BharatTax.net
SearchITATHigh CourtsSupreme CourtPhrasesAI ResearchHistory

Filters

BharatTax.net

Free search engine for ITAT (Income Tax Appellate Tribunal) judgments across all 28 benches in India.

Quick Links

  • Search Judgments
  • Browse by Bench
  • Recent Judgments

About

BharatTax provides free access to Income Tax Appellate Tribunal orders for legal research and reference.

© 2026 BharatTax.net. All rights reserved.

7 results for “TDS”+ Section 271Eclear

Sorted by relevance

Mumbai52Bangalore49Delhi39Karnataka22Indore14Chennai7Kolkata7Visakhapatnam6Jaipur5Panaji5Hyderabad4Pune3Nagpur3Ahmedabad1Raipur1SC1Jodhpur1

Key Topics

Section 234E19Section 200A12Section 1329Section 153A9Section 271E6Section 271C5TDS4Section 201(1)2Condonation of Delay2

JCIT, COIMBATORE vs. CHROMA PRINT INDIA PVT . LTD., COIMBATORE

In the result, the appeal filed by the Revenue is allowed

ITA 2083/CHNY/2016[2012-13]Status: DisposedITAT Chennai13 Oct 2017AY 2012-13

Bench: Shri Sanjay Arora & Shri Duvvuru Rl Reddyआयकर अपील सं./I T.A. No.2083/Mds/2016 "नधा"रण वष"/Assessment Year:2012-13 The Joint Commissioner Of M/S. Chroma Print India Pvt. Ltd., Income Tax, Tds Range, Vs. P.B. No. 5316, 53, Ganesh Nagar, Coimbatore. G.N. Mills Post, Mtp Road, Coimbatore. [Pan:Aaccc6021A] (अपीलाथ" /Appellant) (""यथ"/Respondent) अपीलाथ" क" ओर से / Appellant By : Ms. Veni Raj, Jcit ""यथ" क" ओर से/Respondent By : Shri T.N. Seetharaman, Advocate सुनवाई क" तार"ख/ Date Of Hearing : 03.08.2017 घोषणा क" तार"ख /Date Of Pronouncement : 13.10.2017 आदेश /O R D E R Per Duvvuru Rl Reddy: This Appeal Filed By The Revenue Is Directed Against The Order Of The Ld. Commissioner Of Income Tax (Appeals) 2, Coimbatore Dated 30.03.2016 Relevant To The Assessment Year 2012-13. The Revenue Has Raised The Following Grounds In Its Appeal: “1. The Order Of Learned Cit(A) Is Opposed To The Facts & Circumstances Of The Case. 2. The Ld Cit(A) Has Erred In Holding That No Penalty Is Leviable On The Non Deduction Of Tds On Payment Of Labour Charges Worth

For Appellant: Ms. Veni Raj, JCITFor Respondent: Shri T.N. Seetharaman, Advocate
Section 201(1)Section 271CSection 273

271E, section 271F, section 271FA, section 271FB, section 271G, section 271H, clause (c) or clause (d) of sub section (1) or sub-section (2) of section 272A, sub-section (1) of section 272AA or section 272B or subsection (1) or subsection (1A) of section 272BB or sub-section (1) of section 272BBB or clause (b) of sub-section

T.KOLANDAIVELU & COMPANY,SALEM vs. ITO TDS WARD, SALEM

In the result, the appeals filed by the assessee in ITA

ITA 2874/CHNY/2017[2013-14]Status: DisposedITAT Chennai03 Feb 2020AY 2013-14

Bench: Shri N.R.S. Ganesan

For Appellant: Shri. T. Dinesh, AdvocateFor Respondent: Shri AR.V. Sreenivasan, JCIT
Section 200ASection 234ESection 271E

TDS Ward, Narasothipatty, Salem Alagapuram Salem 636 004. PAN: AACFT 4727F] (अपीलाथ"/Appellant) (""यथ"/Respondent) अपीलाथ" क" ओर से/ Appellant by : Shri. T. Dinesh, Advocate ""यथ" क" ओर से /Respondent by : Shri AR.V. Sreenivasan, JCIT सुनवाई क" तार"ख/Date of Hearing : 03.02.2020 घोषणा क" तार"ख /Date of Pronouncement : 03.02.2020 O R D E R Both the appeals

ARIGNAR ANNA POWERLOOM WEAVERS CO-OP. P & S SOCIETY LTD.,SALEM vs. ITO TDS WARD, SALEM

In the result, the appeal filed by the assessee in ITA

ITA 2871/CHNY/2017[2014-15]Status: DisposedITAT Chennai03 Feb 2020AY 2014-15

Bench: Shri N.R.S. Ganesan.

