M/S PACIFIC ENGINEERS,MOHALI vs. ADIT,CPC, BENGALURU/ITO WARD 6(1), CHANDIGARH

In the result, both the appeals of the assessees are allowed

68, SAS Nagar, Mohali C/o Parikshit Aggarwal, Chartered 160062, Punjab Accountant, H.No. 1238, Sector 22B, Chandigarh "थायी लेखा सं./PAN NO: AABFO7316A अपीलाथ"/Appellant ""यथ"/Respondent "नधा"रती क" ओर से/Assessee by : Shri Parikshit Aggarwal, CA राज"व क" ओर से/ Revenue by : Dr. Ranjeet Kaur, Sr. DR आयकर अपील सं./ ITA No. 404/Chd/ 2021 "नधा"रण वष" / Assessment

PERIDOT KNITWEARS PRIVATE LIMITED,LUDHIANA vs. ITO WARD -7(5),, LUDHIANA

In the result, both the appeals of the assessees are allowed

68, SAS Nagar, Mohali C/o Parikshit Aggarwal, Chartered 160062, Punjab Accountant, H.No. 1238, Sector 22B, Chandigarh "थायी लेखा सं./PAN NO: AABFO7316A अपीलाथ"/Appellant ""यथ"/Respondent "नधा"रती क" ओर से/Assessee by : Shri Parikshit Aggarwal, CA राज"व क" ओर से/ Revenue by : Dr. Ranjeet Kaur, Sr. DR आयकर अपील सं./ ITA No. 404/Chd/ 2021 "नधा"रण वष" / Assessment

M/S OVER AND ABOVE SOFTWARE AND INFRASTRUCTURE SOLUTION (OASIS),MOHALI vs. ITO, WARD 6(1),, MOHALI

In the result, both the appeals of the assessees are allowed

68, SAS Nagar, Mohali C/o Parikshit Aggarwal, Chartered 160062, Punjab Accountant, H.No. 1238, Sector 22B, Chandigarh "थायी लेखा सं./PAN NO: AABFO7316A अपीलाथ"/Appellant ""यथ"/Respondent "नधा"रती क" ओर से/Assessee by : Shri Parikshit Aggarwal, CA राज"व क" ओर से/ Revenue by : Dr. Ranjeet Kaur, Sr. DR आयकर अपील सं./ ITA No. 404/Chd/ 2021 "नधा"रण वष" / Assessment

DOUBLE KNITWEAR,LUDHIANA vs. ITO WARD 3(1), LUDHIANA

In the result, both the appeals of the assessees are allowed

68, SAS Nagar, Mohali C/o Parikshit Aggarwal, Chartered 160062, Punjab Accountant, H.No. 1238, Sector 22B, Chandigarh "थायी लेखा सं./PAN NO: AABFO7316A अपीलाथ"/Appellant ""यथ"/Respondent "नधा"रती क" ओर से/Assessee by : Shri Parikshit Aggarwal, CA राज"व क" ओर से/ Revenue by : Dr. Ranjeet Kaur, Sr. DR आयकर अपील सं./ ITA No. 404/Chd/ 2021 "नधा"रण वष" / Assessment

ATUL GLOBAL PVT.LTD.,LUDHIANA vs. ITO-WARD-1(1), LUDHIANA

In the result, both the appeals of the assessees are allowed

68, SAS Nagar, Mohali C/o Parikshit Aggarwal, Chartered 160062, Punjab Accountant, H.No. 1238, Sector 22B, Chandigarh "थायी लेखा सं./PAN NO: AABFO7316A अपीलाथ"/Appellant ""यथ"/Respondent "नधा"रती क" ओर से/Assessee by : Shri Parikshit Aggarwal, CA राज"व क" ओर से/ Revenue by : Dr. Ranjeet Kaur, Sr. DR आयकर अपील सं./ ITA No. 404/Chd/ 2021 "नधा"रण वष" / Assessment

