BharatTax.net
SearchITATHigh CourtsSupreme CourtPhrasesAI ResearchHistory

Filters

BharatTax.net

Free search engine for ITAT (Income Tax Appellate Tribunal) judgments across all 28 benches in India.

Quick Links

  • Search Judgments
  • Browse by Bench
  • Recent Judgments

About

BharatTax provides free access to Income Tax Appellate Tribunal orders for legal research and reference.

© 2026 BharatTax.net. All rights reserved.

72 results for “TDS”+ Section 193clear

Sorted by relevance

Mumbai324Delhi320Bangalore189Karnataka110Kolkata110Chennai72Jaipur49Chandigarh28Lucknow20Raipur20Hyderabad19Ahmedabad18Surat13Visakhapatnam12Dehradun12Indore12Cochin11Telangana11Guwahati9Rajkot8Nagpur8Pune8Cuttack4SC3Amritsar3Jodhpur2Allahabad1Calcutta1Varanasi1Agra1

Key Topics

Section 14A76Section 143(3)50Section 234E50Disallowance47Section 4036Section 15432Section 200A30TDS26Addition to Income24Deduction

M/S.MAHOGANY LOGISTICS SERVICES PVT. LTD.,MADURAI vs. PCIT, MADURAI-1

In the result, the appeal filed by the assessee is dismissed

ITA 1631/CHNY/2024[2018-19]Status: DisposedITAT Chennai28 Jul 2025AY 2018-19

Bench: Shri S.S. Viswanethra Ravi & Shri S.R. Raghunathaआयकर अपील सं./I.T.A. No.1631/Chny/2024 िनधा"रण वष"/Assessment Year: 2018-19 M/S. Mahogany Logistics Services Vs. The Principal Commissioner Of Private Limited, Income Tax-1, 10, Jawahar Road, Chokkikulam, Madurai. Madurai 625 002. [Pan:Aafcd8781R] (अपीलाथ"/Appellant) (""थ"/Respondent) अपीलाथ" की ओर से / Appellant By : Shri N.V. Balaji, Advocate ""थ" की ओर से/Respondent By : Shri S. Senthil Kumaran, Cit सुनवाई की तारीख/ Date Of Hearing : 30.04.2025 घोषणा की तारीख /Date Of Pronouncement : 28.07.2025 आदेश /O R D E R Per S.S. Viswanethra Ravi: This Appeal Filed By The Assessee Is Directed Against The Order Dated 30.03.2024 Passed By The Ld. Principal Commissioner Of Income Tax 1, Madurai Under Section 263 Of The Income Tax Act, 1961 [“Act” In Short] For The Assessment Year 2018-19. 2. Brief Facts Of The Case Are That The Assessee Company [Earlier Known As M/S. Drsr Logistics Services Private Limited] Filed Its Return Of Income For The Ay 2018-19 Claiming Loss Of ₹.31,28,98,436/- Under 2

For Appellant: Shri N.V. Balaji, AdvocateFor Respondent: Shri S. Senthil Kumaran, CIT
Section 139(9)Section 143(3)Section 201Section 263

Showing 1–20 of 72 · Page 1 of 4

17
Condonation of Delay14
Section 1113
Section 36
Section 37
Section 40

TDS for violation of section 193 of the Act and proceeded to disallow 30% of the impugned interest expenditure. The said

DEPUTY COMMISSIONER OF INCOME TAX, SALEM vs. GOVINDA RAJULU SRINIVASAN, SALEM

In the result, appeal of the Revenue stands dismissed

ITA 1245/CHNY/2025[2014-15]Status: DisposedITAT Chennai04 Sept 2025AY 2014-15

Bench: Shri Aby T. Varkey & Shri Amitabh Shukla

For Appellant: Mr.Bhupendran, AdvocateFor Respondent: Mrs.C. Yamuna, CIT
Section 147Section 148Section 40Section 40A(3)

