SANJEEV KUMAR KATHURIA,YAMUNA NAGAR vs. INCOME TAX OFFICER WARD 1 , YAMUNANAGAR

In the result, the appeal of the assessee is allowed

Bench: SHRI. VIKRAM SINGH YADAV (Accountant Member), SHRI. PARESH M. JOSHI (Judicial Member)

price with low level of construction which cannot be compared with residential house on independent plot in posh area. 15. The Ld. AR further submitted that PCIT has placed reliance on gift deed dated 8/10/2009 executed in favour of the assessee by his father. Stamp duty is charged on minimum collector for stamp duty purposes and it cannot reflect

DEPUTY COMMISSIONER OF INCOME TAX, CHANDIGARH vs. JAMES HOTELS LTD, CHANDIGARH

Bench: The Said Resolution To Enhance Authorized Share Capital.

Transfer Pricing Officer and thereafter the Ld. AO changed the nature of transaction from share application money and treated it as loan on which notional interest was computed. Hon'ble ITAT held that AO has no power to reclassify the transaction from the share application money to loan. 12.18 It was further submitted that while levying the penalty, Additional

KAKA SINGH ALIAS GULJAR SINGH,PATIALA vs. INCOME TAX OFFICER , PATIALA

section 57.\nThe said provision reads thus:\n\"57. Deductions.-The income chargeable under the head 'Income from other\nsources' shall be computed after making the following deductions, namely :.\n(iv) in the case of income of the nature referred to in clause (viii) of sub-\nsection (2) of section 56, a deduction of a sum equal to fifty

GLAXOSMITHKLINE ASIA PVT. LTD.,GURGAON vs. DCIT, CHANDIGARH

In the result, all the appeals of the assessee and the Revenue, stand partly allowed for statistical purposes

section 92B of the Act defining the international transactions, will prevail. Following the decision of the Hon'ble Delhi High Court and applying it to the issue before us, we hold that for characterizing the receivables as international transactions, the same could not have been done automatically and the TPO ideally should have studied the pattern in the accounts

ACIT, CHANDIGARH vs. M/S GLAXO SMITHKLINE ASIA PVT. LTD., GURGAON

In the result, all the appeals of the assessee and the Revenue, stand partly allowed for statistical purposes

section 92B of the Act defining the international transactions, will prevail. Following the decision of the Hon'ble Delhi High Court and applying it to the issue before us, we hold that for characterizing the receivables as international transactions, the same could not have been done automatically and the TPO ideally should have studied the pattern in the accounts

M/S GLAXO SMITHKLINE ASIA PVT. LTD.,GURGAON vs. ACIT, C-4(1), CHANDIGARH

In the result, all the appeals of the assessee and the Revenue, stand partly allowed for statistical purposes

section 92B of the Act defining the international transactions, will prevail. Following the decision of the Hon'ble Delhi High Court and applying it to the issue before us, we hold that for characterizing the receivables as international transactions, the same could not have been done automatically and the TPO ideally should have studied the pattern in the accounts

M/S GLAXO SMITHKLINE ASIA PVT. LTD.,NABHA vs. DCIT, C-4(1), CHANDIGARH

In the result, all the appeals of the assessee and the Revenue, stand partly allowed for statistical purposes

section 92B of the Act defining the international transactions, will prevail. Following the decision of the Hon'ble Delhi High Court and applying it to the issue before us, we hold that for characterizing the receivables as international transactions, the same could not have been done automatically and the TPO ideally should have studied the pattern in the accounts

ACIT, CHANDIGARH vs. M/S GLAXO SMITHKLINE ASIA PVT. LTD., GURGAON

In the result, all the appeals of the assessee and the Revenue, stand partly allowed for statistical purposes

section 92B of the Act defining the international transactions, will prevail. Following the decision of the Hon'ble Delhi High Court and applying it to the issue before us, we hold that for characterizing the receivables as international transactions, the same could not have been done automatically and the TPO ideally should have studied the pattern in the accounts

GLAXOSMITHKLINE ASIA PVT. LTD.,GURGAON vs. ACIT, CHANDIGARH

In the result, all the appeals of the assessee and the Revenue, stand partly allowed for statistical purposes

section 92B of the Act defining the international transactions, will prevail. Following the decision of the Hon'ble Delhi High Court and applying it to the issue before us, we hold that for characterizing the receivables as international transactions, the same could not have been done automatically and the TPO ideally should have studied the pattern in the accounts

GLAXOSMITHKLINE ASIA PVT. LTD.,GURGAON vs. ACIT, CHANDIGARH

In the result, all the appeals of the assessee and the Revenue, stand partly allowed for statistical purposes

section 92B of the Act defining the international transactions, will prevail. Following the decision of the Hon'ble Delhi High Court and applying it to the issue before us, we hold that for characterizing the receivables as international transactions, the same could not have been done automatically and the TPO ideally should have studied the pattern in the accounts

