GOPURAM ENTERPRISES PRIVATE LIMITED,CHENNAI vs. ITO, CHENNAI

In the result, all six these appeals filed by the assessee are allowed

Bench: Hon’Ble Shri Manu Kumar Giri, Jm & Shri S.R. Raghunathaआयकर अपील सं./Ita Nos.: 1002, 1003, 1004, 1005, 1006 & 1007/Chny/2024 िनधा"रण वष"/Assessment Years: 2013-14 (Q2), 2013-2014 (Q3). 2013-14 (Q4), 2014-2015 (Q1), 2014-2015 (Q2) & 2014-2015 (Q3) M/S. Gopuram Enterprises Private Limited, The Assistant Commissioner Of New No.8-A, Madha Church Road, Vs. Income Tax, R.A. Puram, Cc 1(1) Chennai 600 028. Chennai Pan: Aaacs 9903R (अपीलाथ"/Appellant) (""यथ"/Respondent) अपीलाथ" क" ओर से/Appellant By : Shri. R.Devaraj, Advocate ""यथ" क" ओर से/Respondent By : Shri. D. Hema Bhupal, Irs, Jcit सुनवाई क" तारीख/Date Of Hearing : 24.06.2024 घोषणा क" तारीख/Date Of Pronouncement : 26.06.2024 आदेश /O R D E R Per Manu Kumar Giri () This Bunch Of Six Appeals Being Ita Nos. 1002-1007 /Chny/2024 Filed By The Assessee ‘Gopuram Enterprises Private Limited’ [Formerly Known As ‘Savorit Limited’] Are Directed Against Separate Orders Of Even Date 31.10.2019 Passed By The Learned Commissioner Of Income Tax (Appeals)-17, Chennai & Pertain To The Assessment Years 2013-14 To 2014-15. Ita Nos/ 1002 To 1007Chny/2024 2. The Assessee Has Raised Similar Grounds Of Appeal For All The Assessment Years. We Will Take Up Ita No. 1002/Chny/2024 For The Assessment Year 2013-14 (Q2) As Lead Case. Grounds Of Appeal Filed In Ita No. 1002/Chny/2024 For The Assessment Year 2013-14 (Q2) Are Reproduced As Under:-

Section 234 E of the Act, has no effect prior to 01/06/2015, considering the subject matter case. In the case of Vedabhai alias Vaijayantabai Baburao Patil Vs. Shantaram Baburao Patil [2002] reported in 122 Taxman 114, wherein, the Hon'ble Apex Court observes that, in case of no prejudice to the other side occur there then

GOPURAM ENTERPRISES PRIVATE LIMITED,CHENNAI vs. ITO, CHENNAI

In the result, all six these appeals filed by the assessee are allowed

Bench: Hon’Ble Shri Manu Kumar Giri, Jm & Shri S.R. Raghunathaआयकर अपील सं./Ita Nos.: 1002, 1003, 1004, 1005, 1006 & 1007/Chny/2024 िनधा"रण वष"/Assessment Years: 2013-14 (Q2), 2013-2014 (Q3). 2013-14 (Q4), 2014-2015 (Q1), 2014-2015 (Q2) & 2014-2015 (Q3) M/S. Gopuram Enterprises Private Limited, The Assistant Commissioner Of New No.8-A, Madha Church Road, Vs. Income Tax, R.A. Puram, Cc 1(1) Chennai 600 028. Chennai Pan: Aaacs 9903R (अपीलाथ"/Appellant) (""यथ"/Respondent) अपीलाथ" क" ओर से/Appellant By : Shri. R.Devaraj, Advocate ""यथ" क" ओर से/Respondent By : Shri. D. Hema Bhupal, Irs, Jcit सुनवाई क" तारीख/Date Of Hearing : 24.06.2024 घोषणा क" तारीख/Date Of Pronouncement : 26.06.2024 आदेश /O R D E R Per Manu Kumar Giri () This Bunch Of Six Appeals Being Ita Nos. 1002-1007 /Chny/2024 Filed By The Assessee ‘Gopuram Enterprises Private Limited’ [Formerly Known As ‘Savorit Limited’] Are Directed Against Separate Orders Of Even Date 31.10.2019 Passed By The Learned Commissioner Of Income Tax (Appeals)-17, Chennai & Pertain To The Assessment Years 2013-14 To 2014-15. Ita Nos/ 1002 To 1007Chny/2024 2. The Assessee Has Raised Similar Grounds Of Appeal For All The Assessment Years. We Will Take Up Ita No. 1002/Chny/2024 For The Assessment Year 2013-14 (Q2) As Lead Case. Grounds Of Appeal Filed In Ita No. 1002/Chny/2024 For The Assessment Year 2013-14 (Q2) Are Reproduced As Under:-