TDS deduction, the AO is noted to have made additions/disallowances on eleven (11) counts, [which has been reproduced supra]. However we note that the AO had not made any adverse finding or made any addition/disallowances on the issues, for which, he has reopened the assessment as rightly found by Ld.CIT(A). Therefore as rightly held by him, the AO couldn

TANJORE PALACE DEVASTANAM,THANJAVUR vs. DCIT,CPC, BENGALURU

In the result, all the appeal of the Assessee in I

ITA 554/CHNY/2021[2014-15(Q4)]Status: DisposedITAT Chennai15 Jun 2022

Bench: Shri G. Manjunatha & Shri Anikesh Banerjee

For Appellant: Mr. S. Sridhar, AdvocateFor Respondent: Shri ARV Sreenivasan, Addl. CIT
Section 154Section 200ASection 200A(1)Section 234E

TDS] RETURNS Sl. I.T.A. No. Financial Order Pass Date Interest Filing No. Year Fee u/s.234E Rs. 20th October, 2015 [1] I.T.A. No.549/Chny/2021 2013-2014 26,080-00 2nd November, 2015 [2] I.T.A. No.550/Chny/2021 2013-2014 36,654-00 13th July, 2018 [3] I.T.A. No.551/Chny/2021 2014-2015 45,702-00 13th July, 2018 [4] I.T.A. No.552/Chny/2021

TANJORE PALACE DEVASTHANAM,THANJAVUR vs. DCIT,CPC,TDS, BANGALORE

In the result, all the appeal of the Assessee in I

ITA 552/CHNY/2021[2014-15(Q2)]Status: DisposedITAT Chennai15 Jun 2022

Bench: Shri G. Manjunatha & Shri Anikesh Banerjee

For Appellant: Mr. S. Sridhar, AdvocateFor Respondent: Shri ARV Sreenivasan, Addl. CIT
Section 154Section 200ASection 200A(1)Section 234E

TDS] RETURNS Sl. I.T.A. No. Financial Order Pass Date Interest Filing No. Year Fee u/s.234E Rs. 20th October, 2015 [1] I.T.A. No.549/Chny/2021 2013-2014 26,080-00 2nd November, 2015 [2] I.T.A. No.550/Chny/2021 2013-2014 36,654-00 13th July, 2018 [3] I.T.A. No.551/Chny/2021 2014-2015 45,702-00 13th July, 2018 [4] I.T.A. No.552/Chny/2021

TANJORE PALACE DEVASTHANAM,THANJAVUR vs. DCIT, BENGALURU

In the result, all the appeal of the Assessee in I

ITA 549/CHNY/2021[2013-14(Q3)]Status: DisposedITAT Chennai15 Jun 2022

Bench: Shri G. Manjunatha & Shri Anikesh Banerjee

For Appellant: Mr. S. Sridhar, AdvocateFor Respondent: Shri ARV Sreenivasan, Addl. CIT
Section 154Section 200ASection 200A(1)Section 234E

TDS] RETURNS Sl. I.T.A. No. Financial Order Pass Date Interest Filing No. Year Fee u/s.234E Rs. 20th October, 2015 [1] I.T.A. No.549/Chny/2021 2013-2014 26,080-00 2nd November, 2015 [2] I.T.A. No.550/Chny/2021 2013-2014 36,654-00 13th July, 2018 [3] I.T.A. No.551/Chny/2021 2014-2015 45,702-00 13th July, 2018 [4] I.T.A. No.552/Chny/2021

TANJORE PALACE DEVASTANAM,THANJAVUR vs. DCIT,CPC, BENGALURU

In the result, all the appeal of the Assessee in I

ITA 555/CHNY/2021[2015-16(Q1)]Status: DisposedITAT Chennai15 Jun 2022

Bench: Shri G. Manjunatha & Shri Anikesh Banerjee

For Appellant: Mr. S. Sridhar, AdvocateFor Respondent: Shri ARV Sreenivasan, Addl. CIT
Section 154Section 200ASection 200A(1)Section 234E

