BharatTax.net
SearchITATHigh CourtsSupreme CourtPhrasesAI ResearchHistory

Filters

BharatTax.net

Free search engine for ITAT (Income Tax Appellate Tribunal) judgments across all 28 benches in India.

Quick Links

  • Search Judgments
  • Browse by Bench
  • Recent Judgments

About

BharatTax provides free access to Income Tax Appellate Tribunal orders for legal research and reference.

© 2026 BharatTax.net. All rights reserved.

1,389 results for “TDS”+ Section 13(8)clear

Sorted by relevance

Delhi4,160Mumbai4,045Bangalore2,109Chennai1,389Kolkata991Pune589Hyderabad515Ahmedabad496Jaipur351Raipur328Indore305Karnataka280Chandigarh257Cochin257Nagpur227Surat189Visakhapatnam171Rajkot125Lucknow93Cuttack80Amritsar66Patna51Ranchi48Dehradun46Agra37Telangana36Guwahati35Jodhpur32Panaji31Jabalpur19SC19Allahabad17Kerala13Calcutta9Himachal Pradesh8Rajasthan5Varanasi5Uttarakhand3Orissa2Punjab & Haryana2J&K2Gauhati1A.K. SIKRI ROHINTON FALI NARIMAN1

Key Topics

Section 143(3)83Disallowance58Section 4054TDS45Addition to Income35Deduction32Section 14727Section 14A27Section 153A23Section 263

SIVANANDHA MILLS LIMITED,COIMBATORE vs. ACIT, COIMBATORE

In the result, ITA No.2106/Mds/13 is partly allowed for statistical purposes

ITA 1216/CHNY/2013[2009-10]Status: DisposedITAT Chennai17 Jun 2016AY 2009-10

Bench: Shri Chandra Poojari & Shri G. Pavan Kumar

For Appellant: Shri R. Vijayaraghavan, AdvocateFor Respondent: Dr. Milind Madhukar Bhusari, CIT
Section 143Section 143(1)

TDS from such payments. The recipients had also duly reflected / accounted for these sums in their respective accounts and returns as applicable. It will be pertinent to point out that this commission works out to less than 5% of the entire sale consideration. It was the contention 6 - - ITA 1216 & 2106/13 of the assessee that

M/S. SIVANANDHA MILLS LTD.,COIMBATORE vs. DCIT, COIMBATORE

In the result, ITA No.2106/Mds/13 is partly allowed for statistical purposes

Showing 1–20 of 1,389 · Page 1 of 70

...
22
Section 234E22
Double Taxation/DTAA21
ITA 2106/CHNY/2013[2010-11]Status: DisposedITAT Chennai17 Jun 2016AY 2010-11

Bench: Shri Chandra Poojari & Shri G. Pavan Kumar

For Appellant: Shri R. Vijayaraghavan, AdvocateFor Respondent: Dr. Milind Madhukar Bhusari, CIT
Section 143Section 143(1)

TDS from such payments. The recipients had also duly reflected / accounted for these sums in their respective accounts and returns as applicable. It will be pertinent to point out that this commission works out to less than 5% of the entire sale consideration. It was the contention 6 - - ITA 1216 & 2106/13 of the assessee that

PRAKASHCHAND,CHENNAI vs. ITO, TDS WARD-1, CHENNAI

In the result, all the appeals filed by the assessee are allowed

ITA 3065/CHNY/2025[2014-15]Status: DisposedITAT Chennai18 Dec 2025AY 2014-15

Bench: Shri Manu Kumar Giri & Shri S.R.Raghunatha

For Appellant: Mr. Hitesh, AdvocateFor Respondent: 17.12.2025
Section 154Section 200A(1)(c)Section 234ESection 3

TDS Ward-1 ::8 :: 14. Now the dispute is with regard to the assessment years 14. Now the dispute is with regard to the assessment years 14. Now the dispute is with regard to the assessment years 2012- 13, 2013 13, 2013-14, 2014-15 and the applicability of Section

PRAKASHCHAND,CHENNAI vs. ITO, TDS WARD-1,, CHENNAI

In the result, all the appeals filed by the assessee are allowed

ITA 3063/CHNY/2025[2013-14]Status: DisposedITAT Chennai18 Dec 2025AY 2013-14

Bench: Shri Manu Kumar Giri & Shri S.R.Raghunatha

For Appellant: Mr. Hitesh, AdvocateFor Respondent: 17.12.2025
Section 154Section 200A(1)(c)Section 234ESection 3

TDS Ward-1 ::8 :: 14. Now the dispute is with regard to the assessment years 14. Now the dispute is with regard to the assessment years 14. Now the dispute is with regard to the assessment years 2012- 13, 2013 13, 2013-14, 2014-15 and the applicability of Section

