PAREXEL INTERNATIONAL SERVICES INDIA PVT.LTD,,CHANDIGARH vs. ACIT,CIRCLE-5(1),(NEAC), CHANDIGARH

In the result, the appeal of the Assessee is partly allowed

Bench: SHRI. AAKASH DEEP JAIN (Vice President), SHRI. SHRI. KRINWANT SAHAY (Accountant Member)

Sections 144C(13), 143(3A) and 143(3B) of the Act to the extent prejudicial to the Appellant, is bad in law and is liable to be quashed. 2. On the facts and in the circumstances of the case and in law, the Ld. Panel erred in upholding the action of the Ld. Transfer Pricing

CENTRIENT PHARMACEUTICALS INDIA PRIVATE LIMITED,PUNJAB vs. DCIT/ ACIT, CIRCLE 1(1), CHANDIGARH, CHANDIGARH

In the result, the appeal of the assessee is allowed for statistical purposes

Bench: Shri Rajpal Yadav & Shri Krinwant Sahayआयकर अपील सं./ I.T.A. No. 1201/Chd/2024 "नधा"रण वष" / Assessment Year: 2021-22

Transfer Pricing Grounds: Legal grounds Ground 1: That on the facts and circumstances of the case and in law, the impugned order passes by the Ld. AO is barred by limitation in terms of section 153(1)/(4) and therefore, is liable to be quashed. Ground 2: Based on the facts and circumstances of the present case

SH. RAJINDER SINGH BEDI,CHANDIGARH vs. DCIT (INTL. TAXATION), CHANDIGARH

In the result, appeal of the assessee is allowed

Bench: Shri Rajpal Yadav & Shri Manoj Kumar Aggarwalआयकर अपील सं./ Ita No. 538/Chd/2022 "नधा"रण वष" / Assessment Year: 2018-19 Shri Rajinder Singh Bedi, The Dcit, (Int.Taxation ), 1368, Sector 40-B, Vs Chandigarh. Chandigarh. "थायी लेखा सं./Pan No: Afwpb3355A अपीलाथ"/Appellant ""यथ"/Respondent Assessee By : Shri Sudhir Sehgal, Advocate Revenue By : Smt. Kusum Bansal, Cit, Dr Date Of Hearing : 09.04.2025 Date Of Pronouncement : 04.06.2025 Hybrid Hearing O R D E R

13) of the Income Tax Act by Circle-I, International Taxation, Chandigarh. 2. The assessee has taken eight grounds of appeal, however, his grievance revolves around a single issue, namely, A.Y.2018-19 2 as to how true Long Term Capital Gain required to be determined on sale of immovable house property bearing House No. 845 Sector 38-A, Chandigarh

DCIT, C-1(1) , CHANDIGARH vs. M/S FIDELITY INFORMATION SERVICES INDIA PVT. LTD., CHANDIGARH

In the result, the cross-objection filed by the assessee is dismissed

Bench: SHRI. AAKASH DEEP JAIN (Vice President), SHRI. VIKRAM SINGH YADAV (Accountant Member)

144C(13) r.w.s. 143(3) dated 31.10.2012 & for A.Y. 2008-09, that the AO has held that the assessee had failed to show how the inclusion of the expenses was done in the cost charged by the assessee company to its client. Further, the AO held that the assessee failed to explain how these expenses related to the normal business

M/S GLAXO SMITHKLINE ASIA PVT. LTD.,GURGAON vs. ACIT, C-4(1), CHANDIGARH

In the result, all the appeals of the assessee and the Revenue, stand partly allowed for statistical purposes

144C(5) of the Act. 2. At the outset itself it was stated that the impugned appeals had earlier been listed for hearing alongwith the appeals for assessment year 2005-06 and assessment year 2006-07, in ITA No.2453/Del/2016 and ITA No.532/Chd/2014 ITA Nos.219 to 222,225 to 227,242, 228, 344/Chd/2017 ITA No.1495/Chd/2019 A.Ys

