DEPUTY COMMISSIONER OF INCOME TAX, CHANDIGARH vs. WINSOME TEXTILE INDUSTRIES LTD, CHANDIGARH

68 Income Tax Act, 1961 are without\nany basis and on the reliance of SEBI investigation of the lead manager to the\nissue, the SEBI report was also available on record as shown to the Authorised\nRepresentative of the assessee before the issue of the first notice of\nreassessment on 26.03.2017. As such, the assessment framed in respect of both

SOCIETY FOR EDUCATION AND RESEARCH,JAGADHRI, YAMUNANGAR vs. DCIT(E) (CIRCLE-2), CHANDIGARH

In the result, ground no. 2 of the assessee’s appeal is allowed

Bench: SHRI. VIKRAM SINGH YADAV (Accountant Member), SHRI. PARESH M. JOSHI (Judicial Member)

68 of the Act and as against the returned income of NIL, the reassessed income was determined at Rs. 34,50,350/-. 5. Being aggrieved, the assessee carried the matter in appeal before the Ld. CIT(A) who has since sustained the said findings and the appeal of the assessee has been dismissed. Against the said order, the assessee

DCIT,CIRCLE-1(EXEMPTION), CHANDIGARH vs. M/S INDO GLOBAL EDUCATION FOUNDATION, KHARAR

In the result, appeal of the Revenue is dismissed

Bench: Shri Rajpal Yadav & Shri Krinwant Sahayआयकर अपील सं./Ita No. 26/Chd/2020 िनधा"रण वष" / Assessment Year : 2013-14 The Dcit, M/S Indo Global बनाम Circle-1(Exemptions), Education Foundation, Chandigarh Vill. Abhipur, Vs. Sub Tehsil Majra, Tehsil Kharar, Punjab "थायी लेखा सं./Pan No: Aaati2838L अपीलाथ"/Appellant ""यथ"/Respondent

68,00,000/- 2. Swami Vivekananda Educational & Rs. 60,00,000/- Charitable Trust 3. Chaman Educational & Charitable Trust Rs. 3,40,000/- 5. The undisputed facts are that the voluntary contribution have been given and accepted as corpus by the Donor as well as Donee trust and necessary confirmations, both from the Donor and Donees have been submitted

SH. MAHESH CHUGH,CHANDIGARH vs. PR.CIT-2, CHANDIGARH

In the result, the appeal of the assessee is allowed

68,979 (19,33,202-3,64,223) Claim of Assessee in his computation : 15.01,269 Difference : 67,710 (assessee may correct the figure) (B) Investment in resl. Property (3113) taken at Rs. 2,17,35,000 (without renovation claim of 10,15,000) Deduction eligibility : 2,17,35,000x2,04,51,233/2

ACIT, CC-2, CHANDIGARH vs. SHRI KARAJ SINGH, YAMUNA NAGAR

In the result, the revenue’s appeal ITA No

Bench: Hon’Ble Shri Rajpal Yadav & Hon’Ble Shri Manoj Kumar Aggarwal, Am 1. आयकर अपील सं./ Ita No. 726/Chandi/2022 (िनधा"रण वष" / Assessment Year: 2018-19) Acit-Central Circle 2 Shri Karaj Singh बनाम/ Cr Building Sector 17 H. No 1379, Modern Colony, Near Iti Vs. Chandigarh 160017 Yamuna Nagar (Haryana) "ायीलेखासं./जीआइआरसं./Pan/Gir No. Atups-5528-A (अपीलाथ"/Appellant) (""थ" / Respondent) : & 2. Co. No. 16/Chandi/2024 [In Ita No. 726/Chandi/2022 (िनधा"रण वष" / Assessment Year: 2018-19) Shri Karaj Singh Acit-Central Circle 2 बनाम/ H. No 1379, Modern Colony, Near Iti, Cr Building Sector 17 Vs. Yamuna Nagar (Haryana) Chandigarh 160017 "ायीलेखासं./जीआइआरसं./Pan/Gir No. Atups-5528-A (Cross-Objector) : (Respondent) Revenue By : Smt. Kusum Bansal (Cit) – Ld. Dr Assessee By : Shri Dhruv Goel (Ca) - Ld. Ar सुनवाईकीतारीख/Date Of Hearing : 18-09-2025 घोषणाकीतारीख /Date Of Pronouncement : 08/10/2025 आदेश / O R D E R Manoj Kumar Aggarwal () 1.1 Aforesaid Appeal By Revenue For Assessment Year (Ay) 2018-19 Arises Out Of An Order Of Learned Commissioner Of Income Tax (Appeals)- 3, Gurgaon [Cit(A)] Dated 26-09-2022 In The Matter Of An Assessment