TDS] RETURNS Sl. I.T.A. No. Financial Order Pass Date Interest Filing No. Year Fee u/s.234E Rs. 20th October, 2015 [1] I.T.A. No.549/Chny/2021 2013-2014 26,080-00 2nd November, 2015 [2] I.T.A. No.550/Chny/2021 2013-2014 36,654-00 13th July, 2018 [3] I.T.A. No.551/Chny/2021 2014-2015 45,702-00 13th July, 2018 [4] I.T.A. No.552/Chny/2021

TANJORE PALACE DEVASTHANAM,TANJAVUR vs. DCIT,CPC, BENGALURU

In the result, all the appeal of the Assessee in I

ITA 558/CHNY/2021[2015-16(Q4)]Status: DisposedITAT Chennai15 Jun 2022

Bench: Shri G. Manjunatha & Shri Anikesh Banerjee

For Appellant: Mr. S. Sridhar, AdvocateFor Respondent: Shri ARV Sreenivasan, Addl. CIT
Section 154Section 200ASection 200A(1)Section 234E

TDS] RETURNS Sl. I.T.A. No. Financial Order Pass Date Interest Filing No. Year Fee u/s.234E Rs. 20th October, 2015 [1] I.T.A. No.549/Chny/2021 2013-2014 26,080-00 2nd November, 2015 [2] I.T.A. No.550/Chny/2021 2013-2014 36,654-00 13th July, 2018 [3] I.T.A. No.551/Chny/2021 2014-2015 45,702-00 13th July, 2018 [4] I.T.A. No.552/Chny/2021

TANJORE PALACE DEVASTANAM,THANJAVUR vs. DCIT,CPC,TDS, BANGALORE

In the result, all the appeal of the Assessee in I

ITA 556/CHNY/2021[2015-16(Q2)]Status: DisposedITAT Chennai15 Jun 2022

Bench: Shri G. Manjunatha & Shri Anikesh Banerjee

For Appellant: Mr. S. Sridhar, AdvocateFor Respondent: Shri ARV Sreenivasan, Addl. CIT
Section 154Section 200ASection 200A(1)Section 234E

TDS] RETURNS Sl. I.T.A. No. Financial Order Pass Date Interest Filing No. Year Fee u/s.234E Rs. 20th October, 2015 [1] I.T.A. No.549/Chny/2021 2013-2014 26,080-00 2nd November, 2015 [2] I.T.A. No.550/Chny/2021 2013-2014 36,654-00 13th July, 2018 [3] I.T.A. No.551/Chny/2021 2014-2015 45,702-00 13th July, 2018 [4] I.T.A. No.552/Chny/2021

TANJORE PALACE DEVASTANAM,TANJORE vs. DCIT,CPC, BENGALURU

In the result, all the appeal of the Assessee in I

ITA 557/CHNY/2021[2015-16(Q3)]Status: DisposedITAT Chennai15 Jun 2022

Bench: Shri G. Manjunatha & Shri Anikesh Banerjee

For Appellant: Mr. S. Sridhar, AdvocateFor Respondent: Shri ARV Sreenivasan, Addl. CIT
Section 154Section 200ASection 200A(1)Section 234E

TDS] RETURNS Sl. I.T.A. No. Financial Order Pass Date Interest Filing No. Year Fee u/s.234E Rs. 20th October, 2015 [1] I.T.A. No.549/Chny/2021 2013-2014 26,080-00 2nd November, 2015 [2] I.T.A. No.550/Chny/2021 2013-2014 36,654-00 13th July, 2018 [3] I.T.A. No.551/Chny/2021 2014-2015 45,702-00 13th July, 2018 [4] I.T.A. No.552/Chny/2021

TANJORE PALACE DEVASTHANAM,THANJAVUR vs. DCIT,CPC, BENGALURU

In the result, all the appeal of the Assessee in I

ITA 551/CHNY/2021[2014-15(Q1)]Status: DisposedITAT Chennai15 Jun 2022

Bench: Shri G. Manjunatha & Shri Anikesh Banerjee

For Appellant: Mr. S. Sridhar, AdvocateFor Respondent: Shri ARV Sreenivasan, Addl. CIT
Section 154Section 200ASection 200A(1)Section 234E