Section 234 E of the Act, has no effect prior to 01/06/2015, considering the subject matter case. In the case of Vedabhai alias Vaijayantabai Baburao Patil Vs. Shantaram Baburao Patil [2002] reported in 122 Taxman 114, wherein, the Hon'ble Apex Court observes that, in case of no prejudice to the other side occur there then

GOPURAM ENTERPRISES PRIVATE LIMITED,CHENNAI vs. ACIT CC1(1), CHENNAI

In the result, all six these appeals filed by the assessee are allowed

Bench: Hon’Ble Shri Manu Kumar Giri, Jm & Shri S.R. Raghunathaआयकर अपील सं./Ita Nos.: 1002, 1003, 1004, 1005, 1006 & 1007/Chny/2024 िनधा"रण वष"/Assessment Years: 2013-14 (Q2), 2013-2014 (Q3). 2013-14 (Q4), 2014-2015 (Q1), 2014-2015 (Q2) & 2014-2015 (Q3) M/S. Gopuram Enterprises Private Limited, The Assistant Commissioner Of New No.8-A, Madha Church Road, Vs. Income Tax, R.A. Puram, Cc 1(1) Chennai 600 028. Chennai Pan: Aaacs 9903R (अपीलाथ"/Appellant) (""यथ"/Respondent) अपीलाथ" क" ओर से/Appellant By : Shri. R.Devaraj, Advocate ""यथ" क" ओर से/Respondent By : Shri. D. Hema Bhupal, Irs, Jcit सुनवाई क" तारीख/Date Of Hearing : 24.06.2024 घोषणा क" तारीख/Date Of Pronouncement : 26.06.2024 आदेश /O R D E R Per Manu Kumar Giri () This Bunch Of Six Appeals Being Ita Nos. 1002-1007 /Chny/2024 Filed By The Assessee ‘Gopuram Enterprises Private Limited’ [Formerly Known As ‘Savorit Limited’] Are Directed Against Separate Orders Of Even Date 31.10.2019 Passed By The Learned Commissioner Of Income Tax (Appeals)-17, Chennai & Pertain To The Assessment Years 2013-14 To 2014-15. Ita Nos/ 1002 To 1007Chny/2024 2. The Assessee Has Raised Similar Grounds Of Appeal For All The Assessment Years. We Will Take Up Ita No. 1002/Chny/2024 For The Assessment Year 2013-14 (Q2) As Lead Case. Grounds Of Appeal Filed In Ita No. 1002/Chny/2024 For The Assessment Year 2013-14 (Q2) Are Reproduced As Under:-

Section 234 E of the Act, has no effect prior to 01/06/2015, considering the subject matter case. In the case of Vedabhai alias Vaijayantabai Baburao Patil Vs. Shantaram Baburao Patil [2002] reported in 122 Taxman 114, wherein, the Hon'ble Apex Court observes that, in case of no prejudice to the other side occur there then

