Search: transfer pricing

5 results for “transfer pricing”+ Section 40Aclear

Sorted by relevance

Mumbai218 Delhi165 Chennai66 Bangalore51 Ahmedabad33 Kolkata25 Hyderabad24 Jaipur24 Raipur21 Surat17 Pune15 Visakhapatnam11 Jodhpur11 Indore10 Rajkot8 Cochin7 Chandigarh5 Agra5 Cuttack2 Lucknow2 Nagpur1 Amritsar1

Key Topics

Section 143(2)8 Section 143(3)4 Section 271A4 Section 92C3 Section 80I3 Section 2633 Deduction3 Section 92B2 Section 2502

SARASWATI AGRO CHEMICALS (INDIA) PVT. LTD,MOHALI vs. DCIT, CIRCLE-6(1), MOHALI

In the result, the transfer pricing adjustment so made by the AO and confirmed by the ld CIT(A) amounting to Rs 89,22,420/- is hereby set-aside and the ground of appeal is allowed

ITA 165/CHANDI/2024[2014-15]Status: DisposedITAT Chandigarh15 Oct 2024AY 2014-15

Bench: Or At The Time Of Hearing.”

For Appellant: Shri R.K. Gupta, C.A and Shri Akshun Gupta, C.AFor Respondent: Shri Vivek Vardhan, JCIT, Sr. DR

Section 143(1)Section 143(2)Section 143(3)Section 92BSection 92C

Transfer Pricing Officer the aggregate value of specified domestic transactions has been taken from the Form 3CEB filed by the appellant. Perusal of Form 3CEB, prescribed under Rule 10E, states as "Report from an accountant to be furnished under section 92E relating to International Transaction(s) and Specified domestic transaction(s). The particulars of the above transaction(s) required

SARASWATI AGRO CHEMICALS (INDIA) PVT. LTD,MOHALI vs. DCIT, CIRCLE-6(1), MOHALI

SARASWATI AGRO CHEMICALS (INDIA) PVT. LTD,MOHALI vs. DCIT, CIRCLE-6(1), MOHALI

M/S YAMUNA POWER & INFRASTRUCTURE LTD.,JAGADHRI vs. DCIT, CIRCLE, YAMUNANAGAR

SANJEEV KUMAR KATHURIA,YAMUNA NAGAR vs. INCOME TAX OFFICER WARD 1 , YAMUNANAGAR

M/S ASHA TECHNOLOGIES,SIRMOUR vs. ADDL. CIT, SOLAN

M/S ASHA TECHNOLOGIES,KALA AMB vs. ITO, SIRMOUR