SUSHMA,HARYANA vs. ITO, WARD - 4, YAMUNA NAGAR, YAMUNA NAGAR

section 2(24)\n28A, as under:\n(iii) agricultural land55 in India, not being land situate-\n(a) in any area which is comprised within the jurisdiction of a\nmunicipality55 (whether known as a municipality, municipal\ncorporation, notified area committee, town area committee, town\ncommittee, or by any other name) or a cantonment board and\nwhich has a population56

DCIT, CC 1, CHANDIGARH , CHANDIGARH vs. SANJEEV AGGARWAL , CHANDIGARH

The appeals of the revenue are treated as dismissed

201 3-14 to 2018-19\nScott Edil Pharmacia Ltd.\n54,55 Phase-III, Industrial Area,\nChandigarh\nबनाम\nThe DCIT,\nCentral Circle-1,\nChandigarh\nस्थायीलेखासं./PAN NO: AAHCS1643K\n3\nअपीलाथ/Appellant\nप्रथस्थी/Respondent\n&\nआयकरअपीलसं./ITA Nos.726 to 732/CH D /2023\nिनधारणवष / Assessment Years : 2012- 13 t o 2018-19\nShri Balram Krishan\nPlot No. 47-48, Phase-2,\nIndustrial

SCOTT EDIL PHARMACIA LTD.,CHANDIGARH vs. DEPUTY COMMISSIONER OF INCOME TAX, CENTRAL CIRCLE-1, CHANDIGARH

201 3-14 to 2018-19\nScott Edil Pharmacia Ltd.\n54,55 Phase-III, Industrial Area,\nChandigarh बनाम The DCIT,\nCentral Circle-1,\nChandigarh\nथायीलेखासं./PAN NO: AAHCS1643K\n&\nआयकर अपी लसं./ITA Nos. 726 to 732/CH D /2023\nिनधारणवष / Assessment Years : 2 012- 13 t o 2 018-19\nShri Balram Krishan\nPlot No. 47-48, Phase-2,\nIndustrial

M/S BHARTI AIRTEL LIMITED,CHANDIGARH vs. ITO TDS-II, CHANDIGARH

In the result, the appeals of the assessee in ITA

Bench: Shri Sanjay Garg & Ms.Annapurna Guptam/S Bharti Airtel Limited, Vs. The Income Tax Officer, Plot No.21, I.T. Park, Tds-Ii, Chandigarh. Sector 26, Chandigarh. Pan: Aaacb2894G Tan: Ptlb10577A M/S Bharti Airtel Limited, Vs. The A.C.I.T.(Tds), Plot No.21, I.T. Park, Chandigarh. Sector 26, Chandigarh. Pan: Aaacb2894G Tan: Ptlb10577A & M/S Bharti Airtel Limited, Vs. The A.C.I.T.(Tds), Plot No.21, I.T. Park, Chandigarh. Sector 26, Chandigarh. Pan: Aaacb2894G Tan: Ptlb10577A (Appellant) (Respondent)

1) and 201(1A) of the Act, decided the issue in favour of the assessee. The Hon'ble High Court held that there was no relationship of principal and agent between the assessee and its distributors and the transaction was that of sale of right to service on a principal to principal basis.; The Hon'ble High Court held that

M/S BHARTI AIRTEL LIMITED,CHANDIGARH vs. ACIT (TDS), CHANDIGARH

In the result, the appeals of the assessee in ITA

Bench: Shri Sanjay Garg & Ms.Annapurna Guptam/S Bharti Airtel Limited, Vs. The Income Tax Officer, Plot No.21, I.T. Park, Tds-Ii, Chandigarh. Sector 26, Chandigarh. Pan: Aaacb2894G Tan: Ptlb10577A M/S Bharti Airtel Limited, Vs. The A.C.I.T.(Tds), Plot No.21, I.T. Park, Chandigarh. Sector 26, Chandigarh. Pan: Aaacb2894G Tan: Ptlb10577A & M/S Bharti Airtel Limited, Vs. The A.C.I.T.(Tds), Plot No.21, I.T. Park, Chandigarh. Sector 26, Chandigarh. Pan: Aaacb2894G Tan: Ptlb10577A (Appellant) (Respondent)

1) and 201(1A) of the Act, decided the issue in favour of the assessee. The Hon'ble High Court held that there was no relationship of principal and agent between the assessee and its distributors and the transaction was that of sale of right to service on a principal to principal basis.; The Hon'ble High Court held that

