BharatTax.net
SearchITATHigh CourtsSupreme CourtPhrasesAI ResearchHistory

Filters

BharatTax.net

Free search engine for ITAT (Income Tax Appellate Tribunal) judgments across all 28 benches in India.

Quick Links

  • Search Judgments
  • Browse by Bench
  • Recent Judgments

About

BharatTax provides free access to Income Tax Appellate Tribunal orders for legal research and reference.

© 2026 BharatTax.net. All rights reserved.

170 results for “TDS”+ Section 253clear

Sorted by relevance

Mumbai500Delhi443Chennai170Bangalore116Karnataka89Jaipur58Kolkata45Indore42Chandigarh40Ahmedabad31Lucknow30Pune29Raipur26Nagpur24Rajkot13Hyderabad10Panaji10Surat9Cochin9Guwahati6Jodhpur5Varanasi5Jabalpur5Amritsar4Patna4Telangana4Visakhapatnam3SC2Dehradun2J&K1Cuttack1Calcutta1Agra1

Key Topics

TDS71Section 153C42Section 4038Disallowance36Section 143(3)27Addition to Income27Limitation/Time-bar27Section 234E25Section 200A25Deduction

DOLLARS & POUNDS,CHENNAI vs. ACIT CPC TDS, GHAZIABAD

In the result, all the appeals filed by the assessee are allowed

ITA 2015/CHNY/2018[2013-14(Q2)-24Q]Status: DisposedITAT Chennai30 Nov 2018

Bench: Shri A. Mohan Alankamony & Shri Duvvuru Rl Reddy

For Respondent: Ms. G.D. Jayanthi Angayarkanni, JCIT
Section 200ASection 200A(1)Section 234E

TDS returns is appealable. The demand raised by way of charging of fees under section 234E of the Act is under section 156 of the Act and any demand raised under section 156 of the Act is appealable under section 246A(1)(a) and (c) of the Act. Accordingly, we reverse the findings of CIT(A) in this regard

DOLLARS & POUNDS,CHENNAI vs. ACIT CPC TDS, GHAZIABAD

In the result, all the appeals filed by the assessee are allowed

Showing 1–20 of 170 · Page 1 of 9

...
24
Section 1114
Section 2(15)14
ITA 2020/CHNY/2018[2013-14(Q3)-26Q]Status: DisposedITAT Chennai30 Nov 2018

Bench: Shri A. Mohan Alankamony & Shri Duvvuru Rl Reddy

For Respondent: Ms. G.D. Jayanthi Angayarkanni, JCIT
Section 200ASection 200A(1)Section 234E

TDS returns is appealable. The demand raised by way of charging of fees under section 234E of the Act is under section 156 of the Act and any demand raised under section 156 of the Act is appealable under section 246A(1)(a) and (c) of the Act. Accordingly, we reverse the findings of CIT(A) in this regard

DOLLARS & POUNDS,CHENNAI vs. ACIT CPC TDS, GHAZIABAD

In the result, all the appeals filed by the assessee are allowed

ITA 2019/CHNY/2018[2013-14(Q3)-26Q]Status: DisposedITAT Chennai30 Nov 2018

Bench: Shri A. Mohan Alankamony & Shri Duvvuru Rl Reddy

For Respondent: Ms. G.D. Jayanthi Angayarkanni, JCIT
Section 200ASection 200A(1)Section 234E

TDS returns is appealable. The demand raised by way of charging of fees under section 234E of the Act is under section 156 of the Act and any demand raised under section 156 of the Act is appealable under section 246A(1)(a) and (c) of the Act. Accordingly, we reverse the findings of CIT(A) in this regard

DOLLARS & POUNDS,CHENNAI vs. ACIT CPC TDS, GHAZIABAD

In the result, all the appeals filed by the assessee are allowed

ITA 2017/CHNY/2018[2013-14(Q4)-24Q]Status: DisposedITAT Chennai30 Nov 2018

Bench: Shri A. Mohan Alankamony & Shri Duvvuru Rl Reddy

For Respondent: Ms. G.D. Jayanthi Angayarkanni, JCIT
Section 200ASection 200A(1)Section 234E

TDS returns is appealable. The demand raised by way of charging of fees under section 234E of the Act is under section 156 of the Act and any demand raised under section 156 of the Act is appealable under section 246A(1)(a) and (c) of the Act. Accordingly, we reverse the findings of CIT(A) in this regard

