BharatTax.net
SearchITATHigh CourtsSupreme CourtPhrasesAI ResearchHistory

Filters

BharatTax.net

Free search engine for ITAT (Income Tax Appellate Tribunal) judgments across all 28 benches in India.

Quick Links

  • Search Judgments
  • Browse by Bench
  • Recent Judgments

About

BharatTax provides free access to Income Tax Appellate Tribunal orders for legal research and reference.

© 2026 BharatTax.net. All rights reserved.

43 results for “TDS”+ Section 271Aclear

Sorted by relevance

Mumbai67Chennai43Bangalore35Delhi25Karnataka21Kolkata10Indore9Visakhapatnam6Rajkot6Panaji5Jaipur5Pune3Patna3Nagpur2Ahmedabad2Hyderabad2Raipur1Surat1SC1Jodhpur1Jabalpur1

Key Topics

Penalty43Section 153A42Section 271A42Section 271C5Section 201(1)2

JCIT, COIMBATORE vs. CHROMA PRINT INDIA PVT . LTD., COIMBATORE

In the result, the appeal filed by the Revenue is allowed

ITA 2083/CHNY/2016[2012-13]Status: DisposedITAT Chennai13 Oct 2017AY 2012-13

Bench: Shri Sanjay Arora & Shri Duvvuru Rl Reddyआयकर अपील सं./I T.A. No.2083/Mds/2016 "नधा"रण वष"/Assessment Year:2012-13 The Joint Commissioner Of M/S. Chroma Print India Pvt. Ltd., Income Tax, Tds Range, Vs. P.B. No. 5316, 53, Ganesh Nagar, Coimbatore. G.N. Mills Post, Mtp Road, Coimbatore. [Pan:Aaccc6021A] (अपीलाथ" /Appellant) (""यथ"/Respondent) अपीलाथ" क" ओर से / Appellant By : Ms. Veni Raj, Jcit ""यथ" क" ओर से/Respondent By : Shri T.N. Seetharaman, Advocate सुनवाई क" तार"ख/ Date Of Hearing : 03.08.2017 घोषणा क" तार"ख /Date Of Pronouncement : 13.10.2017 आदेश /O R D E R Per Duvvuru Rl Reddy: This Appeal Filed By The Revenue Is Directed Against The Order Of The Ld. Commissioner Of Income Tax (Appeals) 2, Coimbatore Dated 30.03.2016 Relevant To The Assessment Year 2012-13. The Revenue Has Raised The Following Grounds In Its Appeal: “1. The Order Of Learned Cit(A) Is Opposed To The Facts & Circumstances Of The Case. 2. The Ld Cit(A) Has Erred In Holding That No Penalty Is Leviable On The Non Deduction Of Tds On Payment Of Labour Charges Worth

For Appellant: Ms. Veni Raj, JCITFor Respondent: Shri T.N. Seetharaman, Advocate
Section 201(1)Section 271CSection 273

271A, section 271AA, section 271B, section 271BA, section 271BB, section 271C, section 6 I.T.A. No.2083/M/16 271CA, section 271D, section 271E, section 271F, section 271FA, section 271FB, section 271G, section 271H, clause (c) or clause (d) of sub section (1) or sub-section (2) of section 272A, sub-section (1) of section 272AA or section 272B or subsection (1) or subsection

Showing 1–20 of 43 · Page 1 of 3

SHANTHILAL D JAIN,,CHENNAI vs. DCIT, CENTRAL CIRCLE - 2 (1),, CHENNAI

2400/CHNY/2019

ITA 2358/CHNY/2019[2008-09]Status: DisposedITAT Chennai20 May 2022AY 2008-09

Bench: Shri Mahavir Singhand Dr. M.L. Meena

Section 153ASection 271A

TDS, disallowance of expenditures incurred in cash in excess of the prescribed threshold. In this case, as observed earlier, the appellant had not maintained regular and contemporaneous books of account supported by documents, vouchers that are capable of being verified. 10.3.2 In the appellant’s case, he did not produce any bills or vouchers for verification nor maintained any books

