INCOME TAX OFFICER, FATEHABAD vs. MAHESH NAGPAL, FATEHABAD

Bench: SHRI. LALIET KUMAR (Judicial Member), SHRI. KRINWANT SAHAY (Accountant Member)

197 of the I.T. Act to the petitioner for non-deduction of tax at source, in as much as, the petitioner is not able to pay any tax under the head "income from other sources" on the interest paid to it under Section 28 of the Act of 1894". A copy of the judgment and order dated 31.03.2016 passed

BALBIR KUMAR HUF,CHANDIGARH vs. ITO , CHANDIGARH

Bench: SHRI. LALIET KUMAR (Judicial Member), SHRI. KRINWANT SAHAY (Accountant Member)

197 of the I.T. Act to the petitioner for non-deduction of tax at source, in as much as, the petitioner is not able to pay any tax under the head "income from other sources" on the interest paid to it under Section 28 of the Act of 1894". A copy of the judgment and order dated 31.03.2016 passed

SH. AMARDEEP SINGH ATHWAL,YAMUNANAGAR vs. ITO, WARD-1, YAMUNANAGAR

Bench: BEFORE: SHRI. LALIET KUMAR (Judicial Member), SHRI. KRINWANT SAHAY (Accountant Member)

197 of the I.T. Act to the petitioner for non-deduction of tax at source, in as much as, the petitioner is not able to pay any tax under the head "income from other sources" on the interest paid to it under Section 28 of the Act of 1894". A copy of the judgment and order dated 31.03.2016 passed

SAROJ CHAUDHARY BALA,PANCHKULA vs. ITO, WARD-4, PANCHKULA

Bench: SHRI. LALIET KUMAR (Judicial Member), SHRI. KRINWANT SAHAY (Accountant Member)

197 of the I.T. Act to the petitioner for non-deduction of tax at source, in as much as, the petitioner is not able to pay any tax under the head "income from other sources" on the interest paid to it under Section 28 of the Act of 1894". A copy of the judgment and order dated 31.03.2016 passed

ARJESH KUMAR,PATIALA vs. ITO NATIONAL E-ASSESSMENT CENTRE , DELHI

197 of the I.T. Act to the petitioner for non-deduction of tax at source, in as much as, the petitioner is not able to pay any tax under the head "income from other sources" on the interest paid to it under Section 28 of the Act of 1894". A copy of the judgment and order dated 31.03.2016 passed

SMT. SHANKRI DEVI,PANCHKULA vs. ACIT, PANCKULA CIRCLE, PANCHKULA

Bench: SHRI. LALIET KUMAR (Judicial Member), SHRI. KRINWANT SAHAY (Accountant Member)

197 of the I.T. Act to the petitioner for non-deduction of tax at source, in as much as, the petitioner is not able to pay any tax under the head "income from other sources" on the interest paid to it under Section 28 of the Act of 1894". A copy of the judgment and order dated 31.03.2016 passed

RANJIT SINGH,PANCHKULA vs. DEPUTY DIRECTOR, CPC DEPARTMENT

Bench: SHRI. LALIET KUMAR (Judicial Member), SHRI. KRINWANT SAHAY (Accountant Member)

197 of the I.T. Act to the petitioner for non-deduction of tax at source, in as much as, the petitioner is not able to pay any tax under the head "income from other sources" on the interest paid to it under Section 28 of the Act of 1894". A copy of the judgment and order dated 31.03.2016 passed

SH. AMARDEEP SINGH ATHWAL,YAMUNANAGAR vs. ITO, WARD-1, YAMUNANAGAR

Bench: SHRI. LALIET KUMAR (Judicial Member), SHRI. KRINWANT SAHAY (Accountant Member)

197 of the I.T. Act to the petitioner for non-deduction of tax at source, in as much as, the petitioner is not able to pay any tax under the head "income from other sources" on the interest paid to it under Section 28 of the Act of 1894". A copy of the judgment and order dated 31.03.2016 passed

