DEPUTY COMMISSIONER OF INCOME TAX, CHANDIGARH vs. JAMES HOTELS LTD, CHANDIGARH

Bench: The Said Resolution To Enhance Authorized Share Capital.

2 The next question regarding the non applicability of sec. 269AA and consequently sec. 271D of the I.T Act on the amount of Rs. 175.00 lacs as cash share application money, a detailed reply has already been furnished vide our earlier letter dated 07.09.2015. Further as required please find enclosed the copies of the following judgments relied upon

BANSAL RICE TRADERS,SANGRUR vs. ITO-WARD, SANGRUR

In the result, appeal of the assessee is allowed

256 ITR 360 (Guj) 5.2 The Ld. CIT asked the comment of the A.O. on the above submissions of the assessee. In response the A.O. submitted the report which reads as under: "Sub :- Comments and additional evidence under Rule 46A in the case of M/s Bansal Rice Traders, Balial Road, Bhawanigarh, Sangrur for the assessment year 2010-11-regarding Kindly

DCIT, C-V, LUDHIANA vs. M/S HERO CYCLES LTD., LUDHIANA

In the result, appeal of the Department is dismissed and the appeal of the assessee is allowed

Bench: SHRI. RAJPAL YADAV (Vice President), SHRI. KRINWANT SAHAY, AM आयकर अपील सं. / ITA No. 588/Chd/2018 निर्धारण वर्ष / Assessment Years : 2012-13 The DCIT C-V, Ludhiana बनाम M/s Hero Cycles Ltd. Hero Nagar, G.T. Road Ludhiana स्थायी लेखा सं./PAN NO: AAACH4073P अपीलार्थी/Appellant प्रत्यर्थी / Respondent आयकर अपील सं. / ITA No. 473/Chd/2018 निर्धारण वर्ष / Assessment Years : 2012-13 M/s Hero Cycles Ltd. Hero Nagar, G.T. Road Ludhiana बनाम The ACIT C-V, Ludhiana स्थायी लेखा सं./PAN NO: AAACH4073P

256/- which were claimed exempt under section 10(38) of the Act and that the assessee had an investment, income of which is not includible in total income of Rs.5,70,97,51,129/- and Rs.6,06,97,35,636/- as on 31/03/2011 and 31/03/2012 respectively. The A.O. also observed that the assessee claimed interest expenditure of Rs.38

ACIT, C-7, LUDHIANA vs. M/S CEIGALL INDIA LTD., LUDHIANA

In the result appeal of the Department is partly allowed for statistical purposes and the Cross Objection of the assessee is dismissed

Bench: The Appeal Is Finally Heard Or Disposed Off.

2 the grievance of the department relates to the direction given by the Ld. CIT(A) to the A.O. to allow depreciation after applying the net profit rate. 15. Facts related to this issue in brief are that the A.O. while framing the assessment did now allow the claim of the assessee for depreciation. 16. Being aggrieved the assessee carried

DCIT CIRCLE-4, LUDHIANA, LUDHIANA vs. ROCKMAN INDUSTRIES LTD, LUDHIANA

In the result order of CIT(A) is sustained as passed and the appeal of the Revenue is partly allowed for statistical purposes

Bench: SHRI. VIKRAM SINGH YADAV (Accountant Member), SHRI. PARESH M. JOSHI (Judicial Member)

256 1,023,622 5,793,878 TOTAL 2,77,90,068 11373255 39,163,323 Misc. Expenses Ludhiana (37%) Haridwar (63%) Consolidated Legal, Prof & 5048D37 8595305 13643342 Consultation Charges Gen Admin Exp 3671861 6252087 9923948 Gen Exp Others 1797157 3060025 4857182 Domestic Traveling & 1829640 3115333 4944973 Convey-other Foreign Traveling exp-others 2143735 3650143 5793878 TOTAL

DY. COMMISSIONER OF INCOME TAX, CIRCLE-4, LUDHIANA, - vs. ROCKMAN INDUSTRIES LTD, -

In the result order of CIT(A) is sustained as passed and the appeal of the Revenue is partly allowed for statistical purposes

Bench: SHRI. VIKRAM SINGH YADAV (Accountant Member), SHRI. PARESH M. JOSHI (Judicial Member)

256 1,023,622 5,793,878 TOTAL 2,77,90,068 11373255 39,163,323 Misc. Expenses Ludhiana (37%) Haridwar (63%) Consolidated Legal, Prof & 5048D37 8595305 13643342 Consultation Charges Gen Admin Exp 3671861 6252087 9923948 Gen Exp Others 1797157 3060025 4857182 Domestic Traveling & 1829640 3115333 4944973 Convey-other Foreign Traveling exp-others 2143735 3650143 5793878 TOTAL

DY. COMMISSIONER OF INCOME TAX, CIRCLE-4,, AAYAKAR BHAWAN vs. ROCKMAN INDUSTRIES LIMITED, -

In the result order of CIT(A) is sustained as passed and the appeal of the Revenue is partly allowed for statistical purposes

Bench: SHRI. VIKRAM SINGH YADAV (Accountant Member), SHRI. PARESH M. JOSHI (Judicial Member)