PRAKASHCHAND,CHENNAI vs. ITO, TDS WARD-1,, CHENNAI

In the result, all the appeals filed by the assessee are allowed

ITA 3061/CHNY/2025[2014-15]Status: DisposedITAT Chennai18 Dec 2025AY 2014-15

Bench: Shri Manu Kumar Giri & Shri S.R.Raghunatha

For Appellant: Mr. Hitesh, AdvocateFor Respondent: 17.12.2025
Section 154Section 200A(1)(c)Section 234ESection 3

TDS Ward-1 ::8 :: 14. Now the dispute is with regard to the assessment years 14. Now the dispute is with regard to the assessment years 14. Now the dispute is with regard to the assessment years 2012- 13, 2013 13, 2013-14, 2014-15 and the applicability of Section

PRAKASHCHAND,CHENNAI vs. ITO, TDS WARD 1,, CHENNAI

In the result, all the appeals filed by the assessee are allowed

ITA 3064/CHNY/2025[2013-14]Status: DisposedITAT Chennai18 Dec 2025AY 2013-14

Bench: Shri Manu Kumar Giri & Shri S.R.Raghunatha

For Appellant: Mr. Hitesh, AdvocateFor Respondent: 17.12.2025
Section 154Section 200A(1)(c)Section 234ESection 3

TDS Ward-1 ::8 :: 14. Now the dispute is with regard to the assessment years 14. Now the dispute is with regard to the assessment years 14. Now the dispute is with regard to the assessment years 2012- 13, 2013 13, 2013-14, 2014-15 and the applicability of Section

VELLORE INSTITUTE OF TECHNOLOGY,VELLORE vs. DCIT, CC IV(1), CHENNAI

Appeals of the Revenue are dismissed whereas that of assessee are partly allowed

ITA 2125/CHNY/2017[2005-06]Status: DisposedITAT Chennai14 Nov 2018AY 2005-06

Bench: Shri Abraham P. George & Shri Duvvuru Rl Reddy]

For Appellant: Shri. A. Mahesh, C.A
Section 11Section 12ASection 13(1)Section 132Section 153A

8 & 8.1 5 & 5.1 expenses in cash, through imprest account of Finance Manager, Prakash. 17 Erroneously held that there was --- 6 to 6.3 9 to 9.3 6 to 6.3 no diversion of funds & violation of 13(1) (c) though Assessing Officer proved that cash refund of advance fees & tuition fees were not confirmed by parents and despite failure

DCIT, CENTRAL CIRCLE 1(1), CHENNAI vs. VELLORE INSTITUTE OF TECHNOLOGY, VELLORE

Appeals of the Revenue are dismissed whereas that of assessee are partly allowed

ITA 2220/CHNY/2017[2006-07]Status: DisposedITAT Chennai14 Nov 2018AY 2006-07

Bench: Shri Abraham P. George & Shri Duvvuru Rl Reddy]

For Appellant: Shri. A. Mahesh, C.A
Section 11Section 12ASection 13(1)Section 132Section 153A

8 & 8.1 5 & 5.1 expenses in cash, through imprest account of Finance Manager, Prakash. 17 Erroneously held that there was --- 6 to 6.3 9 to 9.3 6 to 6.3 no diversion of funds & violation of 13(1) (c) though Assessing Officer proved that cash refund of advance fees & tuition fees were not confirmed by parents and despite failure

DCIT, CENTRAL CIRCLE 1(1), CHENNAI vs. VELLORE INSTITUTE OF TECHNOLOGY, VELLORE

Appeals of the Revenue are dismissed whereas that of assessee are partly allowed

ITA 2219/CHNY/2017[2005-06]Status: DisposedITAT Chennai14 Nov 2018AY 2005-06

Bench: Shri Abraham P. George & Shri Duvvuru Rl Reddy]

For Appellant: Shri. A. Mahesh, C.A
Section 11Section 12ASection 13(1)Section 132Section 153A

8 & 8.1 5 & 5.1 expenses in cash, through imprest account of Finance Manager, Prakash. 17 Erroneously held that there was --- 6 to 6.3 9 to 9.3 6 to 6.3 no diversion of funds & violation of 13(1) (c) though Assessing Officer proved that cash refund of advance fees & tuition fees were not confirmed by parents and despite failure

VELLORE INSTITUTE OF TECHNOLOGY,VELLORE vs. DCIT, CC IV(1), CHENNAI

Appeals of the Revenue are dismissed whereas that of assessee are partly allowed

ITA 2126/CHNY/2017[2006-07]Status: DisposedITAT Chennai14 Nov 2018AY 2006-07

Bench: Shri Abraham P. George & Shri Duvvuru Rl Reddy]

For Appellant: Shri. A. Mahesh, C.A
Section 11Section 12ASection 13(1)Section 132Section 153A