M/S. SHREE BATTERY HOUSE,,CHENNAI vs. DCIT, CENTRAL CIRCLE - 2 (1),, CHENNAI

2400/CHNY/2019

ITA 2587/CHNY/2019[2010-11]Status: DisposedITAT Chennai20 May 2022AY 2010-11

Bench: Shri Mahavir Singhand Dr. M.L. Meena

Section 153ASection 271A

TDS, disallowance of expenditures incurred in cash in excess of the prescribed threshold. In this case, as observed earlier, the appellant had not maintained regular and contemporaneous books of account supported by documents, vouchers that are capable of being verified. 10.3.2 In the appellant’s case, he did not produce any bills or vouchers for verification nor maintained any books

SHANTHILAL D JAIN,,CHENNAI vs. DCIT, CENTRAL CIRCLE - 2 (1),, CHENNAI

2400/CHNY/2019

ITA 2360/CHNY/2019[2010-11]Status: DisposedITAT Chennai20 May 2022AY 2010-11

Bench: Shri Mahavir Singhand Dr. M.L. Meena

Section 153ASection 271A

TDS, disallowance of expenditures incurred in cash in excess of the prescribed threshold. In this case, as observed earlier, the appellant had not maintained regular and contemporaneous books of account supported by documents, vouchers that are capable of being verified. 10.3.2 In the appellant’s case, he did not produce any bills or vouchers for verification nor maintained any books

SHANTHILAL D JAIN,,CHENNAI vs. DCIT, CENTRAL CIRCLE - 2 (1),, CHENNAI

2400/CHNY/2019

ITA 2361/CHNY/2019[2011-12]Status: DisposedITAT Chennai20 May 2022AY 2011-12

Bench: Shri Mahavir Singhand Dr. M.L. Meena

Section 153ASection 271A

TDS, disallowance of expenditures incurred in cash in excess of the prescribed threshold. In this case, as observed earlier, the appellant had not maintained regular and contemporaneous books of account supported by documents, vouchers that are capable of being verified. 10.3.2 In the appellant’s case, he did not produce any bills or vouchers for verification nor maintained any books

SHANTHILAL D JAIN,,CHENNAI vs. DCIT, CENTRAL CIRCLE - 2 (1),, CHENNAI

2400/CHNY/2019

ITA 2362/CHNY/2019[2012-13]Status: DisposedITAT Chennai20 May 2022AY 2012-13

Bench: Shri Mahavir Singhand Dr. M.L. Meena

Section 153ASection 271A

TDS, disallowance of expenditures incurred in cash in excess of the prescribed threshold. In this case, as observed earlier, the appellant had not maintained regular and contemporaneous books of account supported by documents, vouchers that are capable of being verified. 10.3.2 In the appellant’s case, he did not produce any bills or vouchers for verification nor maintained any books

SHANTHILAL D JAIN,,CHENNAI vs. DCIT, CENTRAL CIRCLE - 2 (1),, CHENNAI

2400/CHNY/2019

ITA 2363/CHNY/2019[2013-14]Status: DisposedITAT Chennai20 May 2022AY 2013-14

Bench: Shri Mahavir Singhand Dr. M.L. Meena

Section 153ASection 271A

TDS, disallowance of expenditures incurred in cash in excess of the prescribed threshold. In this case, as observed earlier, the appellant had not maintained regular and contemporaneous books of account supported by documents, vouchers that are capable of being verified. 10.3.2 In the appellant’s case, he did not produce any bills or vouchers for verification nor maintained any books

SHANTHILAL D JAIN,,CHENNAI vs. DCIT, CENTRAL CIRCLE - 2 (1),, CHENNAI

2400/CHNY/2019

ITA 2396/CHNY/2019[2007-08]Status: DisposedITAT Chennai20 May 2022AY 2007-08

Bench: Shri Mahavir Singhand Dr. M.L. Meena

Section 153ASection 271A

TDS, disallowance of expenditures incurred in cash in excess of the prescribed threshold. In this case, as observed earlier, the appellant had not maintained regular and contemporaneous books of account supported by documents, vouchers that are capable of being verified. 10.3.2 In the appellant’s case, he did not produce any bills or vouchers for verification nor maintained any books