DOLLARS & POUNDS,CHENNAI vs. ACIT CPC TDS, GHAZIABAD

In the result, all the appeals filed by the assessee are allowed

ITA 2016/CHNY/2018[2013-14(Q3)-24Q]Status: DisposedITAT Chennai30 Nov 2018

Bench: Shri A. Mohan Alankamony & Shri Duvvuru Rl Reddy

For Respondent: Ms. G.D. Jayanthi Angayarkanni, JCIT
Section 200ASection 200A(1)Section 234E

TDS returns is appealable. The demand raised by way of charging of fees under section 234E of the Act is under section 156 of the Act and any demand raised under section 156 of the Act is appealable under section 246A(1)(a) and (c) of the Act. Accordingly, we reverse the findings of CIT(A) in this regard

DOLLARS & POUNDS,CHENNAI vs. ACIT CPC TDS, GHAZIABAD

In the result, all the appeals filed by the assessee are allowed

ITA 2018/CHNY/2018[2013-14(Q2)-26Q]Status: DisposedITAT Chennai30 Nov 2018

Bench: Shri A. Mohan Alankamony & Shri Duvvuru Rl Reddy

For Respondent: Ms. G.D. Jayanthi Angayarkanni, JCIT
Section 200ASection 200A(1)Section 234E

TDS returns is appealable. The demand raised by way of charging of fees under section 234E of the Act is under section 156 of the Act and any demand raised under section 156 of the Act is appealable under section 246A(1)(a) and (c) of the Act. Accordingly, we reverse the findings of CIT(A) in this regard

VNC STEEL DISTRIBUTORS,,KARUR vs. DCIT, CIRCLE-1(1), TRICHY

In the result, appeal filed by the assessee is partly allowed

ITA 1937/CHNY/2024[2017-18]Status: DisposedITAT Chennai14 Nov 2024AY 2017-18

Bench: Shri Mahavir Singh, Hon’Ble & Shri S. R. Raghunatha, Hon’Bleआयकरअपीलसं./Ita No.: 1937/Chny/2024 & Stay Petition No: 40/Chny/2024 [In Ita No: 1937/Chny/2024)] िनधा"रणवष" / Assessment Year: 2017-18 Vnc Steel Distributors, Deputy Commissioner Of No.2, Industrial Estate, V. Income Tax, S. Vellalapatti, Circle -1(1), Karur – 639 004. Trichy. [Pan: Aadfv-9137-E] (अपीलाथ"/Appellant) (""यथ"/Respondent) अपीलाथ"क"ओरसे/Appellant By : Shri. Abhinov Vaidyanathan, Advocate ""यथ"क"ओरसे/Respondent By : Shri. R. Clement Ramesh Kumar, Cit सुनवाई क" तारीख/Date Of Hearing : 21.08.2024 घोषणा क" तारीख/Date Of Pronouncement : 14.11.2024 आदेश /O R D E R

For Appellant: Shri. Abhinov Vaidyanathan, AdvocateFor Respondent: Shri. R. Clement Ramesh Kumar, CIT
Section 194CSection 194HSection 2Section 250Section 253(1)Section 30Section 40

253(1) of the Income Tax Act, 1961 ('IT Act') against the order dated May 24, 2024 passed under :-2-: ITA. No: 1937/Chny/2024 & SP No: 40/Chny/2024 Section 250 of the IT Act by the Ld. Commissioner of Income Tax (Appeals) ('Ld. CIT(A)'), National Faceless Appeal Centre for the Assessment Year ('AY') 2017-18. Issue 1: Disallowance of Rs.3

MAIDEEN PITCHAI RAWTHER PEER MOHAMMED,CHENNAI vs. ACIT, CHENNAI

In the result, the appeal of the assesse is allowed for statistical purposes

ITA 2321/CHNY/2016[2012-13]Status: DisposedITAT Chennai09 Mar 2017AY 2012-13

Bench: Shri N.R.S. Ganesan & Shri D.S.Sunder Singh

For Respondent: 25.01.2017
Section 143(3)Section 195Section 195(1)Section 4Section 40Section 9(1)(i)

TDS is upheld. 6.1 It is a settled issue that the powers of the Ld.CIT(A) are co-terminus with that of the AO. As per Sec.250(4) of Income Tax Act, before disposing the appeal, the Ld.CIT(A) is empowered to make further enquiry as thinks fit. For ready reference we produced provisions of Sec.254 of Income