TDS] RETURNS Sl. I.T.A. No. Financial Order Pass Date Interest Filing No. Year Fee u/s.234E Rs. 20th October, 2015 [1] I.T.A. No.549/Chny/2021 2013-2014 26,080-00 2nd November, 2015 [2] I.T.A. No.550/Chny/2021 2013-2014 36,654-00 13th July, 2018 [3] I.T.A. No.551/Chny/2021 2014-2015 45,702-00 13th July, 2018 [4] I.T.A. No.552/Chny/2021

TANJORE PALACE DEVASTHANAM,THANJAVUR vs. DCIT,CPC,TDS, BANGALORE

In the result, all the appeal of the Assessee in I

ITA 550/CHNY/2021[2013-14(Q4)]Status: DisposedITAT Chennai15 Jun 2022

Bench: Shri G. Manjunatha & Shri Anikesh Banerjee

For Appellant: Mr. S. Sridhar, AdvocateFor Respondent: Shri ARV Sreenivasan, Addl. CIT
Section 154Section 200ASection 200A(1)Section 234E

TDS] RETURNS Sl. I.T.A. No. Financial Order Pass Date Interest Filing No. Year Fee u/s.234E Rs. 20th October, 2015 [1] I.T.A. No.549/Chny/2021 2013-2014 26,080-00 2nd November, 2015 [2] I.T.A. No.550/Chny/2021 2013-2014 36,654-00 13th July, 2018 [3] I.T.A. No.551/Chny/2021 2014-2015 45,702-00 13th July, 2018 [4] I.T.A. No.552/Chny/2021

TANJORE PALACE DEVASTANAM,THANJAVUR vs. DCIT,CPC, BENGALURU

In the result, all the appeal of the Assessee in I

ITA 553/CHNY/2021[2014-15(Q3)]Status: DisposedITAT Chennai15 Jun 2022

Bench: Shri G. Manjunatha & Shri Anikesh Banerjee

For Appellant: Mr. S. Sridhar, AdvocateFor Respondent: Shri ARV Sreenivasan, Addl. CIT
Section 154Section 200ASection 200A(1)Section 234E

TDS] RETURNS Sl. I.T.A. No. Financial Order Pass Date Interest Filing No. Year Fee u/s.234E Rs. 20th October, 2015 [1] I.T.A. No.549/Chny/2021 2013-2014 26,080-00 2nd November, 2015 [2] I.T.A. No.550/Chny/2021 2013-2014 36,654-00 13th July, 2018 [3] I.T.A. No.551/Chny/2021 2014-2015 45,702-00 13th July, 2018 [4] I.T.A. No.552/Chny/2021

DCIT, CIRCLE - 2 (1), INTERNTIONAL TAXATION, CHENNAI vs. M/S. PETROFAC ENGINEERING SERVICES INDIA PVT. LTD,,, CHENNAI

In the result, appeals filed by the revenue for both

ITA 657/CHNY/2020[2012-13]Status: DisposedITAT Chennai22 Dec 2021AY 2012-13

Bench: Shri Mahavir Singh, Vice- & Shri G.Manjunathaआयकरअपीलसं./I.T.A.Nos.656 & 657/Chny/2020 ("नधा"रणवष" / Assessment Years: 2011-12 & 2012-13) Vs M/S. Petrofac Engineering The Deputy Commissioner Of Income Tax, Services Pvt.Ltd. 7Th Floor, Block 9A Circle-2(1), International Taxation, Chennai. Dlf Infocity Sez 1/124 Shivaji Gardens, Nandambakkam Post Manapakkam, Chennai-600089. Pan: Aaecp 1211H (अपीलाथ"/Appellant) (""यथ"/Respondent)

For Appellant: Mr. Ashik Shah, C.A ""For Respondent: 08.12.2021
Section 195Section 201(1)Section 9