GOPURAM ENTERPRISES PRIVATE LIMITED,CHENNAI vs. ACIT CC 1(1), CHENNAI

In the result, all six these appeals filed by the assessee are allowed

Bench: Hon’Ble Shri Manu Kumar Giri, Jm & Shri S.R. Raghunathaआयकर अपील सं./Ita Nos.: 1002, 1003, 1004, 1005, 1006 & 1007/Chny/2024 िनधा"रण वष"/Assessment Years: 2013-14 (Q2), 2013-2014 (Q3). 2013-14 (Q4), 2014-2015 (Q1), 2014-2015 (Q2) & 2014-2015 (Q3) M/S. Gopuram Enterprises Private Limited, The Assistant Commissioner Of New No.8-A, Madha Church Road, Vs. Income Tax, R.A. Puram, Cc 1(1) Chennai 600 028. Chennai Pan: Aaacs 9903R (अपीलाथ"/Appellant) (""यथ"/Respondent) अपीलाथ" क" ओर से/Appellant By : Shri. R.Devaraj, Advocate ""यथ" क" ओर से/Respondent By : Shri. D. Hema Bhupal, Irs, Jcit सुनवाई क" तारीख/Date Of Hearing : 24.06.2024 घोषणा क" तारीख/Date Of Pronouncement : 26.06.2024 आदेश /O R D E R Per Manu Kumar Giri () This Bunch Of Six Appeals Being Ita Nos. 1002-1007 /Chny/2024 Filed By The Assessee ‘Gopuram Enterprises Private Limited’ [Formerly Known As ‘Savorit Limited’] Are Directed Against Separate Orders Of Even Date 31.10.2019 Passed By The Learned Commissioner Of Income Tax (Appeals)-17, Chennai & Pertain To The Assessment Years 2013-14 To 2014-15. Ita Nos/ 1002 To 1007Chny/2024 2. The Assessee Has Raised Similar Grounds Of Appeal For All The Assessment Years. We Will Take Up Ita No. 1002/Chny/2024 For The Assessment Year 2013-14 (Q2) As Lead Case. Grounds Of Appeal Filed In Ita No. 1002/Chny/2024 For The Assessment Year 2013-14 (Q2) Are Reproduced As Under:-

Section 234 E of the Act, has no effect prior to 01/06/2015, considering the subject matter case. In the case of Vedabhai alias Vaijayantabai Baburao Patil Vs. Shantaram Baburao Patil [2002] reported in 122 Taxman 114, wherein, the Hon'ble Apex Court observes that, in case of no prejudice to the other side occur there then

GOPURAM ENTERPRISES PRIVATE LIMITED,CHENNAI vs. ACIT C 1(1), CHENNAI

In the result, all six these appeals filed by the assessee are allowed

Bench: Hon’Ble Shri Manu Kumar Giri, Jm & Shri S.R. Raghunathaआयकर अपील सं./Ita Nos.: 1002, 1003, 1004, 1005, 1006 & 1007/Chny/2024 िनधा"रण वष"/Assessment Years: 2013-14 (Q2), 2013-2014 (Q3). 2013-14 (Q4), 2014-2015 (Q1), 2014-2015 (Q2) & 2014-2015 (Q3) M/S. Gopuram Enterprises Private Limited, The Assistant Commissioner Of New No.8-A, Madha Church Road, Vs. Income Tax, R.A. Puram, Cc 1(1) Chennai 600 028. Chennai Pan: Aaacs 9903R (अपीलाथ"/Appellant) (""यथ"/Respondent) अपीलाथ" क" ओर से/Appellant By : Shri. R.Devaraj, Advocate ""यथ" क" ओर से/Respondent By : Shri. D. Hema Bhupal, Irs, Jcit सुनवाई क" तारीख/Date Of Hearing : 24.06.2024 घोषणा क" तारीख/Date Of Pronouncement : 26.06.2024 आदेश /O R D E R Per Manu Kumar Giri () This Bunch Of Six Appeals Being Ita Nos. 1002-1007 /Chny/2024 Filed By The Assessee ‘Gopuram Enterprises Private Limited’ [Formerly Known As ‘Savorit Limited’] Are Directed Against Separate Orders Of Even Date 31.10.2019 Passed By The Learned Commissioner Of Income Tax (Appeals)-17, Chennai & Pertain To The Assessment Years 2013-14 To 2014-15. Ita Nos/ 1002 To 1007Chny/2024 2. The Assessee Has Raised Similar Grounds Of Appeal For All The Assessment Years. We Will Take Up Ita No. 1002/Chny/2024 For The Assessment Year 2013-14 (Q2) As Lead Case. Grounds Of Appeal Filed In Ita No. 1002/Chny/2024 For The Assessment Year 2013-14 (Q2) Are Reproduced As Under:-

