BharatTax.net
SearchITATHigh CourtsSupreme CourtPhrasesAI ResearchHistory

Filters

BharatTax.net

Free search engine for ITAT (Income Tax Appellate Tribunal) judgments across all 28 benches in India.

Quick Links

  • Search Judgments
  • Browse by Bench
  • Recent Judgments

About

BharatTax provides free access to Income Tax Appellate Tribunal orders for legal research and reference.

© 2026 BharatTax.net. All rights reserved.

1,302 results for “TDS”+ Section 17clear

Sorted by relevance

Mumbai3,652Delhi3,568Bangalore1,861Chennai1,302Kolkata821Hyderabad545Pune477Ahmedabad442Jaipur349Indore298Karnataka264Chandigarh260Raipur255Cochin218Surat163Nagpur162Visakhapatnam152Rajkot115Lucknow87Cuttack73Amritsar62Dehradun59Ranchi53Panaji42Telangana41Patna39Jabalpur37Allahabad34Guwahati33Jodhpur26Agra25SC18Kerala12Varanasi11Himachal Pradesh6Rajasthan6Calcutta6Punjab & Haryana4Uttarakhand3J&K1Orissa1Gauhati1A.K. SIKRI ROHINTON FALI NARIMAN1

Key Topics

Section 4072Section 143(3)65TDS50Disallowance50Deduction42Addition to Income41Section 234E35Section 19532Section 14A26Section 200A

PRAKASHCHAND,CHENNAI vs. ITO, TDS WARD-1,, CHENNAI

In the result, all the appeals filed by the assessee are allowed

ITA 3063/CHNY/2025[2013-14]Status: DisposedITAT Chennai18 Dec 2025AY 2013-14

Bench: Shri Manu Kumar Giri & Shri S.R.Raghunatha

For Appellant: Mr. Hitesh, AdvocateFor Respondent: 17.12.2025
Section 154Section 200A(1)(c)Section 234ESection 3

TDS returns under Section 200A of the Act, clause (c) to Sub under Section 200A of the Act, clause (c) to Sub-Section (1) to Section (1) to Section 200A was introduced with effect fr Section 200A was introduced with effect from 01.07.2012. om 01.07.2012. Therefore, the aforesaid submission made by the learned Therefore, the aforesaid submission made

Showing 1–20 of 1,302 · Page 1 of 66

...
24
Section 9(1)(vii)17
Double Taxation/DTAA15

PRAKASHCHAND,CHENNAI vs. ITO, TDS WARD 1,, CHENNAI

In the result, all the appeals filed by the assessee are allowed

ITA 3064/CHNY/2025[2013-14]Status: DisposedITAT Chennai18 Dec 2025AY 2013-14

Bench: Shri Manu Kumar Giri & Shri S.R.Raghunatha

For Appellant: Mr. Hitesh, AdvocateFor Respondent: 17.12.2025
Section 154Section 200A(1)(c)Section 234ESection 3

TDS returns under Section 200A of the Act, clause (c) to Sub under Section 200A of the Act, clause (c) to Sub-Section (1) to Section (1) to Section 200A was introduced with effect fr Section 200A was introduced with effect from 01.07.2012. om 01.07.2012. Therefore, the aforesaid submission made by the learned Therefore, the aforesaid submission made

PRAKASHCHAND,CHENNAI vs. ITO, TDS WARD-1,, CHENNAI

In the result, all the appeals filed by the assessee are allowed

ITA 3061/CHNY/2025[2014-15]Status: DisposedITAT Chennai18 Dec 2025AY 2014-15

Bench: Shri Manu Kumar Giri & Shri S.R.Raghunatha

For Appellant: Mr. Hitesh, AdvocateFor Respondent: 17.12.2025
Section 154Section 200A(1)(c)Section 234ESection 3

TDS returns under Section 200A of the Act, clause (c) to Sub under Section 200A of the Act, clause (c) to Sub-Section (1) to Section (1) to Section 200A was introduced with effect fr Section 200A was introduced with effect from 01.07.2012. om 01.07.2012. Therefore, the aforesaid submission made by the learned Therefore, the aforesaid submission made

PRAKASHCHAND,CHENNAI vs. ITO, TDS WARD-1, CHENNAI

In the result, all the appeals filed by the assessee are allowed

ITA 3065/CHNY/2025[2014-15]Status: DisposedITAT Chennai18 Dec 2025AY 2014-15

Bench: Shri Manu Kumar Giri & Shri S.R.Raghunatha

For Appellant: Mr. Hitesh, AdvocateFor Respondent: 17.12.2025
Section 154Section 200A(1)(c)Section 234ESection 3

