BharatTax.net
SearchITATHigh CourtsSupreme CourtPhrasesAI ResearchHistory

Filters

BharatTax.net

Free search engine for ITAT (Income Tax Appellate Tribunal) judgments across all 28 benches in India.

Quick Links

  • Search Judgments
  • Browse by Bench
  • Recent Judgments

About

BharatTax provides free access to Income Tax Appellate Tribunal orders for legal research and reference.

© 2026 BharatTax.net. All rights reserved.

7 results for “TDS”+ Section 194Bclear

Sorted by relevance

Bangalore39Mumbai18Delhi9Indore9Chennai7Panaji5Kolkata4Ahmedabad4Cochin3Pune2SC2Telangana1Amritsar1Karnataka1Kerala1Lucknow1Rajkot1Agra1

Key Topics

Section 194B12TDS7Section 201(1)6Section 2(24)(ix)5Section 271C5Section 143(3)4Section 404Section 271(1)(c)4Section 2633Business Income

MADRAS RACE CLUB,CHENNAI vs. DCIT, CHENNAI

In the result, the appeals of the assessee is ITA Nos

ITA 646/CHNY/2015[2007-08]Status: DisposedITAT Chennai28 Oct 2015AY 2007-08

Bench: Shri N.R.S. Ganesan & Shri Chandra Poojari] आयकर अपील सं./I.T.A.Nos.646, 647, 648, 649, 650, 651, 652, 653, 654, 655, 656 & 657/Mds/2015 "नधा"रण वष" /Assessment Years : 2007-08, 2007-08, 2008-09, 2008- 09, 2009-10, 2009-10, 2010-11, 2010-11, 2011-12, 2011-12, 2012-13 & 2012-13. M/S. Madras Race Club Vs. The Deputy Commissioner Of Race Course Road, Income Tax, Guindy, Tds Circle –I, Chennai 600 032. Chennai [Pan Aaacm 7640R] (अपीलाथ"/Appellant) (""यथ"/Respondent)

For Appellant: Dr. Anitha Sumanth, AdvocateFor Respondent: Dr. Milind Madhukar Bhusari, IRS, CIT
Section 194Section 194BSection 201Section 201(1)Section 25Section 74A

TDS to be made on 'winnings from race horses' with effect from 01.04.1978, the Circular 240 dated 17.05.1978 came to be issued clarifying that it did not apply to stake money. Hence, insertion of the words 'card game or other game of any sort' to section 194B

3
Revision u/s 2633
Deduction3

SHREE BASAVESHWAR SUGARS LIMITED ,VIJAYAPURA ( BIJAPUR ) vs. ACIT , PANAJI-GOA

In the result, the appeal filed by the assessee is allowed

ITA 725/CHNY/2022[2015-2016]Status: DisposedITAT Chennai25 Apr 2023AY 2015-2016

Bench: Shri Mahavir Singhand Shri Manoj Kumar Aggarwal

For Appellant: Shri P.M. Kathir, AdvocateFor Respondent: Shri AR.V. Sreenivasan, Addl.CIT
Section 133ASection 201Section 201(1)Section 271(1)(c)Section 273B

TDS after the same is deducted by the assessee. Section 271C of the Income Tax Act is quite categoric. Its scope and extent of application is discernible from the provision itself, in unambiguous terms. When the nondeduction of the whole or any part of the tax, as required by or under the various instances/provisions of Chapter XVIIB would invite penalty

JCIT, COIMBATORE vs. CHROMA PRINT INDIA PVT . LTD., COIMBATORE

In the result, the appeal filed by the Revenue is allowed

ITA 2083/CHNY/2016[2012-13]Status: DisposedITAT Chennai13 Oct 2017AY 2012-13

Bench: Shri Sanjay Arora & Shri Duvvuru Rl Reddyआयकर अपील सं./I T.A. No.2083/Mds/2016 "नधा"रण वष"/Assessment Year:2012-13 The Joint Commissioner Of M/S. Chroma Print India Pvt. Ltd., Income Tax, Tds Range, Vs. P.B. No. 5316, 53, Ganesh Nagar, Coimbatore. G.N. Mills Post, Mtp Road, Coimbatore. [Pan:Aaccc6021A] (अपीलाथ" /Appellant) (""यथ"/Respondent) अपीलाथ" क" ओर से / Appellant By : Ms. Veni Raj, Jcit ""यथ" क" ओर से/Respondent By : Shri T.N. Seetharaman, Advocate सुनवाई क" तार"ख/ Date Of Hearing : 03.08.2017 घोषणा क" तार"ख /Date Of Pronouncement : 13.10.2017 आदेश /O R D E R Per Duvvuru Rl Reddy: This Appeal Filed By The Revenue Is Directed Against The Order Of The Ld. Commissioner Of Income Tax (Appeals) 2, Coimbatore Dated 30.03.2016 Relevant To The Assessment Year 2012-13. The Revenue Has Raised The Following Grounds In Its Appeal: “1. The Order Of Learned Cit(A) Is Opposed To The Facts & Circumstances Of The Case. 2. The Ld Cit(A) Has Erred In Holding That No Penalty Is Leviable On The Non Deduction Of Tds On Payment Of Labour Charges Worth