Section 234 E of the Act, has no effect prior to 01/06/2015, considering the subject matter case. In the case of Vedabhai alias Vaijayantabai Baburao Patil Vs. Shantaram Baburao Patil [2002] reported in 122 Taxman 114, wherein, the Hon'ble Apex Court observes that, in case of no prejudice to the other side occur there then

M/S POTHYS,CHENNAI vs. DCIT, CENTRAL CIRCLE-1(3), CHENNAI

The appeal is allowed

Bench: Hon’Ble Shri Manoj Kumar Aggarwal, Am & Hon’Ble Shri Manu Kumar Giri, Jm आयकरअपील सं./ Ita No. 1360/Chny/2023 (िनधा"रणवष" / Assessment Year: 2020-21) M/S. Pothys, Vs. The Deputy Commissioner Of No.15, Dr.Nageswara Rao Road, Income Tax, T. Nagar, Central Circle 1(3), Chennai – 600 017. Chennai. [Pan: Aaffp 2437B] (अपीलाथ"/Appellant) (""यथ"/Respondent) अपीलाथ" क" ओर से/ Appellant By : Shri N. Arjun Raj, Advocate For Shri Y. Sridhar, Ca ""यथ" क" ओर से /Respondent By : Shri Ar.V. Srinivasan, Addl. Cit सुनवाई क" तारीख/Date Of Hearing : 09.05.2024 घोषणा क" तारीख /Date Of Pronouncement : 15.05.2024 आदेश / O R D E R Manu Kumar Giri ()

Section 234(E) of the Act is purely compensatory and is a special benefit to the advantage of the assessee as well for belatedly filing the TDS

HYUNDAI MOTOR INDIA LTD.,KANCHEEPURAM vs. DCIT, CHENNAI

In the result, the appeal filed by assessee in ITA No

Bench: Shri N.R.S. Ganesan & Shri Ramit Kochar"नधा(रण वष( /Assessment Year: 2011-12 V. Hyundai Motor India Limited The Deputy Commissioner Of Plot No. H-1, Sipcot Industrial Park Income Tax, Irrungattukottai, 1775, Jawaharlal Nehru Inner Sriperumbudur Taluk, Ring Road, Kancheepuram District, Anna Nagar Western Tamil Nadu-602117 Extension, Chennai-600101 [Pan: Aaach2364M] (अपीलाथ+/Appellant) (,-यथ+/Respondent)

TDS, the learned :- 4 -: DRP directed AO to verify details and allow credit as per law, vide its directions dated 28.12.2015 passed u/s 144C(5) of the 1961 Act. The AO while passing assessment order dated 28.01.2016 u/s 143(3) read with Section 144C(13) of the 1961 Act, levied interest on ‘assessed income’ instead of ‘returned income’. We have

ABAN OFFSHORE LIMITED,CHENNAI vs. DCIT, INTL, TAX 1(1), CHENNAI

In the result, the appeal filed by the assessee is allowed

234 |TR 371, 391-\n92(AAR). In the facts of that case it has been held (P.230) that the payments\nmade by x\" to the applicant would not be taxable under section 44BB and\nby virtue of the Proviso to Section 44BB(1), the case of the applicant gets\ncovered by the provisions of Section 44D and 115A. However, since

SELVA GANESH CONSTRUCTIONS PVT LTD,CHENNAI vs. ITO CORPORATE WARD-6(2), CHENNAI

In the result, the appeals of the Assessee in I

Bench: Shri Mahavir Singhand Shri Manoj Kumar Aggarwalआयकर अपील सं./I.T.A Nos.:1654 To 1658/Chny/2019 Assessment Years : 2012-13, 2013-14, 2014-15, 2015-16 & 2016-17