8 & 8.1 5 & 5.1 expenses in cash, through imprest account of Finance Manager, Prakash. 17 Erroneously held that there was --- 6 to 6.3 9 to 9.3 6 to 6.3 no diversion of funds & violation of 13(1) (c) though Assessing Officer proved that cash refund of advance fees & tuition fees were not confirmed by parents and despite failure

SREE RAGHAVENDRA EDUCATIONAL SOCIETY,CHENNAI vs. ITO (EXEMPTIONS) WARD 4, CHENNAI

In the result, appeals filed by the assessee for both the assessment years are allowed for statistical purposes

ITA 835/CHNY/2024[2015-16]Status: DisposedITAT Chennai20 Sept 2024AY 2015-16

Bench: Shri Mahavir Singh, Hon’Ble & Shri S. R. Raghunatha, Hon’Bleआयकर अपील सं./Ita Nos.: 834 & 835/Chny/2024 िनधा"रण वष" / Assessment Years: 2011-12 & 2015-16

For Respondent: Shri. G. Suresh, JCIT
Section 11Section 12ASection 13(1)(C)Section 13(1)(c)Section 201Section 40

8 years. The case of the assessee is that it is not the case of the AO that the alleged loan amounts were advanced during the impugned assessment year for the purpose of invoking section 13(1)(c) r.w.s. 13(2)(b) of the Act. b) The assessee submits that the source of the loans mentioned aforesaid

SREE RAGHAVENDRA EDUCATIONAL SOCIETY,CHENNAI vs. ITO (EXEMPTIONS) WARD 1, CHENNAI

In the result, appeals filed by the assessee for both the assessment years are allowed for statistical purposes

ITA 834/CHNY/2024[2011-12]Status: DisposedITAT Chennai20 Sept 2024AY 2011-12

Bench: Shri Mahavir Singh, Hon’Ble & Shri S. R. Raghunatha, Hon’Bleआयकर अपील सं./Ita Nos.: 834 & 835/Chny/2024 िनधा"रण वष" / Assessment Years: 2011-12 & 2015-16

For Respondent: Shri. G. Suresh, JCIT
Section 11Section 12ASection 13(1)(C)Section 13(1)(c)Section 201Section 40

8 years. The case of the assessee is that it is not the case of the AO that the alleged loan amounts were advanced during the impugned assessment year for the purpose of invoking section 13(1)(c) r.w.s. 13(2)(b) of the Act. b) The assessee submits that the source of the loans mentioned aforesaid

M/S GOPURAM ENTERPRISES PVT LTD ,CHENNAI vs. ITO , TDS CPC , GHAZIABAD

In the result, all the appeals filed by the assessee are allowed for

ITA 1051/CHNY/2022[2015-2016]Status: DisposedITAT Chennai11 Jun 2025AY 2015-2016

Bench: Shri Aby T. Varkey & Shri Jagadish

For Appellant: Shri R. Devaraj, AdvocateFor Respondent: Ms. Gouthami Manivasagam, JCIT
Section 200ASection 200A(1)(c)Section 234E

13, 201314, 2014-15 and the applicability of Section 200A(1)(c) of the Act for relevant ITA Nos.1036 to 1053/Chny/2023 :- 7 -: assessment years. There is no dispute on the aspect that the TDS statement was filed under Section 200A of the Act and the respondent had also issued the intimation under Section 200A of the Act, which means

M/S GOPURAM ENTERPRISES PVT LTD ,CHENNAI vs. ITO , TDS CPC , GHAZIABAD

In the result, all the appeals filed by the assessee are allowed for

ITA 1052/CHNY/2022[2015-2016]Status: DisposedITAT Chennai11 Jun 2025AY 2015-2016

Bench: Shri Aby T. Varkey & Shri Jagadish

For Appellant: Shri R. Devaraj, AdvocateFor Respondent: Ms. Gouthami Manivasagam, JCIT
Section 200ASection 200A(1)(c)Section 234E

13, 201314, 2014-15 and the applicability of Section 200A(1)(c) of the Act for relevant ITA Nos.1036 to 1053/Chny/2023 :- 7 -: assessment years. There is no dispute on the aspect that the TDS statement was filed under Section 200A of the Act and the respondent had also issued the intimation under Section 200A of the Act, which means

M/S GOPURAM ENTERPRISES PVT LTD ,CHENNAI vs. ITO , TDS CPC , GHAZIABAD

In the result, all the appeals filed by the assessee are allowed for

ITA 1050/CHNY/2022[2015-2016]Status: DisposedITAT Chennai11 Jun 2025AY 2015-2016

Bench: Shri Aby T. Varkey & Shri Jagadish

For Appellant: Shri R. Devaraj, AdvocateFor Respondent: Ms. Gouthami Manivasagam, JCIT
Section 200ASection 200A(1)(c)Section 234E

