BharatTax.net
SearchITATHigh CourtsSupreme CourtPhrasesAI ResearchHistory

Filters

BharatTax.net

Free search engine for ITAT (Income Tax Appellate Tribunal) judgments across all 28 benches in India.

Quick Links

  • Search Judgments
  • Browse by Bench
  • Recent Judgments

About

BharatTax provides free access to Income Tax Appellate Tribunal orders for legal research and reference.

© 2026 BharatTax.net. All rights reserved.

38 results for “TDS”+ Section 26Aclear

Sorted by relevance

Mumbai93Bangalore91Delhi65Chennai38Jaipur30Kolkata28Indore15Ahmedabad13Raipur12Surat12Chandigarh9Cochin6Pune6Guwahati5Hyderabad5Jodhpur4Visakhapatnam3Cuttack3Rajkot3Varanasi3Karnataka2Panaji2Jabalpur1Amritsar1Agra1Ranchi1Allahabad1Nagpur1Patna1

Key Topics

Section 4061TDS31Section 20123Disallowance19Addition to Income19Deduction17Section 143(3)12Section 194C11Section 201(1)9Section 40A(3)

ACIT, CC - 1 (2),, CHENNAI vs. M/S. STUDIO GREEN,, CHENNAI

In the result, the appeal of the Revenue is dismissed and the Cross

ITA 2427/CHNY/2019[2011-12]Status: DisposedITAT Chennai18 Aug 2021AY 2011-12

Bench: Shri V. Durga Rao & Shri G. Manjunathaआयकर अपील सं./I.T.A. No.2427/Chny/2019 िनधा"रण वष"/Assessment Year: 2011-12 & C.O. No. 99/Chny/2019 [In I.T.A. No. 2427/Chny/2019] The Assistant Commissioner Of M/S. Studio Green, Income Tax, Central Circle 1(2), Vs. Old No. 13, New No. 6, Ii Floor, Investigation Wing, Room No. 311, 6, Thanikachalam Road, No. 46, Mg Road, Chennai. T. Nagar, Chennai 600 017. [Pan: Absfs6433Q] (अपीलाथ" /Appellant) (""थ"/Respondent/Cross Objector) अपीलाथ" की ओर से / Appellant By Shri S. Bharath, Cit : ""थ" की ओर से/Respondent By Shri V. Vivek Rajan, C.A. : सुनवाई की तारीख/ Date Of Hearing 18.08.2021 : घोषणा की तारीख /Date Of Pronouncement : 18.08.2021 आदेश /O R D E R Per V. Durga Rao: This Appeal Filed By The Revenue Is Directed Against The Order Of The Ld. Commissioner Of Income Tax (Appeals) 18, Chennai, Dated 26.06.2019 Relevant To The Assessment Year 2011-12. 2. The Only Issue Involved In The Appeal Of The Revenue Is Relating To Whether The Second Proviso Section 40(A)(Ia) Of The Income Tax Act, 1961 [“Act” In Short] Applies Retrospectively Or Only Prospective From The Date Of 2

Section 194CSection 194JSection 201Section 40

section 40(a)(ia) of the Act is retrospective in nature and directed the Assessing Officer to provide an opportunity to the assessee to furnish Form 7 I.T.A. No. 2427/Chny/2019 & C.O. No. 99/Chny/2019 26A from the recipients of the payments made without TDS

Showing 1–20 of 38 · Page 1 of 2

8
Survey u/s 133A6
Section 143(1)5

G.VANAJA,NAGERCOIL vs. ITO WARD-5, NAGERCOIL

In the result, appeal filed by the assessee is partly allowed

ITA 413/CHNY/2020[2013-14]Status: DisposedITAT Chennai15 Mar 2023AY 2013-14

Bench: Shri V. Durga Rao, Hon’Ble & Shri Manjunatha. G, Hon’Bleआयकर अपील सं./Ita No.: 413/Chny/2020 िनधा"रण वष" / Assessment Year: 2013-14

For Appellant: Shri. T. Vasudevan, AdvocateFor Respondent: Shri. P. Sajit Kumar, JCIT
Section 194CSection 40

TDS, on such payments the AO is right in disallowing such payments u/s. 40(a)(ia) of the Act. Hence, we confirm additions made by the AO. 11. As regards alternative plea of the assessee that it has made payment to reputed shipping companies and all service providers has filed their return of income