TDS returns under Section 200A of the Act, clause (c) to Sub under Section 200A of the Act, clause (c) to Sub-Section (1) to Section (1) to Section 200A was introduced with effect fr Section 200A was introduced with effect from 01.07.2012. om 01.07.2012. Therefore, the aforesaid submission made by the learned Therefore, the aforesaid submission made

SHARAD KUMAR,CHENNAI vs. DEPUTY COMMISSIONER OF INCOME TAX, MEDIA CIRCLE

In the result, appeal filed by the assessee is allowed

ITA 1381/CHNY/2024[2010-2011]Status: DisposedITAT Chennai18 Sept 2024AY 2010-2011

Bench: Shri Aby T. Varkey & Shri S.R.Raghunathaआयकर अपील सं./Ita No.1381/Chny/2024 िनधा"रण वष"/Assessment Year: 2010-11 V. Mr. Sharad Kumar, The Dcit, New No.6, Old No.7, Media Circle-1, Nawab Habibullah Avenue, Chennai. 3Rd Street, Chennai-6. [Pan: Aasps 2554 F] (अपीलाथ"/Appellant) (""यथ"/Respondent)

For Appellant: Mr. D. Anand, AdvFor Respondent: Ms. T.M.Suganthamala
Section 2(24)(iv)

TDS made by the company and on the other hand, he received the extra amount from the company in the guise of interest payment to the Bank, which has already been discharged by the company to the appellant. In view of these facts in hand and also the findings given by the AO. In view of the above facts

ALFHA COACH BUILDERS,KARUR vs. ITO, WARD-1,, KARUR

In the result, all six these appeals filed by the assessee are allowed

ITA 33/CHNY/2025[2015-16]Status: DisposedITAT Chennai15 Jul 2025AY 2015-16

Bench: Shri S.S. Viswanethra Ravi & Shri S. R. Raghunathaआयकर अपील सं./Ita Nos.: 32 & 33/Chny/2025 िनधा"रण वष" / Assessment Years: 2014-15 & 2015-16 Alfha Coach Builders, The Income Tax Officer, Sf No.596’3, Andan Kovil East, Vs. Ward -1, Pudhur, Covai Road, Karur. Karur – 639 002. [Pan: Aaofa-8970-D] (अपीलाथ"/Appellant) (""थ"/Respondent)

For Appellant: Shri J. Saravanan, AdvocateFor Respondent: Shri P. Krishna Kumar, JCIT
Section 154Section 200ASection 234ESection 250

TDS returns under Section 200A of the Act, clause (c) to Sub-Section (1) to Section 200A was introduced with effect from 01.07.2012. Therefore, the aforesaid submission made by the learned counsel for the respondent is rejected by this Court. 16. Further it was stated by the respondent that they have no power to waive the late fee and only

ALFHA COACH BUILDERS,KARUR vs. ITO, WARD-1,, KARUR

In the result, all six these appeals filed by the assessee are allowed

ITA 32/CHNY/2025[2014-15]Status: DisposedITAT Chennai15 Jul 2025AY 2014-15

Bench: Shri S.S. Viswanethra Ravi & Shri S. R. Raghunathaआयकर अपील सं./Ita Nos.: 32 & 33/Chny/2025 िनधा"रण वष" / Assessment Years: 2014-15 & 2015-16 Alfha Coach Builders, The Income Tax Officer, Sf No.596’3, Andan Kovil East, Vs. Ward -1, Pudhur, Covai Road, Karur. Karur – 639 002. [Pan: Aaofa-8970-D] (अपीलाथ"/Appellant) (""थ"/Respondent)

For Appellant: Shri J. Saravanan, AdvocateFor Respondent: Shri P. Krishna Kumar, JCIT
Section 154Section 200ASection 234ESection 250

TDS returns under Section 200A of the Act, clause (c) to Sub-Section (1) to Section 200A was introduced with effect from 01.07.2012. Therefore, the aforesaid submission made by the learned counsel for the respondent is rejected by this Court. 16. Further it was stated by the respondent that they have no power to waive the late fee and only