ACIT, CHANDIGARH vs. M/S GLAXO SMITHKLINE ASIA PVT. LTD., GURGAON

In the result, all the appeals of the assessee and the Revenue, stand partly allowed for statistical purposes

144C(5) of the Act. 2. At the outset itself it was stated that the impugned appeals had earlier been listed for hearing alongwith the appeals for assessment year 2005-06 and assessment year 2006-07, in ITA No.2453/Del/2016 and ITA No.532/Chd/2014 ITA Nos.219 to 222,225 to 227,242, 228, 344/Chd/2017 ITA No.1495/Chd/2019 A.Ys

M/S GLAXOSMITHKLINE ASIA PVT. LTD.,GURGAON vs. ACIT, CHANDIGARH

In the result, all the appeals of the assessee and the Revenue, stand partly allowed for statistical purposes

144C(5) of the Act. 2. At the outset itself it was stated that the impugned appeals had earlier been listed for hearing alongwith the appeals for assessment year 2005-06 and assessment year 2006-07, in ITA No.2453/Del/2016 and ITA No.532/Chd/2014 ITA Nos.219 to 222,225 to 227,242, 228, 344/Chd/2017 ITA No.1495/Chd/2019 A.Ys

GLAXOSMITHKLINE ASIA PVT. LTD.,GURGAON vs. ACIT, CHANDIGARH

In the result, all the appeals of the assessee and the Revenue, stand partly allowed for statistical purposes

144C(5) of the Act. 2. At the outset itself it was stated that the impugned appeals had earlier been listed for hearing alongwith the appeals for assessment year 2005-06 and assessment year 2006-07, in ITA No.2453/Del/2016 and ITA No.532/Chd/2014 ITA Nos.219 to 222,225 to 227,242, 228, 344/Chd/2017 ITA No.1495/Chd/2019 A.Ys

ACIT, CHANDIGARH vs. M/S GLAXO SMITHKLINE ASIA PVT. LTD., GURGAON

In the result, all the appeals of the assessee and the Revenue, stand partly allowed for statistical purposes

144C(5) of the Act. 2. At the outset itself it was stated that the impugned appeals had earlier been listed for hearing alongwith the appeals for assessment year 2005-06 and assessment year 2006-07, in ITA No.2453/Del/2016 and ITA No.532/Chd/2014 ITA Nos.219 to 222,225 to 227,242, 228, 344/Chd/2017 ITA No.1495/Chd/2019 A.Ys

M/S GLAXO SMITHKLINE ASIA PVT. LTD.,NABHA vs. DCIT, C-4(1), CHANDIGARH

In the result, all the appeals of the assessee and the Revenue, stand partly allowed for statistical purposes

144C(5) of the Act. 2. At the outset itself it was stated that the impugned appeals had earlier been listed for hearing alongwith the appeals for assessment year 2005-06 and assessment year 2006-07, in ITA No.2453/Del/2016 and ITA No.532/Chd/2014 ITA Nos.219 to 222,225 to 227,242, 228, 344/Chd/2017 ITA No.1495/Chd/2019 A.Ys

GLAXOSMITHKLINE ASIA PVT. LTD.,GURGAON vs. ACIT, CHANDIGARH

In the result, all the appeals of the assessee and the Revenue, stand partly allowed for statistical purposes

144C(5) of the Act. 2. At the outset itself it was stated that the impugned appeals had earlier been listed for hearing alongwith the appeals for assessment year 2005-06 and assessment year 2006-07, in ITA No.2453/Del/2016 and ITA No.532/Chd/2014 ITA Nos.219 to 222,225 to 227,242, 228, 344/Chd/2017 ITA No.1495/Chd/2019 A.Ys

M/S GLAXO SMITHKLINE ASIA PVT. LTD.,GURGAON vs. ACIT, C-4(1), CHANDIGARH

In the result, all the appeals of the assessee and the Revenue, stand partly allowed for statistical purposes