ACIT, CHENNAI vs. M/S. BSR BUILDERS ENGINEERS CONTRACTORS , CHENNAI

In the result, the appeal of the assessee for AYs 2016-17 & 2017-18

ITA 1561/CHNY/2025[2016]Status: DisposedITAT Chennai14 Jan 2026

Bench: Shri Aby T. Varkey & Shri Jagadishआयकर अपील सं./Ita Nos.1311 & 1312/Chny/2025 िनधा"रणवष"/Assessment Years: 2016-17 & 2017-18 V. Bsr Builders Engineers Contractors, The Dcit, No.28, Bsr Janus, Tank Bund Road, Central Circle-2(3), Nungambakkam, Chennai-600 034. Chennai. [Pan: Aagfb 7140 N] (अपीलाथ"/Appellant) (""यथ"/Respondent) आयकर अपील सं./Ita Nos.1274 & 1561/Chny/2025 िनधा"रणवष"/Assessment Years: 2017-18 & 2016-17 V. The Dcit / Acit, Bsr Builders Engineers Central Circle-2(3), Contractors, Chennai. No.28, Bsr Janus, Tank Bund Road, Nungambakkam, Chennai-600 034. [Pan: Aagfb 7140 N] (अपीलाथ"/Appellant) (""यथ"/Respondent)

For Appellant: Mr.G. Baskar, Advocate &For Respondent: Mr.Nishanth Rao, JCIT

TDS was deducted thereon under the provisions of section 194A of the ITA Nos.1274, 1311, 1312 & 1561/Chny/2025 CO Nos.39 & 47/Chny/2025 (AYs 2016-17 & 2017-18) BSR Builders Engineers Contractors :: 27 :: Act, due to which the AO disallowed 30% of the expenditure i.e. Rs.11,49,997/- u/s 40(a)(ia) of the Act. Aggrieved, assessee preferred an appeal

BSR BUILDERS ENGINEERS CONTRACTORS, ,CHENNAI vs. DCIT, CENT. CIRCLE-2(3), CHENNAI

In the result, the appeal of the assessee for AYs 2016-17 & 2017-18

ITA 1311/CHNY/2025[2016-17]Status: DisposedITAT Chennai14 Jan 2026AY 2016-17

Bench: Shri Aby T. Varkey & Shri Jagadishआयकर अपील सं./Ita Nos.1311 & 1312/Chny/2025 िनधा"रणवष"/Assessment Years: 2016-17 & 2017-18 V. Bsr Builders Engineers Contractors, The Dcit, No.28, Bsr Janus, Tank Bund Road, Central Circle-2(3), Nungambakkam, Chennai-600 034. Chennai. [Pan: Aagfb 7140 N] (अपीलाथ"/Appellant) (""यथ"/Respondent) आयकर अपील सं./Ita Nos.1274 & 1561/Chny/2025 िनधा"रणवष"/Assessment Years: 2017-18 & 2016-17 V. The Dcit / Acit, Bsr Builders Engineers Central Circle-2(3), Contractors, Chennai. No.28, Bsr Janus, Tank Bund Road, Nungambakkam, Chennai-600 034. [Pan: Aagfb 7140 N] (अपीलाथ"/Appellant) (""यथ"/Respondent)

For Appellant: Mr.G. Baskar, Advocate &For Respondent: Mr.Nishanth Rao, JCIT

TDS was deducted thereon under the provisions of section 194A of the ITA Nos.1274, 1311, 1312 & 1561/Chny/2025 CO Nos.39 & 47/Chny/2025 (AYs 2016-17 & 2017-18) BSR Builders Engineers Contractors :: 27 :: Act, due to which the AO disallowed 30% of the expenditure i.e. Rs.11,49,997/- u/s 40(a)(ia) of the Act. Aggrieved, assessee preferred an appeal