M/S GOPURAM ENTERPRISES PVT LTD ,CHENNAI vs. ITO , TDS CPC , GHAZIABAD

In the result, all the appeals filed by the assessee are allowed for

ITA 1050/CHNY/2022[2015-2016]Status: DisposedITAT Chennai11 Jun 2025AY 2015-2016

Bench: Shri Aby T. Varkey & Shri Jagadish

For Appellant: Shri R. Devaraj, AdvocateFor Respondent: Ms. Gouthami Manivasagam, JCIT
Section 200ASection 200A(1)(c)Section 234E

17. In view of the above, it is made clear that the respondent had had imposed the late fee only under Section 234E of the Act for the assessment years 2012-2013, 2013-2014, 2014-2015. However, Section 200A(1)(c) of the Act was not introduced during the said assessment years. In the absence of any provisions under Section

M/S GOPURAM ENTERPRISES PVT LTD ,CHENNAI vs. ITO , TDS CPC , GHAZIABAD

In the result, all the appeals filed by the assessee are allowed for

ITA 1052/CHNY/2022[2015-2016]Status: DisposedITAT Chennai11 Jun 2025AY 2015-2016

Bench: Shri Aby T. Varkey & Shri Jagadish

For Appellant: Shri R. Devaraj, AdvocateFor Respondent: Ms. Gouthami Manivasagam, JCIT
Section 200ASection 200A(1)(c)Section 234E

17. In view of the above, it is made clear that the respondent had had imposed the late fee only under Section 234E of the Act for the assessment years 2012-2013, 2013-2014, 2014-2015. However, Section 200A(1)(c) of the Act was not introduced during the said assessment years. In the absence of any provisions under Section

M/S GOPURAM ENTERPRISES PVT LTD ,CHENNAI vs. ITO , TDS CPC , GHAZIABAD

In the result, all the appeals filed by the assessee are allowed for

ITA 1051/CHNY/2022[2015-2016]Status: DisposedITAT Chennai11 Jun 2025AY 2015-2016

Bench: Shri Aby T. Varkey & Shri Jagadish

For Appellant: Shri R. Devaraj, AdvocateFor Respondent: Ms. Gouthami Manivasagam, JCIT
Section 200ASection 200A(1)(c)Section 234E

17. In view of the above, it is made clear that the respondent had had imposed the late fee only under Section 234E of the Act for the assessment years 2012-2013, 2013-2014, 2014-2015. However, Section 200A(1)(c) of the Act was not introduced during the said assessment years. In the absence of any provisions under Section

M/S GOPURAM ENTERPRISES PVT LTD ,CHENNAI vs. ITO , TDS CPC , GHAZIABAD

In the result, all the appeals filed by the assessee are allowed for

ITA 1053/CHNY/2022[2015-2016]Status: DisposedITAT Chennai11 Jun 2025AY 2015-2016

Bench: Shri Aby T. Varkey & Shri Jagadish

For Appellant: Shri R. Devaraj, AdvocateFor Respondent: Ms. Gouthami Manivasagam, JCIT
Section 200ASection 200A(1)(c)Section 234E

17. In view of the above, it is made clear that the respondent had had imposed the late fee only under Section 234E of the Act for the assessment years 2012-2013, 2013-2014, 2014-2015. However, Section 200A(1)(c) of the Act was not introduced during the said assessment years. In the absence of any provisions under Section

RAMAMURTHY D.P.,PUDUCHERRY vs. ITO, TDS WARD,, PUDUCHERRY

In the result, both the appeals filed by the assessee are allowed for statistical purposes

ITA 1742/CHNY/2025[2014-15]Status: DisposedITAT Chennai28 Aug 2025AY 2014-15

Bench: Shri George George K & Shri Jagadishआयकर अपील सं./Ita Nos.1741 & 1742/Chny/2025 िनधा"रण वष" /Assessment Years: 2013-14 & 2014-15

For Appellant: Shri N. Arjun Raj, AdvocateFor Respondent: Mrs. R. Anitha, Addl. CIT
Section 154Section 200ASection 200A(1)(c)Section 234E

17. In view of the above, it is made clear that the respondent had had imposed the late fee only under Section 234E of the Act for the assessment years 2012-2013, 2013-2014, 2014-2015. However, Section 200A(1)(c) of the Act was not introduced during the said assessment years. In the absence of any provisions under Section

RAMAMURTHY D.P.,PUDUCHERRY vs. ITO, TDS WARD,, PUDUCHERRY

In the result, both the appeals filed by the assessee are allowed for statistical purposes