HARMALA,CHANDIGARH vs. ITO, WARD 1(1), NANGAL

197 of the I.T. Act to\nthe petitioner for non-deduction of tax at source, in as much as, the\npetitioner is not able to pay any tax under the head \"income from other\nsources\" on the interest paid to it under Section 28 of the Act of 1894\".\nA copy of the judgment and order dated 31.03.2016 passed

SH. RAMESH CHAND,JAGADHRI vs. ITO, WARD-3, YAMUNA NAGAR

197 of the I.T. Act to\nthe petitioner for non-deduction of tax at source, in as much as, the\npetitioner is not able to pay any tax under the head \"income from other\nsources\" on the interest paid to it under Section 28 of the Act of 1894\".\nA copy of the judgment and order dated 31.03.2016 passed

SH. SURESH PAL,YAMUNA NAGAR vs. ITO, WARD 5, YAMUNA NAGAR

197 of the I.T. Act to\nthe petitioner for non-deduction of tax at source, inasmuch as, the petitioner\nis not liable to pay any tax under the head \"income from other sources\" on\nthe interest paid to it under section 28 of the Act of 1894\".\nA copy of the judgment and order dated 31.03.2016 passed

NARENDER KAUR,KURUKSHETRA, HARYANA vs. INCOME TAX OFFICER WARD-1 , KURUKSHETRA

197 of the I.T. Act to\nthe petitioner for non-deduction of tax at source, inasmuch as, the petitioner\nis not liable to pay any tax under the head \"income from other sources\" on\nthe interest paid to it under section 28 of the Act of 1894\".\nA copy of the judgment and order dated 31.03.2016 passed

SH. AJIT SINGH,PINJORE vs. ITO, WARD-1, PANCHKULA

197 of the I.T. Act to\nthe petitioner for non-deduction of tax at source, inasmuch as, the petitioner\nis not liable to pay any tax under the head \"income from other sources\" on\nthe interest paid to it under section 28 of the Act of 1894\".\nA copy of the judgment and order dated 31.03.2016 passed

BALJIT SINGH,AMBALA CITY vs. INCOME TAX OFFICER, WARD-1, AMBALA, AMBALA

197 of the I.T. Act to\nthe petitioner for non-deduction of tax at source, inasmuch as, the petitioner\nis not liable to pay any tax under the head \"income from other sources\" on\nthe interest paid to it under section 28 of the Act of 1894\"." A copy of the judgment and order dated 31.03.2016 passed

INCOME TAX OFFICER, WARD-5(5), CHANDIGARH, CHANDIGARH vs. AVTAR SINGH, VILLAGE- KAIMBWALA

197 of the I.T. Act to\nthe petitioner for non-deduction of tax at source, inasmuch as, the petitioner\nis not liable to pay any tax under the head "income from other sources" on\nthe interest paid to it under section 28 of the Act of 1894".\nA copy of the judgment and order dated 31.03.2016 passed

BALVINDER SINGH,FATEHABAD vs. ITO WARD-1, FATEHABAD

197 of the I.T. Act to\nthe petitioner for non-deduction of tax at source, inasmuch as, the petitioner\nis not liable to pay any tax under the head \"income from other sources\" on\nthe interest paid to it under section 28 of the Act of 1894\".\nA copy of the judgment and order dated 31.03.2016 passed

BISHAN CHAND,CHANDIGARH vs. INCOME TAX OFFICER, WARD 5 (5), CHANDIGARH, CHANDIGARH

197 of the I.T. Act to\nthe petitioner for non-deduction of tax at source, inasmuch as, the petitioner\nis not liable to pay any tax under the head "income from other sources" on\nthe interest paid to it under section 28 of the Act of 1894\".\nA copy of the judgment and order dated 31.03.2016 passed

SH. AMRIK SINGH,PANCHKULA vs. ITO, WARD-2, PANCHKULA

197 of the I.T. Act to\nthe petitioner for non-deduction of tax at source, inasmuch as, the petitioner\nis not liable to pay any tax under the head \"income from other sources\" on\nthe interest paid to it under section 28 of the Act of 1894\".\nA copy of the judgment and order dated 31.03.2016 passed