M/S BHARTI AIRTEL LIMITED,CHANDIGARH vs. ACIT (TDS), CHANDIGARH

In the result, the appeals of the assessee in ITA

Bench: Shri Sanjay Garg & Ms.Annapurna Guptam/S Bharti Airtel Limited, Vs. The Income Tax Officer, Plot No.21, I.T. Park, Tds-Ii, Chandigarh. Sector 26, Chandigarh. Pan: Aaacb2894G Tan: Ptlb10577A M/S Bharti Airtel Limited, Vs. The A.C.I.T.(Tds), Plot No.21, I.T. Park, Chandigarh. Sector 26, Chandigarh. Pan: Aaacb2894G Tan: Ptlb10577A & M/S Bharti Airtel Limited, Vs. The A.C.I.T.(Tds), Plot No.21, I.T. Park, Chandigarh. Sector 26, Chandigarh. Pan: Aaacb2894G Tan: Ptlb10577A (Appellant) (Respondent)

1) and 201(1A) of the Act, decided the issue in favour of the assessee. The Hon'ble High Court held that there was no relationship of principal and agent between the assessee and its distributors and the transaction was that of sale of right to service on a principal to principal basis.; The Hon'ble High Court held that

SH.ANIL DHIWAN S/O SH.A.K.DHWAN vs. DY.COMMISSIONER OF INCOME TAX, MANDI

In the result, the appeal of the assessee is allowed

Bench: Shri Sanjay Garg & Ms. Annapurna Guptash.Anil Dhawan, S/O Sh.A.K.Dhawan, Vs. The D.C.I.T., Moti Bazar, Mandi, Distt. Mandi (H.P.) Circle-Mandi (H.P.) Pan: Aejpd7188M (Appellant) (Respondent)

Section 201(1) & 201(1 A) of the Act. Thus, the order of the Ld. CIT(A) and that of the A.O. is reversed and all the grounds of the assessee are allowed. 13. In all the above cases, we find that the I.T.A.T. on examination of the facts of the case found that when recharge coupons and pre-paid

THE PUNJAB STATE COOPERATIVE SUPPLY,ROPAR vs. ACIT, CHANDIGARH

In the result, all the appeals of the Revenue bearing ITA

Bench: Shri Sanjay Garg & Ms. Annapurna Gupta

1) and 201(1A) of the Act for non-compliance of the provisions of section 194C of the Act on account of short deduction of TDS. 4. Being aggrieved by the order of the Assessing officer the assessee preferred appeal before the Ld. CIT(A). 5. The Ld. CIT(A) while relying upon the decision of the Delhi Bench

DCIT, TDS, CHANDIGARH vs. M/S PUNJAB STATE CIVIL SUPPLY CORPN. LTD., SIRHIND

In the result, all the appeals of the Revenue bearing ITA

Bench: Shri Sanjay Garg & Ms. Annapurna Gupta

1) and 201(1A) of the Act for non-compliance of the provisions of section 194C of the Act on account of short deduction of TDS. 4. Being aggrieved by the order of the Assessing officer the assessee preferred appeal before the Ld. CIT(A). 5. The Ld. CIT(A) while relying upon the decision of the Delhi Bench

ITO (TDS-2), CHANDIGARH vs. M/S PUNJAB STATE GRAINS PROCUREMENT CORP. LTD., MOHALI

In the result, all the appeals of the Revenue bearing ITA

Bench: Shri Sanjay Garg & Ms. Annapurna Gupta

1) and 201(1A) of the Act for non-compliance of the provisions of section 194C of the Act on account of short deduction of TDS. 4. Being aggrieved by the order of the Assessing officer the assessee preferred appeal before the Ld. CIT(A). 5. The Ld. CIT(A) while relying upon the decision of the Delhi Bench

DCIT (TDS), CHANDIGARH vs. M/S PUNJAB STATE GRAINS PROCUREMENT CORP. LTD., FATEHGARH SAHIB

In the result, all the appeals of the Revenue bearing ITA

Bench: Shri Sanjay Garg & Ms. Annapurna Gupta

1) and 201(1A) of the Act for non-compliance of the provisions of section 194C of the Act on account of short deduction of TDS. 4. Being aggrieved by the order of the Assessing officer the assessee preferred appeal before the Ld. CIT(A). 5. The Ld. CIT(A) while relying upon the decision of the Delhi Bench