ITA 1741/CHNY/2025[2013-14]Status: DisposedITAT Chennai28 Aug 2025AY 2013-14

Bench: Shri George George K & Shri Jagadishआयकर अपील सं./Ita Nos.1741 & 1742/Chny/2025 िनधा"रण वष" /Assessment Years: 2013-14 & 2014-15

For Appellant: Shri N. Arjun Raj, AdvocateFor Respondent: Mrs. R. Anitha, Addl. CIT
Section 154Section 200ASection 200A(1)(c)Section 234E

17. In view of the above, it is made clear that the respondent had had imposed the late fee only under Section 234E of the Act for the assessment years 2012-2013, 2013-2014, 2014-2015. However, Section 200A(1)(c) of the Act was not introduced during the said assessment years. In the absence of any provisions under Section

DOLLARS & POUNDS,CHENNAI vs. ACIT CPC TDS, GHAZIABAD

In the result, all the appeals filed by the assessee are allowed

ITA 2019/CHNY/2018[2013-14(Q3)-26Q]Status: DisposedITAT Chennai30 Nov 2018

Bench: Shri A. Mohan Alankamony & Shri Duvvuru Rl Reddy

For Respondent: Ms. G.D. Jayanthi Angayarkanni, JCIT
Section 200ASection 200A(1)Section 234E

17, Chennai dated 28.05.2018 relevant to the assessment years 2013-14, 2 I.T.A. No.2015 to 2030/Chny/18 2014-15 and 2015-16 passed under section 200A of the Income Tax Act, 1961 [“Act” in short]. The only common ground raised by the assessee in all the appeals is that the ld. CIT(A) has erred confirming the fee levied under section

DOLLARS & POUNDS,CHENNAI vs. ACIT CPC TDS, GHAZIABAD

In the result, all the appeals filed by the assessee are allowed

ITA 2015/CHNY/2018[2013-14(Q2)-24Q]Status: DisposedITAT Chennai30 Nov 2018

Bench: Shri A. Mohan Alankamony & Shri Duvvuru Rl Reddy

For Respondent: Ms. G.D. Jayanthi Angayarkanni, JCIT
Section 200ASection 200A(1)Section 234E

17, Chennai dated 28.05.2018 relevant to the assessment years 2013-14, 2 I.T.A. No.2015 to 2030/Chny/18 2014-15 and 2015-16 passed under section 200A of the Income Tax Act, 1961 [“Act” in short]. The only common ground raised by the assessee in all the appeals is that the ld. CIT(A) has erred confirming the fee levied under section

DOLLARS & POUNDS,CHENNAI vs. ACIT CPC TDS, GHAZIABAD

In the result, all the appeals filed by the assessee are allowed

ITA 2020/CHNY/2018[2013-14(Q3)-26Q]Status: DisposedITAT Chennai30 Nov 2018

Bench: Shri A. Mohan Alankamony & Shri Duvvuru Rl Reddy

For Respondent: Ms. G.D. Jayanthi Angayarkanni, JCIT
Section 200ASection 200A(1)Section 234E

17, Chennai dated 28.05.2018 relevant to the assessment years 2013-14, 2 I.T.A. No.2015 to 2030/Chny/18 2014-15 and 2015-16 passed under section 200A of the Income Tax Act, 1961 [“Act” in short]. The only common ground raised by the assessee in all the appeals is that the ld. CIT(A) has erred confirming the fee levied under section

DOLLARS & POUNDS,CHENNAI vs. ACIT CPC TDS, GHAZIABAD

In the result, all the appeals filed by the assessee are allowed

ITA 2018/CHNY/2018[2013-14(Q2)-26Q]Status: DisposedITAT Chennai30 Nov 2018

Bench: Shri A. Mohan Alankamony & Shri Duvvuru Rl Reddy

For Respondent: Ms. G.D. Jayanthi Angayarkanni, JCIT
Section 200ASection 200A(1)Section 234E

17, Chennai dated 28.05.2018 relevant to the assessment years 2013-14, 2 I.T.A. No.2015 to 2030/Chny/18 2014-15 and 2015-16 passed under section 200A of the Income Tax Act, 1961 [“Act” in short]. The only common ground raised by the assessee in all the appeals is that the ld. CIT(A) has erred confirming the fee levied under section