SHANTHILAL D JAIN,,CHENNAI vs. DCIT, CENTRAL CIRCLE - 2 (1),, CHENNAI

2400/CHNY/2019

ITA 2397/CHNY/2019[2008-09]Status: DisposedITAT Chennai20 May 2022AY 2008-09

Bench: Shri Mahavir Singhand Dr. M.L. Meena

Section 153ASection 271A

TDS, disallowance of expenditures incurred in cash in excess of the prescribed threshold. In this case, as observed earlier, the appellant had not maintained regular and contemporaneous books of account supported by documents, vouchers that are capable of being verified. 10.3.2 In the appellant’s case, he did not produce any bills or vouchers for verification nor maintained any books

SHANTHILAL D JAIN,,CHENNAI vs. DCIT, CENTRAL CIRCLE - 2 (1),, CHENNAI

2400/CHNY/2019

ITA 2398/CHNY/2019[2009-10]Status: DisposedITAT Chennai20 May 2022AY 2009-10

Bench: Shri Mahavir Singhand Dr. M.L. Meena

Section 153ASection 271A

TDS, disallowance of expenditures incurred in cash in excess of the prescribed threshold. In this case, as observed earlier, the appellant had not maintained regular and contemporaneous books of account supported by documents, vouchers that are capable of being verified. 10.3.2 In the appellant’s case, he did not produce any bills or vouchers for verification nor maintained any books

SHANTHILAL D JAIN,,CHENNAI vs. DCIT, CENTRAL CIRCLE - 2 (1),, CHENNAI

2400/CHNY/2019

ITA 2399/CHNY/2019[2010-11]Status: DisposedITAT Chennai20 May 2022AY 2010-11

Bench: Shri Mahavir Singhand Dr. M.L. Meena

Section 153ASection 271A

TDS, disallowance of expenditures incurred in cash in excess of the prescribed threshold. In this case, as observed earlier, the appellant had not maintained regular and contemporaneous books of account supported by documents, vouchers that are capable of being verified. 10.3.2 In the appellant’s case, he did not produce any bills or vouchers for verification nor maintained any books

SHANTHILAL D JAIN,,CHENNAI vs. DCIT, CENTRAL CIRCLE - 2 (1),, CHENNAI

2400/CHNY/2019

ITA 2400/CHNY/2019[2011-12]Status: DisposedITAT Chennai20 May 2022AY 2011-12

Bench: Shri Mahavir Singhand Dr. M.L. Meena

Section 153ASection 271A

TDS, disallowance of expenditures incurred in cash in excess of the prescribed threshold. In this case, as observed earlier, the appellant had not maintained regular and contemporaneous books of account supported by documents, vouchers that are capable of being verified. 10.3.2 In the appellant’s case, he did not produce any bills or vouchers for verification nor maintained any books

SHANTHILAL D JAIN,,CHENNAI vs. DCIT, CENTRAL CIRCLE - 2 (1),, CHENNAI

2400/CHNY/2019

ITA 2401/CHNY/2019[2012-13]Status: DisposedITAT Chennai20 May 2022AY 2012-13

Bench: Shri Mahavir Singhand Dr. M.L. Meena

Section 153ASection 271A

TDS, disallowance of expenditures incurred in cash in excess of the prescribed threshold. In this case, as observed earlier, the appellant had not maintained regular and contemporaneous books of account supported by documents, vouchers that are capable of being verified. 10.3.2 In the appellant’s case, he did not produce any bills or vouchers for verification nor maintained any books

SHANTHILAL D JAIN,,CHENNAI vs. DCIT, CENTRAL CIRCLE - 2 (1),, CHENNAI

2400/CHNY/2019

ITA 2402/CHNY/2019[2013-14]Status: DisposedITAT Chennai20 May 2022AY 2013-14

Bench: Shri Mahavir Singhand Dr. M.L. Meena

Section 153ASection 271A

TDS, disallowance of expenditures incurred in cash in excess of the prescribed threshold. In this case, as observed earlier, the appellant had not maintained regular and contemporaneous books of account supported by documents, vouchers that are capable of being verified. 10.3.2 In the appellant’s case, he did not produce any bills or vouchers for verification nor maintained any books