TDS by invoking the provisions of Section 40(a)(ia) if the Act. In view of the second proviso to this Section, we are in full agreement with the arguments of the :: 8 :: I.T.A Nos.:1654 to 1658/CHNY/2019 learned Counsel for the Assessee, as well as the learned Senior Departmental Representative that, in case the recipients have disclosed the remunerations

SELVA GANESH CONSTRUCTIONS PVT LTD,CHENNAI vs. ITO CORPORATE WARD-6(2), CHENNAI

In the result, the appeals of the Assessee in I

Bench: Shri Mahavir Singhand Shri Manoj Kumar Aggarwalआयकर अपील सं./I.T.A Nos.:1654 To 1658/Chny/2019 Assessment Years : 2012-13, 2013-14, 2014-15, 2015-16 & 2016-17

TDS by invoking the provisions of Section 40(a)(ia) if the Act. In view of the second proviso to this Section, we are in full agreement with the arguments of the :: 8 :: I.T.A Nos.:1654 to 1658/CHNY/2019 learned Counsel for the Assessee, as well as the learned Senior Departmental Representative that, in case the recipients have disclosed the remunerations

SELVA GANESH CONSTRUCTIONS PVT LTD,CHENNAI vs. ITO CORPORATE WARD-6(2), CHENNAI

In the result, the appeals of the Assessee in I

Bench: Shri Mahavir Singhand Shri Manoj Kumar Aggarwalआयकर अपील सं./I.T.A Nos.:1654 To 1658/Chny/2019 Assessment Years : 2012-13, 2013-14, 2014-15, 2015-16 & 2016-17

TDS by invoking the provisions of Section 40(a)(ia) if the Act. In view of the second proviso to this Section, we are in full agreement with the arguments of the :: 8 :: I.T.A Nos.:1654 to 1658/CHNY/2019 learned Counsel for the Assessee, as well as the learned Senior Departmental Representative that, in case the recipients have disclosed the remunerations

SELVA GANESH CONSTRUCTIONS PVT LTD,CHENNAI vs. ITO CORPORATE WARD-6(2), CHENNAI

In the result, the appeals of the Assessee in I

Bench: Shri Mahavir Singhand Shri Manoj Kumar Aggarwalआयकर अपील सं./I.T.A Nos.:1654 To 1658/Chny/2019 Assessment Years : 2012-13, 2013-14, 2014-15, 2015-16 & 2016-17

TDS by invoking the provisions of Section 40(a)(ia) if the Act. In view of the second proviso to this Section, we are in full agreement with the arguments of the :: 8 :: I.T.A Nos.:1654 to 1658/CHNY/2019 learned Counsel for the Assessee, as well as the learned Senior Departmental Representative that, in case the recipients have disclosed the remunerations

SELVA GANESH CONSTRUCTIONS PVT LTD,CHENNAI vs. ITO CORPORATE WARD-6(2), CHENNAI

In the result, the appeals of the Assessee in I

Bench: Shri Mahavir Singhand Shri Manoj Kumar Aggarwalआयकर अपील सं./I.T.A Nos.:1654 To 1658/Chny/2019 Assessment Years : 2012-13, 2013-14, 2014-15, 2015-16 & 2016-17

TDS by invoking the provisions of Section 40(a)(ia) if the Act. In view of the second proviso to this Section, we are in full agreement with the arguments of the :: 8 :: I.T.A Nos.:1654 to 1658/CHNY/2019 learned Counsel for the Assessee, as well as the learned Senior Departmental Representative that, in case the recipients have disclosed the remunerations