For Appellant: Ms. Veni Raj, JCITFor Respondent: Shri T.N. Seetharaman, Advocate
Section 201(1)Section 271CSection 273

194B, then, such person shall be liable to pay, by way of penalty, a sum equal to the amount of tax which such person failed to deduct or pay as aforesaid. 5.2 However, section 273B of the Act provides that in case the assessee proves that there was some reasonable cause for the failure to deduct tax, then the penalty

DY. CIT, CENTRAL CIRCLE-2, , COIMBATORE vs. M/S POOJA MARKETING, MALAD

In the result, both the appeals stand dismissed

ITA 960/CHNY/2022[2015-16]Status: DisposedITAT Chennai09 Oct 2024AY 2015-16

Bench: HON’BLE SHRI MANOJ KUMAR AGGARWAL (Accountant Member), SHRI MANU KUMAR GIRI (Judicial Member)

For Appellant: Shri Sridharan (Sr. Advocate), Shri Ravi SawanaFor Respondent: Shri R. Clement Ramesh Kumar (CIT) & Shri P
Section 143(3)Section 194BSection 1lSection 2(24)(ix)Section 263Section 56(2)(ib)Section 58

TDS @30% u/s. 194B has been deducted. This would itself prove that the assessee was holder of ticket and accordingly participated in the draw. 2.5 The Ld.CIT(A) erred in holding that the prize winning from unsold lottery tickets to be considered as business income and not under the head "Income from other sources without appreciating the decision

DY. CIT, CENTRAL CIRCLE-2, , COIMBATORE vs. M/S POOJA MARKETING, MALAD

In the result, both the appeals stand dismissed

ITA 958/CHNY/2022[2016-17]Status: DisposedITAT Chennai09 Oct 2024AY 2016-17

Bench: HON’BLE SHRI MANOJ KUMAR AGGARWAL (Accountant Member), SHRI MANU KUMAR GIRI (Judicial Member)

For Appellant: Shri Sridharan (Sr. Advocate), Shri Ravi SawanaFor Respondent: Shri R. Clement Ramesh Kumar (CIT) & Shri P
Section 143(3)Section 194BSection 1lSection 2(24)(ix)Section 263Section 56(2)(ib)Section 58

TDS @30% u/s. 194B has been deducted. This would itself prove that the assessee was holder of ticket and accordingly participated in the draw. 2.5 The Ld.CIT(A) erred in holding that the prize winning from unsold lottery tickets to be considered as business income and not under the head "Income from other sources without appreciating the decision

DCIT CENTRAL CIRCLE-2, , COIMBATORE vs. M/S MARUTI ENTERPRISES, MUMBAI

In the result, both the appeals stand dismissed

ITA 395/CHNY/2023[2017-18]Status: DisposedITAT Chennai09 Oct 2024AY 2017-18

Bench: HON’BLE SHRI MANOJ KUMAR AGGARWAL, AM AND HON’BLE SHRI MANU KUMAR GIRI (Judicial Member)

For Appellant: Shri Sridharan (Sr. Advocate), Shri Ravi SawanaFor Respondent: Shri R. Clement Ramesh Kumar (CIT) & Shri P
Section 115BSection 143(3)Section 194BSection 194GSection 2(24)(ix)Section 263Section 58(4)

194B at higher rates of 30%. If the prize money was out of trading stock that remained unsold, then TDS should have been deducted u/s 194G at lower rate of 5%. Having reported the winnings separately by the assessee in its financial statements, AO was right is taxing the same u/s 2(24)(ix) and apply consequential provisions

DCIT CORPORATE CIRCLE 3(1), CHENNAI vs. TRUSTED AEROSPACE ENGINEERING (P) LIMITED, CHENNAI

In the result appeal of the revenue is dismissed

ITA 473/CHNY/2019[2012-13]Status: DisposedITAT Chennai14 Jun 2023AY 2012-13

Bench: Shri V.Durga Rao, Hon’Ble & Dr. Manish Borad, Hon’Ble

For Appellant: Mr. S.Sridhar, AdvocateFor Respondent: 26.04.2023
Section 143(2)Section 143(3)Section 195Section 40Section 9Section 9(1)(vii)

TDS obligations under Sec 195 arises only when the payment is chargeable to tax in the hands of non-resident in this regard. Further, the charge of income-tax under sub-section (1) of section 4 is on the total income of every person for a previous year at the rates enacted in the Central Act. In the case