Search: transfer pricing

3 results for “transfer pricing”+ Section 16Aclear

Sorted by relevance

Delhi103 Mumbai38 Bangalore31 Chennai21 Kolkata11 Surat8 Hyderabad8 Pune7 Cochin7 Jaipur4 Chandigarh3 Ahmedabad3 SC3 Raipur3 Nagpur3 Indore2 Rajkot2 Visakhapatnam1 Amritsar1 Cuttack1 Karnataka1 Lucknow1 Telangana1

Key Topics

Section 194H5 Section 56(2)(vii)4 Section 1474 Section 56(2)2 Section 402 Addition to Income2

INCOME TAX OFFICER, MOHALI vs. GURTEJ SINGH, MOHALI

In the result, appeal filed by the Revenue in ITA No

ITA 806/CHANDI/2024[2017-18]Status: DisposedITAT Chandigarh24 Apr 2025AY 2017-18

Bench: SHRI. LALIET KUMAR (Judicial Member), SHRI. KRINWANT SAHAY (Accountant Member)

For Appellant: Shri Yogesh Monga, C.AFor Respondent: Shri Rohit Sharma, CIT DR

Section 147Section 56(2)Section 56(2)(vii)

16A, was purchased for Rs. 4,00,00,000/- from Mrs. Taranjot Kaur, with the final registration occurring on 28/06/2016. The Ld. AO contended that the stamp duty value of the property as on 02/02/2015 was Rs. 8,63,21,268/-, leading to a difference of Rs. 4,63,21,268/- between the purchase price and stamp value. This difference

INCOME TAX OFFICER, MOHALI vs. GURTEJ SINGH, MOHALI

KANWALDEEP KAUR,CHANDIGARH vs. DCIT, CIRCLE 1, CHANDIGARH

INCOME TAX OFFICER, MOHALI vs. GURTEJ SINGH, MOHALI

KANWALDEEP KAUR,CHANDIGARH vs. DCIT, CIRCLE 1, CHANDIGARH

SH.ANIL DHIWAN S/O SH.A.K.DHWAN vs. DY.COMMISSIONER OF INCOME TAX, MANDI