DCIT, CHENNAI vs. BSR BUILDERS ENGINEERS CONTRACTORS, CHENNAI

In the result, the appeal of the assessee for AYs 2016-17 & 2017-18

ITA 1274/CHNY/2025[2017]Status: DisposedITAT Chennai14 Jan 2026

Bench: Shri Aby T. Varkey & Shri Jagadishआयकर अपील सं./Ita Nos.1311 & 1312/Chny/2025 िनधा"रणवष"/Assessment Years: 2016-17 & 2017-18 V. Bsr Builders Engineers Contractors, The Dcit, No.28, Bsr Janus, Tank Bund Road, Central Circle-2(3), Nungambakkam, Chennai-600 034. Chennai. [Pan: Aagfb 7140 N] (अपीलाथ"/Appellant) (""यथ"/Respondent) आयकर अपील सं./Ita Nos.1274 & 1561/Chny/2025 िनधा"रणवष"/Assessment Years: 2017-18 & 2016-17 V. The Dcit / Acit, Bsr Builders Engineers Central Circle-2(3), Contractors, Chennai. No.28, Bsr Janus, Tank Bund Road, Nungambakkam, Chennai-600 034. [Pan: Aagfb 7140 N] (अपीलाथ"/Appellant) (""यथ"/Respondent)

For Appellant: Mr.G. Baskar, Advocate &For Respondent: Mr.Nishanth Rao, JCIT

TDS was deducted thereon under the provisions of section 194A of the ITA Nos.1274, 1311, 1312 & 1561/Chny/2025 CO Nos.39 & 47/Chny/2025 (AYs 2016-17 & 2017-18) BSR Builders Engineers Contractors :: 27 :: Act, due to which the AO disallowed 30% of the expenditure i.e. Rs.11,49,997/- u/s 40(a)(ia) of the Act. Aggrieved, assessee preferred an appeal

BSR BUILDERS ENGINEERS CONTRACTORS,,CHENNAI vs. DCIT, CENTRAL CIRCLE-2(3), CHENNAI

In the result, the appeal of the assessee for AYs 2016-17 & 2017-18

ITA 1312/CHNY/2025[2017-18]Status: DisposedITAT Chennai14 Jan 2026AY 2017-18

Bench: Shri Aby T. Varkey & Shri Jagadishआयकर अपील सं./Ita Nos.1311 & 1312/Chny/2025 िनधा"रणवष"/Assessment Years: 2016-17 & 2017-18 V. Bsr Builders Engineers Contractors, The Dcit, No.28, Bsr Janus, Tank Bund Road, Central Circle-2(3), Nungambakkam, Chennai-600 034. Chennai. [Pan: Aagfb 7140 N] (अपीलाथ"/Appellant) (""यथ"/Respondent) आयकर अपील सं./Ita Nos.1274 & 1561/Chny/2025 िनधा"रणवष"/Assessment Years: 2017-18 & 2016-17 V. The Dcit / Acit, Bsr Builders Engineers Central Circle-2(3), Contractors, Chennai. No.28, Bsr Janus, Tank Bund Road, Nungambakkam, Chennai-600 034. [Pan: Aagfb 7140 N] (अपीलाथ"/Appellant) (""यथ"/Respondent)

For Appellant: Mr.G. Baskar, Advocate &For Respondent: Mr.Nishanth Rao, JCIT

TDS was deducted thereon under the provisions of section 194A of the ITA Nos.1274, 1311, 1312 & 1561/Chny/2025 CO Nos.39 & 47/Chny/2025 (AYs 2016-17 & 2017-18) BSR Builders Engineers Contractors :: 27 :: Act, due to which the AO disallowed 30% of the expenditure i.e. Rs.11,49,997/- u/s 40(a)(ia) of the Act. Aggrieved, assessee preferred an appeal

GURUDEV APPARELS,TIRUPPUR vs. DCIT, TIRUPPUR

In the result, the appeal of the Assessee in I

ITA 257/CHNY/2017[2013-14]Status: DisposedITAT Chennai27 May 2022AY 2013-14

Bench: Shri G. Manjunatha & Shri Anikesh Banerjeeआयकर अपील सं./I.T.A No.:257/Chny/2017 िनधा"रण वष" /Assessment Year: 2013 - 2014

For Appellant: Mr. S. Sridhar, AdvocateFor Respondent: Mr. G. Johnson, Addl. CIT
Section 1Section 143(3)Section 194CSection 250(6)Section 40Section 40ASection 40A(3)

section 194C of the Act. The list is placed in the Annexure- A of said paper book. The said list is reproduced here as under: Sl. Name & Address Amount Paid Remarks No 1) Apparel World 79,490 Confirmation Obtained 2) SDV International Logistics 8,42,125 Confirmation Obtained Limited 3) TNT India Private Limited 10,24,722 Confirmation Obtained

