BharatTax.net
SearchITATHigh CourtsSupreme CourtPhrasesAI ResearchHistory

Filters

BharatTax.net

Free search engine for ITAT (Income Tax Appellate Tribunal) judgments across all 28 benches in India.

Quick Links

  • Search Judgments
  • Browse by Bench
  • Recent Judgments

About

BharatTax provides free access to Income Tax Appellate Tribunal orders for legal research and reference.

© 2026 BharatTax.net. All rights reserved.

7 results for “TDS”+ Section 271Dclear

Sorted by relevance

Mumbai49Delhi44Bangalore41Karnataka21Indore15Jaipur10Chennai7Kolkata7Visakhapatnam6Panaji5Chandigarh5Pune4Hyderabad4Nagpur3Jodhpur1Agra1Lucknow1Ahmedabad1Raipur1SC1

Key Topics

Section 1479Section 1329Section 153A9Section 271C5Penalty4TDS4Section 143(3)3Section 1483Section 142(1)3Section 271(1)(c)

JCIT, COIMBATORE vs. CHROMA PRINT INDIA PVT . LTD., COIMBATORE

In the result, the appeal filed by the Revenue is allowed

ITA 2083/CHNY/2016[2012-13]Status: DisposedITAT Chennai13 Oct 2017AY 2012-13

Bench: Shri Sanjay Arora & Shri Duvvuru Rl Reddyआयकर अपील सं./I T.A. No.2083/Mds/2016 "नधा"रण वष"/Assessment Year:2012-13 The Joint Commissioner Of M/S. Chroma Print India Pvt. Ltd., Income Tax, Tds Range, Vs. P.B. No. 5316, 53, Ganesh Nagar, Coimbatore. G.N. Mills Post, Mtp Road, Coimbatore. [Pan:Aaccc6021A] (अपीलाथ" /Appellant) (""यथ"/Respondent) अपीलाथ" क" ओर से / Appellant By : Ms. Veni Raj, Jcit ""यथ" क" ओर से/Respondent By : Shri T.N. Seetharaman, Advocate सुनवाई क" तार"ख/ Date Of Hearing : 03.08.2017 घोषणा क" तार"ख /Date Of Pronouncement : 13.10.2017 आदेश /O R D E R Per Duvvuru Rl Reddy: This Appeal Filed By The Revenue Is Directed Against The Order Of The Ld. Commissioner Of Income Tax (Appeals) 2, Coimbatore Dated 30.03.2016 Relevant To The Assessment Year 2012-13. The Revenue Has Raised The Following Grounds In Its Appeal: “1. The Order Of Learned Cit(A) Is Opposed To The Facts & Circumstances Of The Case. 2. The Ld Cit(A) Has Erred In Holding That No Penalty Is Leviable On The Non Deduction Of Tds On Payment Of Labour Charges Worth

For Appellant: Ms. Veni Raj, JCITFor Respondent: Shri T.N. Seetharaman, Advocate
Section 201(1)Section 271CSection 273

271D, section 271E, section 271F, section 271FA, section 271FB, section 271G, section 271H, clause (c) or clause (d) of sub section (1) or sub-section (2) of section 272A, sub-section (1) of section 272AA or section 272B or subsection (1) or subsection (1A) of section 272BB or sub-section (1) of section 272BBB or clause (b) of sub-section

3
Disallowance3
Addition to Income3

CARIS PURE PROCESSING COMPANY PRIVATE LIMITED,CHENNAI vs. DCIT, CORP WARD 1(1), CHENNAI

In the result, all the three appeals filed by the assessee is allowed for statistical purposes