SHANTHILAL D JAIN,,CHENNAI vs. DCIT, CENTRAL CIRCLE - 2 (1),, CHENNAI

2400/CHNY/2019

ITA 2359/CHNY/2019[2009-10]Status: DisposedITAT Chennai20 May 2022AY 2009-10

Bench: Shri Mahavir Singhand Dr. M.L. Meena

Section 153ASection 271A

TDS, disallowance of expenditures incurred in cash in excess of the prescribed threshold. In this case, as observed earlier, the appellant had not maintained regular and contemporaneous books of account supported by documents, vouchers that are capable of being verified. 10.3.2 In the appellant’s case, he did not produce any bills or vouchers for verification nor maintained any books

M/S. SHREE BATTERY HOUSE,,CHENNAI vs. DCIT, CENTRAL CIRCLE - 2 (1),, CHENNAI

2400/CHNY/2019

ITA 2588/CHNY/2019[2011-12]Status: DisposedITAT Chennai20 May 2022AY 2011-12

Bench: Shri Mahavir Singhand Dr. M.L. Meena

Section 153ASection 271A

TDS, disallowance of expenditures incurred in cash in excess of the prescribed threshold. In this case, as observed earlier, the appellant had not maintained regular and contemporaneous books of account supported by documents, vouchers that are capable of being verified. 10.3.2 In the appellant’s case, he did not produce any bills or vouchers for verification nor maintained any books

M/S. SHREE BATTERY HOUSE,,CHENNAI vs. DCIT, CENTRAL CIRCLE - 2 (1),, CHENNAI

2400/CHNY/2019

ITA 2589/CHNY/2019[2012-13]Status: DisposedITAT Chennai20 May 2022AY 2012-13

Bench: Shri Mahavir Singhand Dr. M.L. Meena

Section 153ASection 271A

TDS, disallowance of expenditures incurred in cash in excess of the prescribed threshold. In this case, as observed earlier, the appellant had not maintained regular and contemporaneous books of account supported by documents, vouchers that are capable of being verified. 10.3.2 In the appellant’s case, he did not produce any bills or vouchers for verification nor maintained any books

M/S. SHREE BATTERY HOUSE,,CHENNAI vs. DCIT, CENTRAL CIRCLE - 2 (1),, CHENNAI

2400/CHNY/2019

ITA 2590/CHNY/2019[2013-14]Status: DisposedITAT Chennai20 May 2022AY 2013-14

Bench: Shri Mahavir Singhand Dr. M.L. Meena

Section 153ASection 271A

TDS, disallowance of expenditures incurred in cash in excess of the prescribed threshold. In this case, as observed earlier, the appellant had not maintained regular and contemporaneous books of account supported by documents, vouchers that are capable of being verified. 10.3.2 In the appellant’s case, he did not produce any bills or vouchers for verification nor maintained any books

M/S. SHREE BATTERY HOUSE,,CHENNAI vs. DCIT, CENTRAL CIRCLE - 2 (1),, CHENNAI

2400/CHNY/2019

ITA 2591/CHNY/2019[2010-11]Status: DisposedITAT Chennai20 May 2022AY 2010-11

Bench: Shri Mahavir Singhand Dr. M.L. Meena

Section 153ASection 271A

TDS, disallowance of expenditures incurred in cash in excess of the prescribed threshold. In this case, as observed earlier, the appellant had not maintained regular and contemporaneous books of account supported by documents, vouchers that are capable of being verified. 10.3.2 In the appellant’s case, he did not produce any bills or vouchers for verification nor maintained any books

SHANTHILAL D JAIN,,CHENNAI vs. DCIT, CENTRAL CIRCLE - 2 (1),, CHENNAI

2400/CHNY/2019

ITA 2357/CHNY/2019[2007-08]Status: DisposedITAT Chennai20 May 2022AY 2007-08

Bench: Shri Mahavir Singhand Dr. M.L. Meena

Section 153ASection 271A

TDS, disallowance of expenditures incurred in cash in excess of the prescribed threshold. In this case, as observed earlier, the appellant had not maintained regular and contemporaneous books of account supported by documents, vouchers that are capable of being verified. 10.3.2 In the appellant’s case, he did not produce any bills or vouchers for verification nor maintained any books