M/S. ELITE SHIPPING SYNERGIES PVT. LTD.,CHENNAI vs. ITO, CHENNAI

In the result, the assessee’s appeal is allowed

ITA 2405/CHNY/2016[2012-13]Status: DisposedITAT Chennai16 Dec 2016AY 2012-13

Bench: Shri Sanjay Arora & Shri G. Pavan Kumarआयकर अपील सं./Ita No.2405/Mds/2016 "नधा"रण वष" / Assessment Year : 2012-13

For Appellant: Ms. Hemalatha, ACAFor Respondent: Shri A.V.Sreekanth, JCIT
Section 143(3)Section 201Section 40

TDS provisions. The amendment by way of second proviso to s. 40(a)(ia) bridges this gap in law, providing for a mechanism (procedure) ensuring the invocation of the said section only whether its avowed object – the recovery of tax on the corresponding income, is not met. The same thus only operationalizes the mandate of Hindustan Coca Cola Beverages

SHRI K. DHANASEKHARAN,CHENNAI vs. DCIT, CC - 3 (2),, CHENNAI

In the result, appeal filed by the assessee is treated as

ITA 1869/CHNY/2019[2010-11]Status: DisposedITAT Chennai10 Feb 2022AY 2010-11

Bench: Shri V. Durga Rao & Shri G. Manjunathaआयकरअपीलसं./I.T.A.No.1869/Chny/2019 ("नधा"रणवष" / Assessment Year: 2010-11) Mr. K.Dhanasekharan Vs Deputy Commissioner Of Income Tax, 59/31, Kachaleeswarar Agraharam Street, Parrys, Central Circle-3(2) Chennai-600 001. Chennai. Pan: Adtpd 8931D (अपीलाथ"/Appellant) (""यथ"/Respondent)

For Appellant: Mr. P.Sajit Kumar, JCITFor Respondent: 08.02.2022
Section 132Section 143(3)Section 144Section 147Section 148Section 153ASection 40

TDS on those expenses which have been disallowed by the Assessing Officer, but payees have duly included sum paid by the assessee in return of income filed by them for relevant assessment year and also 6 paid due taxes thereon. Since, the assessee was not given sufficient time to file necessary details, including income-tax returns and certificate from payees

CSV INVESTMENTS PRIVATE LIMITED,TEYNAMPET CHENNAI vs. ITO, CORPORATE WARD 1(3), CHENNAI, CHENNAI

In the result, the appeal filed by the assessee is allowed for statistical purposes

ITA 499/CHNY/2023[2019-20]Status: DisposedITAT Chennai31 Jan 2024AY 2019-20

Bench: Shri Mahavir Singhand Shri Manoj Kumar Aggarwal

For Appellant: Shri D. Anand, AdvocateFor Respondent: Shri P. Sajit Kumar, JCIT
Section 143(1)Section 40

section 40(a)(ia) of the Act. 3. Brief facts are that the assessee has paid salary to its directors to the tune of Rs.22,32,000/- without deduction of TDS. The CPC, Bangalore vide intimation u/s.143(1) of the Act, disallowed this salary of Rs.22.32 lakhs paid to its Directors without deduction of TDS. Aggrieved, assessee preferred appeal before

ACIT, CHENNAI vs. CHEVRON PETROLEUM INDIA PVT LTD., CHENNAI

In the result, appeal of the Revenue is dismissed

ITA 561/CHNY/2017[2012-13]Status: DisposedITAT Chennai10 Jul 2017AY 2012-13

Bench: Shri N.R.S. Ganesan & Shri A. Mohan Alankamonyआयकरअपीलसं./I.T.A.No.561/Mds/2017 ("नधा"रणवष" / Assessment Year: 2012-13) Vs M/S. Chevron Petroleum India Pvt. The Asstt. Commissioner Of Income Tax, Ltd., Corporate Circle 1(2), No.108, Armenian Street, Chennai – 34. King & Patridge, Catholic Centre, Chennai – 600 001. Pan: Aaact4291P (अपीलाथ"/Appellant) (""यथ"/Respondent)