13, 201314, 2014-15 and the applicability of Section 200A(1)(c) of the Act for relevant ITA Nos.1036 to 1053/Chny/2023 :- 7 -: assessment years. There is no dispute on the aspect that the TDS statement was filed under Section 200A of the Act and the respondent had also issued the intimation under Section 200A of the Act, which means

M/S GOPURAM ENTERPRISES PVT LTD ,CHENNAI vs. ITO , TDS CPC , GHAZIABAD

In the result, all the appeals filed by the assessee are allowed for

ITA 1053/CHNY/2022[2015-2016]Status: DisposedITAT Chennai11 Jun 2025AY 2015-2016

Bench: Shri Aby T. Varkey & Shri Jagadish

For Appellant: Shri R. Devaraj, AdvocateFor Respondent: Ms. Gouthami Manivasagam, JCIT
Section 200ASection 200A(1)(c)Section 234E

13, 201314, 2014-15 and the applicability of Section 200A(1)(c) of the Act for relevant ITA Nos.1036 to 1053/Chny/2023 :- 7 -: assessment years. There is no dispute on the aspect that the TDS statement was filed under Section 200A of the Act and the respondent had also issued the intimation under Section 200A of the Act, which means

RAMAMURTHY D.P.,PUDUCHERRY vs. ITO, TDS WARD,, PUDUCHERRY

In the result, both the appeals filed by the assessee are allowed for statistical purposes

ITA 1742/CHNY/2025[2014-15]Status: DisposedITAT Chennai28 Aug 2025AY 2014-15

Bench: Shri George George K & Shri Jagadishआयकर अपील सं./Ita Nos.1741 & 1742/Chny/2025 िनधा"रण वष" /Assessment Years: 2013-14 & 2014-15

For Appellant: Shri N. Arjun Raj, AdvocateFor Respondent: Mrs. R. Anitha, Addl. CIT
Section 154Section 200ASection 200A(1)(c)Section 234E

13, 201314, 2014-15 and the applicability of Section 200A(1)(c) of the Act for relevant assessment years. There is no dispute on the aspect that the TDS statement was filed under Section 200A of the Act and the respondent had also issued the intimation under Section 200A of the Act, which means the respondents have processed the returns

RAMAMURTHY D.P.,PUDUCHERRY vs. ITO, TDS WARD,, PUDUCHERRY

In the result, both the appeals filed by the assessee are allowed for statistical purposes

ITA 1741/CHNY/2025[2013-14]Status: DisposedITAT Chennai28 Aug 2025AY 2013-14

Bench: Shri George George K & Shri Jagadishआयकर अपील सं./Ita Nos.1741 & 1742/Chny/2025 िनधा"रण वष" /Assessment Years: 2013-14 & 2014-15

For Appellant: Shri N. Arjun Raj, AdvocateFor Respondent: Mrs. R. Anitha, Addl. CIT
Section 154Section 200ASection 200A(1)(c)Section 234E

13, 201314, 2014-15 and the applicability of Section 200A(1)(c) of the Act for relevant assessment years. There is no dispute on the aspect that the TDS statement was filed under Section 200A of the Act and the respondent had also issued the intimation under Section 200A of the Act, which means the respondents have processed the returns

DOLLARS & POUNDS,CHENNAI vs. ACIT CPC TDS, GHAZIABAD

In the result, all the appeals filed by the assessee are allowed

ITA 2020/CHNY/2018[2013-14(Q3)-26Q]Status: DisposedITAT Chennai30 Nov 2018

Bench: Shri A. Mohan Alankamony & Shri Duvvuru Rl Reddy

For Respondent: Ms. G.D. Jayanthi Angayarkanni, JCIT
Section 200ASection 200A(1)Section 234E

8 I.T.A. No.2015 to 2030/Chny/18 provisions of section 200A of the Act so as to enable the computation of fees payable under section 234E of the Act at the time of processing of TDS statements under section 200A of the Act. The Memo explaining the Finance Bill, 2015 very categorically held that currently there does not exist any provision

DOLLARS & POUNDS,CHENNAI vs. ACIT CPC TDS, GHAZIABAD

In the result, all the appeals filed by the assessee are allowed

ITA 2019/CHNY/2018[2013-14(Q3)-26Q]Status: DisposedITAT Chennai30 Nov 2018

Bench: Shri A. Mohan Alankamony & Shri Duvvuru Rl Reddy

For Respondent: Ms. G.D. Jayanthi Angayarkanni, JCIT
Section 200ASection 200A(1)Section 234E

8 I.T.A. No.2015 to 2030/Chny/18 provisions of section 200A of the Act so as to enable the computation of fees payable under section 234E of the Act at the time of processing of TDS statements under section 200A of the Act. The Memo explaining the Finance Bill, 2015 very categorically held that currently there does not exist any provision