Section 143(3) of the Act deserve to be quashed as such. 6. That the authorities below have erred in making/confirming additions without providing adequate opportunity of being heard to the assessee and without adhering to the principles of natural justice. 7. The assessee craves leave to add, amend, alter, substitute or revise any of the above-mentioned grounds

DCIT, CHANDIGARH vs. CHANDIGARH HOUSING BOARD, CHANDIGARH

In the result, the appeal of the Revenue is dismissed

269/- interest earned on RGCTP project kept in FDR’s in escrow account. 3. The said addition was upheld by the Ld.CIT(A). Thereafter penalty proceedings were initiated and after giving due opportunity of hearing to the assessee and considering the replies filed by it, the AO held that it was a clear case of concealment of particulars of income

SUDARSHAN JEANS PRIVATE LIMITED,KOLHAPUR vs. ITO, AMBALA

The appeal stand allowed

Bench: SHRI LALIET KUMAR (Judicial Member), SHRI MANOJ KUMAR AGGARWAL (Accountant Member)

68,388/- was required to be disallowed. It was further alleged that the assessee had claimed and allowed depreciation @ 15% instead of 10% on electrical installations. The excess depreciation claim resulted into underassessment of taxable income by Rs.11,74,096/-. Accordingly, the case was reopened and hearing notices were issued u/s 142(1) from time to time. 4.3 The assessee

M/S ASHA TECHNOLOGIES,SIRMOUR vs. ADDL. CIT, SOLAN

In the result, both the above appeals of the Assessee are partly allowed as aforesaid in respect of impugned orders dt

Bench: SHRI. VIKRAM SINGH YADAV (Accountant Member), SHRI. PARESH M. JOSHI (Judicial Member)

section 40A(3) of Income Tax Act 1961 .Therefore, this amount of Rs 1,23,299/- is added back to the income of the assessee being unexplained cash credit since the same are not reflected in assessee's regular books of accounts on those relevant dates.. Since the above transaction also violated the provisions of section

M/S ASHA TECHNOLOGIES,KALA AMB vs. ITO, SIRMOUR

In the result, both the above appeals of the Assessee are partly allowed as aforesaid in respect of impugned orders dt

Bench: SHRI. VIKRAM SINGH YADAV (Accountant Member), SHRI. PARESH M. JOSHI (Judicial Member)

section 40A(3) of Income Tax Act 1961 .Therefore, this amount of Rs 1,23,299/- is added back to the income of the assessee being unexplained cash credit since the same are not reflected in assessee's regular books of accounts on those relevant dates.. Since the above transaction also violated the provisions of section

M/S HERITAGE EDUCATIONAL SOCIETY,CHANDIGARH vs. DCIT, C-1, (E), CHANDIGARH

269 ITR 35, the Delhi High Court held that as the Trust had given loan without adequate security but the loan was not large and interest was adequate, exemption was granted. The The Gujarat High Court in CIT Vs. Sarladevi Sarabhai Trust No. 2 172 ITR 698 has held that where a charitable trust donates an amount to the corpus

M/S HERITAGE EDUCATIONAL SOCIETY,CHANDIGARH vs. DCIT, C-1, (E), CHANDIGARH

269 ITR 35, the Delhi High Court held that as the Trust had given loan without adequate security but the loan was not large and interest was adequate, exemption was granted. The The Gujarat High Court in CIT Vs. Sarladevi Sarabhai Trust No. 2 172 ITR 698 has held that where a charitable trust donates an amount to the corpus

M/S HERITAGE EDUCATIONAL SOCIETY,CHANDIGARH vs. DCIT, C-1, (E), CHANDIGARH

269 ITR 35, the Delhi High Court held that as the Trust had given loan without adequate security but the loan was not large and interest was adequate, exemption was granted. The The Gujarat High Court in CIT Vs. Sarladevi Sarabhai Trust No. 2 172 ITR 698 has held that where a charitable trust donates an amount to the corpus

MR. RAM PAL SINGH,CHANDIGARH vs. ITO WARD 5(4), CHANDIGARH

In the result, both the appeals of the assessees are allowed

Bench: Shri N.K. Saini & Shri Sudhanshu Srivastavaआयकर अपील सं./ Ita No. 387/Chd/2021 "नधा"रण वष" / Assessment Year : 2018-19 Mr. Ram Pal Singh, The Ito, Ward-5(4), बनाम Sco 68, Chandigarh Ist Floor, Sec. 40-C, Chandigarh "थायी लेखा सं./Pan No: Bawps7303F अपीलाथ"/Appellant ""यथ"/Respondent

68, Chandigarh Ist Floor, Sec. 40-C, Chandigarh "थायी लेखा सं./PAN NO: BAWPS7303F अपीलाथ"/Appellant ""यथ"/Respondent Hearing though video Conferencing "नधा"रती क ओर से/Assessee by : Sh. Anil Batra, Advocate राज"व क ओर से/ Revenue by : Dr. Ranjeet Kaur, CIT DR सुनवाई क तार%ख/Date of Hearing : 14.02.2022 उदघोषणा क तार%ख/Date of Pronouncement