For Appellant: Shri G. Baskar & Ms. A. Sushma
Section 143(3)Section 199Section 250(6)

Section 199 of the Act come to the rescue of the assessee. In the case of the assessee, the assessee had paid the tax due in the year in which he has declared the receipt of Rs. 1,14,71,969/- against which TDS of Rs.11,69,606/- was deducted and the assessee had not claimed the tax credit during

PHOTON KATHAAS PRODUCTION PRIVATE LIMITED,CHENNAI vs. ITO, TDS WARD 1-(1), CHENNAI

In the result, both these appeals filed by the assessee are allowed for statistical purposes

ITA 511/CHNY/2024[2016-17]Status: DisposedITAT Chennai22 Jul 2024AY 2016-17

Bench: Hon’Ble Shri Manoj Kumar Aggarwal, Am & Hon’Ble Shri Manu Kumar Giri, Jm आयकरअपील सं./ Ita Nos.511 & 512/Chny/2024 (िनधा"रणवष" / Assessment Years: 2016-2017 & 2017-2018) Photon Kathaas Production Private Limited, Vs. The Income Tax Officer, No.19, Avenue Road, Tds, Ward 1(1) Nungambakkam, Chennai. Chennai 600 034. [Pan: Aafcp 2805A] (अपीलाथ"/Appellant) (""यथ"/Respondent) अपीलाथ" क" ओर से/ Appellant By : Shri. Raghav Menon, Advocate ""यथ" क" ओर से /Respondent By : Shri. Arv Srinivasan, Irs, Addl.Cit. सुनवाई क" तार"ख/Date Of Hearing : 11.07.2024 घोषणा क" तार"ख /Date Of Pronouncement : 22.07.2024 आदेश / O R D E R Per Manu Kumar Giri () These Two Appeals Being Ita Nos.511-512/Chny/2024 Filed By The Assessee Are Directed Against Separate Orders Of Even Date 29.12.2023 Passed By The Learned Commissioner Of Income Tax (Appeals) [‘Cit(A)’ In Short], Chennai-20 For The Assessment Years 2016-17 & 2017-18. 2. The Assessee Has Raised Common Grounds Of Appeal In Both The Assessment Years, Therefore, For The Sake Of Brevity Grounds Of Appeal Filed In Ita No.511/Chny/2024 For The Assessment Year 2016-17 Is Being Taken As Lead Case & Our Order Thereon Will Mutatis Mutandis Apply To Appeal For Ay 2017-18 Accordingly. Grounds Of Appeal Filed In Ita No.511-512/Chny/2024 Are Reproduced As Under:-

For Appellant: Shri. Raghav Menon, AdvocateFor Respondent: Shri. ARV Srinivasan, IRS, Addl.CIT
Section 133Section 194JSection 201Section 201(1)Section 250

section 201(1A). 3 The Learned CIT(Appeals) Ought to have Rs.45,37,296/- appreciated the fact that the recipient has offered the entire income as part of their Total income and offered the said income to Tax. The Learned CIT(Appeals) Ought to have Rs.45,37,296/- appreciated the Fact that to certain parties whom the appellant has deducted

PHOTON KATHAAS PRODUCTION PRIVATE LIMITED,CHENNAI vs. ITO, TDS WARD 1(1), CHENNAI

In the result, both these appeals filed by the assessee are allowed for statistical purposes