ITA 1454/CHNY/2024[2015-16]Status: DisposedITAT Chennai09 Aug 2024AY 2015-16

Bench: Shri Mahavir Singh, Hon’Ble & Shri S. R. Raghunatha, Hon’Bleआयकर अपीलसं./Ita Nos.: 1453, 1454 & 1455/Chny/2024 िनधा"रणवष" / Assessment Year: 2015-16 Caris Pure Processing Company The Deputy Commissioner Of Private Limited, V. Income Tax, No.23-C, Kohinoor Complex, Corporate Ward -1(1), Vettuvankeni, Chennai. Injambakkam, East Coast Road, Chennai – 600 115. [Pan: Aafcc-2170-D] (अपीलाथ"/Appellant) (""यथ"/Respondent) अपीलाथ" क" ओरसे/Appellant By : Shri. P.M. Kathir, Advocate : Smt. M.S. Deeptha, Jcit ""यथ" क" ओरसे/Respondent By सुनवाई क" तारीख/Date Of Hearing : 08.08.2024 घोषणा क" तारीख/Date Of Pronouncement : 09.08.2024 आदेश /O R D E R

For Appellant: Shri. P.M. Kathir, Advocate
Section 142(1)Section 143(3)Section 147Section 148Section 271(1)(c)

TDS and loss assessed at Rs.2,77,44,770/-. Subsequently, as per the details available on record, the Assessing Officer noted that the assessee has debited a sum of Rs.2,17,08,268/-in P&L Account towards feeding and growing expenditure, whereas the assessee is in the business of process of chicken meat and marketing as per the business

CARIS PURE PROCESSING COMPANY PRIVATE LIMITED,CHENNAI vs. DCIT CORP CIRCLE 1(1), CHENNAI

In the result, all the three appeals filed by the assessee is allowed for statistical purposes

ITA 1455/CHNY/2024[2015-16]Status: DisposedITAT Chennai09 Aug 2024AY 2015-16

Bench: Shri Mahavir Singh, Hon’Ble & Shri S. R. Raghunatha, Hon’Bleआयकर अपीलसं./Ita Nos.: 1453, 1454 & 1455/Chny/2024 िनधा"रणवष" / Assessment Year: 2015-16 Caris Pure Processing Company The Deputy Commissioner Of Private Limited, V. Income Tax, No.23-C, Kohinoor Complex, Corporate Ward -1(1), Vettuvankeni, Chennai. Injambakkam, East Coast Road, Chennai – 600 115. [Pan: Aafcc-2170-D] (अपीलाथ"/Appellant) (""यथ"/Respondent) अपीलाथ" क" ओरसे/Appellant By : Shri. P.M. Kathir, Advocate : Smt. M.S. Deeptha, Jcit ""यथ" क" ओरसे/Respondent By सुनवाई क" तारीख/Date Of Hearing : 08.08.2024 घोषणा क" तारीख/Date Of Pronouncement : 09.08.2024 आदेश /O R D E R

For Appellant: Shri. P.M. Kathir, Advocate
Section 142(1)Section 143(3)Section 147Section 148Section 271(1)(c)

TDS and loss assessed at Rs.2,77,44,770/-. Subsequently, as per the details available on record, the Assessing Officer noted that the assessee has debited a sum of Rs.2,17,08,268/-in P&L Account towards feeding and growing expenditure, whereas the assessee is in the business of process of chicken meat and marketing as per the business

CARIS PURE PROCESSING COMPANY PRIVATE LIMITED,CHENNAI vs. DCIT CORP WARD 1(1), CHENNAI

In the result, all the three appeals filed by the assessee is allowed for statistical purposes

ITA 1453/CHNY/2024[2015-16]Status: DisposedITAT Chennai09 Aug 2024AY 2015-16

Bench: Shri Mahavir Singh, Hon’Ble & Shri S. R. Raghunatha, Hon’Bleआयकर अपीलसं./Ita Nos.: 1453, 1454 & 1455/Chny/2024 िनधा"रणवष" / Assessment Year: 2015-16 Caris Pure Processing Company The Deputy Commissioner Of Private Limited, V. Income Tax, No.23-C, Kohinoor Complex, Corporate Ward -1(1), Vettuvankeni, Chennai. Injambakkam, East Coast Road, Chennai – 600 115. [Pan: Aafcc-2170-D] (अपीलाथ"/Appellant) (""यथ"/Respondent) अपीलाथ" क" ओरसे/Appellant By : Shri. P.M. Kathir, Advocate : Smt. M.S. Deeptha, Jcit ""यथ" क" ओरसे/Respondent By सुनवाई क" तारीख/Date Of Hearing : 08.08.2024 घोषणा क" तारीख/Date Of Pronouncement : 09.08.2024 आदेश /O R D E R