256 1,023,622 5,793,878 TOTAL 2,77,90,068 11373255 39,163,323 Misc. Expenses Ludhiana (37%) Haridwar (63%) Consolidated Legal, Prof & 5048D37 8595305 13643342 Consultation Charges Gen Admin Exp 3671861 6252087 9923948 Gen Exp Others 1797157 3060025 4857182 Domestic Traveling & 1829640 3115333 4944973 Convey-other Foreign Traveling exp-others 2143735 3650143 5793878 TOTAL

DY. COMMISSIONER OF INCOME TAX, CIRCLE-4, LUDHIANA, AAYAKAR BHAWAN vs. ROCKMAN INDUSTRIES LIMITED, -

In the result order of CIT(A) is sustained as passed and the appeal of the Revenue is partly allowed for statistical purposes

Bench: SHRI. VIKRAM SINGH YADAV (Accountant Member), SHRI. PARESH M. JOSHI (Judicial Member)

256 1,023,622 5,793,878 TOTAL 2,77,90,068 11373255 39,163,323 Misc. Expenses Ludhiana (37%) Haridwar (63%) Consolidated Legal, Prof & 5048D37 8595305 13643342 Consultation Charges Gen Admin Exp 3671861 6252087 9923948 Gen Exp Others 1797157 3060025 4857182 Domestic Traveling & 1829640 3115333 4944973 Convey-other Foreign Traveling exp-others 2143735 3650143 5793878 TOTAL

DY. COMMISSIONER OF INCOME TAX, CIRCLE-4, AAYAKAR BHAWAN vs. ROCKMAN INDUSTRIES LIMITED, -

In the result order of CIT(A) is sustained as passed and the appeal of the Revenue is partly allowed for statistical purposes

Bench: SHRI. VIKRAM SINGH YADAV (Accountant Member), SHRI. PARESH M. JOSHI (Judicial Member)

256 1,023,622 5,793,878 TOTAL 2,77,90,068 11373255 39,163,323 Misc. Expenses Ludhiana (37%) Haridwar (63%) Consolidated Legal, Prof & 5048D37 8595305 13643342 Consultation Charges Gen Admin Exp 3671861 6252087 9923948 Gen Exp Others 1797157 3060025 4857182 Domestic Traveling & 1829640 3115333 4944973 Convey-other Foreign Traveling exp-others 2143735 3650143 5793878 TOTAL

DY. COMMISSIONER OF INCOME TAX, CIRCLE-4, , AAYAKAR BHAWAN vs. ROCKMAN INDUSTRIES LIMITED, -

In the result order of CIT(A) is sustained as passed and the appeal of the Revenue is partly allowed for statistical purposes

Bench: SHRI. VIKRAM SINGH YADAV (Accountant Member), SHRI. PARESH M. JOSHI (Judicial Member)

256 1,023,622 5,793,878 TOTAL 2,77,90,068 11373255 39,163,323 Misc. Expenses Ludhiana (37%) Haridwar (63%) Consolidated Legal, Prof & 5048D37 8595305 13643342 Consultation Charges Gen Admin Exp 3671861 6252087 9923948 Gen Exp Others 1797157 3060025 4857182 Domestic Traveling & 1829640 3115333 4944973 Convey-other Foreign Traveling exp-others 2143735 3650143 5793878 TOTAL

DY. COMMISSIONER OF INCOME TAX, AAYAKAR BHAWAN vs. ROCKMAN INDUSTRIES LIMITED, FOCAL POINT

In the result order of CIT(A) is sustained as passed and the appeal of the Revenue is partly allowed for statistical purposes

Bench: SHRI. VIKRAM SINGH YADAV (Accountant Member), SHRI. PARESH M. JOSHI (Judicial Member)

256 1,023,622 5,793,878 TOTAL 2,77,90,068 11373255 39,163,323 Misc. Expenses Ludhiana (37%) Haridwar (63%) Consolidated Legal, Prof & 5048D37 8595305 13643342 Consultation Charges Gen Admin Exp 3671861 6252087 9923948 Gen Exp Others 1797157 3060025 4857182 Domestic Traveling & 1829640 3115333 4944973 Convey-other Foreign Traveling exp-others 2143735 3650143 5793878 TOTAL

ASSTT. COMMISSIONER OF INCOME TAX, CIRCLE-4, AAYAKAR BHAWAN vs. ROCKMAN INDUSTRIES LIMITED, -

In the result order of CIT(A) is sustained as passed and the appeal of the Revenue is partly allowed for statistical purposes

Bench: SHRI. VIKRAM SINGH YADAV (Accountant Member), SHRI. PARESH M. JOSHI (Judicial Member)

256 1,023,622 5,793,878 TOTAL 2,77,90,068 11373255 39,163,323 Misc. Expenses Ludhiana (37%) Haridwar (63%) Consolidated Legal, Prof & 5048D37 8595305 13643342 Consultation Charges Gen Admin Exp 3671861 6252087 9923948 Gen Exp Others 1797157 3060025 4857182 Domestic Traveling & 1829640 3115333 4944973 Convey-other Foreign Traveling exp-others 2143735 3650143 5793878 TOTAL