ITA 512/CHNY/2024[2017-18]Status: DisposedITAT Chennai22 Jul 2024AY 2017-18

Bench: Hon’Ble Shri Manoj Kumar Aggarwal, Am & Hon’Ble Shri Manu Kumar Giri, Jm आयकरअपील सं./ Ita Nos.511 & 512/Chny/2024 (िनधा"रणवष" / Assessment Years: 2016-2017 & 2017-2018) Photon Kathaas Production Private Limited, Vs. The Income Tax Officer, No.19, Avenue Road, Tds, Ward 1(1) Nungambakkam, Chennai. Chennai 600 034. [Pan: Aafcp 2805A] (अपीलाथ"/Appellant) (""यथ"/Respondent) अपीलाथ" क" ओर से/ Appellant By : Shri. Raghav Menon, Advocate ""यथ" क" ओर से /Respondent By : Shri. Arv Srinivasan, Irs, Addl.Cit. सुनवाई क" तार"ख/Date Of Hearing : 11.07.2024 घोषणा क" तार"ख /Date Of Pronouncement : 22.07.2024 आदेश / O R D E R Per Manu Kumar Giri () These Two Appeals Being Ita Nos.511-512/Chny/2024 Filed By The Assessee Are Directed Against Separate Orders Of Even Date 29.12.2023 Passed By The Learned Commissioner Of Income Tax (Appeals) [‘Cit(A)’ In Short], Chennai-20 For The Assessment Years 2016-17 & 2017-18. 2. The Assessee Has Raised Common Grounds Of Appeal In Both The Assessment Years, Therefore, For The Sake Of Brevity Grounds Of Appeal Filed In Ita No.511/Chny/2024 For The Assessment Year 2016-17 Is Being Taken As Lead Case & Our Order Thereon Will Mutatis Mutandis Apply To Appeal For Ay 2017-18 Accordingly. Grounds Of Appeal Filed In Ita No.511-512/Chny/2024 Are Reproduced As Under:-

For Appellant: Shri. Raghav Menon, AdvocateFor Respondent: Shri. ARV Srinivasan, IRS, Addl.CIT
Section 133Section 194JSection 201Section 201(1)Section 250

section 201(1A). 3 The Learned CIT(Appeals) Ought to have Rs.45,37,296/- appreciated the fact that the recipient has offered the entire income as part of their Total income and offered the said income to Tax. The Learned CIT(Appeals) Ought to have Rs.45,37,296/- appreciated the Fact that to certain parties whom the appellant has deducted

PRAHARI AGENCY PRIVATE LIMITED,CHENNAI vs. ITO CORPORATE WARD 5 (2), CHENNAI

In the result, the appeal filed by the assessee is dismissed

ITA 1701/CHNY/2018[2013-14]Status: DisposedITAT Chennai20 Oct 2021AY 2013-14

Bench: Shri Mahavir Singh & Shri G. Manjunathaआयकर अपील सं./Ita No.: 1701/Chny/2018 िनधा"रण वष" / Assessment Year: 2013-14 Prahari Agency Private Limited, Income Tax Officer, 24 Landons Road, V. Croporate Ward 5(2), Kilpauk, Chennai – 600 034. Chennai -600 010. [Pan: Aabcp 7862K] (अपीलाथ"/Appellant) (""यथ"/Respondent) अपीलाथ" क" ओर से/Appellant By : Shri. Arjunraj, Ca For S. Sridhar, Advocate ""यथ" क" ओर से/Respondent By : Shri. G. Johnson, Addl. Cit सुनवाई क" तार"ख/Date Of Hearing : 22.09.2021 घोषणा क" तार"ख/Date Of Pronouncement : 20.10.2021

For Appellant: Shri. Arjunraj, CAFor Respondent: Shri. G. Johnson, Addl. CIT
Section 194CSection 36Section 40

26A, the appellant should not have been treated as 6assessee in default' as provided in Section 40(a)(ia) and on such amounts Section 40(a)(ia) should not have been applied. F. The appellant for the purpose of claiming non deduction of TDS

M.C.RANGANATHAN & CO.,,CHENNAI vs. ITO, CHENNAI

In the result, appeal of the assessee is allowed for statistical purposes as indicated herein above

ITA 1346/CHNY/2017[2013-14]Status: DisposedITAT Chennai16 Apr 2018AY 2013-14

Bench: Shri N.R.S. Ganesan & Shri A.Mohan Alankamony

For Appellant: Shri AR.V. Sreenivasan, JCITFor Respondent: 08.02.2018
Section 143(1)Section 143(2)Section 143(3)Section 195Section 201(1)Section 250(6)Section 40Section 40a

Section 201(1) of the Act, makes it very clear that the reprieve provided to an assessee who fails to effect TDS, in the form of filing of certificate from an Accountant in Form 26A