For Appellant: Shri. P.M. Kathir, Advocate
Section 142(1)Section 143(3)Section 147Section 148Section 271(1)(c)

TDS and loss assessed at Rs.2,77,44,770/-. Subsequently, as per the details available on record, the Assessing Officer noted that the assessee has debited a sum of Rs.2,17,08,268/-in P&L Account towards feeding and growing expenditure, whereas the assessee is in the business of process of chicken meat and marketing as per the business

M/S. LALITHA JEWELLERY MART LTD.,CHENNAI vs. DCIT, CENTRAL CIRCLE-1(4), CHENNAI

In the result, all the appeals of the assessee are partly allowed

ITA 677/CHNY/2025[2018-19]Status: DisposedITAT Chennai12 Jun 2025AY 2018-19

Bench: Shri Aby T. Varkey & Shrimanoj Kumar Aggarwal

For Appellant: Mr. D. Anand, AdvocateFor Respondent: Mr. Shiva Srinivas, CIT
Section 132Section 153A

Section 34 of the Indian Evidence Act, 1872 relying upon Section 34 of the Indian Evidence Act, 1872 relying upon Section 34 of the Indian Evidence Act, 1872, ITA Nos.675 to 675 to 680/Chny/2025 (AYs 2016 16-17 to 2021-22) M/s. Lalithaa Jewellery Mart Ltd. M/s. Lalithaa Jewellery Mart Ltd. :: 38 :: submitted that, the entries in the books

M/S. LALITHA JEWELLERY MART LTD.,CHENNAI vs. DCIT, CENTRAL CIRCLE-1(4), CHENNAI

In the result, all the appeals of the assessee are partly allowed

ITA 678/CHNY/2025[2019-20]Status: DisposedITAT Chennai12 Jun 2025AY 2019-20

Bench: Shri Aby T. Varkey & Shrimanoj Kumar Aggarwal

For Appellant: Mr. D. Anand, AdvocateFor Respondent: Mr. Shiva Srinivas, CIT
Section 132Section 153A

Section 34 of the Indian Evidence Act, 1872 relying upon Section 34 of the Indian Evidence Act, 1872 relying upon Section 34 of the Indian Evidence Act, 1872, ITA Nos.675 to 675 to 680/Chny/2025 (AYs 2016 16-17 to 2021-22) M/s. Lalithaa Jewellery Mart Ltd. M/s. Lalithaa Jewellery Mart Ltd. :: 38 :: submitted that, the entries in the books

M/S. LALITHA JEWELLERY MART LTD.,CHENNAI vs. DCIT, CENTRAL CIRCLE-1(4), CHENNAI

In the result, all the appeals of the assessee are partly allowed

ITA 679/CHNY/2025[2020-21]Status: DisposedITAT Chennai12 Jun 2025AY 2020-21

Bench: Shri Aby T. Varkey & Shrimanoj Kumar Aggarwal

For Appellant: Mr. D. Anand, AdvocateFor Respondent: Mr. Shiva Srinivas, CIT
Section 132Section 153A

Section 34 of the Indian Evidence Act, 1872 relying upon Section 34 of the Indian Evidence Act, 1872 relying upon Section 34 of the Indian Evidence Act, 1872, ITA Nos.675 to 675 to 680/Chny/2025 (AYs 2016 16-17 to 2021-22) M/s. Lalithaa Jewellery Mart Ltd. M/s. Lalithaa Jewellery Mart Ltd. :: 38 :: submitted that, the entries in the books