TDS under section 195 of the Income-tax Act can be held liable to deduct such sums at a time when Explanation 4 was factually not on the statute book, all • This question is answered by two Latin maxims, lex non cogit ad impossibilia, i.e., the law does not demand the impossible and impotentia excusat legem, i.e., when there

DCIT, CIRCLE - 2 (1), INTERNATIONAL TAXATION,, CHENNAI vs. M/S. PETROFAC ENGINEERING SERVICES INDIA PVT. LTD.,, CHENNAI

In the result, appeals filed by the revenue for both

ITA 656/CHNY/2020[2011-12]Status: DisposedITAT Chennai22 Dec 2021AY 2011-12

Bench: Shri Mahavir Singh, Vice- & Shri G.Manjunathaआयकरअपीलसं./I.T.A.Nos.656 & 657/Chny/2020 ("नधा"रणवष" / Assessment Years: 2011-12 & 2012-13) Vs M/S. Petrofac Engineering The Deputy Commissioner Of Income Tax, Services Pvt.Ltd. 7Th Floor, Block 9A Circle-2(1), International Taxation, Chennai. Dlf Infocity Sez 1/124 Shivaji Gardens, Nandambakkam Post Manapakkam, Chennai-600089. Pan: Aaecp 1211H (अपीलाथ"/Appellant) (""यथ"/Respondent)

For Appellant: Mr. Ashik Shah, C.A ""For Respondent: 08.12.2021
Section 195Section 201(1)Section 9

TDS under section 195 of the Income-tax Act can be held liable to deduct such sums at a time when Explanation 4 was factually not on the statute book, all • This question is answered by two Latin maxims, lex non cogit ad impossibilia, i.e., the law does not demand the impossible and impotentia excusat legem, i.e., when there

SHRIRAM FINANCE LIMITED,CHENNAI vs. DCIT, CORPORATE CIRCLE 3(1), CHENNAI, CHENNAI

In the result, the appeal filed by the assessee is partly allowed for statistical purposes

ITA 173/CHNY/2024[2020-2021]Status: DisposedITAT Chennai09 Aug 2024AY 2020-2021

Bench: Shri S.S. Viswanethra Ravi & Shri S.R. Raghunathaआयकर अपील सं./I.T.A. No.173/Chny/2024 िनधा"रण वष"/Assessment Year: 2020-21 Shriram Finance Limited Vs. The Deputy Commissioner Of [Formerly Known As Shriram Transport Income Tax, Finance Company Limited), Corporate Circle 3(1), Sri Towers, Plot No. 14A, South Phase, Chennai. Industrial Estate, Guindy, Chennai 600 017. [Pan: Aaacs7018R] (अपीलाथ"/Appellant) (""थ"/Respondent) अपीलाथ" की ओर से / Appellant By : Shri R. Sivaraman, Advocate ""थ" की ओर से/Respondent By : Shri R.V. Aroon Prasad, Addl. Cit सुनवाई की तारीख/ Date Of Hearing : 25.07.2024 घोषणा की तारीख /Date Of Pronouncement : 09.08.2024 आदेश /O R D E R Per S.S. Viswanethra Ravi: This Appeal Filed By The Assessee Is Directed Against The Order Dated 29.11.2023 Passed By The Ld. Commissioner Of Income Tax (Appeals), National Faceless Appeal Centre [Nfac], Delhi For The Assessment Year 2020-21. 2. Ground No. 1 Is General In Nature & Requires No Adjudication.

For Appellant: Shri R. Sivaraman, AdvocateFor Respondent: Shri R.V. Aroon Prasad, Addl. CIT
Section 14ASection 2

193 ITR 49 (Ker)] while following the Gujarat High Court's decision in S.G. Pgnatale [(1980) 124 ITR 391 (Guj)] to hold that the Explanation was not declaratory but widened the scope of Section 9(1)(ii). It was further held that even if it were assumed to be clarificatory or that it removed whatever ambiguity there was in Section

