BharatTax.net
SearchITATHigh CourtsSupreme CourtPhrasesAI ResearchHistory

Filters

BharatTax.net

Free search engine for ITAT (Income Tax Appellate Tribunal) judgments across all 28 benches in India.

Quick Links

  • Search Judgments
  • Browse by Bench
  • Recent Judgments

About

BharatTax provides free access to Income Tax Appellate Tribunal orders for legal research and reference.

© 2026 BharatTax.net. All rights reserved.

2 results for “transfer pricing”+ Section 194Iclear

Sorted by relevance

Delhi26Raipur17Ahmedabad16Mumbai16Kolkata13Bangalore10Cochin6Chandigarh2Jaipur2Varanasi1Allahabad1Chennai1

Key Topics

Section 116Section 136Section 13(2)(c)4Section 250(6)2Section 13(1)(c)2Section 13(3)2Exemption2Disallowance2Addition to Income

DCIT, C-1 (EXEMPTIONS), CHANDIGARH vs. CT EDUCATIONAL SOCIETY, JALANDHAR

In the result, both the appeals of the Revenue are

ITA 1135/CHANDI/2017[2014-15]Status: DisposedITAT Chandigarh04 Oct 2021AY 2014-15
For Appellant: Shri Ashray Sarna,C.AFor Respondent: Smt. Meenakshi Vohra, Addl. CIT
Section 11Section 13Section 13(1)(c)Section 13(2)(c)Section 13(3)Section 250(6)

price has been paid over a period of time as and when the funds were available in their hands. Further, I find that these transactions have been accepted by the AO in the preceding three years. Accordingly, I do not find any justification in the action of the AO in charging notional interest @12% per annum on the amount

2

DCIT, C-1 (EXEMPTIONS), CHANDIGARH vs. CT EDUCATIONAL SOCIETY, JALANDHAR

In the result, both the appeals of the Revenue are

ITA 700/CHANDI/2019[2015-16]Status: DisposedITAT Chandigarh04 Oct 2021AY 2015-16
For Appellant: Shri Ashray Sarna,C.AFor Respondent: Smt. Meenakshi Vohra, Addl. CIT
Section 11Section 13Section 13(1)(c)Section 13(2)(c)Section 13(3)Section 250(6)

price has been paid over a period of time as and when the funds were available in their hands. Further, I find that these transactions have been accepted by the AO in the preceding three years. Accordingly, I do not find any justification in the action of the AO in charging notional interest @12% per annum on the amount