BharatTax.net
SearchITATHigh CourtsSupreme CourtPhrasesAI ResearchHistory

Filters

BharatTax.net

Free search engine for ITAT (Income Tax Appellate Tribunal) judgments across all 28 benches in India.

Quick Links

  • Search Judgments
  • Browse by Bench
  • Recent Judgments

About

BharatTax provides free access to Income Tax Appellate Tribunal orders for legal research and reference.

© 2026 BharatTax.net. All rights reserved.

5 results for “TDS”+ Section 140A(1)clear

Sorted by relevance

Mumbai69Delhi60Hyderabad25Karnataka23Kolkata8Bangalore7Cochin5Chennai5Ahmedabad3Jaipur2Cuttack2Pune2Raipur2SC2Telangana2Varanasi2

Key Topics

Section 244A13Section 4512Section 234A9Section 234D4Section 1543Section 372Section 36(1)(iii)2Section 140A2Deduction2Penalty

GVR ASHOKA CHENNAI CORR LIMITED,CHENNAI vs. ADIT, BENGALURU

In the result, the appeal of the assessee is allowed

ITA 2621/CHNY/2025[2021-22]Status: DisposedITAT Chennai10 Dec 2025AY 2021-22

Bench: Shri Manu Kumar Giri & Shri S.R.Raghunatha

For Appellant: Mr. Dharan V. Gandhi, ARFor Respondent: 20.11.2025
Section 140A(1)Section 143(1)Section 234A

1). While the issue relating to short grant of TDS was subsequently rectified, CPC continued to levy interest under section 234A up to March 2022, which the assessee disputed. 3. The ld.CIT(A) upheld the levy on the basis of Explanation to section 140A

BRAKES INDIA LIMITED,,CHENNAI vs. DCIT (LTU), CHENNAI

In the result, appeal filed by the assessee is dismissed

2
Disallowance2
Addition to Income2
ITA 758/CHNY/2012[2002-03]Status: DisposedITAT Chennai23 Feb 2022AY 2002-03

Bench: Shri V. Durga Rao & Shri G. Manjunathaआयकरअपीलसं./I.T.A.No.758/Chny/2012 ("नधा"रणवष" / Assessment Year: 2002-03) M/S. Brakes India Ltd. Vs Deputy Commissioner Of Income Tax, (Ltu) Padi, Chennai-600 101. Chennai-600 050. Pan: Aaacb 2533Q (अपीलाथ"/Appellant) (""यथ"/Respondent)

Section 140ASection 143(3)Section 244A

1) Whether on the facts and circumstances of the case, the Tribunal was right in holding that the appellant is not entitled to the differential claim of interest u/s 244A on refund as claimed by it? 2) Whether the Tribunal was right in law in not following the judgment of the Hon’ble Supreme Court in the case

SHRIRAM TRANSPORT FINANCE CO. LTD.,CHENNAI vs. DCIT, CHENNAI

In the result, appeal of the assessee is partly allowed and the

ITA 454/CHNY/2016[2012-2013]Status: DisposedITAT Chennai24 Aug 2016AY 2012-2013

Bench: Shri N.R.S. Ganesan & Shri A. Mohan Alankamony

For Appellant: Shri R. Sivaraman, AdvocateFor Respondent: Dr. U. Anjaneyalu, CIT
Section 234DSection 36(1)(iii)Section 37Section 45

1,43,40,000/- under Rule 8D. The assessee claimed before the Assessing Officer that the assessee-company itself disallowed some of the amount under Section 14A of the Act, therefore, there is no need for any further disallowance. According to the Ld. counsel, the Assessing Officer computed the disallowance under Rule 8D(2)(iii) of the Income-tax Rules

DCIT, CHENNAI vs. SHRIRAM TRANSPORT FINANCE CO. LTD., CHENNAI

In the result, appeal of the assessee is partly allowed and the

ITA 728/CHNY/2016[2012-13]Status: DisposedITAT Chennai24 Aug 2016AY 2012-13

Bench: Shri N.R.S. Ganesan & Shri A. Mohan Alankamony

For Appellant: Shri R. Sivaraman, AdvocateFor Respondent: Dr. U. Anjaneyalu, CIT
Section 234DSection 36(1)(iii)Section 37Section 45

1,43,40,000/- under Rule 8D. The assessee claimed before the Assessing Officer that the assessee-company itself disallowed some of the amount under Section 14A of the Act, therefore, there is no need for any further disallowance. According to the Ld. counsel, the Assessing Officer computed the disallowance under Rule 8D(2)(iii) of the Income-tax Rules

ACIT, CHENNAI vs. SHRI NACHIMUTHU PALANISWAMY, CHENNAI

The appeal stands dismissed

ITA 1032/CHNY/2022[2010-2011]Status: DisposedITAT Chennai16 May 2023AY 2010-2011

Bench: Hon’Ble Shri Mahavir Singh, Vp & Hon’Ble Shri Manoj Kumar Aggarwal, Am आयकरअपील सं./ Ita No.1032/Chny/2022 (िनधा*रण वष* / Assessment Year: 2010-11) Acit Shri Nachimuthu Palaniswamy, बनाम/ Central Circle-3(3), 82, Cathedral Road, Vs. Chennai. Gopalapuram, Chennai-600 086. "थायीलेखासं./जीआइआरसं./Pan/Gir No. Adopp-9910-F (अपीलाथ"/Appellant) : (" थ" / Respondent) अपीलाथ"कीओरसे/ Appellant By : Shri D. Hema Bhupal (Jcit)-Ld. Sr. Dr " थ"कीओरसे/Respondent By : Shri Y.Sridhar (Fca) -Ld. Ar सुनवाईकीतारीख/Date Of Hearing : 16-05-2023 घोषणाकीतारीख /Date Of Pronouncement : 16-05-2023 आदेश / O R D E R

For Appellant: Shri D. Hema Bhupal (JCIT)-Ld. Sr. DRFor Respondent: Shri Y.Sridhar (FCA) -Ld. AR
Section 153ASection 154Section 244(1)(aa)Section 244A

1) or on regular assessment, because there is no proviso to s. 244A(l)(b) as provided under s. 244A(l)(a). 5.4. That apart, the law is well-settled that even for the refund of tax paid under s. 140A on self-assessment, the assessee is entitled to interest as held by this Court in CIT vs. Ashok Leyland