M/S DIN DAYAL PURSOTAM LAL,SIRSA vs. PR.CIT, ROHTAK

Bench: SHRI A.D.JAIN (Vice President), SHRI VIKRAM SINGH YADAV (Accountant Member)

2 to Section 263(1) of the Act, the assessment order was treated as erroneous and ITA 146,147 & 148/CHD/2021 A.Y. 2011-12, 2015-16 & 2016-17 32 prejudicial to the interests of the Revenue . The Tribunal quashed the revisional order and restored the order of the AO, following the Co-ordinate Bench decision in “Rajal Enterprises

M/S DIN DAYAL PURSOTAM LAL,SIRSA vs. PR.CIT, ROHTAK

Bench: SHRI A.D.JAIN (Vice President), SHRI VIKRAM SINGH YADAV (Accountant Member)

2 to Section 263(1) of the Act, the assessment order was treated as erroneous and ITA 146,147 & 148/CHD/2021 A.Y. 2011-12, 2015-16 & 2016-17 32 prejudicial to the interests of the Revenue . The Tribunal quashed the revisional order and restored the order of the AO, following the Co-ordinate Bench decision in “Rajal Enterprises

M/S DIN DAYAL PURSOTAM LAL,SIRSA vs. PR.CIT, ROHTAK

Bench: SHRI A.D.JAIN (Vice President), SHRI VIKRAM SINGH YADAV (Accountant Member)

2 to Section 263(1) of the Act, the assessment order was treated as erroneous and ITA 146,147 & 148/CHD/2021 A.Y. 2011-12, 2015-16 & 2016-17 32 prejudicial to the interests of the Revenue . The Tribunal quashed the revisional order and restored the order of the AO, following the Co-ordinate Bench decision in “Rajal Enterprises

DEEPIKA GARG, E-392, PHASE-VI, FOCAL POINT, LUDHIANA,LUDHIANA vs. INCOME TAX OFFICER, WARD 1(1), LUDHIANA, JAO, THE INCOME TAX OFFICER, WARD 1(5), LUDHIANA, LUDHIANA

In the result, appeal of the Assessee is partly allowed

Bench: SHRI. RAJPAL YADAV (Vice President), SHRI. KRINWANT SAHAY, AM Deepika Garg E-392, Phase-VI Focal Point, Ludhiana स्थायी लेखा सं./PAN NO: ACAPG4693H अपीलार्थी/Appellant आयकर अपील सं. / ITA No. 96/Chd/2025 निर्धारण वर्ष / Assessment Years : 2017-18 बनाम The ITO Ward-1(5), Ludhiana प्रत्यर्थी / Respondent निर्धारिती की ओर से / Assessee by : Shri Sudhir Sehgal, Advocate राजस्व की ओर से / Revenue by : Shri Vivek Vardhan, Addl. CIT सुनवाई की तारीख/Date of Hearing : 29/07/2025 उदघोषणा की तारीख / D

2. account of unexplained credit u/s 68 and invoking the provisions of section 115BBE of the Income Tax Act. That the Ld. Assessing Officer has erred in making the addition of Rs. 24 3. lacs on account of payment received from identifiable parties, against the purchases made by them from the assessee's Proprietary concern and the written submissions

M/S HERO CYCLES LTD.,LUDHIANA vs. ACIT, C-V, LUDHIANA

In the result, appeal of the Department is dismissed and the\nappeal of the assessee is allowed

256/-\nwhich were claimed exempt under section 10(38) of the Act and that\nthe assessee had an investment, income of which is not includible in\ntotal income of Rs.5,70,97,51,129/- and Rs.6,06,97,35,636/- as on\n31/03/2011 and 31/03/2012 respectively. The A.O. also observed that\nthe assessee claimed interest expenditure of Rs.38

KARNAIL SINGH,UK vs. JCIT (OSD) INTL. TAXATION, CIRCLE, CHANDIGARH

In the result, all the appeals of the assessee stands allowed

2,58,092/- Rs. 39,488/- 2008-09 Rs. 61,93,345/- Rs. 1,052,882/- 2009-10 Rs. 64,73,424/- Rs. 11,00,496/- 2010-11 Rs. 62,72,020/- Rs. 10,66,256/- 2011-12 Rs. 54,66,404/- Rs. 8,68,083/- 2012-13 Rs. 53,65,700/- Rs. 8,29,003/- 7.4 It was submitted

KARNAIL SINGH,UK vs. JCIT (OSD) INTL. TAXATION, CIRCLE, CHANDIGARH

In the result, all the appeals of the assessee stands allowed

2,58,092/- Rs. 39,488/- 2008-09 Rs. 61,93,345/- Rs. 1,052,882/- 2009-10 Rs. 64,73,424/- Rs. 11,00,496/- 2010-11 Rs. 62,72,020/- Rs. 10,66,256/- 2011-12 Rs. 54,66,404/- Rs. 8,68,083/- 2012-13 Rs. 53,65,700/- Rs. 8,29,003/- 7.4 It was submitted