BharatTax.net
SearchITATHigh CourtsSupreme CourtPhrasesAI ResearchHistory

Filters

BharatTax.net

Free search engine for ITAT (Income Tax Appellate Tribunal) judgments across all 28 benches in India.

Quick Links

  • Search Judgments
  • Browse by Bench
  • Recent Judgments

About

BharatTax provides free access to Income Tax Appellate Tribunal orders for legal research and reference.

© 2026 BharatTax.net. All rights reserved.

3 results for “section 68”+ Section 80Jclear

Sorted by relevance

Mumbai70Delhi29Bangalore20Surat17Ahmedabad7Chennai7Pune7Jodhpur3Rajkot3Kolkata3Chandigarh3Indore1Amritsar1SC1Jaipur1

Key Topics

Section 964Section 1544Section 104Section 37(1)2Section 242Section 143(1)2Capital Gains2Long Term Capital Gains2Short Term Capital Gains

SHRI SATISH KUMAR,SANGRUR vs. ITO, WARD, SANGRUR

In the result, appeal of the assessee’s are allowed

ITA 1182/CHANDI/2019[2015-16]Status: DisposedITAT Chandigarh27 Aug 2021AY 2015-16
For Appellant: Shri Sudhir Sehgal, AdvocateFor Respondent: Shri Ashok Khanna, Addl. CIT
Section 10Section 143(1)Section 154Section 24Section 96

68 (DEL) • Nulux Engineers Vs. DCIT, in ITA No. 2073/MUM/2017 order dated 05/10/2018 of Mumbai ITAT 9. In his rival submissions the Ld. DR reiterated the observations made by the authorities below and emphasized the observations made by the Ld. CIT(A) in para 5.17 of the impugned order. The reliance was placed on the judgment

2
Exemption2
Deduction2
TDS2

SMT. URMILA GARG,SANGRUR vs. ITO, WARD, SANGRUR

In the result, appeal of the assessee’s are allowed

ITA 1183/CHANDI/2019[2015-16]Status: DisposedITAT Chandigarh27 Aug 2021AY 2015-16
For Appellant: Shri Sudhir Sehgal, AdvocateFor Respondent: Shri Ashok Khanna, Addl. CIT
Section 10Section 143(1)Section 154Section 24Section 96

68 (DEL) • Nulux Engineers Vs. DCIT, in ITA No. 2073/MUM/2017 order dated 05/10/2018 of Mumbai ITAT 9. In his rival submissions the Ld. DR reiterated the observations made by the authorities below and emphasized the observations made by the Ld. CIT(A) in para 5.17 of the impugned order. The reliance was placed on the judgment

DCIT, C-1(1) , CHANDIGARH vs. M/S FIDELITY INFORMATION SERVICES INDIA PVT. LTD., CHANDIGARH

In the result, the cross-objection filed by the assessee is dismissed

ITA 1328/CHANDI/2019[2014-15]Status: DisposedITAT Chandigarh07 Jun 2024AY 2014-15

Bench: SHRI. AAKASH DEEP JAIN (Vice President), SHRI. VIKRAM SINGH YADAV (Accountant Member)

For Appellant: Shri Vishal Kalra, Advocate and Ms. Sumisha, C.AFor Respondent: Shri Rohit Sharma, CIT DR
Section 37(1)

68 days which is not an inordinate long period is condoned. In the result, the delay in filing the cross- objection is condoned and the same is hereby admitted for necessary adjudication. 26. Now, coming to the various grounds of appeal taken by the assessee in its cross-objection so filed, it is noted that the assessee has effectively challenged