DCIT PONDICHERRY CIRCLE, PONDICHERRY vs. RAVIKUMAR DISTILLERIES LTD., PONDICHERRY

Accordingly. The ground stand partly allowed

ITA 1395/CHNY/2018[2012-13]Status: DisposedITAT Chennai03 Dec 2024AY 2012-13

Bench: Hon’Ble Shri Manoj Kumar Aggarwal, Am & Hon’Ble Shri Manu Kumar Giri, Jm 1.आयकरअपील सं./ Ita No.974/Chny/2018 (िनधा)रणवष) / Assessment Year: 2012-13) M/S. Ravikumar Distilleries Limited Dcit बनाम/ #17, Kamaraj Salai, Pondicherry Circle, Vs. Pondicherry-605 011. Puducherry-605 001. "थायीलेखासं./जीआइआरसं./Pan/Gir No.Aabcr-4195-D (अपीलाथ"/Appellant) : (" थ" / Respondent) & 2.आयकरअपील सं./ Ita No.1395/Chny/2018 (िनधा)रणवष) / Assessment Year: 2012-13) Dcit M/S. Ravikumar Distilleries Limited बनाम Pondicherry Circle, # C-9 & C-10, Industrial Estate, / Vs. Puducherry-605 001. Thattanchavady, Pondicherry-605 009. "थायीलेखासं./जीआइआरसं./Pan/Gir No.Aabcr-4195-D (अपीलाथ"/Appellant) : (" थ" / Respondent) अपीलाथ"कीओरसे/ Assessee By : Shri N. Arjun Raj (Advocate) - Ld.Ar " थ"कीओरसे/Revenue By : Shri A.Sasikumar (Cit) - Ld. Sr. Dr सुनवाईकीतारीख/Date Of Hearing : 21-11-2024 घोषणाकीतारीख /Date Of Pronouncement : 03-12-2024 आदेश / O R D E R Manoj Kumar Aggarwal ()

For Appellant: Shri N. Arjun Raj (Advocate) - ld.ARFor Respondent: Shri A.Sasikumar (CIT) - Ld. Sr. DR
Section 143(3)Section 14ASection 194JSection 36(1)(iii)Section 40Section 69

TDS on the said expenses. Your Appellant therefore prays to delete the addition of Rs.1,92,63,967/-. 2. The Learned Assessing Officer has wrongly made additions under Sec. 69 on the ground that there were some differences in balances as per books of Your Appellant and its associated concern Liquor India Ltd. as on 31.03.2012 and the difference amounting

M/S. FAIRMACS SHIPPING TRANSPORT CO. PVT. LTD.,CHENNAI vs. DCIT, CHENNAI

In the result, the assessee’s appeal is allowed/treated as allowed for

ITA 2672/CHNY/2016[2009-10]Status: DisposedITAT Chennai27 Dec 2017AY 2009-10

Bench: Shri Duvvuru Rl Reddy & Shri S. Jayaraman

For Appellant: Shri. S. Seetharaman, CAFor Respondent: Shri. Sailendra Mamidi, CIT
Section 143(3)Section 201(1)Section 28Section 30Section 40

TDS and payments to parties less than threshold limits. The CIT(A) also held that after necessary due diligence and verification, the AO may allow relief to the appellant as per law. The appellant is directed to produce all the necessary evidences before the AO for verification. However, with regard to Form No. 26A submitted by the :-3-: assessee

DEVI TRADING CORPORATION,CHENNAI vs. ITO NON CORPORATE WARD 4(1), CHENNAI

In the result, appeal of the assessee is partly allowed for

ITA 2800/CHNY/2017[2014-15]Status: DisposedITAT Chennai23 May 2018AY 2014-15

Bench: Shri George Mathan

For Appellant: Mr.D.Anand,AdvocateFor Respondent: Mr.B.Segadevan,JCIT,D.R
Section 40

section 40(a)(ia) of the Act. Before me, ld.A.R placed a copy of certificate of Accountant in Form 26A confirming that M/s.Bharat Logistics Solutions Pvt Ltd. has taken into account the sum referred to, being the sum paid by the assessee, when computing taxable income. It was a submission that in view of decision of Hon’ble Delhi High

DCIT CENTRAL CIRCLE 2, TUTICORIN vs. VVD & SONS (P) LIMITED, TUTICORIN

In the result, both the Cross Objections filed by the assessee are allowed and all the appeals filed by the Revenue are dismissed

