BharatTax.net
SearchITATHigh CourtsSupreme CourtPhrasesAI ResearchHistory

Filters

BharatTax.net

Free search engine for ITAT (Income Tax Appellate Tribunal) judgments across all 28 benches in India.

Quick Links

  • Search Judgments
  • Browse by Bench
  • Recent Judgments

About

BharatTax provides free access to Income Tax Appellate Tribunal orders for legal research and reference.

© 2026 BharatTax.net. All rights reserved.

5 results for “TDS”+ Section 192Bclear

Sorted by relevance

Delhi20Chennai5Ahmedabad4Bangalore4Indore4Mumbai2Surat1Panaji1Cochin1

Key Topics

Section 20113Section 201(1)5Deduction5TDS5Section 1944Section 271C3Section 192B3Survey u/s 133A3Section 133A2Section 17(2)(iv)

STATE BANK OF INDIA,CHENNAI vs. ACIT TDS, CHENNAI

In the result, the appeal filed by the assessee is dismissed

ITA 1465/CHNY/2024[2015-16]Status: DisposedITAT Chennai27 Jun 2025AY 2015-16

Bench: Shri S.S. Viswanethra Ravi & Shri Jagadishआयकर अपील सं./I.T.A. No.1465/Chny/2024 िनधा"रण वष"/Assessment Year: 2015-16 State Bank Of India Vs. The Assistant Commissioner Of Industrial Finance Branch, Income Tax, 103, Mount Road, Chennai 600 002. Tds Circle 3(1), [Tan:Ches02510E] Chennai. (अपीलाथ"/Appellant) (""थ"/Respondent) अपीलाथ" की ओर से / Appellant By : Ms. G. Vardini Karthik, Advocate (Virtual) ""थ" की ओर से/Respondent By : Shri N. Madan Kumar, Jcit सुनवाई की तारीख/ Date Of Hearing : 02.04.2025 घोषणा की तारीख /Date Of Pronouncement : 27.06.2025 आदेश /O R D E R Per S.S. Viswanethra Ravi: This Appeal Filed By The Assessee Is Directed Against The Order Dated 21.03.2024 Passed By The Addl/Jcit(1)-1, Coimbatore For The Assessment Year 2015-16. 2. The Assessee Raised 17 Grounds Of Appeal, Amongst Which, The Only Issue Emanates For Our Consideration As To Whether The Ld. Cit(A) Is Justified In Confirming The Order Passed Under Section 201/201(1A) Of The Income Tax Act, 1961 [“Act” In Short] In The Facts & Circumstances Of The Case.

For Appellant: Ms. G. Vardini Karthik, Advocate (virtual)For Respondent: Shri N. Madan Kumar, JCIT
Section 10(5)Section 192BSection 201

TDS under section 192B of the Act for AY 2015-16 and further erred in levying consequential interest under section

2
Section 194A2
Penalty2

M/S. UNITED INDIA INSURANCE CO. LTD.,CHENNAI vs. ACIT TDS CIRCLE-, PANAJI

In the result, both the appeals filed by the assessee are allowed for statistical purposes

ITA 600/CHNY/2023[2012-13]Status: DisposedITAT Chennai18 Oct 2023AY 2012-13

Bench: Shri V. Durga Rao & Shri Manjunatha, G.आयकर अपील सं./I.T.A. Nos.600 & 601/Chny/2023 िनधा"रण वष"/Assessment Years: 2012-13 & 2014-15 United India Insurance Co. Limited, Vs. The Deputy Commissioner Of The Chief Manager, Cfac Department, Income Tax, Tds Circle, Head Office, United India Insurance Co. Panaji, Goa 403 001. Ltd., United India Nalanda, Door No.- 19, Ground Floor, 4Th Lane, Uthamar Gandhi Salai, Chennai 600 034. [Pan:Aaacu5552C] (अपीलाथ"/Appellant) (""थ"/Respondent) अपीलाथ" की ओर से / Appellant By : None ""थ" की ओर से/Respondent By : Shri Ar V Sreenivasan, Addl. Cit सुनवाई की तारीख/ Date Of Hearing : 16.10.2023 घोषणा की तारीख /Date Of Pronouncement : 18.10.2023 आदेश /O R D E R Per V. Durga Rao: Both The Appeals Filed By The Assessee Are Directed Against Separate But Identical Order Of The Ld. Commissioner Of Income Tax (Appeals), National Faceless Appeal Centre [Nfac], Delhi, Both Dated 17.02.2023 Relevant To The Assessment Years 2012-13 & 2014-15. 2. Both The Appeal Filed By The Assessee Are Delayed By 22 Days In Filing The Appeal, For Which, The Assessee Has Filed Petitions For 2