THE ASSISTANT GENERAL MANAGER (F&A) (PERSONAL RESPONSIBLE),SHIMLA vs. ITO (TDS), SHIMLA

In the result, all the appeals of the Revenue bearing ITA

Bench: Shri Sanjay Garg & Ms. Annapurna Gupta

1) and 201(1A) of the Act for non-compliance of the provisions of section 194C of the Act on account of short deduction of TDS. 4. Being aggrieved by the order of the Assessing officer the assessee preferred appeal before the Ld. CIT(A). 5. The Ld. CIT(A) while relying upon the decision of the Delhi Bench

THE ASSISTANT GENERAL MANAGER (F&A) (PERSONAL RESPONSIBLE),SHIMLA vs. ITO (TDS), SHIMLA

In the result, all the appeals of the Revenue bearing ITA

Bench: Shri Sanjay Garg & Ms. Annapurna Gupta

1) and 201(1A) of the Act for non-compliance of the provisions of section 194C of the Act on account of short deduction of TDS. 4. Being aggrieved by the order of the Assessing officer the assessee preferred appeal before the Ld. CIT(A). 5. The Ld. CIT(A) while relying upon the decision of the Delhi Bench

DCIT (TDS), CHANDIGARH vs. M/S PUNJAB STATE GRAINS PROCUREMENT CORP. LTD., FATEHGARH SAHIB

In the result, all the appeals of the Revenue bearing ITA

Bench: Shri Sanjay Garg & Ms. Annapurna Gupta

1) and 201(1A) of the Act for non-compliance of the provisions of section 194C of the Act on account of short deduction of TDS. 4. Being aggrieved by the order of the Assessing officer the assessee preferred appeal before the Ld. CIT(A). 5. The Ld. CIT(A) while relying upon the decision of the Delhi Bench

ITO (TDS), PATIALA vs. THE DISTT. MANAGER, FATEHGARH SAHIB

In the result, all the appeals of the Revenue bearing ITA

Bench: Shri Sanjay Garg & Ms. Annapurna Gupta

1) and 201(1A) of the Act for non-compliance of the provisions of section 194C of the Act on account of short deduction of TDS. 4. Being aggrieved by the order of the Assessing officer the assessee preferred appeal before the Ld. CIT(A). 5. The Ld. CIT(A) while relying upon the decision of the Delhi Bench

ITO (TDS), PATIALA vs. THE DISTT. MANAGER, FATEHGARH SAHIB

In the result, all the appeals of the Revenue bearing ITA

Bench: Shri Sanjay Garg & Ms. Annapurna Gupta

1) and 201(1A) of the Act for non-compliance of the provisions of section 194C of the Act on account of short deduction of TDS. 4. Being aggrieved by the order of the Assessing officer the assessee preferred appeal before the Ld. CIT(A). 5. The Ld. CIT(A) while relying upon the decision of the Delhi Bench

DY COMMISSIONER OF INCOME TAX, CHANDIGARH vs. M/S DISTRICT MANAGER PUNJAB, SANGRUR

In the result, all the appeals of the Revenue bearing ITA

Bench: Shri Sanjay Garg & Ms. Annapurna Gupta

1) and 201(1A) of the Act for non-compliance of the provisions of section 194C of the Act on account of short deduction of TDS. 4. Being aggrieved by the order of the Assessing officer the assessee preferred appeal before the Ld. CIT(A). 5. The Ld. CIT(A) while relying upon the decision of the Delhi Bench

DY COMMISSIONER OF INCOME TAX, CHANDIGARH vs. M/S DISTRICT MANAGER PUNJAB, SANGRUR

In the result, all the appeals of the Revenue bearing ITA

Bench: Shri Sanjay Garg & Ms. Annapurna Gupta

1) and 201(1A) of the Act for non-compliance of the provisions of section 194C of the Act on account of short deduction of TDS. 4. Being aggrieved by the order of the Assessing officer the assessee preferred appeal before the Ld. CIT(A). 5. The Ld. CIT(A) while relying upon the decision of the Delhi Bench

ITO (TDS-2), CHANDIGARH vs. M/S PUNJAB STATE GRAINS PROCUREMENT CORP. LTD., MOHALI

In the result, all the appeals of the Revenue bearing ITA

Bench: Shri Sanjay Garg & Ms. Annapurna Gupta

1) and 201(1A) of the Act for non-compliance of the provisions of section 194C of the Act on account of short deduction of TDS. 4. Being aggrieved by the order of the Assessing officer the assessee preferred appeal before the Ld. CIT(A). 5. The Ld. CIT(A) while relying upon the decision of the Delhi Bench