ITA 2153/CHNY/2018[2013-14]Status: DisposedITAT Chennai13 Sept 2023AY 2013-14

Bench: Shri V. Durga Rao & Shri Manoj Kumar Aggarwalआयकर अपील सं./I.T.A. Nos.2153, 2154 2155 & 2156/Chny/2018 िनधा"रण वष"/Assessment Years: 2013-14, 2014-15, 2015-16 & 2016-17 & C.O. Nos. 132 & 133/Chny/2018 [In Ita Nos. 2153 & 2154/Chny/2018] The Deputy Commissioner Of Vs. M/S. Vvd & Sons (P) Limited, Income Tax, No. 182, Palayamkottai Road, Central Circle 2, Tuticorin 628 008. Madurai. [Pan:Aaacv8438J] (अपीलाथ" /Appellant) (""थ"/Respondent/Cross Objector) अपीलाथ" की ओर से / Appellant By Shri R. Clement Ramesh Kumar, Cit For : Shri M. Rajan, Cit ""थ" की ओर से/Respondent By Shri R. Vijayaraghavan, Advocate : सुनवाई की तारीख/ Date Of Hearing 24.08.2023 : घोषणा की तारीख /Date Of Pronouncement : 13.09.2023 आदेश /O R D E R Per V. Durga Rao: These Four Appeals Filed By The Revenue Are Directed Against The Common Order Of The Ld. Commissioner Of Income Tax (Appeals) 19, Chennai, Dated 23.04.2018 Relevant To The Assessment Years 2013-14, 2014-15, 2015-16 & 2016-17. 2. The Appeals Filed By The Revenue Are Delayed By Three Days For Which, The Revenue Has Filed Affidavits For Condonation Of Delay, To Which 2

Section 40A(3)

TDS Rs15439) was paid to Mr.R.Jeyabalaserma Ganesan who is the intermediary and broker for the purchase of the land. The balance Rs.3,57,145/- was deposited in the Axis bank (A/c. No. 105010200002875) on 24.01.15. This payment was made as land development charges and TDS was made. So the payment was made by withdrawing from the 45 I.T.A. Nos.2153-2156/Chny/18

DCIT CENTRAL CIRCLE 2, TUTICORIN vs. VVD & SONS (P) LIMITED, TUTICORIN

In the result, both the Cross Objections filed by the assessee are allowed and all the appeals filed by the Revenue are dismissed

ITA 2154/CHNY/2018[2014-15]Status: DisposedITAT Chennai13 Sept 2023AY 2014-15

Bench: Shri V. Durga Rao & Shri Manoj Kumar Aggarwalआयकर अपील सं./I.T.A. Nos.2153, 2154 2155 & 2156/Chny/2018 िनधा"रण वष"/Assessment Years: 2013-14, 2014-15, 2015-16 & 2016-17 & C.O. Nos. 132 & 133/Chny/2018 [In Ita Nos. 2153 & 2154/Chny/2018] The Deputy Commissioner Of Vs. M/S. Vvd & Sons (P) Limited, Income Tax, No. 182, Palayamkottai Road, Central Circle 2, Tuticorin 628 008. Madurai. [Pan:Aaacv8438J] (अपीलाथ" /Appellant) (""थ"/Respondent/Cross Objector) अपीलाथ" की ओर से / Appellant By Shri R. Clement Ramesh Kumar, Cit For : Shri M. Rajan, Cit ""थ" की ओर से/Respondent By Shri R. Vijayaraghavan, Advocate : सुनवाई की तारीख/ Date Of Hearing 24.08.2023 : घोषणा की तारीख /Date Of Pronouncement : 13.09.2023 आदेश /O R D E R Per V. Durga Rao: These Four Appeals Filed By The Revenue Are Directed Against The Common Order Of The Ld. Commissioner Of Income Tax (Appeals) 19, Chennai, Dated 23.04.2018 Relevant To The Assessment Years 2013-14, 2014-15, 2015-16 & 2016-17. 2. The Appeals Filed By The Revenue Are Delayed By Three Days For Which, The Revenue Has Filed Affidavits For Condonation Of Delay, To Which 2

Section 40A(3)

TDS Rs15439) was paid to Mr.R.Jeyabalaserma Ganesan who is the intermediary and broker for the purchase of the land. The balance Rs.3,57,145/- was deposited in the Axis bank (A/c. No. 105010200002875) on 24.01.15. This payment was made as land development charges and TDS was made. So the payment was made by withdrawing from the 45 I.T.A. Nos.2153-2156/Chny/18