For Appellant: Shri. T. Dinesh, AdvocateFor Respondent: Shri AR.V. Sreenivasan, JCIT
Section 200ASection 234ESection 271E

TDS Ward, No.SA-164, 3/401-7, Salem Anna Nagar, Vembadithalam Road Salem 637 504. PAN: AABAA 6302M] (""यथ"/Respondent) (अपीलाथ"/Appellant) अपीलाथ" क" ओर से/ Appellant by : Shri. T. Dinesh, Advocate ""यथ" क" ओर से /Respondent by : Shri AR.V. Sreenivasan, JCIT सुनवाई क" तार"ख/Date of hearing : 03.02.2020 घोषणा क" तार"ख /Date of Pronouncement

T KOLLANDAIVELU & COMPANY,SALEM vs. ITO TDS WARD, SALEM

In the result, the appeals filed by the assessee in ITA

ITA 1812/CHNY/2018[2014-15]Status: DisposedITAT Chennai03 Feb 2020AY 2014-15

Bench: Shri N.R.S. Ganesan

For Appellant: Shri. T. Dinesh, AdvocateFor Respondent: Shri AR.V. Sreenivasan, JCIT
Section 200ASection 234ESection 271E

TDS Ward, Narasothipatty, Salem Alagapuram Salem 636 004. PAN: AACFT 4727F] (अपीलाथ"/Appellant) (""यथ"/Respondent) अपीलाथ" क" ओर से/ Appellant by : Shri. T. Dinesh, Advocate ""यथ" क" ओर से /Respondent by : Shri AR.V. Sreenivasan, JCIT सुनवाई क" तार"ख/Date of Hearing : 03.02.2020 घोषणा क" तार"ख /Date of Pronouncement : 03.02.2020 O R D E R Both the appeals

M/S. LALITHA JEWELLERY MART LTD.,CHENNAI vs. DCIT, CENTRAL CIRCLE-1(4), CHENNAI

In the result, all the appeals of the assessee are partly allowed

ITA 679/CHNY/2025[2020-21]Status: DisposedITAT Chennai12 Jun 2025AY 2020-21

Bench: Shri Aby T. Varkey & Shrimanoj Kumar Aggarwal

For Appellant: Mr. D. Anand, AdvocateFor Respondent: Mr. Shiva Srinivas, CIT
Section 132Section 153A

Section 34 of the Indian Evidence Act, 1872 relying upon Section 34 of the Indian Evidence Act, 1872 relying upon Section 34 of the Indian Evidence Act, 1872, ITA Nos.675 to 675 to 680/Chny/2025 (AYs 2016 16-17 to 2021-22) M/s. Lalithaa Jewellery Mart Ltd. M/s. Lalithaa Jewellery Mart Ltd. :: 38 :: submitted that, the entries in the books

M/S. LALITHA JEWELLERY MART LTD.,CHENNAI vs. DCIT, CENTRAL CIRCLE-1(4), CHENNAI

In the result, all the appeals of the assessee are partly allowed

ITA 678/CHNY/2025[2019-20]Status: DisposedITAT Chennai12 Jun 2025AY 2019-20

Bench: Shri Aby T. Varkey & Shrimanoj Kumar Aggarwal

For Appellant: Mr. D. Anand, AdvocateFor Respondent: Mr. Shiva Srinivas, CIT
Section 132Section 153A

Section 34 of the Indian Evidence Act, 1872 relying upon Section 34 of the Indian Evidence Act, 1872 relying upon Section 34 of the Indian Evidence Act, 1872, ITA Nos.675 to 675 to 680/Chny/2025 (AYs 2016 16-17 to 2021-22) M/s. Lalithaa Jewellery Mart Ltd. M/s. Lalithaa Jewellery Mart Ltd. :: 38 :: submitted that, the entries in the books

M/S. LALITHA JEWELLERY MART LTD.,CHENNAI vs. DCIT, CENTRAL CIRCLE-1(4), CHENNAI

In the result, all the appeals of the assessee are partly allowed

ITA 677/CHNY/2025[2018-19]Status: DisposedITAT Chennai12 Jun 2025AY 2018-19

Bench: Shri Aby T. Varkey & Shrimanoj Kumar Aggarwal

For Appellant: Mr. D. Anand, AdvocateFor Respondent: Mr. Shiva Srinivas, CIT
Section 132Section 153A

Section 34 of the Indian Evidence Act, 1872 relying upon Section 34 of the Indian Evidence Act, 1872 relying upon Section 34 of the Indian Evidence Act, 1872, ITA Nos.675 to 675 to 680/Chny/2025 (AYs 2016 16-17 to 2021-22) M/s. Lalithaa Jewellery Mart Ltd. M/s. Lalithaa Jewellery Mart Ltd. :: 38 :: submitted that, the entries in the books