M/S GLAXOSMITHKLINE ASIA PVT. LTD.,GURGAON vs. ACIT, CHANDIGARH

In the result, all the appeals of the assessee and the Revenue, stand partly allowed for statistical purposes

section 92B of the Act defining the international transactions, will prevail. Following the decision of the Hon'ble Delhi High Court and applying it to the issue before us, we hold that for characterizing the receivables as international transactions, the same could not have been done automatically and the TPO ideally should have studied the pattern in the accounts

GLAXOSMITHKLINE ASIA PVT. LTD.,GURGAON vs. DCIT, CHANDIGARH

In the result, all the appeals of the assessee and the Revenue, stand partly allowed for statistical purposes

section 92B of the Act defining the international transactions, will prevail. Following the decision of the Hon'ble Delhi High Court and applying it to the issue before us, we hold that for characterizing the receivables as international transactions, the same could not have been done automatically and the TPO ideally should have studied the pattern in the accounts

ACIT, CHANDIGARH vs. M/S GLAXO SMITHKLINE ASIA PVT. LTD., GURGAON

In the result, all the appeals of the assessee and the Revenue, stand partly allowed for statistical purposes

section 92B of the Act defining the international transactions, will prevail. Following the decision of the Hon'ble Delhi High Court and applying it to the issue before us, we hold that for characterizing the receivables as international transactions, the same could not have been done automatically and the TPO ideally should have studied the pattern in the accounts

ACIT, CHANDIGARH vs. M/S GLAXO SMITHKLINE ASIA PVT. LTD., GURGAON

In the result, all the appeals of the assessee and the Revenue, stand partly allowed for statistical purposes

section 92B of the Act defining the international transactions, will prevail. Following the decision of the Hon'ble Delhi High Court and applying it to the issue before us, we hold that for characterizing the receivables as international transactions, the same could not have been done automatically and the TPO ideally should have studied the pattern in the accounts

M/S GLAXO SMITHKLINE ASIA PVT. LTD.,GURGAON vs. ACIT, C-4(1), CHANDIGARH

In the result, all the appeals of the assessee and the Revenue, stand partly allowed for statistical purposes

section 92B of the Act defining the international transactions, will prevail. Following the decision of the Hon'ble Delhi High Court and applying it to the issue before us, we hold that for characterizing the receivables as international transactions, the same could not have been done automatically and the TPO ideally should have studied the pattern in the accounts

JANTA LAND PROMOTERS PVT LTD,MOHALI vs. THE PRINICIPAL COMMISSIONER OF INCOME TAX ,CHANDIGARH-1, CHANDIGARH

In the result, appeal of the Assessee is allowed

Pricing / MAT. 3. The Ld. AR had submitted that pursuant to the show cause notice issued by the Ld. PCIT the assessee had submitted the reply, which was reproduced at page 8 of the impugned order as under: 1) Issue No.2.1 at para 2 of the show cause notice: 2.1 The Assessing Officer(AO) wrongly allowed the Development Expense provision

MAXPORT INDIA PRIVATE LIMITED,CHANDIGARH vs. DY. COMMISSIONER OF INCOME TAX, CENTRAL CIRCLE-1,CHANDIGARH, CHANDIGARH

price fluctuations. The reliance in\nthis respect can be placed on the following decisions:\n“(i) [Assistant Commissioner of Income Tax, Central Circle-1(3), Kolkata v. Narula\nEducational Trust [2021] 126 taxmann.com 158 (Kolkata - Trib.)\n(ii) Champaklal S. Kasat v. Deputy Commissioner of Income-tax, Cent. Cir. 1(3),\nAhmedabad [2017] 82 taxmann.com 243 (Ahmedabad - Trib

SCOTT EDIL ADVANCE RESEARCH LABORATORIES AND EDUCATION LIMITED,CHANDIGARH vs. DEPUTY COMMISSIONER OF INCOME TAX, CENTRAL CIRCLE-1, CHANDIGARH

price fluctuations. The reliance in\nthis respect can be placed on the following decisions:\n“(i) [Assistant Commissioner of Income Tax, Central Circle-1(3), Kolkata v. Narula\nEducational Trust [2021] 126 taxmann.com 158 (Kolkata - Trib.)\n(ii) Champaklal S. Kasat v. Deputy Commissioner of Income-tax, Cent. Cir. 1(3),\nAhmedabad [2017] 82 taxmann.com 243 (Ahmedabad - Trib

NARENDER KAUR,KURUKSHETRA, HARYANA vs. INCOME TAX OFFICER WARD-1 , KURUKSHETRA

section 56, a deduction of a sum equal to fifty per cent. of such\nincome and no deduction shall be allowed under any other clause of this\nsection.\"\n21. The Assessing Officer in I. T. A. No. 132 of 2018 where the assessee had\nreceived Rs.11,30,561 as interest income, held that the interest payment\nreceived on compensation/enhanced compensation