M/S GOPURAM ENTERPRISES PVT LTD ,CHENNAI vs. ITO , TDS CPC , GHAZIABAD

In the result, all appeals filed by the assessee are dismissed

Bench: Shri V. Durga Rao, Hon’Ble & Shri G. Manjunatha, Hon’Bleआयकर अपील सं./Ita Nos.1036-1039, 1040-1047 & 1048-1053/Chny/2022 िनधा"रण वष" /Assessment Years: 2013-14, 2014-15 & 2015-16 M/S.Gopuram Enterprises Pvt. Ltd., V. The Income Tax Officer, New No.31, Lazarus Church Road, Tds, Cpc, R.A.Puram, Ghaziabad. Chennai-600 028. [Pan: Aaacs 9903 R] (अपीलाथ"/Appellant) (""यथ"/Respondent) : अपीलाथ" क" ओर से/ Appellant By Mr.R.Devaraj, Adv. ""यथ" क" ओर से /Respondent By : Mr.D.Hema Bhupal, Jcit सुनवाई क" तारीख/Date Of Hearing : 30.01.2023 घोषणा क" तारीख /Date Of Pronouncement : 31.01.2023

TDS returns. The appellant submits that, the levy of late fee U/s 234 E of the Act, in the orders passed U/s 200 A of the Act, in relation to the period prior to 01/06/2015, was wholly unjustified and without jurisdiction, especially in view of the prospective amendment, introduced in Section

M/S GOPURAM ENTERPRISES PVT LTD ,CHENNAI vs. ITO , TDS CPC , GHAZIABAD

In the result, all appeals filed by the assessee are dismissed

Bench: Shri V. Durga Rao, Hon’Ble & Shri G. Manjunatha, Hon’Bleआयकर अपील सं./Ita Nos.1036-1039, 1040-1047 & 1048-1053/Chny/2022 िनधा"रण वष" /Assessment Years: 2013-14, 2014-15 & 2015-16 M/S.Gopuram Enterprises Pvt. Ltd., V. The Income Tax Officer, New No.31, Lazarus Church Road, Tds, Cpc, R.A.Puram, Ghaziabad. Chennai-600 028. [Pan: Aaacs 9903 R] (अपीलाथ"/Appellant) (""यथ"/Respondent) : अपीलाथ" क" ओर से/ Appellant By Mr.R.Devaraj, Adv. ""यथ" क" ओर से /Respondent By : Mr.D.Hema Bhupal, Jcit सुनवाई क" तारीख/Date Of Hearing : 30.01.2023 घोषणा क" तारीख /Date Of Pronouncement : 31.01.2023

TDS returns. The appellant submits that, the levy of late fee U/s 234 E of the Act, in the orders passed U/s 200 A of the Act, in relation to the period prior to 01/06/2015, was wholly unjustified and without jurisdiction, especially in view of the prospective amendment, introduced in Section

M/S GOPURAM ENTERPRISES PVT LTD ,CHENNAI vs. ITO , TDS CPC , GHAZIABAD

In the result, all appeals filed by the assessee are dismissed

Bench: Shri V. Durga Rao, Hon’Ble & Shri G. Manjunatha, Hon’Bleआयकर अपील सं./Ita Nos.1036-1039, 1040-1047 & 1048-1053/Chny/2022 िनधा"रण वष" /Assessment Years: 2013-14, 2014-15 & 2015-16 M/S.Gopuram Enterprises Pvt. Ltd., V. The Income Tax Officer, New No.31, Lazarus Church Road, Tds, Cpc, R.A.Puram, Ghaziabad. Chennai-600 028. [Pan: Aaacs 9903 R] (अपीलाथ"/Appellant) (""यथ"/Respondent) : अपीलाथ" क" ओर से/ Appellant By Mr.R.Devaraj, Adv. ""यथ" क" ओर से /Respondent By : Mr.D.Hema Bhupal, Jcit सुनवाई क" तारीख/Date Of Hearing : 30.01.2023 घोषणा क" तारीख /Date Of Pronouncement : 31.01.2023

TDS returns. The appellant submits that, the levy of late fee U/s 234 E of the Act, in the orders passed U/s 200 A of the Act, in relation to the period prior to 01/06/2015, was wholly unjustified and without jurisdiction, especially in view of the prospective amendment, introduced in Section