144C(5) of the Act. 2. At the outset itself it was stated that the impugned appeals had earlier been listed for hearing alongwith the appeals for assessment year 2005-06 and assessment year 2006-07, in ITA No.2453/Del/2016 and ITA No.532/Chd/2014 ITA Nos.219 to 222,225 to 227,242, 228, 344/Chd/2017 ITA No.1495/Chd/2019 A.Ys

GLAXOSMITHKLINE ASIA PVT. LTD.,GURGAON vs. DCIT, CHANDIGARH

In the result, all the appeals of the assessee and the Revenue, stand partly allowed for statistical purposes

144C(5) of the Act. 2. At the outset itself it was stated that the impugned appeals had earlier been listed for hearing alongwith the appeals for assessment year 2005-06 and assessment year 2006-07, in ITA No.2453/Del/2016 and ITA No.532/Chd/2014 ITA Nos.219 to 222,225 to 227,242, 228, 344/Chd/2017 ITA No.1495/Chd/2019 A.Ys

ACIT, CHANDIGARH vs. M/S GLAXO SMITHKLINE ASIA PVT. LTD., GURGAON

In the result, all the appeals of the assessee and the Revenue, stand partly allowed for statistical purposes

144C(5) of the Act. 2. At the outset itself it was stated that the impugned appeals had earlier been listed for hearing alongwith the appeals for assessment year 2005-06 and assessment year 2006-07, in ITA No.2453/Del/2016 and ITA No.532/Chd/2014 ITA Nos.219 to 222,225 to 227,242, 228, 344/Chd/2017 ITA No.1495/Chd/2019 A.Ys

ACIT, CHANDIGARH vs. M/S GLAXO SMITHKLINE ASIA PVT. LTD., GURGAON

In the result, all the appeals of the assessee and the Revenue, stand partly allowed for statistical purposes

144C(5) of the Act. 2. At the outset itself it was stated that the impugned appeals had earlier been listed for hearing alongwith the appeals for assessment year 2005-06 and assessment year 2006-07, in ITA No.2453/Del/2016 and ITA No.532/Chd/2014 ITA Nos.219 to 222,225 to 227,242, 228, 344/Chd/2017 ITA No.1495/Chd/2019 A.Ys

GLAXOSMITHKLINE ASIA PVT. LTD.,GURGAON vs. DCIT, CHANDIGARH

In the result, all the appeals of the assessee and the Revenue, stand partly allowed for statistical purposes

144C(5) of the Act. 2. At the outset itself it was stated that the impugned appeals had earlier been listed for hearing alongwith the appeals for assessment year 2005-06 and assessment year 2006-07, in ITA No.2453/Del/2016 and ITA No.532/Chd/2014 ITA Nos.219 to 222,225 to 227,242, 228, 344/Chd/2017 ITA No.1495/Chd/2019 A.Ys

NEERU ARORA,CHANDIGARH vs. CIRCLE-1, INTERNATIONAL TAXATION, CHANDIGARH

In the result, the appeal of the assessee is partly allowed in terms indicated above

Bench: SHRI. LALIET KUMAR (Judicial Member), SHRI. MANOJ KUMAR AGGARWAL (Accountant Member)

144C(2) on 31.03.2023, along with Form No. 35A and various annexures, challenging the year of taxability, the incorrect application of section 50C, and the denial of deduction for the cost of acquisition. 8. The assessee contended that the transfer of the capital asset was completed in A.Y. 2010-11 when possession was handed over and full consideration was received

M/S GLAXOSMITHKLINE ASIA PVT. LTD.,GURGAON vs. DCIT, CHANDIGARH

In the result, the appeal of the assessee is partly allowed

144C(5) & 254/153(2A) of the Act, passed in accordance with the directions of the Dispute Resolution Panel(DRP in short), in second round, on the directions of the ITAT. It was common ground that the issues involved in both the appeals were identical, they were therefore heard together and are being disposed off by a common consolidated order