appellant By : Shri. R.Devaraj, Advocate ""यथ" क" ओर से/Respondent By : Shri. D. Hema Bhupal, Irs, Jcit सुनवाई क" तारीख/Date Of Hearing : 24.06.2024 घोषणा क" तारीख/Date Of Pronouncement : 26.06.2024 आदेश /O R D E R Per Manu Kumar Giri () This Bunch Of Six Appeals Being Ita Nos. 1002-1007 /Chny/2024 Filed By The Assessee ‘Gopuram Enterprises Private Limited’ [Formerly Known As ‘Savorit Limited’] Are Directed Against Separate Orders Of Even Date 31.10.2019 Passed By The Learned Commissioner Of Income Tax (Appeals)-17, Chennai & Pertain To The Assessment Years 2013-14 To 2014-15. Ita Nos/ 1002 To 1007Chny/2024 2. The Assessee Has Raised Similar Grounds Of Appeal For All The Assessment Years. We Will Take Up Ita No. 1002/Chny/2024 For The Assessment Year 2013-14 (Q2) As Lead Case. Grounds Of Appeal Filed In Ita No. 1002/Chny/2024 For The Assessment Year 2013-14 (Q2) Are Reproduced As Under:-

For Appellant: Shri. R.Devaraj, AdvocateFor Respondent: Shri. D. Hema Bhupal, IRS, JCIT
Section 200ASection 234Section 234ESection 292

section 200A of the Act for the processing of quarterly TDS return filed by the assessee. 7. In the result, all six these appeals filed by the assessee are allowed. Order pronounced in the open court on 26th day of June, 2024 at Chennai. एस.आर. रघुनाथा (मनु कुमार "ग"र) (S.R. RAGHUNATHA) (MANU KUMAR GIRI) लेखा सद"य/ ACCOUNTANT

GOPURAM ENTERPRISES PRIVATE LIMITED,CHENNAI vs. ACIT C 1(1), CHENNAI

In the result, all six these appeals filed by the assessee are allowed

ITA 1002/CHNY/2024[2013-14]Status: DisposedITAT Chennai26 Jun 2024AY 2013-14

Bench: Hon’Ble Shri Manu Kumar Giri, Jm & Shri S.R. Raghunathaआयकर अपील सं./Ita Nos.: 1002, 1003, 1004, 1005, 1006 & 1007/Chny/2024 िनधा"रण वष"/Assessment Years: 2013-14 (Q2), 2013-2014 (Q3). 2013-14 (Q4), 2014-2015 (Q1), 2014-2015 (Q2) & 2014-2015 (Q3) M/S. Gopuram Enterprises Private Limited, The Assistant Commissioner Of New No.8-A, Madha Church Road, Vs. Income Tax, R.A. Puram, Cc 1(1) Chennai 600 028. Chennai Pan: Aaacs 9903R (अपीलाथ"/Appellant) (""यथ"/Respondent) अपीलाथ" क" ओर से/Appellant By : Shri. R.Devaraj, Advocate ""यथ" क" ओर से/Respondent By : Shri. D. Hema Bhupal, Irs, Jcit सुनवाई क" तारीख/Date Of Hearing : 24.06.2024 घोषणा क" तारीख/Date Of Pronouncement : 26.06.2024 आदेश /O R D E R Per Manu Kumar Giri () This Bunch Of Six Appeals Being Ita Nos. 1002-1007 /Chny/2024 Filed By The Assessee ‘Gopuram Enterprises Private Limited’ [Formerly Known As ‘Savorit Limited’] Are Directed Against Separate Orders Of Even Date 31.10.2019 Passed By The Learned Commissioner Of Income Tax (Appeals)-17, Chennai & Pertain To The Assessment Years 2013-14 To 2014-15. Ita Nos/ 1002 To 1007Chny/2024 2. The Assessee Has Raised Similar Grounds Of Appeal For All The Assessment Years. We Will Take Up Ita No. 1002/Chny/2024 For The Assessment Year 2013-14 (Q2) As Lead Case. Grounds Of Appeal Filed In Ita No. 1002/Chny/2024 For The Assessment Year 2013-14 (Q2) Are Reproduced As Under:-

For Appellant: Shri. R.Devaraj, AdvocateFor Respondent: Shri. D. Hema Bhupal, IRS, JCIT
Section 200ASection 234Section 234ESection 292

section 200A of the Act for the processing of quarterly TDS return filed by the assessee. 7. In the result, all six these appeals filed by the assessee are allowed. Order pronounced in the open court on 26th day of June, 2024 at Chennai. एस.आर. रघुनाथा (मनु कुमार "ग"र) (S.R. RAGHUNATHA) (MANU KUMAR GIRI) लेखा सद"य/ ACCOUNTANT