DOUBLE KNITWEAR,LUDHIANA vs. ITO WARD 3(1), LUDHIANA

In the result, both the appeals of the assessees are allowed

68, SAS Nagar, Mohali C/o Parikshit Aggarwal, Chartered 160062, Punjab Accountant, H.No. 1238, Sector 22B, Chandigarh "थायी लेखा सं./PAN NO: AABFO7316A अपीलाथ"/Appellant ""यथ"/Respondent "नधा"रती क" ओर से/Assessee by : Shri Parikshit Aggarwal, CA राज"व क" ओर से/ Revenue by : Dr. Ranjeet Kaur, Sr. DR आयकर अपील सं./ ITA No. 404/Chd/ 2021 "नधा"रण वष" / Assessment

DS MULTIMEDIA PRIVATE LIMITED,PANCHKULA vs. DCIT,CPC/ITO WARD-1, PANCHKULA

In the result, both the appeals of the assessees are allowed

68, SAS Nagar, Mohali C/o Parikshit Aggarwal, Chartered 160062, Punjab Accountant, H.No. 1238, Sector 22B, Chandigarh "थायी लेखा सं./PAN NO: AABFO7316A अपीलाथ"/Appellant ""यथ"/Respondent "नधा"रती क" ओर से/Assessee by : Shri Parikshit Aggarwal, CA राज"व क" ओर से/ Revenue by : Dr. Ranjeet Kaur, Sr. DR आयकर अपील सं./ ITA No. 404/Chd/ 2021 "नधा"रण वष" / Assessment

M/S PACIFIC ENGINEERS,MOHALI vs. ADIT,CPC, BENGALURU/ITO WARD 6(1), CHANDIGARH

In the result, both the appeals of the assessees are allowed

68, SAS Nagar, Mohali C/o Parikshit Aggarwal, Chartered 160062, Punjab Accountant, H.No. 1238, Sector 22B, Chandigarh "थायी लेखा सं./PAN NO: AABFO7316A अपीलाथ"/Appellant ""यथ"/Respondent "नधा"रती क" ओर से/Assessee by : Shri Parikshit Aggarwal, CA राज"व क" ओर से/ Revenue by : Dr. Ranjeet Kaur, Sr. DR आयकर अपील सं./ ITA No. 404/Chd/ 2021 "नधा"रण वष" / Assessment

M/S PACIFIC ENGINEERS,MOHALI vs. ADIT,CPC, BENGALURU/ITO WARD 6(1), CHANDIGARH

In the result, both the appeals of the assessees are allowed

68, SAS Nagar, Mohali C/o Parikshit Aggarwal, Chartered 160062, Punjab Accountant, H.No. 1238, Sector 22B, Chandigarh "थायी लेखा सं./PAN NO: AABFO7316A अपीलाथ"/Appellant ""यथ"/Respondent "नधा"रती क" ओर से/Assessee by : Shri Parikshit Aggarwal, CA राज"व क" ओर से/ Revenue by : Dr. Ranjeet Kaur, Sr. DR आयकर अपील सं./ ITA No. 404/Chd/ 2021 "नधा"रण वष" / Assessment

CHERRY CHIK HATCHERIES PRIVATE LIMITED,MALERKOTLA vs. ITO WARD - 1,, MALERKOTLA

In the result, both the appeals of the assessees are allowed

68, SAS Nagar, Mohali C/o Parikshit Aggarwal, Chartered 160062, Punjab Accountant, H.No. 1238, Sector 22B, Chandigarh "थायी लेखा सं./PAN NO: AABFO7316A अपीलाथ"/Appellant ""यथ"/Respondent "नधा"रती क" ओर से/Assessee by : Shri Parikshit Aggarwal, CA राज"व क" ओर से/ Revenue by : Dr. Ranjeet Kaur, Sr. DR आयकर अपील सं./ ITA No. 404/Chd/ 2021 "नधा"रण वष" / Assessment

ATUL GLOBAL PVT.LTD.,LUDHIANA vs. ITO-WARD-1(1), LUDHIANA

In the result, both the appeals of the assessees are allowed

68, SAS Nagar, Mohali C/o Parikshit Aggarwal, Chartered 160062, Punjab Accountant, H.No. 1238, Sector 22B, Chandigarh "थायी लेखा सं./PAN NO: AABFO7316A अपीलाथ"/Appellant ""यथ"/Respondent "नधा"रती क" ओर से/Assessee by : Shri Parikshit Aggarwal, CA राज"व क" ओर से/ Revenue by : Dr. Ranjeet Kaur, Sr. DR आयकर अपील सं./ ITA No. 404/Chd/ 2021 "नधा"रण वष" / Assessment