M/S PACIFIC ENGINEERS,MOHALI vs. ADIT,CPC, BENGALURU/ITO WARD 6(1), CHANDIGARH

In the result, both the appeals of the assessees are allowed

68, SAS Nagar, Mohali C/o Parikshit Aggarwal, Chartered 160062, Punjab Accountant, H.No. 1238, Sector 22B, Chandigarh "थायी लेखा सं./PAN NO: AABFO7316A अपीलाथ"/Appellant ""यथ"/Respondent "नधा"रती क" ओर से/Assessee by : Shri Parikshit Aggarwal, CA राज"व क" ओर से/ Revenue by : Dr. Ranjeet Kaur, Sr. DR आयकर अपील सं./ ITA No. 404/Chd/ 2021 "नधा"रण वष" / Assessment

CHERRY CHIK HATCHERIES PRIVATE LIMITED,MALERKOTLA vs. ITO WARD - 1,, MALERKOTLA

In the result, both the appeals of the assessees are allowed

68, SAS Nagar, Mohali C/o Parikshit Aggarwal, Chartered 160062, Punjab Accountant, H.No. 1238, Sector 22B, Chandigarh "थायी लेखा सं./PAN NO: AABFO7316A अपीलाथ"/Appellant ""यथ"/Respondent "नधा"रती क" ओर से/Assessee by : Shri Parikshit Aggarwal, CA राज"व क" ओर से/ Revenue by : Dr. Ranjeet Kaur, Sr. DR आयकर अपील सं./ ITA No. 404/Chd/ 2021 "नधा"रण वष" / Assessment

SANDEEP PURI,PATIALA vs. ITO WARD -4,, PATIALA

In the result, both the appeals of the assessees are allowed

68, SAS Nagar, Mohali C/o Parikshit Aggarwal, Chartered 160062, Punjab Accountant, H.No. 1238, Sector 22B, Chandigarh "थायी लेखा सं./PAN NO: AABFO7316A अपीलाथ"/Appellant ""यथ"/Respondent "नधा"रती क" ओर से/Assessee by : Shri Parikshit Aggarwal, CA राज"व क" ओर से/ Revenue by : Dr. Ranjeet Kaur, Sr. DR आयकर अपील सं./ ITA No. 404/Chd/ 2021 "नधा"रण वष" / Assessment

DS MULTIMEDIA PRIVATE LIMITED,PANCHKULA vs. DCIT,CPC/ITO WARD-1, PANCHKULA

In the result, both the appeals of the assessees are allowed

68, SAS Nagar, Mohali C/o Parikshit Aggarwal, Chartered 160062, Punjab Accountant, H.No. 1238, Sector 22B, Chandigarh "थायी लेखा सं./PAN NO: AABFO7316A अपीलाथ"/Appellant ""यथ"/Respondent "नधा"रती क" ओर से/Assessee by : Shri Parikshit Aggarwal, CA राज"व क" ओर से/ Revenue by : Dr. Ranjeet Kaur, Sr. DR आयकर अपील सं./ ITA No. 404/Chd/ 2021 "नधा"रण वष" / Assessment

SARASWATI AGRO CHEMICALS (INDIA) PVT.LTD,MOHALI vs. DCIT,CPC/ DCIT CIRCLE -6(1), CHANDIGARH

In the result, appeals of the assessee are allowed

Bench: The Filing Of Return Of Income.” 3. The Ld. Ar Inviting Attention To The Impugned Order

68,698/-) for deposit of employee's contribution towards Provident Fund and ESI after the due date specified under the respective Acts of PF and ESI. The amount of contribution has been deposited well before the filing of return of income.” 3. The ld. AR inviting attention to the impugned order submitted that the point at issue is fully covered

SHAKTI APIFOODS PRIVATE LIMITED,SANGRUR vs. ADIT,CPC/ DCIT-CIRCLE-IV, LUDHIANA

In the result, the addition so made towards the provision for gratuity amounting to Rs

Bench: Smt.Diva Singh & Shri Vikram Singh Yadavshakti Apifoods Private Limited. बनाम The Assessing Officer, Malerkotla Road, Circle-Iv(1), Sangrur. Ludhiana. "थायी लेखा सं./Pan No: Aamcs8546C

section 36(1)(va) of the Act. He accordingly supported the order of the lower authorities. 6. We have heard the rival contentions and perused the material available on record. In the instant case, it is not in dispute that employees’ contribution to ESI and PF had been deposited well before the due date of filing of return

