BharatTax.net
SearchITATHigh CourtsSupreme CourtPhrasesAI ResearchHistory

Filters

BharatTax.net

Free search engine for ITAT (Income Tax Appellate Tribunal) judgments across all 28 benches in India.

Quick Links

  • Search Judgments
  • Browse by Bench
  • Recent Judgments

About

BharatTax provides free access to Income Tax Appellate Tribunal orders for legal research and reference.

© 2026 BharatTax.net. All rights reserved.

7 results for “TDS”+ Section 115Jclear

Sorted by relevance

Delhi47Mumbai33Kolkata20Chennai7Bangalore6Ahmedabad4Jaipur4Pune1SC1Telangana1

Key Topics

Section 115J30Section 14A27Disallowance7Deduction4TDS4Addition to Income4Section 103Capital Gains3

JAYANT PACKAGING PVT. LTD.,CHENNAI vs. DCIT CORPORATE WARD 2(2), CHENNAI

In the result, the appeal filed by the assessee for assessment year 2012-13 in ITA No

ITA 731/CHNY/2018[2012-13]Status: DisposedITAT Chennai21 Apr 2021AY 2012-13

Bench: Shri V. Durga Rao & Shri G. Manjunathaआयकर अपील सं./Ita Nos.: 730, 731 & 732/Chny/2018 िनधा"रण वष" / Assessment Years: 2010-11, 2012-13 & 2012-13

For Appellant: Shri I. Dinesh, AdvocateFor Respondent: Shri Suresh Periasamy, JCIT
Section 115JSection 14A

TDS is taken, corresponding income needs to be offered to tax and accordingly made addition to total income of the assessee. Since book profit computed u/s.115JB of the Act is higher than income computed under normal provisions of the Act, the AO has made addition to book profit u/s.115JB of the Act. The ld.AR for the assessee contended before

JAYANT PACKAGING PVT. LTD.,CHENNAI vs. DCIT CORPORATE WARD 2(2), CHENNAI

In the result, the appeal filed by the assessee for assessment year 2012-13 in ITA No

ITA 732/CHNY/2018[2012-13]Status: DisposedITAT Chennai21 Apr 2021AY 2012-13

Bench: Shri V. Durga Rao & Shri G. Manjunathaआयकर अपील सं./Ita Nos.: 730, 731 & 732/Chny/2018 िनधा"रण वष" / Assessment Years: 2010-11, 2012-13 & 2012-13

For Appellant: Shri I. Dinesh, AdvocateFor Respondent: Shri Suresh Periasamy, JCIT
Section 115JSection 14A

TDS is taken, corresponding income needs to be offered to tax and accordingly made addition to total income of the assessee. Since book profit computed u/s.115JB of the Act is higher than income computed under normal provisions of the Act, the AO has made addition to book profit u/s.115JB of the Act. The ld.AR for the assessee contended before

JAYANT PACKAGING PVT. LTD.,CHENNAI vs. DCIT CORPORATE WARD 2(2), CHENNAI

In the result, the appeal filed by the assessee for assessment year 2012-13 in ITA No

ITA 730/CHNY/2018[2010-11]Status: DisposedITAT Chennai21 Apr 2021AY 2010-11

Bench: Shri V. Durga Rao & Shri G. Manjunathaआयकर अपील सं./Ita Nos.: 730, 731 & 732/Chny/2018 िनधा"रण वष" / Assessment Years: 2010-11, 2012-13 & 2012-13

For Appellant: Shri I. Dinesh, AdvocateFor Respondent: Shri Suresh Periasamy, JCIT
Section 115JSection 14A

TDS is taken, corresponding income needs to be offered to tax and accordingly made addition to total income of the assessee. Since book profit computed u/s.115JB of the Act is higher than income computed under normal provisions of the Act, the AO has made addition to book profit u/s.115JB of the Act. The ld.AR for the assessee contended before

MADRAS SUGARS LIMITED,COIMBATORE vs. DCIT, CORPORATE CIRCLE-1, COIMBAOTRE

ITA 433/CHNY/2023[2014-15]Status: DisposedITAT Chennai27 Sept 2023AY 2014-15

Bench: Shri Mahavir Singhand Shri Manoj Kumar Aggarwal

For Appellant: Shri R. Vijayaraghavan, AdvocateFor Respondent: Shri P. Sajit Kumar, JCIT
Section 115JSection 143(3)

section 115J". 4. The learned Commissioner of Income Tax (Appeals) ought to have considered the judgement in the case of Kavithalayaa Productions (P.) Ltd. vs. Assistant Commissioner of Income- tax in the ITAT Chennai Bench 'B' (IT APPEAL NO. 58 (CHNY.) OF 2020), wherein it has held that "we are of the considered view that on this issue

DCIT, CHENNAI vs. SICAL LOGISTICS LTD., CHENNAI

ITA 1697/CHNY/2014[2010-11]Status: DisposedITAT Chennai18 Aug 2017AY 2010-11

Bench: Shri Chandra Poojari & Shri Duvvuru Rl Reddy

For Appellant: Shri Milind Madhukar, JCIT &For Respondent: Shri S. Sridhar, Advocate
Section 10Section 14A

TDS on it. Accordingly, this ground of appeal is dismissed. 16. The next ground in the appeal of Revenue in ITA No.1697/Mds/2014 is that the CIT(Appeals) erred in deleting the addition made by the AO with regard to premium on FCCBS bought back to the tune of ₹ 25.61 crore and also gain arising out of buy back of FCCBs

DCIT, CHENNAI vs. SICAL LOGISTICS LTD., CHENNAI

ITA 1695/CHNY/2014[2008-09]Status: DisposedITAT Chennai18 Aug 2017AY 2008-09

Bench: Shri Chandra Poojari & Shri Duvvuru Rl Reddy

For Appellant: Shri Milind Madhukar, JCIT &For Respondent: Shri S. Sridhar, Advocate
Section 10Section 14A

TDS on it. Accordingly, this ground of appeal is dismissed. 16. The next ground in the appeal of Revenue in ITA No.1697/Mds/2014 is that the CIT(Appeals) erred in deleting the addition made by the AO with regard to premium on FCCBS bought back to the tune of ₹ 25.61 crore and also gain arising out of buy back of FCCBs

DCIT, CHENNAI vs. SICAL LOGISTICS LTD., CHENNAI

ITA 1696/CHNY/2014[2009-10]Status: DisposedITAT Chennai18 Aug 2017AY 2009-10

Bench: Shri Chandra Poojari & Shri Duvvuru Rl Reddy

For Appellant: Shri Milind Madhukar, JCIT &For Respondent: Shri S. Sridhar, Advocate
Section 10Section 14A

TDS on it. Accordingly, this ground of appeal is dismissed. 16. The next ground in the appeal of Revenue in ITA No.1697/Mds/2014 is that the CIT(Appeals) erred in deleting the addition made by the AO with regard to premium on FCCBS bought back to the tune of ₹ 25.61 crore and also gain arising out of buy back of FCCBs