G VENKATESWARAN ITO TDS WARD MADURAI, MADURAI vs. MADURAI DISTRICT CENTRAL CO-OP BANK ANNA NAGAR BRANCH MADURAI, MADURAI

In the result, appeals filed by the Revenue are

ITA 466/CHNY/2022[2020-21]Status: DisposedITAT Chennai29 Jun 2022AY 2020-21

Bench: Shri V. Durga Rao & Shri G. Manjunatha

TDS in terms of the provisions introduced by the Legislature and that has not been held as ultravires yet. 4.Whether the CIT(A) has erred in not appreciating the fact that the deductor cannot decide the taxability of the amount to be distributed to the Payees. 5. Whether the CIT(A) erred in not appreciating Section 198 Specifically declaring that

G VENKATESWARAN ITO TDS WARD MADURAI, MADURAI vs. CENTRAL CO-OP BANK LTD VILLAPURAM BRANCH MADURAI, MADURAI

In the result, appeals filed by the Revenue are

ITA 461/CHNY/2022[2020-2021]Status: DisposedITAT Chennai29 Jun 2022AY 2020-2021

Bench: Shri V. Durga Rao & Shri G. Manjunatha

TDS in terms of the provisions introduced by the Legislature and that has not been held as ultravires yet. 4.Whether the CIT(A) has erred in not appreciating the fact that the deductor cannot decide the taxability of the amount to be distributed to the Payees. 5. Whether the CIT(A) erred in not appreciating Section 198 Specifically declaring that

G VENKATESWARAN ITO TDS WARD MADURAI, MADURAI vs. CENTRAL CO-OP BANK KRISHNAPURAM COLONY BRANCH MADURAI, MADURAI

In the result, appeals filed by the Revenue are

ITA 463/CHNY/2022[2020-2021]Status: DisposedITAT Chennai29 Jun 2022AY 2020-2021

Bench: Shri V. Durga Rao & Shri G. Manjunatha

TDS in terms of the provisions introduced by the Legislature and that has not been held as ultravires yet. 4.Whether the CIT(A) has erred in not appreciating the fact that the deductor cannot decide the taxability of the amount to be distributed to the Payees. 5. Whether the CIT(A) erred in not appreciating Section 198 Specifically declaring that

G VENKATESWARAN ITO TDS WARD MADURAI, MADURAI vs. CENTRAL CO-OP BANK THIRUPARANKUNDRAM BRANCH MADURAI, MADURAI

In the result, appeals filed by the Revenue are

ITA 462/CHNY/2022[2020-2021]Status: DisposedITAT Chennai29 Jun 2022AY 2020-2021

Bench: Shri V. Durga Rao & Shri G. Manjunatha

TDS in terms of the provisions introduced by the Legislature and that has not been held as ultravires yet. 4.Whether the CIT(A) has erred in not appreciating the fact that the deductor cannot decide the taxability of the amount to be distributed to the Payees. 5. Whether the CIT(A) erred in not appreciating Section 198 Specifically declaring that

G VENKATESWARAN ITO TDS WARD MADURAI, MADURAI vs. CENTRAL CO-OP BANK OTTHAKADAI BRANCH MADURAI, MADURAI

In the result, appeals filed by the Revenue are

ITA 464/CHNY/2022[2020-2021]Status: DisposedITAT Chennai29 Jun 2022AY 2020-2021

Bench: Shri V. Durga Rao & Shri G. Manjunatha

TDS in terms of the provisions introduced by the Legislature and that has not been held as ultravires yet. 4.Whether the CIT(A) has erred in not appreciating the fact that the deductor cannot decide the taxability of the amount to be distributed to the Payees. 5. Whether the CIT(A) erred in not appreciating Section 198 Specifically declaring that

G VENKATESWARAN ITO TDS WARD , MADURAI vs. MADURAI DISTRICT CENTRAL CO-OP BANK IYERBANGALOW MADURAI, MADURAI

In the result, appeals filed by the Revenue are

ITA 465/CHNY/2022[2020-21]Status: DisposedITAT Chennai29 Jun 2022AY 2020-21

Bench: Shri V. Durga Rao & Shri G. Manjunatha

TDS in terms of the provisions introduced by the Legislature and that has not been held as ultravires yet. 4.Whether the CIT(A) has erred in not appreciating the fact that the deductor cannot decide the taxability of the amount to be distributed to the Payees. 5. Whether the CIT(A) erred in not appreciating Section 198 Specifically declaring that