DOLLARS & POUNDS,CHENNAI vs. ACIT CPC TDS, GHAZIABAD

In the result, all the appeals filed by the assessee are allowed

ITA 2017/CHNY/2018[2013-14(Q4)-24Q]Status: DisposedITAT Chennai30 Nov 2018

Bench: Shri A. Mohan Alankamony & Shri Duvvuru Rl Reddy

For Respondent: Ms. G.D. Jayanthi Angayarkanni, JCIT
Section 200ASection 200A(1)Section 234E

17, Chennai dated 28.05.2018 relevant to the assessment years 2013-14, 2 I.T.A. No.2015 to 2030/Chny/18 2014-15 and 2015-16 passed under section 200A of the Income Tax Act, 1961 [“Act” in short]. The only common ground raised by the assessee in all the appeals is that the ld. CIT(A) has erred confirming the fee levied under section

DOLLARS & POUNDS,CHENNAI vs. ACIT CPC TDS, GHAZIABAD

In the result, all the appeals filed by the assessee are allowed

ITA 2016/CHNY/2018[2013-14(Q3)-24Q]Status: DisposedITAT Chennai30 Nov 2018

Bench: Shri A. Mohan Alankamony & Shri Duvvuru Rl Reddy

For Respondent: Ms. G.D. Jayanthi Angayarkanni, JCIT
Section 200ASection 200A(1)Section 234E

17, Chennai dated 28.05.2018 relevant to the assessment years 2013-14, 2 I.T.A. No.2015 to 2030/Chny/18 2014-15 and 2015-16 passed under section 200A of the Income Tax Act, 1961 [“Act” in short]. The only common ground raised by the assessee in all the appeals is that the ld. CIT(A) has erred confirming the fee levied under section

GOPURAM ENTERPRISES PRIVATE LIMITED,CHENNAI vs. ACIT C 1(1), CHENNAI

In the result, all six these appeals filed by the assessee are allowed

ITA 1002/CHNY/2024[2013-14]Status: DisposedITAT Chennai26 Jun 2024AY 2013-14

Bench: Hon’Ble Shri Manu Kumar Giri, Jm & Shri S.R. Raghunathaआयकर अपील सं./Ita Nos.: 1002, 1003, 1004, 1005, 1006 & 1007/Chny/2024 िनधा"रण वष"/Assessment Years: 2013-14 (Q2), 2013-2014 (Q3). 2013-14 (Q4), 2014-2015 (Q1), 2014-2015 (Q2) & 2014-2015 (Q3) M/S. Gopuram Enterprises Private Limited, The Assistant Commissioner Of New No.8-A, Madha Church Road, Vs. Income Tax, R.A. Puram, Cc 1(1) Chennai 600 028. Chennai Pan: Aaacs 9903R (अपीलाथ"/Appellant) (""यथ"/Respondent) अपीलाथ" क" ओर से/Appellant By : Shri. R.Devaraj, Advocate ""यथ" क" ओर से/Respondent By : Shri. D. Hema Bhupal, Irs, Jcit सुनवाई क" तारीख/Date Of Hearing : 24.06.2024 घोषणा क" तारीख/Date Of Pronouncement : 26.06.2024 आदेश /O R D E R Per Manu Kumar Giri () This Bunch Of Six Appeals Being Ita Nos. 1002-1007 /Chny/2024 Filed By The Assessee ‘Gopuram Enterprises Private Limited’ [Formerly Known As ‘Savorit Limited’] Are Directed Against Separate Orders Of Even Date 31.10.2019 Passed By The Learned Commissioner Of Income Tax (Appeals)-17, Chennai & Pertain To The Assessment Years 2013-14 To 2014-15. Ita Nos/ 1002 To 1007Chny/2024 2. The Assessee Has Raised Similar Grounds Of Appeal For All The Assessment Years. We Will Take Up Ita No. 1002/Chny/2024 For The Assessment Year 2013-14 (Q2) As Lead Case. Grounds Of Appeal Filed In Ita No. 1002/Chny/2024 For The Assessment Year 2013-14 (Q2) Are Reproduced As Under:-

For Appellant: Shri. R.Devaraj, AdvocateFor Respondent: Shri. D. Hema Bhupal, IRS, JCIT
Section 200ASection 234Section 234ESection 292

TDS returns under Section 200A of the Act, clause (c) to Sub-Section (1) to Section 200A was introduced with effect from 01.07.2012. Therefore, the aforesaid submission made by the learned counsel for the respondent is rejected by this Court. 16. Further it was stated by the respondent that they have no power to waive the late fee and only