For Appellant: NoneFor Respondent: Shri AR V Sreenivasan, Addl. CIT
Section 133ASection 17(2)(iv)Section 201Section 201(1)

TDS from perquisite portion of salary, as applicable under section 17(2)(iv) of the Act r.w.s. 192B of the Act. Accordingly

M/S. UNITED INDIA INSURANCE CO. LTD.,CHENNAI vs. ACIT TDS CIRCLE-, PANAJI

In the result, both the appeals filed by the assessee are allowed for statistical purposes

ITA 601/CHNY/2023[2014-15]Status: DisposedITAT Chennai18 Oct 2023AY 2014-15

Bench: Shri V. Durga Rao & Shri Manjunatha, G.आयकर अपील सं./I.T.A. Nos.600 & 601/Chny/2023 िनधा"रण वष"/Assessment Years: 2012-13 & 2014-15 United India Insurance Co. Limited, Vs. The Deputy Commissioner Of The Chief Manager, Cfac Department, Income Tax, Tds Circle, Head Office, United India Insurance Co. Panaji, Goa 403 001. Ltd., United India Nalanda, Door No.- 19, Ground Floor, 4Th Lane, Uthamar Gandhi Salai, Chennai 600 034. [Pan:Aaacu5552C] (अपीलाथ"/Appellant) (""थ"/Respondent) अपीलाथ" की ओर से / Appellant By : None ""थ" की ओर से/Respondent By : Shri Ar V Sreenivasan, Addl. Cit सुनवाई की तारीख/ Date Of Hearing : 16.10.2023 घोषणा की तारीख /Date Of Pronouncement : 18.10.2023 आदेश /O R D E R Per V. Durga Rao: Both The Appeals Filed By The Assessee Are Directed Against Separate But Identical Order Of The Ld. Commissioner Of Income Tax (Appeals), National Faceless Appeal Centre [Nfac], Delhi, Both Dated 17.02.2023 Relevant To The Assessment Years 2012-13 & 2014-15. 2. Both The Appeal Filed By The Assessee Are Delayed By 22 Days In Filing The Appeal, For Which, The Assessee Has Filed Petitions For 2

For Appellant: NoneFor Respondent: Shri AR V Sreenivasan, Addl. CIT
Section 133ASection 17(2)(iv)Section 201Section 201(1)

TDS from perquisite portion of salary, as applicable under section 17(2)(iv) of the Act r.w.s. 192B of the Act. Accordingly

JCIT, COIMBATORE vs. SELMA MEMOIRAL TRUST, THE NILGIRIS

In the result, the appeal filed by the Revenue is dismissed

ITA 3378/CHNY/2016[2013-14]Status: DisposedITAT Chennai31 May 2017AY 2013-14

Bench: Shri N.R.S. Ganesan & Shri D.S. Sunder Singhआयकर अपील सं./Ita No.3378/Mds/2016 "नधा"रण वष" / Assessment Year : 2013-14 The Joint Commissioner Of M/S Selma Memorial Trust, Income Tax, V. Prop: Riverside Public School, Tds Range, Coimbatore. San-Tri-Moo, P.B. No.34, Kotagiri, The Nilgiris – 643 217. Pan : Aadts 8376 E (अपीलाथ"/Appellant) (""यथ"/Respondent)

For Appellant: Shri A.V. Sreekanth, JCITFor Respondent: Smt. Nithya Sankaran, CA
Section 192BSection 194Section 194ASection 194JSection 271C

TDS Range, Coimbatore, levied penalty of `10,70,242/- under Section 271C of 2 I.T.A. No.3378/Mds/16 the Income-tax Act, 1961 (in short 'the Act') for non-deduction of tax at source. According to the Ld. D.R., the assessee-trust established educational institution in the name and style of “Riverside Public School” During the course of inspection, it was found

ITO TDS WARD 2 , COIMBATORE vs. SUBA PLASTICS PVT. LTD. , COIMBATORE

In the result, the revenue’s appeal is treated as allowed for statistical

ITA 1600/CHNY/2017[2008-09]Status: DisposedITAT Chennai29 Nov 2017AY 2008-09

Bench: Shri N.R.S. Ganesan & Shri S. Jayaraman

For Appellant: Shri. TN. Seetharaman, Advocate
Section 148Section 194Section 2(22)(e)Section 201Section 201(1)

TDS Ward 1(3), Coimbatore (A O) conducted an inspection in theassessee’s premises on 31.01.2013. Based on survey observations, the AO initiated proceedings u/s. 201, called for the details on various payments made, verified them, passed a consolidated order u/ss. 201(1) and 201(1A) on 22.08.2013 on the payments falling under various sections viz., 192B