M/S GOPURAM ENTERPRISES PVT LTD ,CHENNAI vs. ITO , TDS CPC , GHAZIABAD

In the result, all appeals filed by the assessee are dismissed

Bench: Shri V. Durga Rao, Hon’Ble & Shri G. Manjunatha, Hon’Bleआयकर अपील सं./Ita Nos.1036-1039, 1040-1047 & 1048-1053/Chny/2022 िनधा"रण वष" /Assessment Years: 2013-14, 2014-15 & 2015-16 M/S.Gopuram Enterprises Pvt. Ltd., V. The Income Tax Officer, New No.31, Lazarus Church Road, Tds, Cpc, R.A.Puram, Ghaziabad. Chennai-600 028. [Pan: Aaacs 9903 R] (अपीलाथ"/Appellant) (""यथ"/Respondent) : अपीलाथ" क" ओर से/ Appellant By Mr.R.Devaraj, Adv. ""यथ" क" ओर से /Respondent By : Mr.D.Hema Bhupal, Jcit सुनवाई क" तारीख/Date Of Hearing : 30.01.2023 घोषणा क" तारीख /Date Of Pronouncement : 31.01.2023

TDS returns. The appellant submits that, the levy of late fee U/s 234 E of the Act, in the orders passed U/s 200 A of the Act, in relation to the period prior to 01/06/2015, was wholly unjustified and without jurisdiction, especially in view of the prospective amendment, introduced in Section

M/S GOPURAM ENTERPRISES PVT LTD ,CHENNAI vs. ITO , TDS CPC , GHAZIABAD

In the result, all appeals filed by the assessee are dismissed

Bench: Shri V. Durga Rao, Hon’Ble & Shri G. Manjunatha, Hon’Bleआयकर अपील सं./Ita Nos.1036-1039, 1040-1047 & 1048-1053/Chny/2022 िनधा"रण वष" /Assessment Years: 2013-14, 2014-15 & 2015-16 M/S.Gopuram Enterprises Pvt. Ltd., V. The Income Tax Officer, New No.31, Lazarus Church Road, Tds, Cpc, R.A.Puram, Ghaziabad. Chennai-600 028. [Pan: Aaacs 9903 R] (अपीलाथ"/Appellant) (""यथ"/Respondent) : अपीलाथ" क" ओर से/ Appellant By Mr.R.Devaraj, Adv. ""यथ" क" ओर से /Respondent By : Mr.D.Hema Bhupal, Jcit सुनवाई क" तारीख/Date Of Hearing : 30.01.2023 घोषणा क" तारीख /Date Of Pronouncement : 31.01.2023

TDS returns. The appellant submits that, the levy of late fee U/s 234 E of the Act, in the orders passed U/s 200 A of the Act, in relation to the period prior to 01/06/2015, was wholly unjustified and without jurisdiction, especially in view of the prospective amendment, introduced in Section

M/S GOPURAM ENTERPRISES PVT LTD ,CHENNAI vs. ITO , TDS CPC , GHAZIABAD

In the result, all appeals filed by the assessee are dismissed

Bench: Shri V. Durga Rao, Hon’Ble & Shri G. Manjunatha, Hon’Bleआयकर अपील सं./Ita Nos.1036-1039, 1040-1047 & 1048-1053/Chny/2022 िनधा"रण वष" /Assessment Years: 2013-14, 2014-15 & 2015-16 M/S.Gopuram Enterprises Pvt. Ltd., V. The Income Tax Officer, New No.31, Lazarus Church Road, Tds, Cpc, R.A.Puram, Ghaziabad. Chennai-600 028. [Pan: Aaacs 9903 R] (अपीलाथ"/Appellant) (""यथ"/Respondent) : अपीलाथ" क" ओर से/ Appellant By Mr.R.Devaraj, Adv. ""यथ" क" ओर से /Respondent By : Mr.D.Hema Bhupal, Jcit सुनवाई क" तारीख/Date Of Hearing : 30.01.2023 घोषणा क" तारीख /Date Of Pronouncement : 31.01.2023

TDS returns. The appellant submits that, the levy of late fee U/s 234 E of the Act, in the orders passed U/s 200 A of the Act, in relation to the period prior to 01/06/2015, was wholly unjustified and without jurisdiction, especially in view of the prospective amendment, introduced in Section