SAROJ CHAUDHARY BALA,PANCHKULA vs. ITO, WARD-4, PANCHKULA

Bench: SHRI. LALIET KUMAR (Judicial Member), SHRI. KRINWANT SAHAY (Accountant Member)

Section 16 or Section 17 of the Act. We, therefore, hold that the statutory interest paid under Section 34 of the Act is interest paid for the delayed payment of the compensation amount and, therefore, is a revenue receipt liable to tax under the Income Tax Act." 9. This position of law has been consistently reiterated

SH. AMARDEEP SINGH ATHWAL,YAMUNANAGAR vs. ITO, WARD-1, YAMUNANAGAR

Bench: BEFORE: SHRI. LALIET KUMAR (Judicial Member), SHRI. KRINWANT SAHAY (Accountant Member)

Section 16 or Section 17 of the Act. We, therefore, hold that the statutory interest paid under Section 34 of the Act is interest paid for the delayed payment of the compensation amount and, therefore, is a revenue receipt liable to tax under the Income Tax Act." 9. This position of law has been consistently reiterated

SMT. SHANKRI DEVI,PANCHKULA vs. ACIT, PANCKULA CIRCLE, PANCHKULA

Bench: SHRI. LALIET KUMAR (Judicial Member), SHRI. KRINWANT SAHAY (Accountant Member)

Section 16 or Section 17 of the Act. We, therefore, hold that the statutory interest paid under Section 34 of the Act is interest paid for the delayed payment of the compensation amount and, therefore, is a revenue receipt liable to tax under the Income Tax Act." 9. This position of law has been consistently reiterated

BALBIR KUMAR HUF,CHANDIGARH vs. ITO , CHANDIGARH

Bench: SHRI. LALIET KUMAR (Judicial Member), SHRI. KRINWANT SAHAY (Accountant Member)

Section 16 or Section 17 of the Act. We, therefore, hold that the statutory interest paid under Section 34 of the Act is interest paid for the delayed payment of the compensation amount and, therefore, is a revenue receipt liable to tax under the Income Tax Act." 9. This position of law has been consistently reiterated

INCOME TAX OFFICER, FATEHABAD vs. MAHESH NAGPAL, FATEHABAD

Bench: SHRI. LALIET KUMAR (Judicial Member), SHRI. KRINWANT SAHAY (Accountant Member)

Section 16 or Section 17 of the Act. We, therefore, hold that the statutory interest paid under Section 34 of the Act is interest paid for the delayed payment of the compensation amount and, therefore, is a revenue receipt liable to tax under the Income Tax Act." 9. This position of law has been consistently reiterated

PAWAN KUMAR,FATEHABAD vs. INCOME TAX OFFICER WARD-1, FATEHABAD

Bench: SHRI. LALIET KUMAR (Judicial Member), SHRI. KRINWANT SAHAY (Accountant Member)

Section 16 or Section 17 of the Act. We, therefore, hold that the statutory interest paid under Section 34 of the Act is interest paid for the delayed payment of the compensation amount and, therefore, is a revenue receipt liable to tax under the Income Tax Act." 9. This position of law has been consistently reiterated

RANJIT SINGH,PANCHKULA vs. DEPUTY DIRECTOR, CPC DEPARTMENT

Bench: SHRI. LALIET KUMAR (Judicial Member), SHRI. KRINWANT SAHAY (Accountant Member)

Section 16 or Section 17 of the Act. We, therefore, hold that the statutory interest paid under Section 34 of the Act is interest paid for the delayed payment of the compensation amount and, therefore, is a revenue receipt liable to tax under the Income Tax Act." 9. This position of law has been consistently reiterated

SH. AMARDEEP SINGH ATHWAL,YAMUNANAGAR vs. ITO, WARD-1, YAMUNANAGAR

Bench: SHRI. LALIET KUMAR (Judicial Member), SHRI. KRINWANT SAHAY (Accountant Member)

Section 16 or Section 17 of the Act. We, therefore, hold that the statutory interest paid under Section 34 of the Act is interest paid for the delayed payment of the compensation amount and, therefore, is a revenue receipt liable to tax under the Income Tax Act." 9. This position of law has been consistently reiterated