BharatTax.net
SearchITATHigh CourtsSupreme CourtPhrasesAI ResearchHistory

Filters

BharatTax.net

Free search engine for ITAT (Income Tax Appellate Tribunal) judgments across all 28 benches in India.

Quick Links

  • Search Judgments
  • Browse by Bench
  • Recent Judgments

About

BharatTax provides free access to Income Tax Appellate Tribunal orders for legal research and reference.

© 2026 BharatTax.net. All rights reserved.

3 results for “section 68”+ Section 271D(2)clear

Sorted by relevance

Delhi57Jaipur54Mumbai41Hyderabad27Chennai26Karnataka21Ahmedabad19Kolkata14Pune13Indore12Agra9Bangalore9Surat7Rajkot5Chandigarh3Cuttack3Jabalpur2Nagpur2Visakhapatnam2Lucknow1Ranchi1SC1Cochin1Varanasi1Amritsar1

Key Topics

Section 269S5Section 271D5Section 683Addition to Income3Cash Deposit2Penalty2

DEPUTY COMMISSIONER OF INCOME TAX, CHANDIGARH vs. JAMES HOTELS LTD, CHANDIGARH

ITA 552/CHANDI/2023[2012-13]Status: DisposedITAT Chandigarh01 Oct 2024AY 2012-13

Bench: The Said Resolution To Enhance Authorized Share Capital.

For Appellant: Shri R.K. KapoorFor Respondent: Shri Rohit Sharma, CIT, DR
Section 143(2)Section 269SSection 271D

2 The next question regarding the non applicability of sec. 269AA and consequently sec. 271D of the I.T Act on the amount of Rs. 175.00 lacs as cash share application money, a detailed reply has already been furnished vide our earlier letter dated 07.09.2015. Further as required please find enclosed the copies of the following judgments relied upon

PREMJIT KUMAR,PATIALA vs. ITO-WARD-4, PATIALA

The appeal of the assessee stands allowed

ITA 1595/CHANDI/2019[2010-11]Status: DisposedITAT Chandigarh01 Dec 2021AY 2010-11

Bench: Him

For Appellant: Shri Rakesh Cajla, AdvocateFor Respondent: Shri Ashok Khanna, Addl.CIT
Section 131Section 147Section 148Section 269SSection 68

2. The brief facts of the case are that the assessee had not filed his return of income for the assessment year 2010-11. As per the information available with the AO, there was a cash deposit of Rs. 42.59 lacs in the bank account of the assessee. The AO, therefore, reopened the assessment u/s 147 of the Income

M/S GAGANDEEP ICE & COLD STORAGE PVT. LTD,,SIRHIND vs. ITO, WARD SIRHIND HQ, MANDI GOBINDGARH

In the result, the appeal of the assessee is treated as allowed for statistical purposes

ITA 1079/CHANDI/2018[2008-09]Status: DisposedITAT Chandigarh06 Jun 2019AY 2008-09

Bench: Shri Sanjay Garg

For Appellant: Sh Jaspal Sharma, AdvocateFor Respondent: Sh. Arvind Sudershan, Sr.DR
Section 269SSection 271DSection 68

68 of the Income Tax Act. 5. On the facts and circumstances of the case the Ld. CIT(Appeals) has erred in having confirmed the action of the AO in referring the matter to the Addl. CIT for consideration of imposition of penalty u/s 271D of the Income Tax Act by holding that the assessee company received share application money