G VENKATESWARAN ITO TDS WARD , MADURAI vs. MADURAI CENTRAL CO-OP BANK BODINAYAKANUR BRANCH MADURAI, MADURAI

In the result, appeals filed by the Revenue are

ITA 467/CHNY/2022[2020-21]Status: DisposedITAT Chennai29 Jun 2022AY 2020-21

Bench: Shri V. Durga Rao & Shri G. Manjunatha

TDS in terms of the provisions introduced by the Legislature and that has not been held as ultravires yet. 4.Whether the CIT(A) has erred in not appreciating the fact that the deductor cannot decide the taxability of the amount to be distributed to the Payees. 5. Whether the CIT(A) erred in not appreciating Section 198 Specifically declaring that

G VENKATESWARAN ITO TDS WARD MADURAI, MADURAI vs. MADURAI CO-OP BANK LTD MADURAI, MADURAI

In the result, appeals filed by the Revenue are

ITA 458/CHNY/2022[2020-2021]Status: DisposedITAT Chennai29 Jun 2022AY 2020-2021

Bench: Shri V. Durga Rao & Shri G. Manjunatha

TDS in terms of the provisions introduced by the Legislature and that has not been held as ultravires yet. 4.Whether the CIT(A) has erred in not appreciating the fact that the deductor cannot decide the taxability of the amount to be distributed to the Payees. 5. Whether the CIT(A) erred in not appreciating Section 198 Specifically declaring that

G VENKATESWARAN ITO TDS WARD MADURAI, MADURAI vs. CENTRAL CO-OP BANK LTD NAGAMALAI PUDUKOTTAI BRANCH MADURAI, MADURAI

In the result, appeals filed by the Revenue are

ITA 456/CHNY/2022[2020-2021]Status: DisposedITAT Chennai29 Jun 2022AY 2020-2021

Bench: Shri V. Durga Rao & Shri G. Manjunatha

TDS in terms of the provisions introduced by the Legislature and that has not been held as ultravires yet. 4.Whether the CIT(A) has erred in not appreciating the fact that the deductor cannot decide the taxability of the amount to be distributed to the Payees. 5. Whether the CIT(A) erred in not appreciating Section 198 Specifically declaring that

G VENKATESWARAN ITO TDS WARD MADURAI, MADURAI vs. CENTRAL CO-OP BANK LTD PUDUR BRANCH MADURAI, MADURAI

In the result, appeals filed by the Revenue are

ITA 457/CHNY/2022[2020-2021]Status: DisposedITAT Chennai29 Jun 2022AY 2020-2021

Bench: Shri V. Durga Rao & Shri G. Manjunatha

TDS in terms of the provisions introduced by the Legislature and that has not been held as ultravires yet. 4.Whether the CIT(A) has erred in not appreciating the fact that the deductor cannot decide the taxability of the amount to be distributed to the Payees. 5. Whether the CIT(A) erred in not appreciating Section 198 Specifically declaring that

G VENKATESWARAN ITO TDS WARD MADURAI, MADURAI vs. MADURAI DISTRICT CO-OP BANK MADURAI, MADURAI

In the result, appeals filed by the Revenue are

ITA 459/CHNY/2022[2020-2021]Status: DisposedITAT Chennai29 Jun 2022AY 2020-2021

Bench: Shri V. Durga Rao & Shri G. Manjunatha

TDS in terms of the provisions introduced by the Legislature and that has not been held as ultravires yet. 4.Whether the CIT(A) has erred in not appreciating the fact that the deductor cannot decide the taxability of the amount to be distributed to the Payees. 5. Whether the CIT(A) erred in not appreciating Section 198 Specifically declaring that

G VENKATESWARAN INCOMETAX OFFICER TDS WARD MADURAI, MADURAI vs. M/S MADURAI DISTRICT CENTRAL CO-OP BANK LTD, MADURAI

In the result, appeals filed by the Revenue are

ITA 453/CHNY/2022[2020-2021]Status: DisposedITAT Chennai29 Jun 2022AY 2020-2021

Bench: Shri V. Durga Rao & Shri G. Manjunatha

TDS in terms of the provisions introduced by the Legislature and that has not been held as ultravires yet. 4.Whether the CIT(A) has erred in not appreciating the fact that the deductor cannot decide the taxability of the amount to be distributed to the Payees. 5. Whether the CIT(A) erred in not appreciating Section 198 Specifically declaring that