DCIT, CENTRAL CIRCLE-1 (3), CHENNAI vs. TRIMEX INDUSTRIES PRIVATE LIMITED, CHENNAI

In the result, the appeals filed by the assessee in ITA Nos

ITA 1035/CHNY/2022[2009-2010]Status: DisposedITAT Chennai11 Oct 2023AY 2009-2010

Bench: Shri Mahavir Singhand Shri Manoj Kumar Aggarwal

For Appellant: Shri D. Anand, AdvocateFor Respondent: Shri Suresh Guduri, JCIT
Section 14Section 143(3)Section 14A

193/- to Empire Mineral and Transport on account of plot rent. According to AO, the assessee has not deducted TDS on the above amount. Hence, he invoking the provisions of section

TRIMEX INDUSTRIES PRIVATE LIMITED,CHENNAI vs. ACIT, CENTRAL CIRCLE-IV(3), CHENNAI

In the result, the appeals filed by the assessee in ITA Nos

ITA 993/CHNY/2022[2009-10]Status: DisposedITAT Chennai11 Oct 2023AY 2009-10

Bench: Shri Mahavir Singhand Shri Manoj Kumar Aggarwal

For Appellant: Shri D. Anand, AdvocateFor Respondent: Shri Suresh Guduri, JCIT
Section 14Section 143(3)Section 14A

193/- to Empire Mineral and Transport on account of plot rent. According to AO, the assessee has not deducted TDS on the above amount. Hence, he invoking the provisions of section

DCIT, CENTRAL CIRCLE-1 (3), CHENNAI vs. TRIMEX INDUSTRIES PRIVATE LIMITED, CHENNAI

In the result, the appeals filed by the assessee in ITA Nos

ITA 1120/CHNY/2022[2013-2014]Status: DisposedITAT Chennai11 Oct 2023AY 2013-2014

Bench: Shri Mahavir Singhand Shri Manoj Kumar Aggarwal

For Appellant: Shri D. Anand, AdvocateFor Respondent: Shri Suresh Guduri, JCIT
Section 14Section 143(3)Section 14A

193/- to Empire Mineral and Transport on account of plot rent. According to AO, the assessee has not deducted TDS on the above amount. Hence, he invoking the provisions of section

ACIT CIRCLE 1 , SALEM vs. M/S AVR SWARNAMAHAL JEWELLERY PRIVATE LIMITED, SALEM

The appeals stand partly allowed for statistical purposes in terms of our above order

ITA 564/CHNY/2018[2012-13]Status: DisposedITAT Chennai09 Jun 2023AY 2012-13

Bench: Hon’Ble Shri V. Durga Rao & Hon’Ble Shri Manoj Kumar Aggarwal, Am

For Appellant: Shri T. Banusekar (CA) – Ld. ARFor Respondent: Shri D. Hema Bhupal (JCIT) – Ld. DR
Section 143(3)

Section 193 of the Income Tax Act. The subsequent Circular No.4/2004 dated 13.05.2004 clarified that the tax would be deducted at source u/s 193 or Sec.195, as the case may be, only at the time of redemption of such bonds, irrespective of whether the income from the bonds have been declared by the bond-holder on accrual basis from year

ACIT CIRCLE 1 , SALEM vs. M/S AVR SWARNAMAHAL JEWELLERY PRIVATE LIMITED, SALEM

The appeals stand partly allowed for statistical purposes in terms of our above order

ITA 563/CHNY/2018[2011-12]Status: DisposedITAT Chennai09 Jun 2023AY 2011-12

Bench: Hon’Ble Shri V. Durga Rao & Hon’Ble Shri Manoj Kumar Aggarwal, Am

For Appellant: Shri T. Banusekar (CA) – Ld. ARFor Respondent: Shri D. Hema Bhupal (JCIT) – Ld. DR
Section 143(3)

Section 193 of the Income Tax Act. The subsequent Circular No.4/2004 dated 13.05.2004 clarified that the tax would be deducted at source u/s 193 or Sec.195, as the case may be, only at the time of redemption of such bonds, irrespective of whether the income from the bonds have been declared by the bond-holder on accrual basis from year